summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2022-10-29Comment why normalization is needed for debug assertionsMichael Goulet-1/+6
2022-10-20Ensure enum cast movesGary Guo-2/+2
(cherry picked from commit de0396c7180f8e36165c3fefb9325b0ec1bfb5a2)
2022-10-05fix doc and dedup diverge_cleanupDing Xiang Fei-23/+4
(cherry picked from commit 565c35aa5c3c39626fcd332bafbd8936b70ed989)
2022-10-05apply suggestionX-1/+1
Co-authored-by: SafariMonkey <charlton.rodda@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit fb52dc7c3b7cc5170d5096931827a0169fd65eb5)
2022-10-05fix unwind drop glue for if-then scopesDing Xiang Fei-10/+46
(cherry picked from commit 4a2c1a12b662eb590dbe78f7f9d13c2f327d3bb6)
2022-10-04avoid duplicating StorageLive in let-elseDing Xiang Fei-9/+33
(cherry picked from commit 48c1c1d19043120e9e89b3186d5d5286142f3066)
2022-09-17Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplettDylan DPC-3/+3
Stabilize `let else` :tada: **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** :tada: Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156 closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue) FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585 ---------- ## Stabilization report ### Summary The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is followed by a diverging `else`: ```Rust fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) { let mut it = s.split(' '); let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else { panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'"); }; let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else { panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'"); }; (count, item) } assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs")); ``` ### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block. ### Test cases In chronological order as they were merged. Added by df9a2e0687895731e12f4a2651e8d70acd08872d (#87688): * [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`. Added by 5b95df4bdc330f34213812ad65cae86ced90d80c (#87688): * [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates. * [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates. * [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block. * [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires. * [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement. * [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges. * [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings. * [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it. Added by bf7c32a4477a76bfd18fdcd8f45a939cbed82d34 (#89965): * [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1cefbb8ed8408d2db3f9f7d5afddbf0 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests. Added by 856541963ce95ef4f7d4a81784bb5002ccf63c93 (#89974): * [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible. Added by 9b45713b6c1775f0103a1ebee6ab7c6d9b781a21: * [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern. Added by 61bcd8d3075471b3867428788c49f54fffe53f52 (#89841): * [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841. * [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. Added by 102b9125e1cefbb8ed8408d2db3f9f7d5afddbf0 (#89841): * [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed. Added by 2715c5f984fda7faa156d1c9cf91aa4934f0e00f (#89841): * Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite. Added by fec8a507a27de1b08a0b95592dc8ec93bf0a321a (#89841): * [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions. #### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09) Added by 76ea56667703ac06689ff1d6fba5d170fa7392a7 (#94211): * [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995. Added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da (#94208): * [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report. * Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report. Added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc (#94208): * [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report. Added by 5374688e1d8cbcff7d1d14bb34e38fe6fe7c233e (#98574): * [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else` Added by 6c529ded8674b89c46052da92399227c3b764c6a (#98574): * [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672 Added by 9b566401068cb8450912f6ab48f3d0e60f5cb482 (#99518): * [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951 * Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order) Added by baf9a7cb57120ec1411196214fd0d1c33fb18bf6 (#99518): * Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs` Added by 60be2de8b7b8a1c4eee7e065b8cef38ea629a6a3 (#99518): * Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518 Added by 47a7a91c969ed2edd12c674ca05c1baf867f6f6f (#100132): * [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks. Added by e3c5bd617d040b5ee0bc79e6e7f01772adce791b (#100443): * [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring. Added by 981852677c531d52f701b870bb27b45668a44d52 (#100443): * [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176. Added by e182d12a8493b40a557394325a3a713b6528de60 (#100434): * [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways) Added by e26285603ca8b83b9d06e56f74e10e3d410553ff (#99954): * [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921 Added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc (#99291): * [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523). Added by 1b87ce0d4092045728c1c68282769d555706f273 (#101410): * Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228 Added by af591ebe4d0cf2097a5fdc0bb710442d0f2e7876 (#101410): * [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975. Added by this PR: * `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`. ### Things not currently tested * ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da* * ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da* * ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da* * ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc* * ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc* Edit: they are all tested now. ### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments [RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`. As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported. So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995. A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary: ```Rust let mut v = 0; maybe Some(v) = foo(&v); maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() }; ``` Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
2022-09-17Auto merge of #98588 - b-naber:valtrees-cleanup, r=lcnrbors-26/+17
Use only ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system r? `@lcnr`
2022-09-15Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrapest31-1/+1
On later stages, the feature is already stable. Result of running: rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
2022-09-15Remove feature gate from let else suggestionest31-2/+2
The let else suggestion added by 0d92752b8aac53e033541d04fc7d9677d8bca227 does not need a feature gate any more.
