| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Rename `static_mut_ref` lint to `static_mut_refs`.
(cherry picked from commit 408eeae59d35cbcaab2cfb345d24373954e74fc5)
|
|
|
|
hir: Refactor getters for owner nodes
|
|
|
|
|
|
Error codes are integers, but `String` is used everywhere to represent
them. Gross!
This commit introduces `ErrCode`, an integral newtype for error codes,
replacing `String`. It also introduces a constant for every error code,
e.g. `E0123`, and removes the `error_code!` macro. The constants are
imported wherever used with `use rustc_errors::codes::*`.
With the old code, we have three different ways to specify an error code
at a use point:
```
error_code!(E0123) // macro call
struct_span_code_err!(dcx, span, E0123, "msg"); // bare ident arg to macro call
\#[diag(name, code = "E0123")] // string
struct Diag;
```
With the new code, they all use the `E0123` constant.
```
E0123 // constant
struct_span_code_err!(dcx, span, E0123, "msg"); // constant
\#[diag(name, code = E0123)] // constant
struct Diag;
```
The commit also changes the structure of the error code definitions:
- `rustc_error_codes` now just defines a higher-order macro listing the
used error codes and nothing else.
- Because that's now the only thing in the `rustc_error_codes` crate, I
moved it into the `lib.rs` file and removed the `error_codes.rs` file.
- `rustc_errors` uses that macro to define everything, e.g. the error
code constants and the `DIAGNOSTIC_TABLES`. This is in its new
`codes.rs` file.
|
|
Don't fire `OPAQUE_HIDDEN_INFERRED_BOUND` on sized return of AFIT
Conceptually, we should probably not fire `OPAQUE_HIDDEN_INFERRED_BOUND` for methods like:
```
trait Foo { async fn bar() -> Self; }
```
Even though we technically cannot prove that `Self: Sized`, which is one of the item bounds of the `Output` type in the `-> impl Future<Output = Sized>` from the async desugaring.
This is somewhat justifiable along the same lines as how we allow regular methods to return `-> Self` even though `Self` isn't sized.
Fixes #113538
(side-note: some days i wonder if we should just remove the `OPAQUE_HIDDEN_INFERRED_BOUND` lint... it does make me sad that we have non-well-formed types in signatures, though.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix naming in the lint API
Methods for emit lints are named very inconsistently. This PR fixes that up.
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Revert stabilization of trait_upcasting feature
Reverts #118133
This reverts commit 6d2b84b3ed7848fd91b8d6151d4451b3103ed816, reversing changes made to 73bc12199ea8c7651ed98b069c0dd6b0bb5fabcf.
The feature has a soundness bug:
* #120222
It is unclear to me whether we'll actually want to destabilize, but I thought it was still prudent to open the PR for easy destabilization once we get there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`LintLevelsBuilder::emit_span_lint`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
`LintContext::span_lint_with_diagnostics`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=WaffleLapkin
Undeprecate lint `unstable_features` and make use of it in the compiler
See also #117937.
r? compiler
|
|
This reverts commit 6d2b84b3ed7848fd91b8d6151d4451b3103ed816, reversing
changes made to 73bc12199ea8c7651ed98b069c0dd6b0bb5fabcf.
|
|
Pack u128 in the compiler to mitigate new alignment
This is based on #116672, adding a new `#[repr(packed(8))]` wrapper on `u128` to avoid changing any of the compiler's size assertions. This is needed in two places:
* `SwitchTargets`, otherwise its `SmallVec<[u128; 1]>` gets padded up to 32 bytes.
* `LitKind::Int`, so that entire `enum` can stay 24 bytes.
* This change definitely has far-reaching effects though, since it's public.
|
|
Improve `let_underscore_lock`
- lint if the lock was in a nested pattern
- lint if the lock is inside a `Result<Lock, _>`
addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119704#discussion_r1444044745
|
|
|
|
Add `PatKind::Err` to AST/HIR
#116715 added `thir::PatKind::Error`; this PR adds `hir::PatKind::Err` and `ast::PatKind::Err` (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118625#discussion_r1446587901.)
---
``@rustbot`` label +A-patterns
r? WaffleLapkin
|
|
Add way to express that no values are expected with check-cfg
This PR adds way to express no-values (no values expected) with `--check-cfg` by making empty `values()` no longer mean `values(none())` (internal: `&[None]`) and now be an empty list (internal: `&[]`).
### Context
Currently `--check-cfg` has a way to express that _any value is expected_ with `values(any())`, but has no way to do the inverse and say that _no value is expected_.
