| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
This allows us to get rid of the `rustc_const_eval->rustc_borrowck`
dependency edge which was delaying the compilation of borrowck.
The added utils in `rustc_middle` are small and should not affect
compile times there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only emit alignment checks if we have a panic_impl
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109996
r? `@bjorn3` because you commented that this situation could impact you as well
|
|
|
|
r=wesleywiser
Preserve argument indexes when inlining MIR
We store argument indexes on VarDebugInfo. Unlike the previous method of relying on the variable index to know whether a variable is an argument, this survives MIR inlining.
We also no longer check if var.source_info.scope is the outermost scope. When a function gets inlined, the arguments to the inner function will no longer be in the outermost scope. What we care about though is whether they were in the outermost scope prior to inlining, which we know by whether we assigned an argument index.
Fixes #83217
I considered using `Option<NonZeroU16>` instead of `Option<u16>` to store the index. I didn't because `TypeFoldable` isn't implemented for `NonZeroU16` and because it looks like due to padding, it currently wouldn't make any difference. But I indexed from 1 anyway because (a) it'll make it easier if later it becomes worthwhile to use a `NonZeroU16` and because the arguments were previously indexed from 1, so it made for a smaller change.
This is my first PR on rust-lang/rust, so apologies if I've gotten anything not quite right.
|
|
We store argument indexes on VarDebugInfo. Unlike the previous method of
relying on the variable index to know whether a variable is an argument,
this survives MIR inlining.
We also no longer check if var.source_info.scope is the outermost scope.
When a function gets inlined, the arguments to the inner function will
no longer be in the outermost scope. What we care about though is
whether they were in the outermost scope prior to inlining, which we
know by whether we assigned an argument index.
|
|
|
|
Make elaboration generic over input
Combines all the `elaborate_*` family of functions into just one, which is an iterator over the same type that you pass in (e.g. elaborating `Predicate` gives `Predicate`s, elaborating `Obligation`s gives `Obligation`s, etc.)
|
|
|
|
Refactor unwind in MIR
This makes unwinding from current `Option<BasicBlock>` into
```rust
enum UnwindAction {
Continue,
Cleanup(BasicBlock),
Unreachable,
Terminate,
}
```
cc `@JakobDegen` `@RalfJung` `@Amanieu`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unify terminology used in unwind action and terminator, and reflect
the fact that a nounwind panic is triggered instead of an immediate
abort is triggered for this terminator.
|
|
|
|
This also makes eval machine's `StackPopUnwind`
redundant so that is replaced.
|
|
|
|
Use `FieldIdx` in `FieldsShape`
Finally got to the main motivating example from https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606 :)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finally got to the main motivating example from the MCP :)
|
|
Move a const-prop-lint specific hack from mir interpret to const-prop-lint and make it fallible
fixes #109743
This hack didn't need to live in the mir interpreter. For const-prop-lint it is entirely correct to avoid doing any const prop if normalization fails at this stage. Most likely we couldn't const propagate anything anyway, and if revealing was needed (so opaque types were involved), we wouldn't want to be too smart and leak the hidden type anyway.
|
|
and make it fallible
|
|
|
|
All the same reasons as for `[T]`: more general, less pointer chasing, and `&mut IndexSlice` emphasizes that it doesn't change *length*.
|
|
Shrank `AggregateKind` by 8 bytes on x64, since the active field of a union is tracked as an `Option<FieldIdx>` instead of `Option<usize>`.
|
|
Insert alignment checks for pointer dereferences when debug assertions are enabled
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54915
- [x] Jake tells me this sounds like a place to use `MirPatch`, but I can't figure out how to insert a new basic block with a new terminator in the middle of an existing basic block, using `MirPatch`. (if nobody else backs up this point I'm checking this as "not actually a good idea" because the code looks pretty clean to me after rearranging it a bit)
- [x] Using `CastKind::PointerExposeAddress` is definitely wrong, we don't want to expose. Calling a function to get the pointer address seems quite excessive. ~I'll see if I can add a new `CastKind`.~ `CastKind::Transmute` to the rescue!
