about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2024-08-01interpret: simplify pointer arithmetic logicRalf Jung-3/+3
2024-07-29Reformat `use` declarations.Nicholas Nethercote-294/+287
The previous commit updated `rustfmt.toml` appropriately. This commit is the outcome of running `x fmt --all` with the new formatting options.
2024-07-26Auto merge of #128165 - saethlin:optimize-clone-shims, r=compiler-errorsbors-3/+3
Let InstCombine remove Clone shims inside Clone shims The Clone shims that we generate tend to recurse into other Clone shims, which gets very silly very quickly. Here's our current state: https://godbolt.org/z/E69YeY8eq So I've added InstSimplify to the shims optimization passes, and improved `is_trivially_pure_clone_copy` so that it can delete those calls inside the shim. This makes the shim way smaller because most of its size is the required ceremony for unwinding. This change also completely breaks the UI test added for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104870. With this PR, that program ICEs in MIR type checking because `is_trivially_pure_clone_copy` and the trait solver disagree on whether `*mut u8` is `Copy`. And adding the requisite `Copy` impl to make them agree makes the test not generate any diagnostics. Considering that I spent most of my time on this PR fixing `#![no_core]` tests, I would prefer to just delete this one. The maintenance burden of `#![no_core]` is uniquely high because when they break they tend to break in very confusing ways. try-job: x86_64-mingw
2024-07-25Let InstCombine remove Clone shims inside Clone shimsBen Kimock-3/+3
Co-authored-by: scottmcm <scottmcm@users.noreply.github.com>
2024-07-24Rollup merge of #127717 - gurry:127441-stray-impl-sugg, r=compiler-errorsMatthias Krüger-20/+49
Fix malformed suggestion for repeated maybe unsized bounds Fixes #127441 Now when we encounter something like `foo(a : impl ?Sized + ?Sized)`, instead of suggesting removal of both bounds and leaving `foo(a: impl )` behind, we suggest changing the first bound to `Sized` and removing the second bound, resulting in `foo(a: impl Sized)`. Although the issue was reported for impl trait types, it also occurred with regular param bounds. So if we encounter `foo<T: ?Sized + ?Sized>(a: T)` we now detect that all the bounds are `?Sized` and therefore emit the suggestion to remove the entire predicate `: ?Sized + ?Sized` resulting in `foo<T>(a: T)`. Lastly, if we encounter a situation where some of the bounds are something other than `?Sized`, then we emit separate removal suggestions for each `?Sized` bound. E.g. if we see `foo(a: impl ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized)` or `foo<T: ?Sized + Bar + ?Sized>(a: T)` we emit suggestions such that the user will be left with `foo(a : impl Bar)` or `foo<T: Bar>(a: T)` respectively.
2024-07-24Do not try to reveal hidden types when trying to prove Freeze in the ↵Oli Scherer-1/+1
defining scope
2024-07-21Auto merge of #120812 - compiler-errors:impl-sorting, r=lcnrbors-9/+37
Remove unnecessary impl sorting in queries and metadata Removes unnecessary impl sorting because queries already return their keys in HIR definition order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120371#issuecomment-1926422838 r? `@cjgillot` or `@lcnr` -- unless I totally misunderstood what was being asked for here? 😆 fixes #120371
2024-07-19Avoid ref when using format! in compilerYuri Astrakhan-1/+1
Clean up a few minor refs in `format!` macro, as it has a performance cost. Apparently the compiler is unable to inline `format!("{}", &variable)`, and does a run-time double-reference instead (format macro already does one level referencing). Inlining format args prevents accidental `&` misuse.
