| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Only rewrite valtree-constants to patterns and keep other constants opaque
Now that we can reliably fall back to comparing constants with `PartialEq::eq` to the match scrutinee, we can
1. eagerly try to convert constants to valtrees
2. then deeply convert the valtree to a pattern
3. if the to-valtree conversion failed, create an "opaque constant" pattern.
This PR specifically avoids any behavioral changes or major cleanups. What we can now do as follow ups is
* move the two remaining call sites to `destructure_mir_constant` off that query
* make valtree to pattern conversion infallible
* this needs to be done after careful analysis of the effects. There may be user visible changes from that.
based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111768
|
|
|
|
change `BorrowKind::Unique` to be a mutating `PlaceContext`
fixes #112056
I believe that `BorrowKind::Unique` is a footgun in general, so I added a FIXME and opened https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112072. This is a bit too involved for this PR though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIR: opt-in normalization of `BasicBlock` and `Local` numbering
This doesn't matter at all for actual codegen, but after spending some time reading pre-codegen MIR, I was wishing I didn't have to jump around so much in reading post-inlining code.
So this add two passes that are off by default for every mir level, but can be enabled (`-Zmir-enable-passes=+ReorderBasicBlocks,+ReorderLocals`) for humans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't check for misaligned raw pointer derefs inside Rvalue::AddressOf
From https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112026#issuecomment-1565686697:
rustc 1.70 (stable next week) added a Mir pass to add pointer alignment checks in debug mode. Adding these checks caused some crates to break, but that was expected, since they contain broken code (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111487) for tracking that.
However, the checks added are slightly more aggressive than they should have been. Specifically, they also check the place in an `addr_of!` expression. Whether lack of alignment there is or isn't UB is unclear. This PR modifies the pass to not affect those cases.
I spot checked the crater regressions and the ones I saw were not the case that this PR is modifying. It still seems good to not land anything overaggressive though
|
|
Enable MatchBranchSimplification
This pass is one of the small number of benefits from `-Zmir-opt-level=3` that has motivated rustc_codegen_cranelift to use it:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/19ed0aade60e1c1038fe40554bcd9d01b717effa/compiler/rustc_codegen_cranelift/build_system/build_sysroot.rs#L244-L246
Cranelift's motivation for this is _runtime_ performance improvements in debug builds. Lifting this pass all the way to `-Zmir-opt-level=1` seems to come without significant perf overhead, so that's what I'm suggesting here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove DesugaringKind::Replace.
A simple boolean flag is enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111741 (Use `ObligationCtxt` in custom type ops)
- #111840 (Expose more information in `get_body_with_borrowck_facts`)
- #111876 (Roll compiler_builtins to 0.1.92)
- #111912 (Use `Option::is_some_and` and `Result::is_ok_and` in the compiler )
- #111915 (libtest: Improve error when missing `-Zunstable-options`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
r=petrochenkov
Use `Option::is_some_and` and `Result::is_ok_and` in the compiler
`.is_some_and(..)`/`.is_ok_and(..)` replace `.map_or(false, ..)` and `.map(..).unwrap_or(false)`, making the code more readable.
This PR is a sibling of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111873#issuecomment-1561316515
|
|
Work around `rust-analyzer` false-positive type errors
rust-analyzer incorrectly reports two type errors in `debug.rs`:
> expected &dyn Display, found &i32
> expected &dyn Display, found &i32
This is due to a known bug in r-a: (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/11847).
In these particular cases, changing `&0` to `&0i32` seems to be enough to avoid the bug.
|
|
Preprocess and cache dominator tree
Preprocessing dominators has a very strong effect for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111344.
That pass checks that assignments dominate their uses repeatedly. Using the unprocessed dominator tree caused a quadratic runtime (number of bbs x depth of the dominator tree).
This PR also caches the dominator tree and the pre-processed dominators in the MIR cfg cache.