This would be particularly useful for build systems that control a config name and it's values as they could always declare a config name as expected and if in the current state they have values pass them and if not pass an empty list.
To give a more concrete example, Cargo `--check-cfg` currently needs to generate:
- `--check-cfg=cfg(feature, values(...))` for the case with declared features
- and `--check-cfg=cfg()` for the case without any features declared
This means that when there are no features declared, users will get an `unexpected config name` but from the point of view of Cargo the config name `feature` is expected, it's just that for now there aren't any values for it.
See [Cargo `check_cfg_args` function](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/blob/92395d90106b3b61bcb68bcf2069052c93771764/src/cargo/core/compiler/mod.rs#L1263-L1281) for more details.
### De-specializing *empty* `values()`
To solve this issue I propose that we "de-specialize" empty `values()` to no longer mean `values(none())` but to actually mean empty set/list. This is one of the last source of confusion for my-self and others with the `--check-cfg` syntax.
> The confusing part here is that an empty `values()` currently means the same as `values(none())`, i.e. an expected list of values with the _none_ variant (as in `#[cfg(name)]` where the value is none) instead of meaning an empty set.
Before the new `cfg()` syntax, defining the _none_ variant was only possible under certain circumstances, so in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111068 I decided to make `values()` to mean the _none_ variant, but it is no longer necessary since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119473 which introduced the `none()` syntax.
A simplified representation of the proposed "de-specialization" would be:
| Syntax | List/set of expected values |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------|
| `cfg(name)`/`cfg(name, values(none()))` | `&[None]` |
| `cfg(name, values())` | `&[]` |
Note that I have my-self made the mistake of using an empty `values()` as meaning empty set, see https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/13011.
`@rustbot` label +F-check-cfg
r? `@petrochenkov`
cc `@epage`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=petrochenkov
Exclude well known names from showing a suggestion in check-cfg
This PR adds an exclusion for well known names from showing in suggestions of check-cfg/`unexpected_cfgs`.
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118213 and fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118213#issuecomment-1854189934.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
- lint if the lock was in a nested pattern
- lint if the lock is inside a `Result<Lock, _>`
|
|
Fix unused_parens issue when cast is followed LT
Fixes #117142
The original check only checks `a as (i32) < 0`, this fix extends it to handle `b + a as (i32) < 0`.
A better way is maybe we suggest `(a as i32) < 0` instead of suppressing the warning, maybe following PR could improve it.
|
|
|
|
Check rust lints when an unknown lint is detected
Fixes #118183
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make inductive cycles in coherence ambiguous always
Logical conclusion of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114040
One step after #116493
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/20
r? lcnr to kick off the FCP after review... maybe we should wait until 1.75 is landed? In that case, I'd still like to get the FCP boxes checked sooner since that'll be near the holidays which means everyone's away.
|
|
Fix two variable binding issues in lint let_underscore
Fixes #119696
Fixes #119697
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including comparisons with root context
|
|
Replace a number of FxHashMaps/Sets with stable-iteration-order alternatives
This PR replaces almost all of the remaining `FxHashMap`s in query results with either `FxIndexMap` or `UnordMap`. The only case that is missing is the `EffectiveVisibilities` struct which turned out to not be straightforward to transform. Once that is done too, we can remove the `HashStable` implementation from `HashMap`.
The first commit adds the `StableCompare` trait which is a companion trait to `StableOrd`. Some types like `Symbol` can be compared in a cross-session stable way, but their `Ord` implementation is not stable. In such cases, a `StableCompare` implementation can be provided to offer a lightweight way for stable sorting. The more heavyweight option is to sort via `ToStableHashKey`, but then sorting needs to have access to a stable hashing context and `ToStableHashKey` can also be expensive as in the case of `Symbol` where it has to allocate a `String`.
The rest of the commits are rather mechanical and don't overlap, so they are best reviewed individually.
Part of [MCP 533](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/533).
|
|
Cleanup error handlers: round 5
More rustc_errors cleanups. A sequel to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119171.
r? ````@compiler-errors````
|
|
Merge `unused_tuple_struct_fields` into `dead_code`
This implicitly upgrades the lint from `allow` to `warn` and places it into the `unused` lint group.
[Discussion on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Moving.20.60unused_tuple_struct_fields.60.20from.20allow.20to.20warn)
|
|
|
|
Make named_asm_labels lint not trigger on unicode and trigger on format args
Someone showed me some cursed code that used format args to create named labels, and rustc wasn't linting on that. Additionally while fixing that, I noticed that Unicode alphabetic characters were being used as part of labels, when they are not actually permitted in labels.
r? ```@Amanieu```
|
