| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
convert more `DefId`s to `LocalDefId`
|
|
small type system refactoring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Better suggestions for `Fn`-family trait selection errors
1. Suppress suggestions to add `std::ops::Fn{,Mut,Once}` bounds when a type already implements `Fn{,Mut,Once}`
2. Add a note that points out that a type does in fact implement `Fn{,Mut,Once}`, but the arguments vary (either by number or by actual arguments)
3. Add a note that points out that a type does in fact implement `Fn{,Mut,Once}`, but not the right one (e.g. implements `FnMut`, but `Fn` is required).
Fixes #95147
|
|
|
|
|
|
This PR cleans up the rest of the spelling mistakes in the compiler comments. This PR does not change any literal or code spelling issues.
|
|
Lazy type-alias-impl-trait take two
### user visible change 1: RPIT inference from recursive call sites
Lazy TAIT has an insta-stable change. The following snippet now compiles, because opaque types can now have their hidden type set from wherever the opaque type is mentioned.
```rust
fn bar(b: bool) -> impl std::fmt::Debug {
if b {
return 42
}
let x: u32 = bar(false); // this errors on stable
99
}
```
The return type of `bar` stays opaque, you can't do `bar(false) + 42`, you need to actually mention the hidden type.
### user visible change 2: divergence between RPIT and TAIT in return statements
Note that `return` statements and the trailing return expression are special with RPIT (but not TAIT). So
```rust
#![feature(type_alias_impl_trait)]
type Foo = impl std::fmt::Debug;
fn foo(b: bool) -> Foo {
if b {
return vec![42];
}
std::iter::empty().collect() //~ ERROR `Foo` cannot be built from an iterator
}
fn bar(b: bool) -> impl std::fmt::Debug {
if b {
return vec![42]
}
std::iter::empty().collect() // Works, magic (accidentally stabilized, not intended)
}
```
But when we are working with the return value of a recursive call, the behavior of RPIT and TAIT is the same:
```rust
type Foo = impl std::fmt::Debug;
fn foo(b: bool) -> Foo {
if b {
return vec![];
}
let mut x = foo(false);
x = std::iter::empty().collect(); //~ ERROR `Foo` cannot be built from an iterator
vec![]
}
fn bar(b: bool) -> impl std::fmt::Debug {
if b {
return vec![];
}
let mut x = bar(false);
x = std::iter::empty().collect(); //~ ERROR `impl Debug` cannot be built from an iterator
vec![]
}
```
### user visible change 3: TAIT does not merge types across branches
In contrast to RPIT, TAIT does not merge types across branches, so the following does not compile.
```rust
type Foo = impl std::fmt::Debug;
fn foo(b: bool) -> Foo {
if b {
vec![42_i32]
} else {
std::iter::empty().collect()
//~^ ERROR `Foo` cannot be built from an iterator over elements of type `_`
}
}
```
It is easy to support, but we should make an explicit decision to include the additional complexity in the implementation (it's not much, see a721052457cf513487fb4266e3ade65c29b272d2 which needs to be reverted to enable this).
### PR formalities
previous attempt: #92007
This PR also includes #92306 and #93783, as they were reverted along with #92007 in #93893
fixes #93411
fixes #88236
fixes #89312
fixes #87340
fixes #86800
fixes #86719
fixes #84073
fixes #83919
fixes #82139
fixes #77987
fixes #74282
fixes #67830
fixes #62742
fixes #54895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
encountered.
This also registers obligations for the hidden type immediately.
|
|
|
|
of the owning function
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 6499c5e7fc173a3f55b7a3bd1e6a50e9edef782d, reversing
changes made to 78450d2d602b06d9b94349aaf8cece1a4acaf3a8.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overlap inherent impls
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Closes #94526
|
|
Try to evaluate in try unify and postpone resolution of constants that contain inference variables
We want code like that in [`ui/const-generics/generic_const_exprs/eval-try-unify.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...b-naber:eval-in-try-unify?expand=1#diff-8027038201cf07a6c96abf3cbf0b0f4fdd8a64ce6292435f01c8ed995b87fe9b) to compile. To do that we need to try to evaluate constants in `try_unify_abstract_consts`, this requires us to be more careful about what constants we try to resolve, specifically we cannot try to resolve constants that still contain inference variables.
r? `@lcnr`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of probing for all possible impls that could have caused an
`ImplObligation`, keep track of its `DefId` and obligation spans for
accurate error reporting.
Follow up to #89580. Addresses #89418.
Remove some unnecessary clones.
Tweak output for auto trait impl obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are a few places were we have to construct it, though, and a few
places that are more invasive to change. To do this, we create a
constructor with a long obvious name.
|
|
Improve `AdtDef` interning.
This commit makes `AdtDef` use `Interned`. Much of the commit is tedious
changes to introduce getter functions. The interesting changes are in
`compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/adt.rs`.
r? `@fee1-dead`
|
|
|
|
This commit makes `AdtDef` use `Interned`. Much the commit is tedious
changes to introduce getter functions. The interesting changes are in
`compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/adt.rs`.
|
|
add `#[rustc_pass_by_value]` to more types
the only interesting changes here should be to `TransitiveRelation`, but I believe to be highly unlikely that we will ever use a non `Copy` type with this type.
|
|
Edit `rustc_trait_selection::infer::lattice` docs
Closes #94311.
Removes mentions of outdated/missing type and filename (`infer.rs` and `LatticeValue`).
|
|
|
|
all: fix some typos
Signed-off-by: cuishuang <imcusg@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: cuishuang <imcusg@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
match up for traits and impls.
Issue #94462
|
|
Remove mentions of outdated/missing type and filename (`infer.rs` and
`LatticeValue`).
|
|
Bump bootstrap to 1.60
This bumps the bootstrap compiler to 1.60 and cleans up cfgs and Span's rustc_pass_by_value (enabled by the bootstrap bump).
|
|
Remove in band lifetimes
As discussed in t-lang backlog bonanza, the `in_band_lifetimes` FCP closed in favor for the feature not being stabilized. This PR removes `#![feature(in_band_lifetimes)]` in its entirety.
Let me know if this PR is too hasty, and if we should instead do something intermediate for deprecate the feature first.
r? `@scottmcm` (or feel free to reassign, just saw your last comment on #44524)
Closes #44524
|
|
|