2024-07-19Auto merge of #125915 - camelid:const-arg-refactor, r=BoxyUwUbors-43/+89
Represent type-level consts with new-and-improved `hir::ConstArg` ### Summary This is a step toward `min_generic_const_exprs`. We now represent all const generic arguments using an enum that differentiates between const *paths* (temporarily just bare const params) and arbitrary anon consts that may perform computations. This will enable us to cleanly implement the `min_generic_const_args` plan of allowing the use of generics in paths used as const args, while disallowing their use in arbitrary anon consts. Here is a summary of the salient aspects of this change: - Add `current_def_id_parent` to `LoweringContext` This is needed to track anon const parents properly once we implement `ConstArgKind::Path` (which requires moving anon const def-creation outside of `DefCollector`). - Create `hir::ConstArgKind` enum with `Path` and `Anon` variants. Use it in the existing `hir::ConstArg` struct, replacing the previous `hir::AnonConst` field. - Use `ConstArg` for all instances of const args. Specifically, use it instead of `AnonConst` for assoc item constraints, array lengths, and const param defaults. - Some `ast::AnonConst`s now have their `DefId`s created in rustc_ast_lowering rather than `DefCollector`. This is because in some cases they will end up becoming a `ConstArgKind::Path` instead, which has no `DefId`. We have to solve this in a hacky way where we guess whether the `AnonConst` could end up as a path const since we can't know for sure until after name resolution (`N` could refer to a free const or a nullary struct). If it has no chance as being a const param, then we create a `DefId` in `DefCollector` -- otherwise we decide during ast_lowering. This will have to be updated once all path consts use `ConstArgKind::Path`. - We explicitly use `ConstArgHasType` for array lengths, rather than implicitly relying on anon const type feeding -- this is due to the addition of `ConstArgKind::Path`. - Some tests have their outputs changed, but the changes are for the most part minor (including removing duplicate or almost-duplicate errors). One test now ICEs, but it is for an incomplete, unstable feature and is now tracked at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127009. ### Followup items post-merge - Use `ConstArgKind::Path` for all const paths, not just const params. - Fix (no github dont close this issue) #127009 - If a path in generic args doesn't resolve as a type, try to resolve as a const instead (do this in rustc_resolve). Then remove the special-casing from `rustc_ast_lowering`, so that all params will automatically be lowered as `ConstArgKind::Path`. - (?) Consider making `const_evaluatable_unchecked` a hard error, or at least trying it in crater r? `@BoxyUwU`
2024-07-18Move query providersMichael Goulet-6/+35
2024-07-18Avoid unnecessary sorting of traitsMichael Goulet-3/+2
2024-07-18const_to_pat: cleanup leftovers from when we had to deal with non-structural ↵Ralf Jung-14/+38
constants
2024-07-18valtree construction: keep track of which type was valtree-incompatibleRalf Jung-2/+1
2024-07-18Rollup merge of #127810 - compiler-errors:less-tcx, r=lcnrMatthias Krüger-9/+9
Rename `tcx` to `cx` in `rustc_type_ir` Self-explanatory. Forgot that we had to do this in type_ir too, and not just the new solver crate lol. r? lcnr
2024-07-18Rollup merge of #127783 - compiler-errors:rtn-pretty, r=fee1-deadMatthias Krüger-2/+5
Put the dots back in RTN pretty printing Also don't render RTN-like bounds for methods with ty/const params.
2024-07-17Put the dots backMichael Goulet-2/+5
2024-07-17Fix relationsMichael Goulet-2/+2
2024-07-17lift_to_tcx -> lift_to_internerMichael Goulet-7/+7
2024-07-17Remove invalid further restricting for type boundyukang-0/+14
2024-07-16Add `ConstArgKind::Path` and make `ConstArg` its own HIR nodeNoah Lev-11/+12
This is a very large commit since a lot needs to be changed in order to make the tests pass. The salient changes are: - `ConstArgKind` gets a new `Path` variant, and all const params are now represented using it. Non-param paths still use `ConstArgKind::Anon` to prevent this change from getting too large, but they will soon use the `Path` variant too. - `ConstArg` gets a distinct `hir_id` field and its own variant in `hir::Node`. This affected many parts of the compiler that expected the parent of an `AnonConst` to be the containing context (e.g., an array repeat expression). They have been changed to check the "grandparent" where necessary. - Some `ast::AnonConst`s now have their `DefId`s created in rustc_ast_lowering rather than `DefCollector`. This is because in some cases they will end up becoming a `ConstArgKind::Path` instead, which has no `DefId`. We have to solve this in a hacky way where we guess whether the `AnonConst` could end up as a path const since we can't know for sure until after name resolution (`N` could refer to a free const or a nullary struct). If it has no chance as being a const param, then we create a `DefId` in `DefCollector` -- otherwise we decide during ast_lowering. This will have to be updated once all path consts use `ConstArgKind::Path`. - We explicitly use `ConstArgHasType` for array lengths, rather than implicitly relying on anon const type feeding -- this is due to the addition of `ConstArgKind::Path`. - Some tests have their outputs changed, but the changes are for the most part minor (including removing duplicate or almost-duplicate errors). One test now ICEs, but it is for an incomplete, unstable feature and is now tracked at #127009.
2024-07-16Use `ConstArg` for const param defaultsNoah Lev-4/+4
Now everything that actually affects the type system (i.e., excluding const blocks, enum variant discriminants, etc.) *should* be using `ConstArg`.
