| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Make ErrorGuaranteed discoverable outside types, consts, and lifetimes
types like `PatKind` could contain `ErrorGuaranteed`, but not return them via `tainted_by_errors` or `error_reported` (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127687#discussion_r1679027883). Now this happens, but it's a bit fragile as you can see with the `TypeSuperVisitable for Ty` impl.
We will catch any problems around Ty, Region or Const at runtime with an assert, and everything using derives will not have such issues, as it will just invoke the `TypeVisitable for ErrorGuaranteed` impl
|
|
Fix and enforce `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` in compiler
In preparation for edition 2024, this PR previews the fallout of enabling the `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` lint in the compiler, since it's defaulting to warn in the new edition (#112038).
The major annoyance comes primarily from the `rustc_codegen_llvm` module, where there's a ton of unsafe calls. I tended to wrap individual calls to unsafe fns in `unsafe {}`, but there a handful of places I chose to just wrap several calls in an `unsafe {}` block just because it would've been excessive to wrap each call individually.
This doesn't enable the lint for the standard library, since I'm not totally certain what T-libs prefers w/ this lint.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add cache for `allocate_str`
Best effort cache for string allocation in const eval.
Fixes [rust-lang/miri#3470](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3470).
|
|
|
|
coverage: Restrict `ExpressionUsed` simplification to `Code` mappings
In the future, branch and MC/DC mappings might have expressions that don't correspond to any single point in the control-flow graph. That makes it trickier to keep track of which expressions should expect an `ExpressionUsed` node.
We therefore sidestep that complexity by only performing `ExpressionUsed` simplification for expressions associated directly with ordinary `Code` mappings.
(This simplification step is inherited from the original coverage implementation, which only supported `Code` mappings anyway, so there's no particular reason to extend it to other kinds of mappings unless we specifically choose to.)
Relevant to:
- #124154
- #126677
- #124278
```@rustbot``` label +A-code-coverage
|
|
Stop using the `gen` identifier in the compiler
In preparation for edition 2024, this PR previews the fallout of removing usages of `gen` since it's being reserved as a keyword.
There are two notable changes here:
1. Had to rename `fn gen(..)` in gen/kill analysis to `gen_`. Not certain there's a better name than that.
2. There are (false?[^1]) positives in `rustc_macros` when using synstructure, which uses `gen impl` to mark an implementation. We could suppress this in a one-off way, or perhaps just ignore `gen` in macros altogether, since if an identifier ends up in expanded code then it'll get properly denied anyways.
Not relevant to the compiler, but it's gonna be really annoying to change `rand`'s `gen` fn in the library and miri...
[^1]: I haven't looked at the synstructure proc macro code itself so I'm not certain if it'll start to fail when converted to ed2024 (or, e.g., when syn starts parsing `gen` as a kw).
|
|
In the future, branch and MC/DC mappings might have expressions that don't
correspond to any single point in the control-flow graph. That makes it
trickier to keep track of which expressions should expect an `ExpressionUsed`
node.
We therefore sidestep that complexity by only performing `ExpressionUsed`
simplification for expressions associated directly with ordinary `Code`
mappings.
|
|
find_field does not need to be a query.
The current implementation is quadratic in the number of nested fields.
r? `@davidtwco` as you reviewed https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115367
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gate the type length limit check behind a nightly flag
Effectively disables the type length limit by introducing a `-Zenforce-type-length-limit` which defaults to **`false`**, since making the length limit actually be enforced ended up having a worse fallout than expected. We still keep the code around, but the type length limit attr is now a noop (except for its usage in some diagnostics code?).
r? `@lcnr` -- up to you to decide what team consensus we need here since this reverses an FCP decision.
Reopens #125460 (if we decide to reopen it or keep it closed)
Effectively reverses the decision FCP'd in #125507
Closes #127346
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ignore allocation bytes in some mir-opt tests
This adds `rustc -Zdump-mir-exclude-alloc-bytes` to skip writing allocation bytes in MIR dumps, and applies it to tests that were failing on s390x due to its big-endian byte order.
Fixes #126261
|
|
|
|
generalize search graph to enable fuzzing
I do not believe it to be feasible to correctly implement the search graph without fuzzing. This PR enables this by requiring a fuzzer to only implement three new traits:
- `Cx`: implemented by all `I: Interner`
- `ProofTreeBuilder`: implemented by `struct ProofTreeBuilder<D>` for all `D: SolverDelegate`
- `Delegate`: implemented for a new `struct SearchGraphDelegate<D>` for all `D: SolverDelegate`
It also moves the evaluation cache implementation into `rustc_type_ir`, requiring `Interner` to provide methods to create and access arbitrary `WithDepNode<T>` and to provide mutable access to a given `GlobalCache`. It otherwise does not change the API surface for users of the shared library.
