| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
skip_binder in mir subst methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Populate effective visibilities in 'rustc_privacy'
Next part of RFC https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48054.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
More robust debug assertions for `Instance::resolve` on built-in traits with non-standard trait items
In #111264, a user added a new item to the `Future` trait, but the code in [`resolve_associated_item`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_ty_utils/instance/fn.resolve_associated_item.html) implicitly assumes that the `Future` trait is defined with only one method (`Future::poll`) and treats the generator body as the implementation of that method.
This PR adds some debug assertions to make sure that that new methods defined on `Future`/`Generator`/etc. don't accidentally resolve to the wrong item when they are added, and adds a helpful comment guiding a compiler dev (or curious `#![no_core]` user) to what must be done to support adding new associated items to these built-in implementations.
I am open to discuss whether a test should be added, but I chose against it because I opted to make these `bug!()`s instead of, e.g., diagnostics or fatal errors. Arguably it doesn't need a test because it's not a bug that can be triggered by an end user, and internal-facing misuses of core kind of touch on rust-lang/compiler-team#620 -- however, I think the assertions I added in this PR are still a very useful way to make sure this bug doesn't waste debugging resources down the line.
Fixes #111264
|
|
Use fulfillment to check `Drop` impl compatibility
Use an `ObligationCtxt` to ensure that a `Drop` impl does not have stricter requirements than the ADT that it's implemented for, rather than using a `SimpleEqRelation` to (more or less) syntactically equate predicates on an ADT with predicates on an impl.
r? types
### Some background
The old code reads:
```rust
// An earlier version of this code attempted to do this checking
// via the traits::fulfill machinery. However, it ran into trouble
// since the fulfill machinery merely turns outlives-predicates
// 'a:'b and T:'b into region inference constraints. It is simpler
// just to look for all the predicates directly.
```
I'm not sure what this means, but perhaps in the 8 years since that this comment was written (cc #23638) it's gotten easier to process region constraints after doing fulfillment? I don't know how this logic differs from anything we do in the `compare_impl_item` module. Ironically, later on it says:
```rust
// However, it may be more efficient in the future to batch
// the analysis together via the fulfill (see comment above regarding
// the usage of the fulfill machinery), rather than the
// repeated `.iter().any(..)` calls.
```
Also:
* Removes `SimpleEqRelation` which was far too syntactical in its relation.
* Fixes #110557
|
|
custom items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Such implementations are usually mistakes and are not used in the
compiler or standard library (after this commit) so forbid them with
`min_specialization`.
|
|
|
|
Still more encoder cleanups
r? ``@cjgillot``
|
|
|
|
check array type of repeat exprs is wf
Fixes #111091
Also makes sure that we actually renumber regions in the length of repeat exprs which we previously weren't doing and would cause ICEs in `adt_const_params` + `generic_const_exprs` from attempting to prove the wf goals when the length was an unevaluated constant with `'erased` in the `ty` field of `Const`
The duplicate errors are caused by the fact that `const_arg_to_const`/`array_len_to_const` in `FnCtxt` adds a `WellFormed` goal for the created `Const` which is also checked by the added `WellFormed(array_ty)`. I don't want to change this to just emit a `T: Sized` goal for the element type since that would ignore `ConstArgHasType` wf requirements and generally uncomfortable with the idea of trying to sync up `wf::obligations` for arrays and the code in hir typeck for repeat exprs.
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Make PlaceMention a non-mutating use.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110781
r? `@JakobDegen`
I don't agree with your statement in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110781#issuecomment-1520841434. I suggest that we start fixing `PlaceContext` to be accurate enough for optimizations to use it. This structure is very convenient to use in visitors, and we perhaps have an opportunity to make it less of a footgun.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #110859 (Explicitly reject negative and reservation drop impls)
- #111020 (Validate resolution for SelfCtor too.)
- #111024 (Use the full Fingerprint when stringifying Svh)
- #111027 (Remove `allow(rustc::potential_query_instability)` for `builtin_macros`)
- #111039 (Encode def span for foreign return-position `impl Trait` in trait)
- #111070 (Don't suffix `RibKind` variants)
- #111094 (Add needs-unwind annotations to tests that need stack unwinding)
- #111103 (correctly recurse when expanding anon consts)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
correctly recurse when expanding anon consts
recursing with `super_fold_with` is wrong in case `bac` is itself normalizable, the test that was supposed to test for this being wrong did not actually test for this in reality because of the usage of `{ (N) }` instead of `{{ N }}`. The former resulting in a simple `ConstKind::Param` instead of `ConstKind::Unevaluated`. Tbh generally this test seems very brittle and it will be a lot easier to test once we have normalization of assoc consts since then we can just test that `T::ASSOC` normalizes to some `U::OTHER` which normalizes to some third thing.
r? `@compiler-errors`
|
|
Explicitly reject negative and reservation drop impls
Fixes #110858
It doesn't really make sense for a type to have a `!Drop` impl. Or at least, I don't want us to implicitly assign a meaning to it by the way the compiler *currently* handles it (incompletely), and rather I would like to see a PR (or an RFC...) assign a meaning to `!Drop` if we actually wanted one for it.