2024-07-16Setup ty::Const functions for `ConstArg`Noah Lev-37/+82
2024-07-16Rollup merge of #127808 - oli-obk:tainting_visitors2, r=lcnr,nnethercoteMatthias Krüger-8/+17
Make ErrorGuaranteed discoverable outside types, consts, and lifetimes types like `PatKind` could contain `ErrorGuaranteed`, but not return them via `tainted_by_errors` or `error_reported` (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127687#discussion_r1679027883). Now this happens, but it's a bit fragile as you can see with the `TypeSuperVisitable for Ty` impl. We will catch any problems around Ty, Region or Const at runtime with an assert, and everything using derives will not have such issues, as it will just invoke the `TypeVisitable for ErrorGuaranteed` impl
2024-07-16Rollup merge of #127730 - compiler-errors:ed-2024-unsafe, r=petrochenkovMatthias Krüger-1/+1
Fix and enforce `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` in compiler In preparation for edition 2024, this PR previews the fallout of enabling the `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` lint in the compiler, since it's defaulting to warn in the new edition (#112038). The major annoyance comes primarily from the `rustc_codegen_llvm` module, where there's a ton of unsafe calls. I tended to wrap individual calls to unsafe fns in `unsafe {}`, but there a handful of places I chose to just wrap several calls in an `unsafe {}` block just because it would've been excessive to wrap each call individually. This doesn't enable the lint for the standard library, since I'm not totally certain what T-libs prefers w/ this lint.
2024-07-16Remove an unnecessary implOli Scherer-6/+0
2024-07-16Make `ErrorGuaranteed` discoverable outside types, consts, and lifetimesOli Scherer-2/+17
2024-07-16Fix unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn in compilerMichael Goulet-1/+1
2024-07-16Auto merge of #127638 - adwinwhite:cache_string, r=oli-obkbors-2/+3
Add cache for `allocate_str` Best effort cache for string allocation in const eval. Fixes [rust-lang/miri#3470](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3470).
2024-07-14Add cache for `allocate_str`Adwin White-2/+3
2024-07-14Fix malformed suggestion for repeated maybe unsized boundsGurinder Singh-20/+49
2024-07-12Gate the type length limit check behind a nightly flagMichael Goulet-1/+3
2024-07-12Rollup merge of #127627 - lcnr:rustc_search_graph, r=compiler-errorsMatthias Krüger-7/+22
generalize search graph to enable fuzzing I do not believe it to be feasible to correctly implement the search graph without fuzzing. This PR enables this by requiring a fuzzer to only implement three new traits: - `Cx`: implemented by all `I: Interner` - `ProofTreeBuilder`: implemented by `struct ProofTreeBuilder<D>` for all `D: SolverDelegate` - `Delegate`: implemented for a new `struct SearchGraphDelegate<D>` for all `D: SolverDelegate` It also moves the evaluation cache implementation into `rustc_type_ir`, requiring `Interner` to provide methods to create and access arbitrary `WithDepNode<T>` and to provide mutable access to a given `GlobalCache`. It otherwise does not change the API surface for users of the shared library. This change should not impact behavior in any way. r? ``@compiler-errors``
2024-07-12enable fuzzing of `SearchGraph`lcnr-7/+22
fully move it into `rustc_type_ir` and make it independent of `Interner`.
2024-07-11Rollup merge of #127605 - nikic:remove-extern-wasm, r=oli-obkMatthias Krüger-1/+0
Remove extern "wasm" ABI Remove the unstable `extern "wasm"` ABI (`wasm_abi` feature tracked in #83788). As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513#issuecomment-2220410679 and following, this ABI is a failed experiment that did not end up being used for anything. Keeping support for this ABI in LLVM 19 would require us to switch wasm targets to the `experimental-mv` ABI, which we do not want to do. It should be noted that `Abi::Wasm` was internally used for two things: The `-Z wasm-c-abi=legacy` ABI that is still used by default on some wasm targets, and the `extern "wasm"` ABI. Despite both being `Abi::Wasm` internally, they were not the same. An explicit `extern "wasm"` additionally enabled the `+multivalue` feature. I've opted to remove `Abi::Wasm` in this patch entirely, instead of keeping it as an ABI with only internal usage. Both `-Z wasm-c-abi` variants are now treated as part of the normal C ABI, just with different different treatment in adjust_for_foreign_abi.
2024-07-11Remove extern "wasm" ABINikita Popov-1/+0
Remove the unstable `extern "wasm"` ABI (`wasm_abi` feature tracked in #83788). As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513#issuecomment-2220410679 and following, this ABI is a failed experiment that did not end up being used for anything. Keeping support for this ABI in LLVM 19 would require us to switch wasm targets to the `experimental-mv` ABI, which we do not want to do. It should be noted that `Abi::Wasm` was internally used for two things: The `-Z wasm-c-abi=legacy` ABI that is still used by default on some wasm targets, and the `extern "wasm"` ABI. Despite both being `Abi::Wasm` internally, they were not the same. An explicit `extern "wasm"` additionally enabled the `+multivalue` feature. I've opted to remove `Abi::Wasm` in this patch entirely, instead of keeping it as an ABI with only internal usage. Both `-Z wasm-c-abi` variants are now treated as part of the normal C ABI, just with different different treatment in adjust_for_foreign_abi.
