about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/expr.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2024-04-11remove some things that do not need to beMatthias Krüger-2/+1
2024-04-02Don't ICE for postfix match after asMichael Goulet-0/+1
2024-03-27chore: fix some commentsxiaoxiangxianzi-1/+1
Signed-off-by: xiaoxiangxianzi <zhaoyizheng@outlook.com>
2024-03-25Clarify `parse_dot_suffix_expr`.Nicholas Nethercote-16/+19
For the `MiddleDot` case, current behaviour: - For a case like `1.2`, `sym1` is `1` and `sym2` is `2`, and `self.token` holds `1.2`. - It creates a new ident token from `sym1` that it puts into `self.token`. - Then it does `bump_with` with a new dot token, which moves the `sym1` token into `prev_token`. - Then it does `bump_with` with a new ident token from `sym2`, which moves the `dot` token into `prev_token` and discards the `sym1` token. - Then it does `bump`, which puts whatever is next into `self.token`, moves the `sym2` token into `prev_token`, and discards the `dot` token altogether. New behaviour: - Skips creating and inserting the `sym1` and dot tokens, because they are unnecessary. - This also demonstrates that the comment about `Spacing::Alone` is wrong -- that value is never used. That comment was added in #77250, and AFAICT it has always been incorrect. The commit also expands comments. I found this code hard to read previously, the examples in comments make it easier.
2024-03-25Change `parse_expr_tuple_field_access`.Nicholas Nethercote-10/+15
Pass in the span for the field rather than using `prev_token`. Also rename it `mk_expr_tuple_field_access`, because it doesn't do any actual parsing, it just creates an expression with what it's given. Not much of a clarity win by itself, but unlocks additional subsequent simplifications.
2024-03-25Remove `next_token` handling from `parse_expr_tuple_field_access`.Nicholas Nethercote-18/+10
It's clearer at the call site.
2024-03-25Inline and remove `Parser::parse_expr_tuple_field_access_float`.Nicholas Nethercote-36/+38
It has a single call site, and afterwards all the calls to `parse_expr_tuple_field_access` are in a single method, which is nice.
2024-03-22Rollup merge of #121619 - RossSmyth:pfix_match, r=petrochenkovMatthias Krüger-5/+24
Experimental feature postfix match This has a basic experimental implementation for the RFC postfix match (rust-lang/rfcs#3295, #121618). [Liaison is](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Postfix.20Match.20Liaison/near/423301844) ```@scottmcm``` with the lang team's [experimental feature gate process](https://github.com/rust-lang/lang-team/blob/master/src/how_to/experiment.md). This feature has had an RFC for a while, and there has been discussion on it for a while. It would probably be valuable to see it out in the field rather than continue discussing it. This feature also allows to see how popular postfix expressions like this are for the postfix macros RFC, as those will take more time to implement. It is entirely implemented in the parser, so it should be relatively easy to remove if needed. This PR is split in to 5 commits to ease review. 1. The implementation of the feature & gating. 2. Add a MatchKind field, fix uses, fix pretty. 3. Basic rustfmt impl, as rustfmt crashes upon seeing this syntax without a fix. 4. Add new MatchSource to HIR for Clippy & other HIR consumers
2024-03-21Rollup merge of #122752 - nnethercote:Interpolated-cleanups, r=petrochenkovMatthias Krüger-10/+0
Interpolated cleanups Various cleanups I made while working on attempts to remove `Interpolated`, that are worth merging now. Best reviewed one commit at a time. r? `@petrochenkov`
2024-03-20Make type_ascribe! not a built-inMichael Goulet-5/+15
2024-03-21Remove non-useful code path.Nicholas Nethercote-10/+0
It has no effect on anything in the test suite.
2024-03-18Ensure stack before parsing dot-or-callJubilee Young-1/+4
There are many cases where, due to codegen or a massively unruly codebase, a deeply nested call(call(call(call(call(call(call(call(call(f()))))))))) can happen. This is a spot where it would be good to grow our stack, so that we can survive to tell the programmer their code is dubiously written.
2024-03-11Rename `AddToDiagnostic` as `Subdiagnostic`.Nicholas Nethercote-3/+3
To match `derive(Subdiagnostic)`. Also rename `add_to_diagnostic{,_with}` as `add_to_diag{,_with}`.
