| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Update miri submodule
fixes #101344
cc `@rust-lang/miri`
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
Lower the assume intrinsic to a MIR statement
This makes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96862#issuecomment-1153739068 easier and will generally allow us to cheaply insert assume intrinsic calls in mir building.
r? rust-lang/wg-mir-opt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And move them into a module, as has been done previously for AST, HIR,
etc.
|
|
|
|
This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].
I only picked the ones I was sure were spelling errors to fix, mostly in
the comments.
[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
|
|
Rework definition of MIR phases to more closely reflect semantic concerns
Implements most of rust-lang/compiler-team#522 .
I tried my best to restrict this PR to the "core" parts of the MCP. In other words, this includes just enough changes to make the new definition of `MirPhase` make sense. That means there are a couple of FIXMEs lying around. Depending on what reviewers prefer, I can either fix them in this PR or send follow up PRs. There are also a couple other refactorings of the `rustc_mir_transform/src/lib.rs` file that I want to do in follow ups that I didn't leave explicit FIXMEs for.
|
|
|
|
interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information
Next step in the reaction to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2456.
Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this:
```
= help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer
= help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported
```
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
Replace `Body::basic_blocks()` with field access
Since the refactoring in #98930, it is possible to borrow the basic blocks
independently from other parts of MIR by accessing the `basic_blocks` field
directly.
Replace unnecessary `Body::basic_blocks()` method with a direct field access,
which has an additional benefit of borrowing the basic blocks only.
|
|
|
|
and show some extra information when it happens in CTFE
|
|
|
|
|
|
initialized Scalar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This feature of MIR patch system is no longer used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
never consider unsafe blocks unused if they would be required with deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)
Judging from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71668#issuecomment-1200317370 the consensus nowadays seems to be that we should never consider an unsafe block unused if it was required with `deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)`, no matter whether that lint is actually enabled or not. So let's adjust rustc accordingly.
The first commit does the change, the 2nd does some cleanup.
|
|
avoid assertion failures in try_to_scalar_int
Given that this is called `try_to_scalar_int`, we probably shouldn't `assert_int` here. Similarly `try_to_bits` also doesn't `assert!` that the size is correct.
Also add some `track_caller` for debugging, while we are at it.
r? ```@oli-obk```
|
|
This also applies that option to some uses of the visitor
|
|
More EarlyBinder cleanups
Each commit is independent
r? types
|
|
|
|
As a part of this change, we adjust MirPatch to not needlessly create unnecessary resume blocks.
|
|
|
|
Improve size assertions.
- For any file with four or more size assertions, move them into a
separate module (as is already done for `hir.rs`).
- Add some more for AST nodes and THIR nodes.
- Put the `hir.rs` ones in alphabetical order.
r? `@lqd`
|
|
- For any file with four or more size assertions, move them into a
separate module (as is already done for `hir.rs`).
- Add some more for AST nodes and THIR nodes.
- Put the `hir.rs` ones in alphabetical order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This adds a new option, `-Zmir-pretty-relative-line-numbers`, that
is then used in compiletest for the mir-opt tests.
|
|
Simplify some code that depend on Deref
Now that we can assume #97025 works, it's safe to expect Deref is always in the first place of projections. With this, I was able to simplify some code that depended on Deref's place in projections. When we are able to move Derefer before `ElaborateDrops` successfully we will be able to optimize more places.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix unreachable coverage generation for inlined functions
To generate a function coverage we need at least one coverage counter,
so a coverage from unreachable blocks is retained only when some live
counters remain.
The previous implementation incorrectly retained unreachable coverage,
because it didn't account for the fact that those live counters can
belong to another function due to inlining.
Fixes #98833.
|
|
make vtable pointers entirely opaque
This implements the scheme discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/338: vtable pointers should be considered entirely opaque and not even readable by Rust code, similar to function pointers.
- We have a new kind of `GlobalAlloc` that symbolically refers to a vtable.
- Miri uses that kind of allocation when generating a vtable.
- The codegen backends, upon encountering such an allocation, call `vtable_allocation` to obtain an actually dataful allocation for this vtable.
- We need new intrinsics to obtain the size and align from a vtable (for some `ptr::metadata` APIs), since direct accesses are UB now.
I had to touch quite a bit of code that I am not very familiar with, so some of this might not make much sense...
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
Remove the unused StableSet and StableMap types from rustc_data_structures.
The current implementation is not "stable" in the same sense that `HashStable` and `StableHasher` are stable, i.e. across compilation sessions. So, in my opinion, it's better to remove those types (which are basically unused anyway) than to give the wrong impression that these are safe for incr. comp.
I plan to provide new "stable" collection types soon that can be used to replace `FxHashMap` and `FxHashSet` in query results (see [draft](https://github.com/michaelwoerister/rust/commit/69d03ac7a7d651a397ab793e9d78f8fce3edf7a6)). It's unsound that `HashMap` and `HashSet` implement `HashStable` (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98890 for a recent P-critical bug caused by this) -- so we should make some progress there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
