| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
lint: don't suggest MaybeUninit::assume_init for uninhabited types
Creating a zeroed uninhabited type such as `!` or an empty enum with `mem::zeroed()` (or transmuting `()` to `!`) currently triggers this lint:
```rs
warning: the type `!` does not permit zero-initialization
--> test.rs:5:23
|
5 | let _val: ! = mem::zeroed();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| |
| this code causes undefined behavior when executed
| help: use `MaybeUninit<T>` instead, and only call `assume_init` after initialization is done
|
= note: the `!` type has no valid value
```
The `MaybeUninit` suggestion in the help message seems confusing/useless for uninhabited types, as such a type cannot be fully initialized in the first place (as the note implies).
This PR limits this help message to inhabited types which can be initialized
|
|
r=tmiasko
Use restricted Damerau-Levenshtein distance for diagnostics
This replaces the existing Levenshtein algorithm with the Damerau-Levenshtein algorithm. This means that "ab" to "ba" is one change (a transposition) instead of two (a deletion and insertion). More specifically, this is a _restricted_ implementation, in that "ca" to "abc" cannot be performed as "ca" → "ac" → "abc", as there is an insertion in the middle of a transposition. I believe that errors like that are sufficiently rare that it's not worth taking into account.
This was first brought up [on IRLO](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/18227) when it was noticed that the diagnostic for `prinltn!` (transposed L and T) was `print!` and not `println!`. Only a single existing UI test was effected, with the result being an objective improvement.
~~I have left the method name and various other references to the Levenshtein algorithm untouched, as the exact manner in which the edit distance is calculated should not be relevant to the caller.~~
r? ``@estebank``
``@rustbot`` label +A-diagnostics +C-enhancement
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't eagerly convert principal to string
Fixes #108155
~~I haven't yet been able to reproduce the ICE in a minimal example unfortunately.~~ Added a test
|
|
|
|
|
|
Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `type_of` query
Part of the work to finish #105779 and implement https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/78.
Several queries `X` have a `bound_X` variant that wraps the output in `EarlyBinder`. This adds `EarlyBinder` to the return type of the `type_of` query and removes `bound_type_of`.
r? `@lcnr`
|
|
in metadata
|
|
|
|
Implement partial support for non-lifetime binders
This implements support for non-lifetime binders. It's pretty useless currently, but I wanted to put this up so the implementation can be discussed.
Specifically, this piggybacks off of the late-bound lifetime collection code in `rustc_hir_typeck::collect::lifetimes`. This seems like a necessary step given the fact we don't resolve late-bound regions until this point, and binders are sometimes merged.
Q: I'm not sure if I should go along this route, or try to modify the earlier nameres code to compute the right bound var indices for type and const binders eagerly... If so, I'll need to rename all these queries to something more appropriate (I've done this for `resolve_lifetime::Region` -> `resolve_lifetime::ResolvedArg`)
cc rust-lang/types-team#81
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #107573 (Update the minimum external LLVM to 14)
- #107626 (Fix `x fix` on the standard library itself)
- #107673 (update ICU4X to 1.1.0)
- #107733 (Store metrics from `metrics.json` to CI PGO timer)
- #108007 (Use `is_str` instead of string kind comparison)
- #108033 (add an unstable `#[rustc_coinductive]` attribute)
- #108039 (Refactor refcounted structural_impls via functors)
- #108040 (Use derive attributes for uninteresting traversals)
- #108044 (interpret: rename Pointer::from_addr → from_addr_invalid)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Use `is_str` instead of string kind comparison
Split out from #107939
|
|
s/eval_usize/eval_target_usize/ for clarity
r? `@nnethercote`
as discussed in https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/.60Const.60.20and.20.60usize.60.2F.60u64.60 it is unclear what `usize` means and why we use a `u64` for something talking about `usize`. This renaming should make it clear that we're talking about `usize`s on the target platform, irrespective of the compiler host platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add explanatory message for [#must_use] in ops
Fixes #103320
|
|
don't point at nonexisting code beyond EOF when warning about delims
Previously we would show this:
```
warning: unnecessary braces around block return value
--> /tmp/bad.rs:1:8
|
1 | fn a(){{{
| ^ ^
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_braces)]` on by default
help: remove these braces
|
1 - fn a(){{{
1 + fn a(){{
|
```
which is now hidden in this case.
We would create a span spanning between the pair of redundant {}s but there is only EOF instead of the `}` so we would previously point at nothing. This would cause the debug assertion ice to trigger. I would have loved to just only point at the second delim and say "you can remove that" but I'm not sure how to do that without refactoring the entire diagnostic which seems tricky. :( But given that this does not seem to regress any other tests we have, I think this edge-casey enough be acceptable.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/107423
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Previously we would show this:
```
warning: unnecessary braces around block return value
--> /tmp/bad.rs:1:8
|
1 | fn a(){{{
| ^ ^
|
= note: `#[warn(unused_braces)]` on by default
help: remove these braces
|
1 - fn a(){{{
1 + fn a(){{
|
```
which is now hidden in this case.
We would create a span spanning between the pair of redundant {}s but there is only EOF instead of the `}` so we would previously point at nothing.
This would cause the debug assertion ice to trigger.