2024-03-06Add MatchKind member to the Match expr for pretty printing & fmtRoss Smyth-8/+10
2024-03-05Add postfix-match experimental featureRoss Smyth-1/+18
Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <jistone@redhat.com>
2024-03-05Use `ControlFlow` in AST visitors.Jason Newcomb-7/+9
2024-03-05Rename `BuiltinLintDiagnostics` as `BuiltinLintDiag`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
Not the dropping of the trailing `s` -- this type describes a single diagnostic and its name should be singular.
2024-03-05Rename all `ParseSess` variables/fields/lifetimes as `psess`.Nicholas Nethercote-30/+30
Existing names for values of this type are `sess`, `parse_sess`, `parse_session`, and `ps`. `sess` is particularly annoying because that's also used for `Session` values, which are often co-located, and it can be difficult to know which type a value named `sess` refers to. (That annoyance is the main motivation for this change.) `psess` is nice and short, which is good for a name used this much. The commit also renames some `parse_sess_created` values as `psess_created`.
2024-03-02Auto merge of #121657 - estebank:issue-119665, r=davidtwcobors-2/+2
Detect more cases of `=` to `:` typo When a `Local` is fully parsed, but not followed by a `;`, keep the `:` span arround and mention it. If the type could continue being parsed as an expression, suggest replacing the `:` with a `=`. ``` error: expected one of `!`, `+`, `->`, `::`, `;`, or `=`, found `.` --> file.rs:2:32 | 2 | let _: std::env::temp_dir().join("foo"); | - ^ expected one of `!`, `+`, `->`, `::`, `;`, or `=` | | | while parsing the type for `_` | help: use `=` if you meant to assign ``` Fix #119665.
2024-03-01Detect more cases of `=` to `:` typoEsteban Küber-2/+2
When a `Local` is fully parsed, but not followed by a `;`, keep the `:` span arround and mention it. If the type could continue being parsed as an expression, suggest replacing the `:` with a `=`. ``` error: expected one of `!`, `+`, `->`, `::`, `;`, or `=`, found `.` --> file.rs:2:32 | 2 | let _: std::env::temp_dir().join("foo"); | - ^ expected one of `!`, `+`, `->`, `::`, `;`, or `=` | | | while parsing the type for `_` | help: use `=` if you meant to assign ``` Fix #119665.
2024-02-29Overhaul how stashed diagnostics work, again.Nicholas Nethercote-14/+15
Stashed errors used to be counted as errors, but could then be cancelled, leading to `ErrorGuaranteed` soundness holes. #120828 changed that, closing the soundness hole. But it introduced other difficulties because you sometimes have to account for pending stashed errors when making decisions about whether errors have occured/will occur and it's easy to overlook these. This commit aims for a middle ground. - Stashed errors (not warnings) are counted immediately as emitted errors, avoiding the possibility of forgetting to consider them. - The ability to cancel (or downgrade) stashed errors is eliminated, by disallowing the use of `steal_diagnostic` with errors, and introducing the more restrictive methods `try_steal_{modify,replace}_and_emit_err` that can be used instead. Other things: - `DiagnosticBuilder::stash` and `DiagCtxt::stash_diagnostic` now both return `Option<ErrorGuaranteed>`, which enables the removal of two `delayed_bug` calls and one `Ty::new_error_with_message` call. This is possible because we store error guarantees in `DiagCtxt::stashed_diagnostics`. - Storing the guarantees also saves us having to maintain a counter. - Calls to the `stashed_err_count` method are no longer necessary alongside calls to `has_errors`, which is a nice simplification, and eliminates two more `span_delayed_bug` calls and one FIXME comment. - Tests are added for three of the four fixed PRs mentioned below. - `issue-121108.rs`'s output improved slightly, omitting a non-useful error message. Fixes #121451. Fixes #121477. Fixes #121504. Fixes #121508.
2024-02-28Rename `DiagnosticBuilder` as `Diag`.Nicholas Nethercote-4/+4
Much better! Note that this involves renaming (and updating the value of) `DIAGNOSTIC_BUILDER` in clippy.
2024-02-27Refactor `take_for_recovery` call sites.Nicholas Nethercote-16/+13
To make them more concise and similar to each other.
