| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Revert "store ScalarPair via memset when one side is undef and the other side can be memset"
cc #137892
reverts #135335
r? oli-obk
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit a7a6c64a657f68113301c2ffe0745b49a16442d1, reversing
changes made to ebbe63891f1fae21734cb97f2f863b08b1d44bf8.
|
|
Currently it gets the pointers in the range and checks if the result is
empty, but it can be done faster if you combine those two steps.
|
|
Make it so that every structured error annotated with `#[derive(Diagnostic)]` that has a field of type `Ty<'_>`, the printing of that value into a `String` will look at the thread-local storage `TyCtxt` in order to shorten to a length appropriate with the terminal width. When this happen, the resulting error will have a note with the file where the full type name was written to.
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)``
--> long.rs:7:5
|
6 | fn foo(x: D) { //~ `x` has type `(...
| - `x` has type `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)`
7 | x(); //~ ERROR expected function, found `(...
| ^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
= note: the full name for the type has been written to 'long.long-type-14182675702747116984.txt'
= note: consider using `--verbose` to print the full type name to the console
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simplify intra-crate qualifiers.
The following is a weird pattern for a file within `rustc_middle`:
```
use rustc_middle::aaa;
use crate::bbb;
```
More sensible and standard would be this:
```
use crate::{aaa, bbb};
```
I.e. we generally prefer using `crate::` to using a crate's own name. (Exceptions are things like in macros where `crate::` doesn't work because the macro is used in multiple crates.)
This commit fixes a bunch of these weird qualifiers.
r? `@jieyouxu`
|
|
The following is a weird pattern for a file within `rustc_middle`:
```
use rustc_middle::aaa;
use crate::bbb;
```
More sensible and standard would be this:
```
use crate::{aaa, bbb};
```
I.e. we generally prefer using `crate::` to using a crate's own name.
(Exceptions are things like in macros where `crate::` doesn't work
because the macro is used in multiple crates.)
This commit fixes a bunch of these weird qualifiers.
|
|
We cannot produce anything useful if asked to compile unknown targets.
We should handle the error immediately at the point of discovery instead
of propagating it upward, and preferably in the simplest way: Die.
This allows cleaning up our "error-handling" spread across 5 crates.
|
|
|
|
We have four macros for generating trivial traversal (fold/visit) and
lift impls.
- `rustc_ir::TrivialTypeTraversalImpls`
- `rustc_middle::TrivialTypeTraversalImpls`
- `rustc_middle::TrivialLiftImpls`
- `rustc_middle::TrivialTypeTraversalAndLiftImpls`
The first two are very similar. The last one just combines the second
and third one.
The macros themselves are ok, but their use is a mess. This commit does
the following.
- Removes types that no longer need a lift and/or traversal impl from
the macro calls.
- Consolidates the macro calls into the smallest number of calls
possible, with each one mentioning as many types as possible.
- Orders the types within those macro calls alphabetically, and makes
the module qualification more consistent.
- Eliminates `rustc_middle::mir::type_foldable`, because the macro calls
were merged and the manual `TypeFoldable` impls are better placed in
`structural_impls.rs`, alongside all the other ones.
This makes the code more concise. Moving forward, it also makes it more
obvious where new types should be added.
|
|
Shard AllocMap Lock
This improves performance on many-seed parallel (-Zthreads=32) miri executions from managing to use ~8 cores to using 27-28 cores, which is about the same as what I see with the data structure proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136105 - I haven't analyzed but I suspect the sharding might actually work out better if we commonly insert "densely" since sharding would split the cache lines and the OnceVec packs locks close together. Of course, we could do something similar with the bitset lock too.
Either way, this seems like a very reasonable starting point that solves the problem ~equally well on what I can test locally.
r? `@RalfJung`
|
|
This improves performance on many-seed parallel (-Zthreads=32) miri
executions from managing to use ~8 cores to using 27-28 cores. That's
pretty reasonable scaling for the simplicity of this solution.
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert some `Into` impls into `From` impls
From the [`From`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.From.html) docs:
> One should always prefer implementing `From` over [`Into`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.Into.html) because implementing `From` automatically provides one with an implementation of [`Into`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.Into.html) thanks to the blanket implementation in the standard library.
>
> Only implement [`Into`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.Into.html) when targeting a version prior to Rust 1.41 and converting to a type outside the current crate. `From` was not able to do these types of conversions in earlier versions because of Rust’s orphaning rules. See [Into](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/convert/trait.Into.html) for more details.
