| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
This reverts commit ddc5f9b6c1f21da5d4596bf7980185a00984ac42.
|
|
Revert "use `tcx.used_crates(())` more" before it reaches beta
There are more open issues caused by #124976 than will be fixed by #125493 alone. The beta cut is soon, so let's revert it and buy some time to analyze and fix these issues in our own time.
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125474
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125484
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125646
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125707
fixes #126066
fixes #125934
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126021
r? `@petrochenkov`
`@bors` p=1
|
|
This reverts commit eda4a35f365535af72118118a3597edf5a13c12d, reversing
changes made to eb6b35b5bcb3c2a594cb29cd478aeb2893f49d30.
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Rename HIR `TypeBinding` to `AssocItemConstraint` and related cleanup
Rename `hir::TypeBinding` and `ast::AssocConstraint` to `AssocItemConstraint` and update all items and locals using the old terminology.
Motivation: The terminology *type binding* is extremely outdated. "Type bindings" not only include constraints on associated *types* but also on associated *constants* (feature `associated_const_equality`) and on RPITITs of associated *functions* (feature `return_type_notation`). Hence the word *item* in the new name. Furthermore, the word *binding* commonly refers to a mapping from a binder/identifier to a "value" for some definition of "value". Its use in "type binding" made sense when equality constraints (e.g., `AssocTy = Ty`) were the only kind of associated item constraint. Nowadays however, we also have *associated type bounds* (e.g., `AssocTy: Bound`) for which the term *binding* doesn't make sense.
---
Old terminology (HIR, rustdoc):
```
`TypeBinding`: (associated) type binding
├── `Constraint`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: (associated) equality constraint (?)
├── `Ty`: (associated) type binding
└── `Const`: associated const equality (constraint)
```
Old terminology (AST, abbrev.):
```
`AssocConstraint`
├── `Bound`
└── `Equality`
├── `Ty`
└── `Const`
```
New terminology (AST, HIR, rustdoc):
```
`AssocItemConstraint`: associated item constraint
├── `Bound`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: associated item equality constraint OR associated item binding (for short)
├── `Ty`: associated type equality constraint OR associated type binding (for short)
└── `Const`: associated const equality constraint OR associated const binding (for short)
```
r? compiler-errors
|
|
|
|
Almost all callers want this anyway, and now we can use it to also return fed bodies
|
|
|
|
And explain when it should be used.
|
|
report_return_mismatched_types
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix #124819, where a if-less block causes a wrong output. It is
caused by get_return_block in get_fn_decl. In get_return_block,
when a else-less if expression is the tail expression, the check
for next_node will keep iterating. So it is necessary to make a
early return in the check.
|
|
|
|
|
|
behind indirections
|
|
Implement syntax for `impl Trait` to specify its captures explicitly (`feature(precise_capturing)`)
Implements `impl use<'a, 'b, T, U> Sized` syntax that allows users to explicitly list the captured parameters for an opaque, rather than inferring it from the opaque's bounds (or capturing *all* lifetimes under 2024-edition capture rules). This allows us to exclude some implicit captures, so this syntax may be used as a migration strategy for changes due to #117587.
We represent this list of captured params as `PreciseCapturingArg` in AST and HIR, resolving them between `rustc_resolve` and `resolve_bound_vars`. Later on, we validate that the opaques only capture the parameters in this list.
We artificially limit the feature to *require* mentioning all type and const parameters, since we don't currently have support for non-lifetime bivariant generics. This can be relaxed in the future.
We also may need to limit this to require naming *all* lifetime parameters for RPITIT, since GATs have no variance. I have to investigate this. This can also be relaxed in the future.
r? `@oli-obk`
Tracking issue:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123432
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is commonly used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
various clippy fixes
We need to keep the order of the given clippy lint rules before passing them.
Since clap doesn't offer any useful interface for this purpose out of the box,
we have to handle it manually.
Additionally, this PR makes `-D` rules work as expected. Previously, lint rules were limited to `-W`. By enabling `-D`, clippy began to complain numerous lines in the tree, all of which have been resolved in this PR as well.
Fixes #121481
cc `@matthiaskrgr`
|
|
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
|
|
Ensure nested statics have a HIR node to prevent various queries from ICEing
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3389
|
|
other hir nodes that were fed
|
|
They match on almost the same patterns, which is fishy.
Also turn `associated_body` into a method and do some cleanups nearby the call sites
|
|
hir: Remove `opt_local_def_id_to_hir_id` and `opt_hir_node_by_def_id`
Also replace a few `hir_node()` calls with `hir_node_by_def_id()`.
Follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120943.
|
|
Also replace a few `hir_node()` calls with `hir_node_by_def_id()`
|
|
Rename `StmtKind::Local` variant into `StmtKind::Let`
It comes from this [discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Improve.20naming.20of.20.60ExprKind.3A.3ALet.60.3F).
Starting point was:
> I often end up looking at [ExprKind::Let](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/enum.ExprKind.html#variant.Let) instead of Local because of the name. I think renaming it (both the `ExprKind` variant and the Let struct) to `LetPattern` or LetPat could improve the situation as I'm not sure I'm not the only one encountering this issue.
And then it evolved into:
> It's already `Expr::Let` instead of `StmtKind::Local`. Counterproposal: rename `StmtKind::Local` to `StmtKind::Let`.
The goal here is to clear this confusion.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Will be used in the next commit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When encountering a tail expression in the then arm of an `if` expression
without an `else` arm, account for `async fn` and `async` blocks to
suggest `return`ing the value and pointing at the return type of the
`async fn`.
We now also account for AFIT when looking for the return type to point at.
Fix #115405.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove the FIXME and keep `CRATE_HIR_ID` being its own parent.
This scheme turned out to be more practical than having an `Option` on closer inspection.
Also make `hir_owner_parent` more readable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The query accept arbitrary DefIds, not just owner DefIds.
The return can be an `Option` because if there are no nodes, then it doesn't matter whether it's due to NonOwner or Phantom.
Also rename the query to `opt_hir_owner_nodes`.
|
|
|
|
|