2022-09-15add diagram to explain the MIR structureDing Xiang Fei-0/+53
2022-09-15add explanatory noteDing Xiang Fei-0/+15
2022-09-15supplement for the missing or incomplete commentsDing Xiang Fei-1/+4
2022-09-15reorder nesting scopes and declare bindings without drop scheduleDing Xiang Fei-56/+101
2022-09-14Auto merge of #101212 - eholk:dyn-star, r=compiler-errorsbors-0/+2
Initial implementation of dyn* This PR adds extremely basic and incomplete support for [dyn*](https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps//blog/2022/03/29/dyn-can-we-make-dyn-sized/). The goal is to get something in tree behind a flag to make collaboration easier, and also to make sure the implementation so far is not unreasonable. This PR does quite a few things: * Introduce `dyn_star` feature flag * Adds parsing for `dyn* Trait` types * Defines `dyn* Trait` as a sized type * Adds support for explicit casts, like `42usize as dyn* Debug` * Including const evaluation of such casts * Adds codegen for drop glue so things are cleaned up properly when a `dyn* Trait` object goes out of scope * Adds codegen for method calls, at least for methods that take `&self` Quite a bit is still missing, but this gives us a starting point. Note that this is never intended to become stable surface syntax for Rust, but rather `dyn*` is planned to be used as an implementation detail for async functions in dyn traits. Joint work with `@nikomatsakis` and `@compiler-errors.` r? `@bjorn3`
2022-09-14address review againb-naber-11/+6
2022-09-13Shrink some visibilities.Camille GILLOT-17/+17
2022-09-13Also compute implicit params in THIR.Camille GILLOT-81/+93
2022-09-13Compute explicit MIR params on THIR.Camille GILLOT-55/+60
2022-09-13Simplify MIR building entry.Camille GILLOT-281/+250
2022-09-13Use tcx.hir() utils for spans in MIR building.Camille GILLOT-43/+16
This corrects the `span_with_body` in the case of closures, which was incorrectly shortened to the `def_span`.
2022-09-13Only keep one version of ImplicitSelfKind.Camille GILLOT-8/+2
2022-09-13use ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type systemb-naber-15/+11
2022-09-12Call destructors when dyn* object goes out of scopeEric Holk-4/+1
2022-09-12dyn* through more typechecking and MIREric Holk-0/+5
2022-09-10Auto merge of #100968 - cjgillot:mir-upvar-vec, r=wesleywiserbors-152/+83
Only compute captures once when building MIR.
2022-09-10Remove unused temp.Camille Gillot-2/+1
Co-authored-by: Wesley Wiser <wwiser@gmail.com>
2022-09-08Auto merge of #101467 - nnethercote:shrink-hir-Ty-Pat, r=spastorinobors-1/+1
Shrink `hir::Ty` and `hir::Pat` r? `@ghost`
2022-09-08Rollup merge of #101399 - cjgillot:borrowck-binding-span, r=estebankDylan DPC-2/+7
Shrink span for bindings with subpatterns. Bindings with nested patterns (`binding @ pat` syntax) currently point to the full pattern. This PR proposes to shrink the span to stop before the ````@`.``` This makes the diagnostics for move/mutability conflicts clearer, as they not point to the `binding` only, instead of the full pat. r? ```@estebank```
2022-09-08Introduce `DotDotPos`.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
This shrinks `hir::Pat` from 88 to 72 bytes.
