| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Improve diagnostic for const ctors in array repeat expressions
Fixes #113912
|
|
`rustc_span` cleanups
Just some things I found while looking over this crate.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
Most notably, this commit changes the `pub use crate::*;` in that file
to `use crate::*;`. This requires a lot of `use` items in other crates
to be adjusted, because everything defined within `rustc_span::*` was
also available via `rustc_span::source_map::*`, which is bizarre.
The commit also removes `SourceMap::span_to_relative_line_string`, which
is unused.
|
|
|
|
Suggest `;` after bare `match` expression E0308
Fix #72634.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix #72634.
|
|
|
|
|
|
rustc_hir_analysis: add a helper to check function the signature mismatches
This function is now used to check `#[panic_handler]`, `start` lang item, `main`, `#[start]` and intrinsic functions.
The diagnosis produced are now closer to the ones produced by trait/impl method signature mismatch.
This is the first time I do anything with rustc_hir_analysis/rustc_hir_typeck, so comments and suggestions about things I did wrong or that could be improved will be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
This function is now used to check `#[panic_handler]`, `start` lang item, `main`, `#[start]` and intrinsic functions.
The diagnosis produced are now closer to the ones produced by trait/impl method signature mismatch.
|
|
inspect: closer to proof trees for coherence
a continuation of #115751. Now explicitly store the added goals
r? ```@compiler-errors```
|
|
|
|
I found these by commenting out all `Lift` derives and then adding back
the ones that were necessary to successfully compile.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
also handle 2 panics when dumping proof trees for the whole test suite
- need to actually tell the proof tree builder about overflow
- need to handle a recursion_limit of 0 :<
|
|
|
|
|
|
the unnormalized goal is in the callers inference context, while
anything inside of the `CanonicalGoalEvaluation` is inside of
a new one.
|
|
|
|
When encountering code like
```rust
fn foo() -> i32 {
match 0 {
1 => return 0,
2 => "",
_ => 1,
}
}
```
Point at the return type and not at the prior arm, as that arm has type
`!` which isn't influencing the arm corresponding to arm `2`.
Fix #78124.
|
|
|
|
update overflow handling in the new trait solver
implements https://hackmd.io/QY0dfEOgSNWwU4oiGnVRLw?view. I want to clean up this doc and add it to the rustc-dev-guide, but I think this PR is ready for merge as is, even without the dev-guide entry.
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Rework upcasting confirmation to support upcasting to fewer projections in target bounds
This PR implements a modified trait upcasting algorithm that is resilient to changes in the number of associated types in the bounds of the source and target trait objects.
It does this by equating each bound of the target trait ref individually against the bounds of the source trait ref, rather than doing them all together by constructing a new trait object.
#### The new way we do trait upcasting confirmation
1. Equate the target trait object's principal trait ref with one of the supertraits of the source trait object's principal.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdcab310b2a57a4e9cc0b2629abd27afda49cd80/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs#L2509-L2525
2. Make sure that every auto trait in the *target* trait object is present in the source trait ref's bounds.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdcab310b2a57a4e9cc0b2629abd27afda49cd80/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs#L2559-L2562
3. For each projection in the *target* trait object, make sure there is exactly one projection that equates with it in the source trait ref's bound. If there is more than one, bail with ambiguity.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdcab310b2a57a4e9cc0b2629abd27afda49cd80/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs#L2526-L2557
* Since there may be more than one that applies, we probe first to check that there is exactly one, then we equate it outside of a probe once we know that it's unique.
4. Make sure the lifetime of the source trait object outlives the lifetime of the target.
<details>
<summary>Meanwhile, this is how we used to do upcasting:</summary>
1. For each supertrait of the source trait object, take that supertrait, append the source object's projection bounds, and the *target* trait object's auto trait bounds, and make this into a new object type:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d12c6e947ceacf3b22c154caf9532b390d8dc88a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs#L915-L929
2. Then equate it with the target trait object:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d12c6e947ceacf3b22c154caf9532b390d8dc88a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs#L936
This will be a type mismatch if the target trait object has fewer projection bounds, since we compare the bounds structurally in relate:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d12c6e947ceacf3b22c154caf9532b390d8dc88a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/relate.rs#L696-L698
</details>
Fixes #114035
Also fixes #114113, because I added a normalize call in the old solver.
r? types
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
refactor builtin unsize handling, extend comments
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More `ImplSource` nits
Even more clean-ups, I'll put this up in parallel with the `select_in_new_trait_solver` PR.
r? ``@lcnr``
|
|
|
|
|