Rebase of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107157
cc `@tmiasko`
|
|
|
|
MIR drive-by cleanups
Some random drive-by cleanups I did while working with MIR/THIR.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add timings for MIR passes to profiling report
This will help identify which pass is responsible for a regression.
|
|
|
|
Stop turning transmutes into discriminant reads in mir-opt
Partially reverts #109612, as after #109993 these aren't actually equivalent any more, and I'm no longer confident this was ever an improvement in the first place.
Having this "simplification" meant that similar-looking code actually did somewhat different things. For example,
```rust
pub unsafe fn demo1(x: std::cmp::Ordering) -> u8 {
std::mem::transmute(x)
}
pub unsafe fn demo2(x: std::cmp::Ordering) -> i8 {
std::mem::transmute(x)
}
```
in nightly today is generating <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/dPK58zW18>
```llvm
define noundef i8 `@_ZN7example5demo117h341ef313673d2ee6E(i8` noundef %x) unnamed_addr #0 {
%0 = icmp uge i8 %x, -1
%1 = icmp ule i8 %x, 1
%2 = or i1 %0, %1
call void `@llvm.assume(i1` %2)
ret i8 %x
}
define noundef i8 `@_ZN7example5demo217h5ad29f361a3f5700E(i8` noundef %0) unnamed_addr #0 {
%x = alloca i8, align 1
store i8 %0, ptr %x, align 1
%1 = load i8, ptr %x, align 1, !range !2, !noundef !3
ret i8 %1
}
```
Which feels too different when the original code is essentially identical.
---
Aside: that example is different *after* optimizations too:
```llvm
define noundef i8 `@_ZN7example5demo117h341ef313673d2ee6E(i8` noundef returned %x) unnamed_addr #0 {
%0 = add i8 %x, 1
%1 = icmp ult i8 %0, 3
tail call void `@llvm.assume(i1` %1)
ret i8 %x
}
define noundef i8 `@_ZN7example5demo217h5ad29f361a3f5700E(i8` noundef returned %0) unnamed_addr #1 {
ret i8 %0
}
```
so turning the `Transmute` into a `Discriminant` was arguably just making things worse, so leaving it alone instead -- and thus having less code in rustc -- seems clearly better.
|
|
Don't expect normalization to succeed in elaborate_drops
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110682
This was exposed through the changes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/109247, which causes more things to be inlined. Inlining can happen before monomorphization, so we can't expect normalization to succeed. In the elaborate_drops analysis we currently have [this call](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/033aa092ab23ba14cdad27073c5e37ba0eddb428/compiler/rustc_mir_dataflow/src/elaborate_drops.rs#L278) to `normalize_erasing_regions`, which ICEs when normalization fails. The types are used to infer [whether the type needs a drop](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/033aa092ab23ba14cdad27073c5e37ba0eddb428/compiler/rustc_mir_dataflow/src/elaborate_drops.rs#L374), where `needs_drop` itself [uses `try_normalize_erasing_regions`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/033aa092ab23ba14cdad27073c5e37ba0eddb428/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/util.rs#L1121).
~[`instance_mir`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/ty/context/struct.TyCtxt.html#method.instance_mir) isn't explicit about whether it expects the instances corresponding to the `InstanceDef`s to be monomorphized (though I think in all other contexts the function is used post-monomorphization), so the use of `instance_mir` in inlining doesn't necessarily seem wrong to me.~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merge return place with other locals in CopyProp.
This reintroduces a limited form of NRVO.
r? wg-mir-opt
|
|
Handle error body in generator layout
Fixes #111468
I feel like making this query return `Option<GeneratorLayout>` might be better but had some issues with that approach
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partially reverts 109612, as after 109993 these aren't actually equivalent any more, and I'm no longer confident this was ever an improvement in the first place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
allow mutating function args through `&raw const`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/111502 by "turning off the sketchy optimization while we figure out if this is ok", like `@JakobDegen` said.
The first commit in this PR removes some suspicious looking logic from the same method, but should have no functional changes, since it doesn't modify the `context` outside of the method. Best reviewed commit by commit.
r? opsem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
