about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_middle
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2023-08-08Auto merge of #114602 - compiler-errors:rpit-outlives-sadness, r=oli-obkbors-0/+78
Map RPIT duplicated lifetimes back to fn captured lifetimes Use the [`lifetime_mapping`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_hir/hir/struct.OpaqueTy.html#structfield.lifetime_mapping) to map an RPIT's captured lifetimes back to the early- or late-bound lifetimes from its parent function. We may be going thru several layers of mapping, since opaques can be nested, so we introduce `TyCtxt::map_rpit_lifetime_to_fn_lifetime` to loop through several opaques worth of mapping, and handle turning it into a `ty::Region` as well. We can then use this instead of the identity substs for RPITs in `check_opaque_meets_bounds` to address #114285. We can then also use `map_rpit_lifetime_to_fn_lifetime` to properly install bidirectional-outlives predicates for both RPITs and RPITITs. This addresses #114601. I based this on #114574, but I don't actually know how much of that PR we still need, so some code may be redundant now... :shrug: --- Fixes #114597 Fixes #114579 Fixes #114285 Also fixes #114601, since it turns out we had other bugs with RPITITs and their duplicated lifetime params :sweat_smile:. Supersedes #114574 r? `@oli-obk`
2023-08-08Simplify via map_rpit_lifetime_to_fn_lifetimeMichael Goulet-1/+10
2023-08-08Install bidirectional outlives predicates for RPITITs (and RPITs) correctlyMichael Goulet-0/+69
2023-08-08interpret: remove incomplete protection against invalid where clausesRalf Jung-2/+0
2023-08-08Rollup merge of #114566 - fmease:type-alias-laziness-is-crate-specific, ↵Matthias Krüger-13/+15
r=oli-obk Store the laziness of type aliases in their `DefKind` Previously, we would treat paths referring to type aliases as *lazy* type aliases if the current crate had lazy type aliases enabled independently of whether the crate which the alias was defined in had the feature enabled or not. With this PR, the laziness of a type alias depends on the crate it is defined in. This generally makes more sense to me especially if / once lazy type aliases become the default in a new edition and we need to think about *edition interoperability*: Consider the hypothetical case where the dependency crate has an older edition (and thus eager type aliases), it exports a type alias with bounds & a where-clause (which are void but technically valid), the dependent crate has the latest edition (and thus lazy type aliases) and it uses that type alias. Arguably, the bounds should *not* be checked since at any time, the dependency crate should be allowed to change the bounds at will with a *non*-major version bump & without negatively affecting downstream crates. As for the reverse case (dependency: lazy type aliases, dependent: eager type aliases), I guess it rules out anything from slight confusion to mild annoyance from upstream crate authors that would be caused by the compiler ignoring the bounds of their type aliases in downstream crates with older editions. --- This fixes #114468 since before, my assumption that the type alias associated with a given weak projection was lazy (and therefore had its variances computed) did not necessarily hold in cross-crate scenarios (which [I kinda had a hunch about](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114253#discussion_r1278608099)) as outlined above. Now it does hold. `@rustbot` label F-lazy_type_alias r? `@oli-obk`
2023-08-07Store the laziness of type aliases in the DefKindLeón Orell Valerian Liehr-13/+15
2023-08-07Migrate a trait selection error to use diagnostic translationDeadbeef-7/+18
2023-08-06Auto merge of #114553 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-5yddunv, r=matthiaskrgrbors-11/+17
Rollup of 5 pull requests Successful merges: - #114466 (Add Allocation to SMIR) - #114505 (Add documentation to has_deref) - #114519 (use offset_of! to calculate dirent64 field offsets) - #114537 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format) - #114539 (linkchecker: Remove unneeded FIXME about intra-doc links) Failed merges: - #114485 (Add trait decls to SMIR) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2023-08-06Rollup merge of #114505 - ouz-a:cleanup_mir, r=RalfJungMatthias Krüger-11/+17
Add documentation to has_deref Documentation of `has_deref` needed some polish to be more clear about where it should be used and what's it's purpose. cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114401 r? `@RalfJung`
2023-08-06cleanup misinformation regarding has_derefouz-a-11/+17
2023-08-06lower impl const to bind to host effect paramDeadbeef-2/+7
2023-08-06Do not mark shallow_lint_levels_on as eval_always.Camille GILLOT-1/+0
2023-08-05parent_module_from_def_id does not need to be a query.Camille GILLOT-21/+15
2023-08-05Auto merge of #113734 - cjgillot:no-crate-lint, r=petrochenkovbors-0/+5
Convert builtin "global" late lints to run per module The compiler currently has 4 non-incremental lints: 1. `clashing_extern_declarations`; 2. `missing_debug_implementations`; 3. ~`unnameable_test_items`;~ changed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114414 4. `missing_docs`. Non-incremental lints get reexecuted for each compilation, which is slow. Moreover, those lints are allow-by-default, so run for nothing most of the time. This PR attempts to make them more incremental-friendly. `clashing_extern_declarations` is moved to a standalone query. `missing_debug_implementation` can use `non_blanket_impls_for_ty` instead of recomputing it. `missing_docs` is harder as it needs to track if there is a `doc(hidden)` module surrounding. I hack around this using the lint level engine. That's easy to implement and allows to re-enable the lint for a re-exported module, while a more proper solution would reuse the same device as `unnameable_test_items`.
