| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
When encoding a proc-macro crate, there may be gaps in the table (since
we only encode the crate root and proc-macro items). Account for this by
checking if the entry is present, rather than using `unwrap()`
|
|
|
|
Implement lazy decoding of DefPathTable during incremental compilation
PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75813 implemented lazy decoding of the `DefPathTable` from crate metadata. However, it requires decoding the entire `DefPathTable` when incremental compilation is active, so that we can map a decoded `DefPathHash` to a `DefId` from an arbitrary crate.
This PR adds support for lazy decoding of dependency `DefPathTable`s when incremental compilation si active.
When we load the incremental cache and dep
graph, we need the ability to map a `DefPathHash` to a `DefId` in the
current compilation session (if the corresponding definition still
exists).
This is accomplished by storing the old `DefId` (that is, the `DefId`
from the previous compilation session) for each `DefPathHash` we need to
remap. Since a `DefPathHash` includes the owning crate, the old crate is
guaranteed to be the right one (if the definition still exists). We then
use the old `DefIndex` as an initial guess, which we validate by
comparing the expected and actual `DefPathHash`es. In most cases,
foreign crates will be completely unchanged, which means that we our
guess will be correct. If our guess is wrong, we fall back to decoding
the entire `DefPathTable` for the foreign crate. This still represents
an improvement over the status quo, since we can skip decoding the
entire `DefPathTable` for other crates (where all of our guesses were
correct).
|
|
Encode proc_macro name directly.
Do not store None values.
|
|
|
|
have a type
|
|
|
|
The discussion seems to have resolved that this lint is a bit "noisy" in
that applying it in all places would result in a reduction in
readability.
A few of the trivial functions (like `Path::new`) are fine to leave
outside of closures.
The general rule seems to be that anything that is obviously an
allocation (`Box`, `Vec`, `vec![]`) should be in a closure, even if it
is a 0-sized allocation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #77523
Now that hygiene serialization is implemented, we also need to record
`expansion_that_defined` so that we properly handle a foreign
`SyntaxContext`.
|
|
Currently, we serialize the same crate metadata for proc-macro crates as
we do for normal crates. This is quite wasteful - almost none of this
metadata is ever used, and much of it can't even be deserialized (if it
contains a foreign `CrateNum`).
This PR changes metadata encoding to skip encoding the majority of crate
metadata for proc-macro crates. Most of the `Lazy<[T]>` fields are left
completetly empty, while the non-lazy fields are left as-is.
Additionally, proc-macros now have a def span that does not include
their body. This was done for normal functions in #75465, but was missed
for proc-macros.
As a result of this PR, we should only ever encode local `CrateNum`s
when encoding proc-macro crates. I've added a specialized serialization
impl for `CrateNum` to assert this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
