| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Note: there was an existing code path involving `Interpolated` in
`MetaItem::from_tokens` that was dead. This commit transfers that to the
new form, but puts an `unreachable!` call inside it.
|
|
Make it so that every structured error annotated with `#[derive(Diagnostic)]` that has a field of type `Ty<'_>`, the printing of that value into a `String` will look at the thread-local storage `TyCtxt` in order to shorten to a length appropriate with the terminal width. When this happen, the resulting error will have a note with the file where the full type name was written to.
```
error[E0618]: expected function, found `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)``
--> long.rs:7:5
|
6 | fn foo(x: D) { //~ `x` has type `(...
| - `x` has type `((..., ..., ..., ...), ..., ..., ...)`
7 | x(); //~ ERROR expected function, found `(...
| ^--
| |
| call expression requires function
|
= note: the full name for the type has been written to 'long.long-type-14182675702747116984.txt'
= note: consider using `--verbose` to print the full type name to the console
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trim extra whitespace in fn ptr suggestion span
Trim extra whitespace when suggesting removal of invalid qualifiers when parsing function pointer type.
Fixes: #133083
---
I made a comment about the format of the diagnostic error message in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133083#issuecomment-2480047875. I think the `.label` may be a little redundant if the diagnostic only highlights the bad qualifier instead of the entire `TyKind::BareFn` span. If it makes sense, I can include it in this PR.
|
|
Trim extra whitespace when suggesting removal of invalid qualifiers when
parsing function pointer type.
Fixes: #133083
Signed-off-by: Tyrone Wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from
`rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some
closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use
rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use
rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good
reason.
This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`,
and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to
`rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly
because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to
one.
|
|
Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681.
Support default fields in enum struct variant
Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition:
```rust
pub enum Bar {
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant
```rust
Bar::Foo { .. }
```
`#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants.
Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields
```rust
pub enum Bar {
#[default]
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build.
Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled).
Properly instantiate MIR const
The following works:
```rust
struct S<A> {
a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(),
}
S::<i32> { .. }
```
Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval
We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users'
getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error
that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to
*always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted.
This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the
expression relies on a const parameter.
Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`:
- Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields.
- Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values.
- Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trim extra space in 'repeated `mut`' diagnostic
Trim an extra space when removing repeated `mut`.
Also an extra test for even more repeated `mut`s
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pasted metavariables are wrapped in invisible delimiters, which
pretty-print as empty strings, and changing that can break some proc
macros. But error messages saying "expected identifer, found ``" are
bad. So this commit adds support for metavariables in `TokenDescription`
so they print as "metavariable" in error messages, instead of "``".
It's not used meaningfully yet, but will be needed to get rid of
interpolated tokens.
|
|
Separate `RemoveLet` span into primary span for `let` and removal
suggestion span for `let `, so that primary span does not include
whitespace.
Fixes: #133031
Signed-off-by: Tyrone Wu <wudevelops@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
Add suggestion for removing invalid path sep `::` in fn def
Add suggestion for removing invalid path separator `::` in function definition.
for example: `fn invalid_path_separator::<T>() {}`
fixes #130791
|
|
|
|
```
error: expected a pattern, found an expression
--> f889.rs:3:13
|
3 | let (x, y.drop()) = (1, 2); //~ ERROR
| ^^^^^^^^ not a pattern
|
= note: arbitrary expressions are not allowed in patterns: <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-00-patterns.html>
error[E0532]: expected a pattern, found a function call
--> f889.rs:2:13
|
2 | let (x, drop(y)) = (1, 2); //~ ERROR
| ^^^^ not a tuple struct or tuple variant
|
= note: function calls are not allowed in patterns: <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-00-patterns.html>
```
Fix #97200.
|
|
Parser: better error messages for `@` in struct patterns
|
|
for example: `fn invalid_path_separator::<T>() {}`
fixes: #130791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix removed `box_syntax` diagnostic if source isn't available
Fix #128442
|
|
|
|
r=estebank,traviscross
More unsafe attr verification
This code denies unsafe on attributes such as `#[test]` and `#[ignore]`, while also changing the `MetaItem` parsing so `unsafe` in args like `#[allow(unsafe(dead_code))]` is not accidentally allowed.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123757
|
|
This makes it possible for the `unsafe(...)` syntax to only be
valid at the top level, and the `NestedMetaItem`s will automatically
reject `unsafe(...)`.
|
|
Bump bootstrap compiler to new beta
https://forge.rust-lang.org/release/process.html#master-bootstrap-update-t-2-day-tuesday
|
|
The previous commit updated `rustfmt.toml` appropriately. This commit is
the outcome of running `x fmt --all` with the new formatting options.
|
|
|
|
Reorder trait bound modifiers *after* `for<...>` binder in trait bounds
This PR suggests changing the grammar of trait bounds from:
```
[CONSTNESS] [ASYNCNESS] [?] [BINDER] [TRAIT_PATH]
const async ? for<'a> Sized
```
to
```
([BINDER] [CONSTNESS] [ASYNCNESS] | [?]) [TRAIT_PATH]
```
i.e., either
```
? Sized
```
or
```
for<'a> const async Sized
```
(but not both)
### Why?
I think it's strange that the binder applies "more tightly" than the `?` trait polarity. This becomes even weirder when considering that we (or at least, I) want to have `async` trait bounds expressed like:
```
where T: for<'a> async Fn(&'a ()) -> i32,
```
and not:
```
where T: async for<'a> Fn(&'a ()) -> i32,
```
### Fallout
No crates on crater use this syntax, presumably because it's literally useless. This will require modifying the reference grammar, though.
### Alternatives
If this is not desirable, then we can alternatively keep parsing `for<'a>` after the `?` but deprecate it with either an FCW (or an immediate hard error), and begin parsing `for<'a>` *before* the `?`.
|
|
Parser: Suggest Placing the Return Type After Function Parameters
Fixes #126311
This PR suggests placing the return type after the function parameters when it's misplaced after a `where` clause.
This also tangentially improves diagnostics for cases like [this](https://github.com/veera-sivarajan/rust/blob/86d6f1312a77997ef994240e716288d61a343a6d/tests/ui/parser/issues/misplaced-return-type-without-where-issue-126311.rs#L1C1-L1C28) and adds doc comments for `parser::AllowPlus`.
|
|
|
|
The second suggestion shown here would previously incorrectly assume that the span corresponding to `⩵` was 2 bytes wide composed by 2 1 byte wide chars, so a span pointing at `==` could point only at one of the `=` to remove it. Instead, we now replace the whole thing (as we should have the whole time):
```
error: unknown start of token: \u{2a75}
--> $DIR/unicode-double-equals-recovery.rs:1:16
|
LL | const A: usize ⩵ 2;
| ^
|
help: Unicode character '⩵' (Two Consecutive Equals Signs) looks like '==' (Double Equals Sign), but it is not
|
LL | const A: usize == 2;
| ~~
error: unexpected `==`
--> $DIR/unicode-double-equals-recovery.rs:1:16
|
LL | const A: usize ⩵ 2;
| ^
|
help: try using `=` instead
|
LL | const A: usize = 2;
| ~
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Go over all structured parser suggestions and make them verbose style.
When suggesting to add or remove delimiters, turn them into multiple suggestion parts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