2023-08-04Rollup merge of #114287 - lcnr:overflow, r=compiler-errorsMichael Goulet-2/+115
update overflow handling in the new trait solver implements https://hackmd.io/QY0dfEOgSNWwU4oiGnVRLw?view. I want to clean up this doc and add it to the rustc-dev-guide, but I think this PR is ready for merge as is, even without the dev-guide entry. r? `@compiler-errors`
2023-08-04Querify clashing_extern_declarations lint.Camille GILLOT-0/+5
2023-08-04Auto merge of #114036 - compiler-errors:upcast-to-fewer-assocs, r=lcnrbors-8/+15
Rework upcasting confirmation to support upcasting to fewer projections in target bounds This PR implements a modified trait upcasting algorithm that is resilient to changes in the number of associated types in the bounds of the source and target trait objects. It does this by equating each bound of the target trait ref individually against the bounds of the source trait ref, rather than doing them all together by constructing a new trait object. #### The new way we do trait upcasting confirmation 1. Equate the target trait object's principal trait ref with one of the supertraits of the source trait object's principal. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdcab310b2a57a4e9cc0b2629abd27afda49cd80/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs#L2509-L2525 2. Make sure that every auto trait in the *target* trait object is present in the source trait ref's bounds. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdcab310b2a57a4e9cc0b2629abd27afda49cd80/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs#L2559-L2562 3. For each projection in the *target* trait object, make sure there is exactly one projection that equates with it in the source trait ref's bound. If there is more than one, bail with ambiguity. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fdcab310b2a57a4e9cc0b2629abd27afda49cd80/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs#L2526-L2557 * Since there may be more than one that applies, we probe first to check that there is exactly one, then we equate it outside of a probe once we know that it's unique. 4. Make sure the lifetime of the source trait object outlives the lifetime of the target. <details> <summary>Meanwhile, this is how we used to do upcasting:</summary> 1. For each supertrait of the source trait object, take that supertrait, append the source object's projection bounds, and the *target* trait object's auto trait bounds, and make this into a new object type: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d12c6e947ceacf3b22c154caf9532b390d8dc88a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs#L915-L929 2. Then equate it with the target trait object: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d12c6e947ceacf3b22c154caf9532b390d8dc88a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs#L936 This will be a type mismatch if the target trait object has fewer projection bounds, since we compare the bounds structurally in relate: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/d12c6e947ceacf3b22c154caf9532b390d8dc88a/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/relate.rs#L696-L698 </details> Fixes #114035 Also fixes #114113, because I added a normalize call in the old solver. r? types
2023-08-04Rollup merge of #114355 - compiler-errors:resolve_vars_early, r=lcnrMatthias Krüger-7/+3
resolve before canonicalization in new solver, ICE if unresolved Fold the values with a resolver before canonicalization instead of making it happen within canonicalization. This allows us to filter trivial region constraints from the external constraints. r? ``@lcnr``
2023-08-04Rollup merge of #114253 - fmease:compute-variances-for-lazy-ty-aliases, ↵Matthias Krüger-1/+1
r=oli-obk Compute variances for lazy type aliases Fixes #114221. CC ``@oli-obk`` r? types
2023-08-04Rollup merge of #114022 - oli-obk:tait_ice_alias_field_projection, r=cjgillotMatthias Krüger-0/+6
Perform OpaqueCast field projection on HIR, too. fixes #105819 This is necessary for closure captures in 2021 edition, as they capture individual fields, not the full mentioned variables. So it may try to capture a field of an opaque (because the hidden type is known to be something with a field). See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99806 for when and why we added OpaqueCast to MIR.
2023-08-03Auto merge of #108955 - Nilstrieb:dont-use-me-pls, r=oli-obkbors-0/+1
Add `internal_features` lint Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/596 Also requires some more test blessing for codegen tests etc `@jyn514` had the idea of just `allow`ing the lint by default in the test suite. I'm not sure whether this is a good idea, but it's definitely one worth considering. Additional input encouraged.
