| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Suggest lint groups
Fixes rust-lang/rust-clippy#6986
|
|
Make `--force-warns` a normal lint level option
Now that `ForceWarn` is a lint level, there's no reason `--force-warns` should be treated differently from other options that set lint levels. This merges the `ForceWarn` handling in with the other lint level command line options. It also unifies all of the relevant selection logic in `compiler/rustc_lint/src/levels.rs`, rather than having some of it weirdly elsewhere.
Fixes #86958, which arose from the special-cased handling of `ForceWarn` having had an error in it.
|
|
Compute a better `lint_node_id` during expansion
When we need to emit a lint at a macro invocation, we currently use the
`NodeId` of its parent definition (e.g. the enclosing function). This
means that any `#[allow]` / `#[deny]` attributes placed 'closer' to the
macro (e.g. on an enclosing block or statement) will have no effect.
This commit computes a better `lint_node_id` in `InvocationCollector`.
When we visit/flat_map an AST node, we assign it a `NodeId` (earlier
than we normally would), and store than `NodeId` in current
`ExpansionData`. When we collect a macro invocation, the current
`lint_node_id` gets cloned along with our `ExpansionData`, allowing it
to be used if we need to emit a lint later on.
This improves the handling of `#[allow]` / `#[deny]` for
`SEMICOLON_IN_EXPRESSIONS_FROM_MACROS` and some `asm!`-related lints.
The 'legacy derive helpers' lint retains its current behavior
(I've inlined the now-removed `lint_node_id` function), since
there isn't an `ExpansionData` readily available.
|
|
Based on the conversation in #86747.
Explanation
-----------
A trait object bound of the form `dyn Drop` is most likely misleading
and not what the programmer intended.
`Drop` bounds do not actually indicate whether a type can be trivially
dropped or not, because a composite type containing `Drop` types does
not necessarily implement `Drop` itself. Naïvely, one might be tempted
to write a deferred drop system, to pull cleaning up memory out of a
latency-sensitive code path, using `dyn Drop` trait objects. However,
this breaks down e.g. when `T` is `String`, which does not implement
`Drop`, but should probably be accepted.
To write a trait object bound that accepts anything, use a placeholder
trait with a blanket implementation.
```rust
trait Placeholder {}
impl<T> Placeholder for T {}
fn foo(_x: Box<dyn Placeholder>) {}
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix internal `default_hash_types` lint to use resolved path
I run into false positives now and then (mostly in Clippy) when I want to name some util after HashMap.
|
|
The flag has a vague meaning and is used for a single diagnostic change that is low benefit and appears only under `-Z macro_backtrace`.
|
|
Remove `missing_docs` lint on private 2.0 macros
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/798baebde1fe77e5a660490ec64e727a5d79970d/compiler/rustc_lint/src/builtin.rs#L573-L584
This code is the source of #57569. The problem is subtle, so let me point it out. This code makes the mistake of assuming that all of the macros in `krate.exported_macros` are exported.
...Yeah. For some historical reason, all `macro` macros are marked as exported, regardless of whether they actually are, which is dreadfully confusing. It would be more accurate to say that `exported_macros` currently contains only macros that have paths.
This PR renames `exported_macros` to `importable_macros`, since these macros can be imported with `use` while others cannot. It also fixes the code above to no longer lint on private `macro` macros, since the `missing_docs` lint should only appear on exported items.
Fixes #57569.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Support lint tool names in rustc command line options
When rustc is running without a lint tool such as clippy enabled, options for lints such as `clippy::foo` are meant to be ignored. This was already working for those specified by attrs, such as `#![allow(clippy::foo)]`, but this did not work for command line arguments like `-A clippy::foo`. This PR fixes that issue.
Note that we discovered this issue while discussing https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/5034.
Fixes #86628.
|
|
This change merges `check_lint_and_tool_name` into `check_lint_name` in
order to avoid having two very similar functions.
Also adds the `.stderr` file back for the test case, since apparently
it is still needed.
|
|
This shares a little more code between checking command line and
attribute lint specifications.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cleanup the computation of lint levels
This now uses an `IndexVec` and a special root `LintStackIndex = 0` to encode command-line levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix typo and improve documentation for E0632
Edit: After https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/85520#issuecomment-870095546, this PR has been boiled down to just an extended description for `E0632` and a fixed typo.
|
|
Only include lint in future_incompatible lint group if not an edition lint
A follow up to #86330 - this only includes lints annotated with `FutureIncompatibleInfo` in the `future_incompatibile` lint group if the future compatibility is not tied to an edition.
We probably want to rename `FutureIncompatibleInfo` to something else since this type is now used to indicate future breakages of all kinds (even those that happen in editions). I'd prefer to do that in a separate PR though.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make ForceWarn a lint level.
Follow-up to #85788
cc `@rylev`
|
|
Don't make `rustc_insignificant_dtor` feature gate
This isn't a feature gate, it's an attribute that is feature gated behind the `rustc_attrs` attribute. Closes #85680.
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
Turn non_fmt_panic into a future_incompatible edition lint.
This turns the `non_fmt_panic` lint into a future_incompatible edition lint, so it becomes part of the `rust_2021_compatibility` group. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85894.
This lint produces both warnings about semantical changes (e.g. `panic!("{{")`) and things that will become hard errors (e.g. `panic!("{")`). So I added a `explain_reason: false` that supresses the default "this will become a hard error" or "the semantics will change" message, and instead added a note depending on the situation. (cc `@rylev)`
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
|
|
This prevents mistakes where the feature is in the list of incomplete
features but not actually a feature by making the incompleteness a part
of the declaration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve prefixed identifiers and literals (RFC 3101)
This PR denies any identifiers immediately followed by one of three tokens `"`, `'` or `#`, which is stricter than the requirements of RFC 3101 but may be necessary according to the discussion at [Zulip].
[Zulip]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/268952-edition-2021/topic/reserved.20prefixes/near/238470099
The tracking issue #84599 says we'll add a feature gate named `reserved_prefixes`, but I don't think I can do this because it is impossible for the lexer to know whether a feature is enabled or not. I guess determining the behavior by the edition information should be enough.
Fixes #84599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
position.
|
|
Use `Iterator::find` instead of open-coding it
```@rustbot``` modify labels +C-cleanup +T-compiler
|
|
Use `Iterator::any` and `filter_map` instead of open-coding them
``@rustbot`` modify labels +C-cleanup +T-compiler
|
