| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
cache type sizes in type-size limit visitor
This is basically https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125507#issuecomment-2206813779 as lcnr can't open the PR now.
Locally it reduces the `itertools` regression by quite a bit, to "only +50%" compared to nightly (that includes overhead from the local lack of artifact post-processing, and is just a data point to compare to the 10-20x timings without the cache).
```console
Benchmark 1: cargo +stage1 build --release
Time (mean ± σ): 2.721 s ± 0.009 s [User: 2.446 s, System: 0.325 s]
Range (min … max): 2.710 s … 2.738 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: cargo +nightly build --release
Time (mean ± σ): 1.784 s ± 0.005 s [User: 1.540 s, System: 0.279 s]
Range (min … max): 1.778 s … 1.792 s 10 runs
Summary
cargo +nightly build --release ran
1.52 ± 0.01 times faster than cargo +stage1 build --release
```
On master, it's from 34s to the 2.7s above.
r? compiler-errors
|
|
|
|
Less magic number for corountine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add `as_lang_item` to `LanguageItems`, new trait solver
Add `as_lang_item` which turns `DefId` into a `TraitSolverLangItem` in the new trait solver, so we can turn the large chain of if statements in `assemble_builtin_impl_candidates` into a match instead.
r? lcnr
|
|
Re-implement a type-size based limit
r? lcnr
This PR reintroduces the type length limit added in #37789, which was accidentally made practically useless by the caching changes to `Ty::walk` in #72412, which caused the `walk` function to no longer walk over identical elements.
Hitting this length limit is not fatal unless we are in codegen -- so it shouldn't affect passes like the mir inliner which creates potentially very large types (which we observed, for example, when the new trait solver compiles `itertools` in `--release` mode).
This also increases the type length limit from `1048576 == 2 ** 20` to `2 ** 24`, which covers all of the code that can be reached with craterbot-check. Individual crates can increase the length limit further if desired.
Perf regression is mild and I think we should accept it -- reinstating this limit is important for the new trait solver and to make sure we don't accidentally hit more type-size related regressions in the future.
Fixes #125460
|
|
|
|
fn_trait_kind_from_def_id
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chore: remove duplicate words
remove duplicate words in comments to improve readability.
|
|
Make `FloatTy` checks exhaustive in pretty print
This should prevent the default fallback if we add more float types in the future.
|
|
Uplift fast rejection to new solver
Self explanatory.
r? lcnr
|
|
|
|
This should prevent the default fallback if we add more float types in the
future.
|
|
|
|
Implement new effects desugaring
cc `@rust-lang/project-const-traits.` Will write down notes once I have finished.
* [x] See if we want `T: Tr` to desugar into `T: Tr, T::Effects: Compat<true>`
* [x] Fix ICEs on `type Assoc: ~const Tr` and `type Assoc<T: ~const Tr>`
* [ ] add types and traits to minicore test
* [ ] update rustc-dev-guide
Fixes #119717
Fixes #123664
Fixes #124857
Fixes #126148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove more `PtrToPtr` casts in GVN
This addresses two things I noticed in MIR:
1. `NonNull::<T>::eq` does `(a as *mut T) == (b as *mut T)`, but it could just compare the `*const T`s, so this removes `PtrToPtr` casts that are on both sides of a pointer comparison, so long as they're not fat-to-thin casts.
2. `NonNull::<T>::addr` does `transmute::<_, usize>(p as *const ())`, but so long as `T: Thin` that cast doesn't do anything, and thus we can directly transmute the `*const T` instead.
r? mir-opt
|
|
transmute size check: properly account for alignment
Fixes another place where ZST alignment was ignored when checking whether something is a newtype. I wonder how many more of these there are...
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101084
|
|
|
|
AliasTy/AliasTerm/TraitRef/projection
|
|
This section of code depends on `rustc_apfloat` rather than our internal
types, so this is one potential ICE that we should be able to melt now.