2022-09-06Shrink span for bindings with subpatterns.Camille GILLOT-2/+7
2022-09-06Rollup merge of #101357 - compiler-errors:variant-sugg-tweak, r=oli-obkGuillaume Gomez-1/+1
Include enum path in variant suggestion (except for `Result` and `Option`, which we should have via the prelude) Fixes #101356
2022-09-05refactor: remove unnecessary variablesTakayuki Maeda-1/+2
2022-09-05separate the receiver from arguments in HIRTakayuki Maeda-3/+6
2022-09-03Include enum path in variant suggestionMichael Goulet-1/+1
2022-09-02Use boxed slices in `PatKind`.Nicholas Nethercote-12/+23
To shrink it a little more.
2022-09-02Box `CanonicalUserTypeAnnotation::CanonicalUserType`.Nicholas Nethercote-15/+15
This shrinks `Ascription`, which shrinks `PatKind::AscribeUserType`, which shrinks `Pat`.
2022-09-02Box `PatKind::Range`.Nicholas Nethercote-20/+28
Because it's the biggest variant. Also, make `PatRange` non-`Copy`, because it's 104 bytes, which is pretty big.
2022-09-02Avoid some clones.Nicholas Nethercote-6/+9
`Builder::expr_into_pattern` has a single call site. Currently the `pattern` argument at the call site is always cloned. This commit changes things so that we instead do a clone within `expr_into_pattern`, but only if the pattern has the `PatKind::AscribeUserType` kind, and we only clone the annotation within the pattern instead of the entire pattern.
2022-09-02Clean up THIR patterns.Nicholas Nethercote-94/+96
`thir::Pat::kind` is a `Box<PatKind>`, which doesn't follow the usual pattern in AST/HIR/THIR which is that the "kind" enum for a node is stored inline within the parent struct. This commit makes the `PatKind` directly inline within the `Pat`. This requires using `Box<Pat>` in all the types that hold a `Pat. Ideally, `Pat` would be stored in `Thir` like `Expr` and `Stmt` and referred to with a `PatId` rather than `Box<Pat>`. But this is hard to do because lots of `Pat`s get created after the destruction of the `Cx` that does normal THIR building. But this does get us a step closer to `PatId`, because all the `Box<Pat>` occurrences would be replaced with `PatId` if `PatId` ever happened. At 128 bytes, `Pat` is large. Subsequent commits will shrink it.
2022-09-01tracing::instrument cleanupOli Scherer-8/+4
2022-09-01Always import all tracing macros for the entire crate instead of piecemeal ↵Oli Scherer-1/+1
by module
2022-09-01Directly use the `instrument` macro instead of its full pathOli Scherer-2/+2
2022-08-31Fix a bunch of typoDezhi Wu-1/+1
This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos]. I only picked the ones I was sure were spelling errors to fix, mostly in the comments. [typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
2022-08-29Revert let_chains stabilizationNilstrieb-0/+1
This reverts commit 326646074940222d602f3683d0559088690830f4. This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
2022-08-29Rollup merge of #99027 - tmiasko:basic-blocks, r=oli-obkMatthias Krüger-1/+1
Replace `Body::basic_blocks()` with field access Since the refactoring in #98930, it is possible to borrow the basic blocks independently from other parts of MIR by accessing the `basic_blocks` field directly. Replace unnecessary `Body::basic_blocks()` method with a direct field access, which has an additional benefit of borrowing the basic blocks only.
2022-08-26Replace `Body::basic_blocks()` with field accessTomasz Miąsko-1/+1
2022-08-26Auto merge of #100944 - nnethercote:shrink-thir-Expr, r=cjgillotbors-71/+104
Shrink `thir::Expr` r? `@cjgillot`
2022-08-25Rollup merge of #99954 - dingxiangfei2009:break-out-let-else-higher-up, ↵Yuki Okushi-2/+19
r=oli-obk let-else: break out to one scope higher for let-else ```@est31``` This PR follows up with #99518 which is to break out to the last remainder scope. It breaks to the out-most `region_scope` of the block if the first statement is a `let-else`.
2022-08-24Rename `thir::Adt` as `thir::AdtExpr`.Nicholas Nethercote-7/+12
This matches the naming scheme used elsewhere, e.g. in the AST, and avoids name clashes with the `ExprKind::Closure` variant.