- [x] Implement a more helpful panic message like slice bounds checking.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
Update `ty::VariantDef` to use `IndexVec<FieldIdx, FieldDef>`
And while doing the updates for that, also uses `FieldIdx` in `ProjectionKind::Field` and `TypeckResults::field_indices`.
There's more places that could use it (like `rustc_const_eval` and `LayoutS`), but I tried to keep this PR from exploding to *even more* places.
Part 2/? of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606
|
|
And while doing the updates for that, also uses `FieldIdx` in `ProjectionKind::Field` and `TypeckResults::field_indices`.
There's more places that could use it (like `rustc_const_eval` and `LayoutS`), but I tried to keep this PR from exploding to *even more* places.
Part 2/? of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606
|
|
Partial stabilization of `once_cell`
This PR aims to stabilize a portion of the `once_cell` feature:
- `core::cell::OnceCell`
- `std::cell::OnceCell` (re-export of the above)
- `std::sync::OnceLock`
This will leave `LazyCell` and `LazyLock` unstabilized, which have been moved to the `lazy_cell` feature flag.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74465 (does not fully close, but it may make sense to move to a new issue)
Future steps for separate PRs:
- ~~Add `#[inline]` to many methods~~ #105651
- Update cranelift usage of the `once_cell` crate
- Update rust-analyzer usage of the `once_cell` crate
- Update error messages discussing once_cell
## To be stabilized API summary
```rust
// core::cell (in core/cell/once.rs)
pub struct OnceCell<T> { .. }
impl<T> OnceCell<T> {
pub const fn new() -> OnceCell<T>;
pub fn get(&self) -> Option<&T>;
pub fn get_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
pub fn set(&self, value: T) -> Result<(), T>;
pub fn get_or_init<F>(&self, f: F) -> &T where F: FnOnce() -> T;
pub fn into_inner(self) -> Option<T>;
pub fn take(&mut self) -> Option<T>;
}
impl<T: Clone> Clone for OnceCell<T>;
impl<T: Debug> Debug for OnceCell<T>
impl<T> Default for OnceCell<T>;
impl<T> From<T> for OnceCell<T>;
impl<T: PartialEq> PartialEq for OnceCell<T>;
impl<T: Eq> Eq for OnceCell<T>;
```
```rust
// std::sync (in std/sync/once_lock.rs)
impl<T> OnceLock<T> {
pub const fn new() -> OnceLock<T>;
pub fn get(&self) -> Option<&T>;
pub fn get_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
pub fn set(&self, value: T) -> Result<(), T>;
pub fn get_or_init<F>(&self, f: F) -> &T where F: FnOnce() -> T;
pub fn into_inner(self) -> Option<T>;
pub fn take(&mut self) -> Option<T>;
}
impl<T: Clone> Clone for OnceLock<T>;
impl<T: Debug> Debug for OnceLock<T>;
impl<T> Default for OnceLock<T>;
impl<#[may_dangle] T> Drop for OnceLock<T>;
impl<T> From<T> for OnceLock<T>;
impl<T: PartialEq> PartialEq for OnceLock<T>
impl<T: Eq> Eq for OnceLock<T>;
impl<T: RefUnwindSafe + UnwindSafe> RefUnwindSafe for OnceLock<T>;
unsafe impl<T: Send> Send for OnceLock<T>;
unsafe impl<T: Sync + Send> Sync for OnceLock<T>;
impl<T: UnwindSafe> UnwindSafe for OnceLock<T>;
```
No longer planned as part of this PR, and moved to the `rust_cell_try` feature gate:
```rust
impl<T> OnceCell<T> {
pub fn get_or_try_init<F, E>(&self, f: F) -> Result<&T, E> where F: FnOnce() -> Result<T, E>;
}
impl<T> OnceLock<T> {
pub fn get_or_try_init<F, E>(&self, f: F) -> Result<&T, E> where F: FnOnce() -> Result<T, E>;
}
```
I am new to this process so would appreciate mentorship wherever needed.