Some of these impls are likely from before 1.41, and then some others were probably just mistakes. Building nightly rust is definitely not supported on 1.41, so let's modernize these impls :D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extend Miri to correctly pass mutable pointers through FFI
Based off of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129684, this PR further extends Miri to execute native calls that make use of pointers to *mutable* memory.
We adapt Miri's bookkeeping of internal state upon any FFI call that gives external code permission to mutate memory.
Native code may now possibly write and therefore initialize and change the pointer provenance of bytes it has access to: Such memory is assumed to be *initialized* afterwards and bytes are given *arbitrary (wildcard) provenance*. This enables programs that correctly use mutating FFI calls to run Miri without errors, at the cost of possibly missing Undefined Behaviour caused by incorrect usage of mutating FFI.
> <details>
>
> <summary> Simple example </summary>
>
> ```rust
> extern "C" {
> fn init_int(ptr: *mut i32);
> }
>
> fn main() {
> let mut x = std::mem::MaybeUninit::<i32>::uninit();
> let x = unsafe {
> init_int(x.as_mut_ptr());
> x.assume_init()
> };
>
> println!("C initialized my memory to: {x}");
> }
> ```
> ```c
> void init_int(int *ptr) {
> *ptr = 42;
> }
> ```
> should now show `C initialized my memory to: 42`.
>
> </details>
r? ``@RalfJung``
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ralf Jung <post@ralfj.de>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interpret: do not ICE when a promoted fails with OOM
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130687
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
|
|
|
|
the behavior of the type system not only depends on the current
assumptions, but also the currentnphase of the compiler. This is
mostly necessary as we need to decide whether and how to reveal
opaque types. We track this via the `TypingMode`.
|
|
duplication with validity checking
|
|
Stop reexporting ReprOptions from middle::ty
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const-eval interning: accept interior mutable pointers in final value
…but keep rejecting mutable references
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121610 by no longer firing the lint when there is a pointer with interior mutability in the final value of the constant. On stable, such pointers can be created with code like:
```rust
pub enum JsValue {
Undefined,
Object(Cell<bool>),
}
impl Drop for JsValue {
fn drop(&mut self) {}
}
// This does *not* get promoted since `JsValue` has a destructor.
// However, the outer scope rule applies, still giving this 'static lifetime.
const UNDEFINED: &JsValue = &JsValue::Undefined;
```
It's not great to accept such values since people *might* think that it is legal to mutate them with unsafe code. (This is related to how "infectious" `UnsafeCell` is, which is a [wide open question](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/236).) However, we [explicitly document](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/behavior-considered-undefined.html) that things created by `const` are immutable. Furthermore, we also accept the following even more questionable code without any lint today:
```rust
let x: &'static Option<Cell<i32>> = &None;
```
This is even more questionable since it does *not* involve a `const`, and yet still puts the data into immutable memory. We could view this as promotion [potentially introducing UB](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/493). However, we've accepted this since ~forever and it's [too late to reject this now](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/122789); the pattern is just too useful.
So basically, if you think that `UnsafeCell` should be tracked fully precisely, then you should want the lint we currently emit to be removed, which this PR does. If you think `UnsafeCell` should "infect" surrounding `enum`s, the big problem is really https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/493 which does not trigger the lint -- the cases the lint triggers on are actually the "harmless" ones as there is an explicit surrounding `const` explaining why things end up being immutable.
What all this goes to show is that the hard error added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/118324 (later turned into the future-compat lint that I am now suggesting we remove) was based on some wrong assumptions, at least insofar as it concerns shared references. Furthermore, that lint does not help at all for the most problematic case here where the potential UB is completely implicit. (In fact, the lint is actively in the way of [my preferred long-term strategy](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/493#issuecomment-2028674105) for dealing with this UB.) So I think we should go back to square one and remove that error/lint for shared references. For mutable references, it does seem to work as intended, so we can keep it. Here it serves as a safety net in case the static checks that try to contain mutable references to the inside of a const initializer are not working as intended; I therefore made the check ICE to encourage users to tell us if that safety net is triggered.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/122153 by removing the lint.
Cc `@rust-lang/opsem` `@rust-lang/lang`
|
|
Simplify some nested `if` statements
Applies some but not all instances of `clippy::collapsible_if`. Some ended up looking worse afterwards, though, so I left those out. Also applies instances of `clippy::collapsible_else_if`
Review with whitespace disabled please.
|
|
Remove needless returns detected by clippy in the compiler
|
|
|
|
keep rejecting mutable references)
|