This change should not impact behavior in any way.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
|
|
fully move it into `rustc_type_ir` and make it
independent of `Interner`.
|
|
Remove extern "wasm" ABI
Remove the unstable `extern "wasm"` ABI (`wasm_abi` feature tracked in #83788).
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513#issuecomment-2220410679 and following, this ABI is a failed experiment that did not end up being used for anything. Keeping support for this ABI in LLVM 19 would require us to switch wasm targets to the `experimental-mv` ABI, which we do not want to do.
It should be noted that `Abi::Wasm` was internally used for two things: The `-Z wasm-c-abi=legacy` ABI that is still used by default on some wasm targets, and the `extern "wasm"` ABI. Despite both being `Abi::Wasm` internally, they were not the same. An explicit `extern "wasm"` additionally enabled the `+multivalue` feature.
I've opted to remove `Abi::Wasm` in this patch entirely, instead of keeping it as an ABI with only internal usage. Both `-Z wasm-c-abi` variants are now treated as part of the normal C ABI, just with different different treatment in
adjust_for_foreign_abi.
|
|
Remove the unstable `extern "wasm"` ABI (`wasm_abi` feature tracked
in #83788).
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513#issuecomment-2220410679
and following, this ABI is a failed experiment that did not end
up being used for anything. Keeping support for this ABI in LLVM 19
would require us to switch wasm targets to the `experimental-mv`
ABI, which we do not want to do.
It should be noted that `Abi::Wasm` was internally used for two
things: The `-Z wasm-c-abi=legacy` ABI that is still used by
default on some wasm targets, and the `extern "wasm"` ABI. Despite
both being `Abi::Wasm` internally, they were not the same. An
explicit `extern "wasm"` additionally enabled the `+multivalue`
feature.
I've opted to remove `Abi::Wasm` in this patch entirely, instead
of keeping it as an ABI with only internal usage. Both
`-Z wasm-c-abi` variants are now treated as part of the normal
C ABI, just with different different treatment in
adjust_for_foreign_abi.
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Avoid "no field" error and ICE on recovered ADT variant
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126744
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/126344, a more general fix compared with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127426
r? `@oli-obk`
From `@compiler-errors` 's comment https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127502#discussion_r1669538204
Seems most of the ADTs don't have taint, so maybe it's not proper to change `TyCtxt::type_of` query.
|
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
Add `constness` to `TraitDef`
Second attempt at fixing the regression @ https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120639#issuecomment-2198373716
r? project-const-traits
|
|
r=compiler-errors,oli-obk,lnicola
Make casts of pointers to trait objects stricter
This is an attempt to `fix` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120222 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120217.
This is done by adding restrictions on casting pointers to trait objects.
Before this PR the rules were as follows:
> When casting `*const X<dyn A>` -> `*const Y<dyn B>`, principal traits in `A` and `B` must refer to the same trait definition (or no trait).
With this PR the rules are changed to
> When casting `*const X<dyn Src>` -> `*const Y<dyn Dst>`
> - if `Dst` has a principal trait `DstP`,
> - `Src` must have a principal trait `SrcP`
> - `dyn SrcP` and `dyn DstP` must be the same type (modulo the trait object lifetime, `dyn T+'a` -> `dyn T+'b` is allowed)
> - Auto traits in `Dst` must be a subset of auto traits in `Src`
> - Not adhering to this is currently a FCW (warn-by-default + `FutureReleaseErrorReportInDeps`), instead of an error
> - if `Src` has a principal trait `Dst` must as well
> - this restriction will be removed in a follow up PR
This ensures that
1. Principal trait's generic arguments match (no `*const dyn Tr<A>` -> `*const dyn Tr<B>` casts, which are a problem for [#120222](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120222))
2. Principal trait's lifetime arguments match (no `*const dyn Tr<'a>` -> `*const dyn Tr<'b>` casts, which are a problem for [#120217](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/120217))
3. No auto traits can be _added_ (this is a problem for arbitrary self types, see [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120248#discussion_r1463835350))
Some notes:
- We only care about the metadata/last field, so you can still cast `*const dyn T` to `*const WithHeader<dyn T>`, etc
- The lifetime of the trait object itself (`dyn A + 'lt`) is not checked, so you can still cast `*mut FnOnce() + '_` to `*mut FnOnce() + 'static`, etc
- This feels fishy, but I couldn't come up with a reason it must be checked
The diagnostics are currently not great, to say the least, but as far as I can tell this correctly fixes the issues.