2023-08-03Placeholder nitMichael Goulet-6/+2
2023-08-03resolve before canonicalization, ICE if unresolvedMichael Goulet-1/+1
2023-08-03Rework upcastingMichael Goulet-8/+15
2023-08-03Rollup merge of #114372 - RalfJung:const-pointer-as-int, r=oli-obkMatthias Krüger-60/+77
const validation: point at where we found a pointer but expected an integer Instead of validation just printing "unable to turn pointer into bytes", make this a regular validation error that says where in the value the bad pointer was found. Also distinguish "expected integer, got pointer" from "expected pointer, got partial pointer or mix of pointers". To avoid duplicating things too much I refactored the diagnostics for validity a bit, so that "got uninit, expected X" and "got pointer, expected X" can share the "X" part. Also all the errors emitted for validation are now grouped under `const_eval_validation` so that they are in a single group in the ftl file. r? `@oli-obk`
2023-08-03rewrite stack dependent overflow handlinglcnr-2/+102
2023-08-03Add `internal_features` lintNilstrieb-0/+1
It lints against features that are inteded to be internal to the compiler and standard library. Implements MCP #596. We allow `internal_features` in the standard library and compiler as those use many features and this _is_ the standard library from the "internal to the compiler and standard library" after all. Marking some features as internal wasn't exactly the most scientific approach, I just marked some mostly obvious features. While there is a categorization in the macro, it's not very well upheld (should probably be fixed in another PR). We always pass `-Ainternal_features` in the testsuite About 400 UI tests and several other tests use internal features. Instead of throwing the attribute on each one, just always allow them. There's nothing wrong with testing internal features^^
2023-08-03avoid more `ty::Binder:dummy`lcnr-0/+13
2023-08-03Rollup merge of #114363 - RalfJung:interpret-not-miri, r=jackh726Matthias Krüger-2/+2
avoid 'miri' when refering to the shared interpreter This is basically the rustc source code version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/1471.
2023-08-03Compute variances for lazy type aliasesLeón Orell Valerian Liehr-1/+1
2023-08-02Auto merge of #107254 - chenyukang:yukang/fix-107113-wrong-sugg-in-macro, ↵bors-1/+14
r=estebank Avoid wrong code suggesting for attribute macro Fixes #107113 r? `@estebank`
2023-08-02const validation: point at where we found a pointer but expected an integerRalf Jung-60/+77
2023-08-02Remove constness from `TraitPredicate`Deadbeef-89/+6
2023-08-02avoid 'miri' when refering to the shared interpreterRalf Jung-2/+2
2023-08-02Rollup merge of #114079 - compiler-errors:closure-upvars, r=oli-obkNilstrieb-19/+13
Use `upvar_tys` in more places, make it return a list Just a cleanup that fell out of a PR that I was gonna write, but that PR kinda got stuck.
2023-08-02Replace old private-in-public diagnostic with type privacy lintsBryanskiy-3/+0
2023-08-02Auto merge of #114333 - RalfJung:dangling-ptr-offset, r=oli-obkbors-2/+2
Miri: fix error on dangling pointer inbounds offset We used to claim that the pointer was "dereferenced", but that is just not true. Can be reviewed commit-by-commit. The first commit is an unrelated rename that didn't seem worth splitting into its own PR. r? `@oli-obk`
2023-08-02fix RedundantLocals clippy caused by async and awaityukang-0/+9
2023-08-02Fix #107113, avoid suggest for macro attributesyukang-1/+5
2023-08-02Rollup merge of #114314 - compiler-errors:sized-crit, r=lcnrMatthias Krüger-13/+5
Tweaks to `adt_sized_constraint` fixes a comment, but also some other nits. r? lcnr
2023-08-02Rollup merge of #114301 - ↵Matthias Krüger-28/+1
compiler-errors:dont-error-on-missing-region-outlives, r=spastorino Don't check unnecessarily that impl trait is RPIT We have this random `return_type_impl_trait` function to detect if a function returns an RPIT which is used in outlives suggestions, but removing it doesn't actually change any diagnostics. Let's just remove it. Also, suppress a spurious outlives error from a ReError. Fixes #114274
2023-08-01Use upvar_tys in more places, make it a listMichael Goulet-19/+13
2023-08-01Fix a commentMichael Goulet-10/+2
2023-08-01Convert adt_sized_constraint to early-binder, use listMichael Goulet-3/+3
2023-08-01properly track why we checked whether a pointer is in-boundsRalf Jung-2/+2
also simplify the in-bounds checking in Miri's borrow trackers
2023-08-01Make coverage counter IDs count up from 0, not 1Zalathar-14/+14
Operand types are now tracked explicitly, so there is no need to reserve ID 0 for the special always-zero counter. As part of the renumbering, this change fixes an off-by-one error in the way counters were counted by the `coverageinfo` query. As a result, functions should now have exactly the number of counters they actually need, instead of always having an extra counter that is never used.
2023-08-01Make coverage expression IDs count up from 0, not down from `u32::MAX`Zalathar-13/+16
Operand types are now tracked explicitly, so there is no need for expression IDs to avoid counter IDs by descending from `u32::MAX`. Instead they can just count up from 0, and can be used directly as indices when necessary.
2023-08-01Replace `ExpressionOperandId` with enum `Operand`Zalathar-49/+26
Because the three kinds of operand are now distinguished explicitly, we no longer need fiddly code to disambiguate counter IDs and expression IDs based on the total number of counters/expressions in a function. This does increase the size of operands from 4 bytes to 8 bytes, but that shouldn't be a big deal since they are mostly stored inside boxed structures, and the current coverage code is not particularly size-optimized anyway.
2023-08-01Add some line comments to enum `CoverageKind`Zalathar-0/+4
The actual motivation here is to prevent `rustfmt` from suddenly reformatting these enum variants onto a single line, when they become slightly shorter in the future. But there's no harm in adding some helpful documentation at the same time.
2023-07-31Don't check unnecessarily that impl trait is RPITMichael Goulet-28/+1