I would have loved to just only point at the second delim and say "you can remove that" but I'm not sure how to do that without refactoring the entire diagnostic which seems tricky. :(
But given that this does not seem to regress any other tests we have, I think this edge-casey enough be acceptable.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/107423
r? @compiler-errors
|
|
Emit warnings on unused parens in index expressions
Fixes: #96606.
I am not sure what the best term for "index expression" is. Is there a better term we could use?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #106898 (Include both md and yaml ICE ticket templates)
- #107331 (Clean up eslint annotations and remove unused JS function)
- #107348 (small refactor to new projection code)
- #107354 (rustdoc: update Source Serif 4 from 4.004 to 4.005)
- #107412 (avoid needless checks)
- #107467 (Improve enum checks)
- #107486 (Track bound types like bound regions)
- #107491 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS from `.setting-check`)
- #107508 (`Edition` micro refactor)
- #107525 (PointeeInfo is advisory only)
- #107527 (rustdoc: stop making unstable items transparent)
- #107535 (Replace unwrap with ? in TcpListener doc)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Improve enum checks
Some light refactoring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currently, deriving on packed structs has some non-trivial limitations,
related to the fact that taking references on unaligned fields is UB.
The current approach to field accesses in derived code:
- Normal case: `&self.0`
- In a packed struct that derives `Copy`: `&{self.0}`
- In a packed struct that doesn't derive `Copy`: `&self.0`
Plus, we disallow deriving any builtin traits other than `Default` for any
packed generic type, because it's possible that there might be
misaligned fields. This is a fairly broad restriction.
Plus, we disallow deriving any builtin traits other than `Default` for most
packed types that don't derive `Copy`. (The exceptions are those where the
alignments inherently satisfy the packing, e.g. in a type with
`repr(packed(N))` where all the fields have alignments of `N` or less
anyway. Such types are pretty strange, because the `packed` attribute is
not having any effect.)
This commit introduces a new, simpler approach to field accesses:
- Normal case: `&self.0`
- In a packed struct: `&{self.0}`
In the latter case, this requires that all fields impl `Copy`, which is
a new restriction. This means that the following example compiles under
the old approach and doesn't compile under the new approach.
```
#[derive(Debug)]
struct NonCopy(u8);
#[derive(Debug)
#[repr(packed)]
struct MyType(NonCopy);
```
(Note that the old approach's support for cases like this was brittle.
Changing the `u8` to a `u16` would be enough to stop it working. So not
much capability is lost here.)
However, the other constraints from the old rules are removed. We can now
derive builtin traits for packed generic structs like this:
```
trait Trait { type A; }
#[derive(Hash)]
#[repr(packed)]
pub struct Foo<T: Trait>(T, T::A);
```
To allow this, we add a `T: Copy` bound in the derived impl and a `T::A:
Copy` bound in where clauses. So `T` and `T::A` must impl `Copy`.
We can now also derive builtin traits for packed structs that don't derive
`Copy`, so long as the fields impl `Copy`:
```
#[derive(Hash)]
#[repr(packed)]
pub struct Foo(u32);
```
This includes types that hand-impl `Copy` rather than deriving it, such as the
following, that show up in winapi-0.2:
```
#[derive(Clone)]
#[repr(packed)]
struct MyType(i32);
impl Copy for MyType {}
```
The new approach is simpler to understand and implement, and it avoids
the need for the `unsafe_derive_on_repr_packed` check.
One exception is required for backwards-compatibility: we allow `[u8]`
fields for now. There is a new lint for this,
`byte_slice_in_packed_struct_with_derive`.
|
|
Skip possible where_clause_object_safety lints when checking `multiple_supertrait_upcastable`
Fix #106247
To achieve this, I lifted the `WhereClauseReferencesSelf` out from `object_safety_violations` and move it into `is_object_safe` (which is changed to a new query).
cc `@dtolnay`
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Remove HirId -> LocalDefId map from HIR.
Having this map in HIR prevents the creating of new definitions after HIR has been built.
Thankfully, we do not need it.
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103902
|
|
|
|
Remove overlapping parts of multipart suggestions
This PR adds a debug assertion that the parts of a single substitution cannot overlap, fixes a overlapping substitution from the testsuite, and fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106870.
Note that a single suggestion can still have multiple overlapping substitutions / possible edits, we just don't suggest overlapping replacements in a single edit anymore.
I've also included a fix for an unrelated bug where rustfix for `explicit_outlives_requirements` would produce multiple trailing commas for a where clause.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EarlyBinder to fn_sig in metadata
|
|
|
|
use LocalDefId instead of HirId in trait resolution to simplify
the obligation clause resolution
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
|
|
Fix `SingleUseLifetime` ICE
Fixes #104440
cc: ``@matthiaskrgr``
|
|
Check ADT fields for copy implementations considering regions
Fixes #88901
r? `@ghost`
|
|
also delete trailing comma if necessary
|
|
Switching them to `Break(())` and `Continue(())` instead.
libs-api would like to remove these constants, so stop using them in compiler to make the removal PR later smaller.
|
|
Remove double spaces after dots in comments
Most of the comments do not have double spaces, so I assume these are typos.
|