cc `@oli-obk` `@compiler-errors` `@lcnr`
|
|
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126841 ([`macro_metavar_expr_concat`] Add support for literals)
- #126881 (Make `NEVER_TYPE_FALLBACK_FLOWING_INTO_UNSAFE` a deny-by-default lint in edition 2024)
- #126921 (Give VaList its own home)
- #127367 (Run alloc sync tests)
- #127431 (Use field ident spans directly instead of the full field span in diagnostics on local fields)
- #127437 (Uplift trait ref is knowable into `rustc_next_trait_solver`)
- #127439 (Uplift elaboration into `rustc_type_ir`)
- #127451 (Improve `run-make/output-type-permutations` code and improve `filename_not_in_denylist` API)
- #127452 (Fix intrinsic const parameter counting with `effects`)
- #127459 (rustdoc-json: add type/trait alias tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Uplift elaboration into `rustc_type_ir`
Allows us to deduplicate and consolidate elaboration (including these stupid elaboration duplicate fns i added for pretty printing like 3 years ago) so I'm pretty hyped about this change :3
r? lcnr
|
|
Uplift trait ref is knowable into `rustc_next_trait_solver`
Self-explanatory. Eliminates one more delegate method.
r? lcnr cc ``@fmease``
|
|
Support tail calls in mir via `TerminatorKind::TailCall`
This is one of the interesting bits in tail call implementation — MIR support.
This adds a new `TerminatorKind` which represents a tail call:
```rust
TailCall {
func: Operand<'tcx>,
args: Vec<Operand<'tcx>>,
fn_span: Span,
},
```
*Structurally* this is very similar to a normal `Call` but is missing a few fields:
- `destination` — tail calls don't write to destination, instead they pass caller's destination to the callee (such that eventual `return` will write to the caller of the function that used tail call)
- `target` — similarly to `destination` tail calls pass the caller's return address to the callee, so there is nothing to do
- `unwind` — I _think_ this is applicable too, although it's a bit confusing
- `call_source` — `become` forbids operators and is not created as a lowering of something else; tail calls always come from HIR (at least for now)
It might be helpful to read the interpreter implementation to understand what `TailCall` means exactly, although I've tried documenting it too.
-----
There are a few `FIXME`-questions still left, ideally we'd be able to answer them during review ':)
-----
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@scottmcm` `@DrMeepster` `@JakobDegen`
|
|
Cache hir_owner_nodes in ParentHirIterator.
Lint level computation may traverse deep HIR trees using that iterator. This calls `hir_owner_nodes` many times for the same HIR owner, which is wasterful.
This PR caches the value to allow a more efficient iteration scheme.
r? ghost for perf
|
|
- r-l/r 126784
- r-l/r 127113
- r-l/miri 3562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compiler-errors:uplift-predicate-emitting-relation, r=lcnr
uplift `PredicateEmittingRelation`
Small follow-up to #127333
r? lcnr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
coverage: Rename `mir::coverage::BranchInfo` to `CoverageInfoHi`
This opens the door to collecting and storing coverage information that is unrelated to branch coverage or MC/DC, during MIR building.
There is no change to the output of coverage instrumentation, but one deliberate change is that functions now *always* have an attached `CoverageInfoHi` (if coverage is enabled and they are eligible), even if they didn't collect any interesting branch information.
---
`@rustbot` label +A-code-coverage
|
|
DependencyList: removed outdated comment
Comment was outdated. Didn't updated description, as `Linkage` enum have descriptive names.
Also added fixme about moving this file to rustc_metadata.
|
|
|
|
This opens the door to collecting and storing coverage information that is
unrelated to branch coverage or MC/DC.
|
|
Miri function identity hack: account for possible inlining
Having a non-lifetime generic is not the only reason a function can be duplicated. Another possibility is that the function may be eligible for cross-crate inlining. So also take into account the inlining attribute in this Miri hack for function pointer identity.
That said, `cross_crate_inlinable` will still sometimes return true even for `inline(never)` functions:
- when they are `DefKind::Ctor(..) | DefKind::Closure` -- I assume those cannot be `InlineAttr::Never` anyway?
- when `cross_crate_inline_threshold == InliningThreshold::Always`
so maybe this is still not quite the right criterion to use for function pointer identity.
|
|
cache type sizes in type-size limit visitor
This is basically https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125507#issuecomment-2206813779 as lcnr can't open the PR now.
Locally it reduces the `itertools` regression by quite a bit, to "only +50%" compared to nightly (that includes overhead from the local lack of artifact post-processing, and is just a data point to compare to the 10-20x timings without the cache).
```console
Benchmark 1: cargo +stage1 build --release
Time (mean ± σ): 2.721 s ± 0.009 s [User: 2.446 s, System: 0.325 s]
Range (min … max): 2.710 s … 2.738 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: cargo +nightly build --release
Time (mean ± σ): 1.784 s ± 0.005 s [User: 1.540 s, System: 0.279 s]
Range (min … max): 1.778 s … 1.792 s 10 runs
Summary
cargo +nightly build --release ran
1.52 ± 0.01 times faster than cargo +stage1 build --release
```
On master, it's from 34s to the 2.7s above.
r? compiler-errors
|
