| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Implement `#[rustc_default_body_unstable]`
This PR implements a new stability attribute — `#[rustc_default_body_unstable]`.
`#[rustc_default_body_unstable]` controls the stability of default bodies in traits.
For example:
```rust
pub trait Trait {
#[rustc_default_body_unstable(feature = "feat", isssue = "none")]
fn item() {}
}
```
In order to implement `Trait` user needs to either
- implement `item` (even though it has a default implementation)
- enable `#![feature(feat)]`
This is useful in conjunction with [`#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92164), we may want to relax requirements for a trait, for example allowing implementing either of `PartialEq::{eq, ne}`, but do so in a safe way — making implementation of only `PartialEq::ne` unstable.
r? `@Aaron1011`
cc `@nrc` (iirc you were interested in this wrt `read_buf`), `@danielhenrymantilla` (you were interested in the related `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]`)
P.S. This is my first time working with stability attributes, so I'm not sure if I did everything right 😅
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This attribute allows to mark default body of a trait function as
unstable. This means that implementing the trait without implementing
the function will require enabling unstable feature.
This is useful in conjunction with `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]`,
we may want to relax requirements for a trait, for example allowing
implementing either of `PartialEq::{eq, ne}`, but do so in a safe way
-- making implementation of only `PartialEq::ne` unstable.
|
|
Improves the diagnostic when a feature attribute is specified
unnecessarily but the feature implies another (i.e. it was partially
stabilized) to refer to the implied feature.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return a FxIndexSet in is_late_bound query.
This return value is iterated upon by borrowck, hence the need to preserve
a deterministic iteration order.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98890
Affects https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96655
I don't know if this supersedes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98924 or fixes an unrelated bug.
r? `@michaelwoerister`
This may deserve a backport.
|
|
This return value is iterated upon by borrowck, hence the need to preserve
a deterministic iteration order.
|
|
|
|
Fix FFI-unwind unsoundness with mixed panic mode
UB maybe introduced when an FFI exception happens in a `C-unwind` foreign function and it propagates through a crate compiled with `-C panic=unwind` into a crate compiled with `-C panic=abort` (#96926).
To prevent this unsoundness from happening, we will disallow a crate compiled with `-C panic=unwind` to be linked into `panic-abort` *if* it contains a call to `C-unwind` foreign function or function pointer. If no such call exists, then we continue to allow such mixed panic mode linking because it's sound (and stable). In fact we still need the ability to do mixed panic mode linking for std, because we only compile std once with `-C panic=unwind` and link it regardless panic strategy.
For libraries that wish to remain compile-once-and-linkable-to-both-panic-runtimes, a `ffi_unwind_calls` lint is added (gated under `c_unwind` feature gate) to flag any FFI unwind calls that will cause the linkable panic runtime be restricted.
In summary:
```rust
#![warn(ffi_unwind_calls)]
mod foo {
#[no_mangle]
pub extern "C-unwind" fn foo() {}
}
extern "C-unwind" {
fn foo();
}
fn main() {
// Call to Rust function is fine regardless ABI.
foo::foo();
// Call to foreign function, will cause the crate to be unlinkable to panic-abort if compiled with `-Cpanic=unwind`.
unsafe { foo(); }
//~^ WARNING call to foreign function with FFI-unwind ABI
let ptr: extern "C-unwind" fn() = foo::foo;
// Call to function pointer, will cause the crate to be unlinkable to panic-abort if compiled with `-Cpanic=unwind`.
ptr();
//~^ WARNING call to function pointer with FFI-unwind ABI
}
```
Fix #96926
`@rustbot` label: T-compiler F-c_unwind
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only keep a single query for well-formed checking
There are currently 3 queries to perform wf checks on different item-likes. This complexity is not required.
This PR replaces the query by:
- one query per item;
- one query to invoke it for a whole module.
This allows to remove HIR `ParItemLikeVisitor`.
|
|
Perform coherence checking per impl.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rename `impl_constness` to `constness`
The current code is a basis for `is_const_fn_raw`, and `impl_constness`
is no longer a valid name, which is previously used for determining the
constness of impls, and not items in general.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
The current code is a basis for `is_const_fn_raw`, and `impl_constness`
is no longer a valid name, which is previously used for determining the
constness of impls, and not items in general.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compute lifetimes in scope at diagnostic time
The set of available lifetimes is currently computed during lifetime resolution on HIR. It is only used for one diagnostic.
In this PR, HIR lifetime resolution just reports whether elided lifetimes are well-defined at the place of use. The diagnostic code is responsible for building a list of lifetime names if elision is not allowed.
This will allow to remove lifetime resolution on HIR eventually.
|
|
Iterate over `maybe_unused_trait_imports` when checking dead trait imports
Closes #96873
r? `@cjgillot`
Some questions, if you have time:
- Is there a way to shorten the `rustc_data_structures::fx::FxIndexSet` path in the query declaration? I wasn't sure where to put a `use`.
- Was returning by reference from the query the right choice here?
- How would I go about evaluating the importance of the `is_dummy()` call in `check_crate`? I don't see failing tests when I comment it out. Should I just try to determine whether dummy spans can ever be put into `maybe_unused_trait_imports`?
- Am I doing anything silly with the various ID types?
- Is that `let-else` with `unreachable!()` bad? (i.e is there a better idiom? Would `panic!("<explanation>")` be better?)
- If I want to evaluate the perf of using a `Vec` as mentioned in #96873, is the best way to use the CI or is it feasible locally?
Thanks :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
The computation is actually much simpler, and can be done by directly
fetching the HIR for the `FnDecl` and its generics.
|
|
r=dingxiangfei2009
Try to cache region_scope_tree as a query
This PR will attempt to restore `region_scope_tree` as a query so that caching works again. It seems that `region_scope_tree` could be re-computed for nested items after all, which could explain the performance regression introduced by #95563.
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` `@pnkfelix` I will try to trigger a perf run here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
remove region_scope_tree from RegionCtxt
Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Niko Matsakis <niko@alum.mit.edu>
|
|
Cache more queries on disk
One of the principles of incremental compilation is to allow saving results on disk to avoid recomputing them.
This PR investigates persisting a lot of queries whose result are to be saved into metadata.
Some of the queries are cheap reads from HIR, but we may also want to get rid of these reads for incremental lowering.
|
|
Transition to valtrees pt1
Compartmentalising https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/96591 as much as possible.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
Add a query for checking whether a function is an intrinsic.
work towards #93145
This will reduce churn when we add more ways to declare intrinsics
r? `@scottmcm`
|
|
valtree_to_const_val
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
don't encode only locally used attrs
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/505.
We now filter builtin attributes before encoding them in the crate metadata in case they should only be used in the local crate. To prevent accidental misuse `get_attrs` now requires the caller to state which attribute they are interested in. For places where that isn't trivially possible, I've added a method `fn get_attrs_unchecked` which I intend to remove in a followup PR.
After this pull request landed, we can then slowly move all attributes to only be used in the local crate while being certain that we don't accidentally try to access them from extern crates.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94963#issuecomment-1082924289
|