This also fixes some missing range and match handling in `rustc_middle`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126380 (Add std Xtensa targets support)
- #126636 (Resolve Clippy `f16` and `f128` `unimplemented!`/`FIXME`s )
- #126659 (More status-quo tests for the `#[coverage(..)]` attribute)
- #126711 (Make Option::as_[mut_]slice const)
- #126717 (Clean up some comments near `use` declarations)
- #126719 (Fix assertion failure for some `Expect` diagnostics.)
- #126730 (Add opaque type corner case test)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Clean up some comments near `use` declarations
#125443 will reformat all `use` declarations in the repository. There are a few edge cases involving comments on `use` declarations that require care. This PR cleans up some clumsy comment cases, taking us a step closer to #125443 being able to merge.
r? ``@lqd``
|
|
Stabilise `c_unwind`
Fix #74990
Fix #115285 (that's also where FCP is happening)
Marking as draft PR for now due to `compiler_builtins` issues
r? `@Amanieu`
|
|
Trying to address an incremental compilation issues
This pull request contains two independent changes, one makes it so when `try_force_from_dep_node` fails to recover a query - it marks the node as "red" instead of "green" and the second one makes Debug impl for `DepNode` less panicky if it encounters something from the previous compilation that doesn't map to anything in the current one.
I'm not 100% confident that this is the correct approach, but so far I managed to find a bunch of comments suggesting that some things are allowed to fail in a certain way and changes I made are allowing for those things to fail this way and it fixes all the small reproducers I managed to find.
Compilation panic this pull request avoids is caused by an automatically generated code on an associated type and it is not happening if something else marks it as outdated first (or close like that, but scenario is quite obscure).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/107226
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125367
|
|
Most modules have such a blank line, but some don't. Inserting the blank
line makes it clearer that the `//!` comments are describing the entire
module, rather than the `use` declaration(s) that immediately follows.
|
|
|
|
local_def_path_hash_to_def_id is used by Debug impl for DepNode and it
looks for DefPathHash inside the current compilation. During incremental
compilation we are going through nodes that belong to a previous
compilation and might not be present and a simple attempt to print such
node with tracing::debug (try_mark_parent_green does it for example)
results in a otherwise avoidable panic
Panic was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82183,
specifically in 2b60338ee9, with a comment "We only use this mapping for
cases where we know that it must succeed.", but I'm not sure if this
property holds when we traverse nodes from the old compilation in order
to figure out if they are valid or not
|
|
Make pretty printing for `f16` and `f128` consistent
Currently the docs show e.g.
{transmute(0xfffeffffffffffffffffffffffffffff): f128}
for f128 constants. This should fix that to instead use apfloat for printing, as is done for `f32` and `f64`.
|
|
Make async drop code more consistent with regular drop code
Fixes #126573
Relates to #126482
r? ````@petrochenkov````
|
|
Currently the docs show e.g.
{transmute(0xfffeffffffffffffffffffffffffffff): f128}
for f128 constants. This should fix that to instead use apfloat for
printing, as is done for `f32` and `f64`.
|
|
Uplift next trait solver to `rustc_next_trait_solver`
🎉
There's so many FIXMEs! Sorry! Ideally this merges with the FIXMEs and we track and squash them over the near future.
Also, this still doesn't build on anything other than rustc. I still need to fix `feature = "nightly"` in `rustc_type_ir`, and remove and fix all the nightly feature usage in the new trait solver (notably: let-chains).
Also, sorry `@lcnr` I know you asked for me to separate the commit where we `mv rustc_trait_selection/solve/... rustc_next_trait_solver/solve/...`, but I had already done all the work by that point. Luckily, `git` understands the file moves so it should still be relatively reviewable.
If this is still very difficult to review, then I can do some rebasing magic to try to separate this out. Please let me know!
r? lcnr
|
|
This paves the way for tracking more state (e.g. error tainting) in the diagnostic context handle
|
|
|
|
|