2024-07-11Auto merge of #127575 - chenyukang:yukang-fix-struct-fields-ice, ↵bors-19/+38
r=compiler-errors Avoid "no field" error and ICE on recovered ADT variant Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126744 Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126344, a more general fix compared with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127426 r? `@oli-obk` From `@compiler-errors` 's comment https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127502#discussion_r1669538204 Seems most of the ADTs don't have taint, so maybe it's not proper to change `TyCtxt::type_of` query.
2024-07-11report pat no field error no recoverd struct variantyukang-19/+38
2024-07-09Auto merge of #127200 - fee1-dead-contrib:trait_def_const_trait, ↵bors-1/+9
r=compiler-errors Add `constness` to `TraitDef` Second attempt at fixing the regression @ https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120639#issuecomment-2198373716 r? project-const-traits
2024-07-08Rollup merge of #120248 - WaffleLapkin:bonk-ptr-object-casts, ↵Matthias Krüger-0/+8
r=compiler-errors,oli-obk,lnicola Make casts of pointers to trait objects stricter This is an attempt to `fix` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120222 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120217. This is done by adding restrictions on casting pointers to trait objects. Before this PR the rules were as follows: > When casting `*const X<dyn A>` -> `*const Y<dyn B>`, principal traits in `A` and `B` must refer to the same trait definition (or no trait). With this PR the rules are changed to > When casting `*const X<dyn Src>` -> `*const Y<dyn Dst>` > - if `Dst` has a principal trait `DstP`, > - `Src` must have a principal trait `SrcP` > - `dyn SrcP` and `dyn DstP` must be the same type (modulo the trait object lifetime, `dyn T+'a` -> `dyn T+'b` is allowed) > - Auto traits in `Dst` must be a subset of auto traits in `Src` > - Not adhering to this is currently a FCW (warn-by-default + `FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps`), instead of an error > - if `Src` has a principal trait `Dst` must as well > - this restriction will be removed in a follow up PR This ensures that 1. Principal trait's generic arguments match (no `*const dyn Tr<A>` -> `*const dyn Tr<B>` casts, which are a problem for [#120222](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120222)) 2. Principal trait's lifetime arguments match (no `*const dyn Tr<'a>` -> `*const dyn Tr<'b>` casts, which are a problem for [#120217](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120217)) 3. No auto traits can be _added_ (this is a problem for arbitrary self types, see [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120248#discussion_r1463835350)) Some notes: - We only care about the metadata/last field, so you can still cast `*const dyn T` to `*const WithHeader<dyn T>`, etc - The lifetime of the trait object itself (`dyn A + 'lt`) is not checked, so you can still cast `*mut FnOnce() + '_` to `*mut FnOnce() + 'static`, etc - This feels fishy, but I couldn't come up with a reason it must be checked The diagnostics are currently not great, to say the least, but as far as I can tell this correctly fixes the issues. cc `@oli-obk` `@compiler-errors` `@lcnr`
2024-07-08Rollup merge of #127439 - compiler-errors:uplift-elaborate, r=lcnr许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-38/+129
Uplift elaboration into `rustc_type_ir` Allows us to deduplicate and consolidate elaboration (including these stupid elaboration duplicate fns i added for pretty printing like 3 years ago) so I'm pretty hyped about this change :3 r? lcnr
2024-07-07Get rid of the redundant elaboration in middleMichael Goulet-31/+10
2024-07-07Uplift elaborationMichael Goulet-6/+118
2024-07-07Uplift trait_ref_is_knowable and friendsMichael Goulet-0/+12
2024-07-07Add fundamental to trait defMichael Goulet-1/+6
2024-07-07iter_identity is a better nameMichael Goulet-1/+1
2024-07-06Rollup merge of #127405 - ↵Michael Goulet-12/+2
compiler-errors:uplift-predicate-emitting-relation, r=lcnr uplift `PredicateEmittingRelation` Small follow-up to #127333 r? lcnr
2024-07-06Remove walk_shallowMichael Goulet-17/+0
2024-07-06Uplift push_outlives_componentsMichael Goulet-0/+7
2024-07-06Uplift PredicateEmittingRelation firstMichael Goulet-12/+2
2024-07-04Auto merge of #123781 - RalfJung:miri-fn-identity, r=oli-obkbors-2/+2
Miri function identity hack: account for possible inlining Having a non-lifetime generic is not the only reason a function can be duplicated. Another possibility is that the function may be eligible for cross-crate inlining. So also take into account the inlining attribute in this Miri hack for function pointer identity. That said, `cross_crate_inlinable` will still sometimes return true even for `inline(never)` functions: - when they are `DefKind::Ctor(..) | DefKind::Closure` -- I assume those cannot be `InlineAttr::Never` anyway? - when `cross_crate_inline_threshold == InliningThreshold::Always` so maybe this is still not quite the right criterion to use for function pointer identity.