| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
CTFE/Miri engine Pointer type overhaul
This fixes the long-standing problem that we are using `Scalar` as a type to represent pointers that might be integer values (since they point to a ZST). The main problem is that with int-to-ptr casts, there are multiple ways to represent the same pointer as a `Scalar` and it is unclear if "normalization" (i.e., the cast) already happened or not. This leads to ugly methods like `force_mplace_ptr` and `force_op_ptr`.
Another problem this solves is that in Miri, it would make a lot more sense to have the `Pointer::offset` field represent the full absolute address (instead of being relative to the `AllocId`). This means we can do ptr-to-int casts without access to any machine state, and it means that the overflow checks on pointer arithmetic are (finally!) accurate.
To solve this, the `Pointer` type is made entirely parametric over the provenance, so that we can use `Pointer<AllocId>` inside `Scalar` but use `Pointer<Option<AllocId>>` when accessing memory (where `None` represents the case that we could not figure out an `AllocId`; in that case the `offset` is an absolute address). Moreover, the `Provenance` trait determines if a pointer with a given provenance can be cast to an integer by simply dropping the provenance.
I hope this can be read commit-by-commit, but the first commit does the bulk of the work. It introduces some FIXMEs that are resolved later.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/841
Miri PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1851
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
I wish the derive macro would support adding extra where clauses...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
different meanings there)
|
|
|
|
Move assert_matches to an inner module
Fixes #82913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scalar methods
|
|
infallible
This resolves all the problems we had around "normalizing" the representation of a Scalar in case it carries a Pointer value: we can just use Pointer if we want to have a value taht we are sure is already normalized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use #[track_caller] in const panic diagnostics.
This change stops const panic diagnostics from reporting inside #[track_caller] functions by skipping over them.
|
|
It was already used for the message. This also uses it for the spans
used for the error and backtrace.
|
|
- Add `:Sized` assertion in interpreter impl
- Use `Scalar::from_bool` instead of `ScalarInt: From<bool>`
- Remove unneeded comparison in intrinsic typeck
- Make this UB to call with undef, not just return undef in that case
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that this breaks Miri.
Closes #79601
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refactor vtable codegen
This refactor the codegen of vtables of miri interpreter, llvm, cranelift codegen backends.
This is preparation for the implementation of trait upcasting feature. cc #65991
Note that aside from code reorganization, there's an internal behavior change here that now InstanceDef::Virtual's index now include the three metadata slots, and now the first method is with index 3.
cc `@RalfJung` `@bjorn3`
|
|
representation.
|
|
`with_no_trimmed_paths`
|
|
|
|
They were "freeform const UB" error message, but could reach validation
and trigger ICEs there. We now catch them during validation to avoid
that.
|
|
Detect incorrect vtable alignment during const eval
This PR fixes #86132 by detecting invalid alignment values for trait objects in the interpreter, and emitting an error about this conversion failure, to avoid the ICE.
I've noticed that the error emitted at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/a50d72158e08e02cfc051b863017bdbd2c45b637/compiler/rustc_mir/src/interpret/traits.rs#L163-L166 doesn't seem to be present in the const-ub tests, so I've tried adding a test that triggers both of these cases: one for the invalid size, and another for the invalid alignment that #86132 tracks (I have found different magic values triggering different `Align::from_bytes` errors than the "power of 2" one, if need be).
However, when doing that, I *cannot* for the life of me figure out the correct incantation to make these 2 errors trigger with the "it is undefined behavior to use this value" message rather than the "any use of this value will cause an error" lint.
I've tried Oli's suggestions of different values, tuples and arrays, using the transparent wrapper trick from the other tests and I was only able to trigger the regular const-ub errors about the size of the vtable, or that the drop pointer was invalid. Maybe these "type validation failed" errors happen before this part of the interpreter is reached and there just needs some magic incorrect values to bypass them, I don't know.
Since this fixes an ICE, and if the constants are indeed used, these 2 tests will turn into a hard error, I thought I'd open the PR anyways. And if ```@RalfJung``` you know of a way I could manage that (if you think that these tests are worth checking that the `throw_ub_format!` does indeed create const-ub errors as we expect) I'd be grateful.
For that reason, r? ```@RalfJung``` and cc ```@oli-obk.```
|
|
also add tests for these 2 kinds of errors for size and alignment,
as the existing size check wasn't apparently tested
|
|
|
|
otherwise evaluation could change after further substitutions.
|
|
Show `::{{constructor}}` in std::any::type_name().
Fix #84666
Before:
```
[src/main.rs:6] type_name::<T>() = "playground::Velocity"
[src/main.rs:6] type_name::<T>() = "playground::Velocity"
```
After:
```
[src/main.rs:6] type_name::<T>() = "scratchpad::Velocity::{{constructor}}"
[src/main.rs:6] type_name::<T>() = "scratchpad::Velocity"
```
cc ``@scottmcm``
|
|
|
|
Also remove original_crate_name, which had the exact same implementation
|
|
|
|
Also remove original_crate_name, which had the exact same implementation
|
|
const-eval: disallow unwinding across functions that `!fn_can_unwind()`
Following https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1776#discussion_r633074343, so r? `@RalfJung`
This PR turns `unwind` in `StackPopCleanup::Goto` into a new enum `StackPopUnwind`, with a `NotAllowed` variant to indicate that unwinding is not allowed. This variant is chosen based on `rustc_middle::ty::layout::fn_can_unwind()` in `eval_fn_call()` when pushing the frame. A check is added in `unwind_to_block()` to report UB if unwinding happens across a `StackPopUnwind::NotAllowed` frame.
Tested with Miri `HEAD` with [minor changes](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/compare/HEAD..9cf3c7f0d86325a586fbcbf2acdc9232b861f1d8) and the rust-lang/miri#1776 branch with [these changes](https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/compare/d866c1c52f48bf562720383455b75c257bb1ad92..626638fbfe2fff34648dda29a34d59db498a6e52).
|
|
|
|
|
|
This removes a workaround for #24159, which has been fixed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
