| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
Fix stack overflow in recursive AST walk in early lint
The src/test/ui/issues/issue-74564-if-expr-stack-overflow.rs test case added to verify https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74564 still crashes with a stack overflow on s390x-ibm-linux.
Symptom is a very deep recursion in compiler/rustc_lint/src/early.rs:
fn visit_expr(&mut self, e: &'a ast::Expr) {
self.with_lint_attrs(e.id, &e.attrs, |cx| {
lint_callback!(cx, check_expr, e);
ast_visit::walk_expr(cx, e);
})
}
(where walk_expr recursively calls back into visit_expr). The crash happens at a nesting depth of over 17000 stack frames when using the default 8 MB stack size on s390x.
This patch fixes the problem by adding a ensure_sufficient_stack call to the with_lint_attrs routine (which also should take care of all the other mutually recursive visitors here).
Fixes part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105383.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fix: NonBindingLetSub
|
|
|
|
add: `emit_spanned_lint` and `emit_lint` for `LintLevelsBuilder`
migrate: `DeprecatedLintName`
|
|
|
|
|
|
update: `lints.rs` for renamed `SessionSubdiagnostic` and `AddSubdiagnostic`
fix: NonSnakeCaseDiagSub
fix: OverflowingBinHexSign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add: `lints.rs`
refactor: move `InvalidAtomicOrderingDiag` to `lints.rs`
|
|
Rename `hir::Map::{get_,find_}parent_node` to `hir::Map::{,opt_}parent_id`, and add `hir::Map::{get,find}_parent`
The `hir::Map::get_parent_node` function doesn't return a `Node`, and I think that's quite confusing. Let's rename it to something that sounds more like something that gets the parent hir id => `hir::Map::parent_id`. Same with `find_parent_node` => `opt_parent_id`.
Also, combine `hir.get(hir.parent_id(hir_id))` and similar `hir.find(hir.parent_id(hir_id))` function into new functions that actually retrieve the parent node in one call. This last commit is the only one that might need to be looked at closely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revert "Implement allow-by-default `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` lint"
This is a clean revert of #105484.
I confirmed that reverting that PR fixes the regression reported in #106247. ~~I can't say I understand what this code is doing, but maybe it can be re-landed with a different implementation.~~ **Edit:** https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106247#issuecomment-1367174384 has an explanation of why #105484 ends up surfacing spurious `where_clause_object_safety` errors. The implementation of `where_clause_object_safety` assumes we only check whether a trait is object safe when somebody actually uses that trait with `dyn`. However the implementation of `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` added in the problematic PR involves checking *every* trait for whether it is object-safe.
FYI `@nbdd0121` `@compiler-errors`
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Rename `Rptr` to `Ref` in AST and HIR
The name makes a lot more sense, and `ty::TyKind` calls it `Ref` already as well.
|
|
This reverts commit 5e44a65517bfcccbe6624a70b54b9f192baa94f3.
|
|
The name makes a lot more sense, and `ty::TyKind` calls it `Ref` already
as well.
|
|
Implement allow-by-default `multiple_supertrait_upcastable` lint
The lint detects when an object-safe trait has multiple supertraits.
Enabled in libcore and liballoc as they are low-level enough that many embedded programs will use them.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
Partially fix `explicit_outlives_requirements` lint in macros
Show the suggestion if and only if the bounds are from the same source context.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106044
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106063
|
|
Account for macros in const generics
Fix #104141.
|
|
|
|
match_result_ok
obfuscated_if_else
single_char_add
writeln_empty_string
collapsible_match
iter_cloned_collect
unnecessary_mut_passed
|
|
rustc: Remove needless lifetimes
|