|
|
Move items not part of this stabilization to 'lazy_cell' or 'once_cell_try'
|
|
Move `mir::Field` → `abi::FieldIdx`
The first PR for https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606
This is just the move-and-rename, because it's plenty big already. Future PRs will start using `FieldIdx` more broadly, and concomitantly removing `FieldIdx::new`s.
|
|
Support TLS access into dylibs on Windows
This allows access to `#[thread_local]` in upstream dylibs on Windows by introducing a MIR shim to return the address of the thread local. Accesses that go into an upstream dylib will call the MIR shim to get the address of it.
`convert_tls_rvalues` is introduced in `rustc_codegen_ssa` which rewrites MIR TLS accesses to dummy calls which are replaced with calls to the MIR shims when the dummy calls are lowered to backend calls.
A new `dll_tls_export` target option enables this behavior with a `false` value which is set for Windows platforms.
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84933.
|
|
As I've been trying to replace a `Vec` with an `IndexVec`, having `last` exist on both but returning very different types makes the transition a bit awkward -- the errors are later, where you get things like "there's no `ty` method on `mir::Field`" rather than a more localized error like "hey, there's no `last` on `IndexVec`".
So I propose renaming `last` to `last_index` to help distinguish `Vec::last`, which returns an element, and `IndexVec::last_index`, which returns an index.
(Similarly, `Iterator::last` also returns an element, not an index.)
|
|
|
|
The first PR for https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/606
This is just the move-and-rename, because it's plenty big-and-bitrotty already. Future PRs will start using `FieldIdx` more broadly, and concomitantly removing `FieldIdx::new`s.
|
|
Thanks to the combination of #108246 and #108442 it could already remove identity transmutes.
With this PR, it can also simplify them to `IntToInt` casts, `Discriminant` reads, or `Field` projections.
|
|
Add a builtin `FnPtr` trait that is implemented for all function pointers
r? `@ghost`
Rebased version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99531 (plus adjustments mentioned in the PR).
If perf is happy with this version, I would like to land it, even if the diagnostics fix in 9df8e1befb5031a5bf9d8dfe25170620642d3c59 only works for `FnPtr` specifically, and does not generally improve blanket impls.
|
|
|
|
Don't elaborate non-obligations into obligations
It's suspicious to elaborate a `PolyTraitRef` or `Predicate` into an `Obligation`, since the former does not have a param-env associated with it, but the latter does. This is a footgun that, while not being misused *currently* in the compiler, easily could be misused by someone less familiar with the elaborator's inner workings.
This PR just changes the API -- ideally, the elaborator wouldn't even have to deal with obligations if we're not elaborating obligations, but that would require a bit more abstraction than I could be bothered with today.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #109007 (rustdoc: skip `// some variants omitted` if enum is `#[non_exhaustive]`)
- #109593 (Rustdoc Book refer to rustdoc::missing_doc_code_examples. Fixes #109592.)
- #109595 (Improve "Auto-hide trait implementation documentation" GUI test)
- #109619 (Still-further-specializable projections are ambiguous in new solver)
- #109620 (Correct typo (`back_box` -> `black_box`))
- #109621 (Refactor: `VariantIdx::from_u32(0)` -> `FIRST_VARIANT`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Permit the MIR inliner to inline diverging functions
This heuristic prevents inlining of `hint::unreachable_unchecked`, which in turn makes `Option/Result::unwrap_unchecked` a bad inlining candidate. I looked through the changes to `core`, `alloc`, `std`, and `hashbrown` by hand and they all seem reasonable. Let's see how this looks in perf...
---
Based on rustc-perf it looks like this regresses ctfe-stress, and the cachegrind diff indicates that this regression is in `InterpCx::statement`. I don't know how to do any deeper analysis because that function is _enormous_ in the try toolchain, which has no debuginfo in it. And a local build produces significantly different codegen for that function, even with LTO.
|