|
|
Replace `tcx.mk_trait_ref` with `TraitRef::new`
First step in implementing https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/616
r? `@lcnr`
|
|
In #110927 the encode/decode methods for `i8`, `char`, `bool`, and `str`
were made inherent. This commit removes some unnecessary implementations
of these methods that were missed in that PR.
|
|
So they match the order in the `Decoder` trait.
|
|
rustc_middle: Fix `opt_item_ident` for non-local def ids
Noticed while working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110855.
|
|
Add cross-language LLVM CFI support to the Rust compiler
This PR adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI) support to the Rust compiler by adding the `-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang `-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and -Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e., non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
Thank you again, ``@bjorn3,`` ``@nikic,`` ``@samitolvanen,`` and the Rust community for all the help!
|
|
This commit adds cross-language LLVM Control Flow Integrity (CFI)
support to the Rust compiler by adding the
`-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers` option to be used with Clang
`-fsanitize-cfi-icall-normalize-integers` for normalizing integer types
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D139395).
It provides forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust
-compiled code share the same virtual address space). For more
information about LLVM CFI and cross-language LLVM CFI support for the
Rust compiler, see design document in the tracking issue #89653.
Cross-language LLVM CFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=cfi and
-Zsanitizer-cfi-normalize-integers, and requires proper (i.e.,
non-rustc) LTO (i.e., -Clinker-plugin-lto).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avoid ICEing miri on layout query cycles
Miri has special logic for catching panics during interpretation. Raising a fatal error in rustc uses unwinding to abort compilation. Thus miri ends up catching that fatal error and thinks it saw an ICE. While we should probably change that to ignore `Fatal` payloads, I think it's also neat to continue compilation after a layout query cycle 😆
Query cycles now (in addition to reporting an error just like before), return `Err(Cycle)` instead of raising a fatal error. This allows the interpreter to wind down via the regular error paths.
r? `@RalfJung` for a first round, feel free to reroll for the compiler team once the miri side looks good
|
|
interpret: fail more gracefully on uninit unsized locals
r? `@oli-obk`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68538
|
|
resolve: One more attempt to simplify `module_children`
If the next step is performed and `fn module_children_local` is merged with the `module_children` query, then it causes perf regressions, regardless of whether query result feeding is [used](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=43a78029b4f4d92978b8fde0a677ea300b113c41&end=2eb5bcc5068b9d92f74bcb1797da664865d6981d&stat=instructions:u) or [not](https://perf.rust-lang.org/compare.html?start=2fce2290865f012391b8f3e581c3852a248031fa&end=2a33d6cd99481d1712037a79e7d66a8aefadbf72&stat=instructions:u).
|
|
Implement negative bounds for internal testing purposes
Implements partial support the `!` negative polarity on trait bounds. This is incomplete, but should allow us to at least be able to play with the feature.
Not even gonna consider them as a public-facing feature, but I'm implementing them because would've been nice to have in UI tests, for example in #110671.
|
|
|
|
Currently a `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` can be created from any type that
impls `Into<String>`. That includes `&str`, `String`, and `Cow<'static,
str>`, which are reasonable. It also includes `&String`, which is pretty
weird, and results in many places making unnecessary allocations for
patterns like this:
```
self.fatal(&format!(...))
```
This creates a string with `format!`, takes a reference, passes the
reference to `fatal`, which does an `into()`, which clones the
reference, doing a second allocation. Two allocations for a single
string, bleh.
This commit changes the `From` impls so that you can only create a
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` from `&str`, `String`, or `Cow<'static,
str>`. This requires changing all the places that currently create one
from a `&String`. Most of these are of the `&format!(...)` form
described above; each one removes an unnecessary static `&`, plus an
allocation when executed. There are also a few places where the existing
use of `&String` was more reasonable; these now just use `clone()` at
the call site.
As well as making the code nicer and more efficient, this is a step
towards possibly using `Cow<'static, str>` in
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}`. That would require changing
the `From<&'a str>` impls to `From<&'static str>`, which is doable, but
I'm not yet sure if it's worthwhile.
|
|
|
|
Make some simple queries no longer cache on disk
I don't think we need to cache queries with really simple local providers, like loading hir and accessing an attr
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only cache typeck results if it's the typeck root
context: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/241847-t-compiler.2Fwg-incr-comp/topic/incr_comp_query_cache_promotion.20taking.20forever
Basically, typeck children just copy the typeck results of their typeck root item, so caching their results means copying the same typeck results for each child item.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
Tweak await span to not contain dot
Fixes a discrepancy between method calls and await expressions where the latter are desugared to have a span that *contains* the dot (i.e. `.await`) but method call identifiers don't contain the dot. This leads to weird suggestions suggestions in borrowck -- see linked issue.
Fixes #110761
This mostly touches a bunch of tests to tighten their `await` span.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