2024-02-25Add `ErrorGuaranteed` to `ast::ExprKind::Err`Lieselotte-71/+94
2024-02-25Add `ast::ExprKind::Dummy`Lieselotte-1/+2
2024-02-25Rollup merge of #121060 - clubby789:bool-newtypes, r=cjgillotMatthias Krüger-23/+27
Add newtypes for bool fields/params/return types Fixed all the cases of this found with some simple searches for `*/ bool` and `bool /*`; probably many more
2024-02-20Add newtype for trailing in parserclubby789-2/+2
2024-02-20Add newtype for parser recoveryclubby789-4/+4
2024-02-20Add newtype for raw identsclubby789-17/+21
2024-02-19Prefer `DiagnosticBuilder` over `Diagnostic` in diagnostic modifiers.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+3
There are lots of functions that modify a diagnostic. This can be via a `&mut Diagnostic` or a `&mut DiagnosticBuilder`, because the latter type wraps the former and impls `DerefMut`. This commit converts all the `&mut Diagnostic` occurrences to `&mut DiagnosticBuilder`. This is a step towards greatly simplifying `Diagnostic`. Some of the relevant function are made generic, because they deal with both errors and warnings. No function bodies are changed, because all the modifier methods are available on both `Diagnostic` and `DiagnosticBuilder`.
2024-02-17Rollup merge of #121085 - davidtwco:always-eager-diagnostics, r=nnethercoteMatthias Krüger-1/+1
errors: only eagerly translate subdiagnostics Subdiagnostics don't need to be lazily translated, they can always be eagerly translated. Eager translation is slightly more complex as we need to have a `DiagCtxt` available to perform the translation, which involves slightly more threading of that context. This slight increase in complexity should enable later simplifications - like passing `DiagCtxt` into `AddToDiagnostic` and moving Fluent messages into the diagnostic structs rather than having them in separate files (working on that was what led to this change). r? ```@nnethercote```
2024-02-15errors: only eagerly translate subdiagnosticsDavid Wood-1/+1
Subdiagnostics don't need to be lazily translated, they can always be eagerly translated. Eager translation is slightly more complex as we need to have a `DiagCtxt` available to perform the translation, which involves slightly more threading of that context. This slight increase in complexity should enable later simplifications - like passing `DiagCtxt` into `AddToDiagnostic` and moving Fluent messages into the diagnostic structs rather than having them in separate files (working on that was what led to this change). Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
2024-02-15Add `ErrorGuaranteed` to `ast::LitKind::Err`, `token::LitKind::Err`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
This mostly works well, and eliminates a couple of delayed bugs. One annoying thing is that we should really also add an `ErrorGuaranteed` to `proc_macro::bridge::LitKind::Err`. But that's difficult because `proc_macro` doesn't have access to `ErrorGuaranteed`, so we have to fake it.
2024-02-08Continue to borrowck even if there were previous errorsOli Scherer-1/+11
2024-02-02Remove unnecessary `.to_string()`/`.as_str()`strevyn-1/+1
2024-01-30Rollup merge of #120460 - nnethercote:fix-120397, r=compiler-errorsGuillaume Gomez-9/+22
Be more careful about interpreting a label/lifetime as a mistyped char literal. Currently the parser interprets any label/lifetime in certain positions as a mistyped char literal, on the assumption that the trailing single quote was accidentally omitted. In such cases it gives an error with a suggestion to add the trailing single quote, and then puts the appropriate char literal into the AST. This behaviour was introduced in #101293. This is reasonable for a case like this: ``` let c = 'a; ``` because `'a'` is a valid char literal. It's less reasonable for a case like this: ``` let c = 'abc; ``` because `'abc'` is not a valid char literal. Prior to #120329 this could result in some sub-optimal suggestions in error messages, but nothing else. But #120329 changed `LitKind::from_token_lit` to assume that the char/byte/string literals it receives are valid, and to assert if not. This is reasonable because the lexer does not produce invalid char/byte/string literals in general. But in this "interpret label/lifetime as unclosed char literal" case the parser can produce an invalid char literal with contents such as `abc`, which triggers an assertion failure. This PR changes the parser so it's more cautious about interpreting labels/lifetimes as unclosed char literals. Fixes #120397. r? `@compiler-errors`
2024-01-29Be more careful about interpreting a label/lifetime as a mistyped char literal.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+15
Currently the parser will interpret any label/lifetime in certain positions as a mistyped char literal, on the assumption that the trailing single quote was accidentally omitted. This is reasonable for a something like 'a (because 'a' would be valid) but not reasonable for a something like 'abc (because 'abc' is not valid). This commit restricts this behaviour only to labels/lifetimes that would be valid char literals, via the new `could_be_unclosed_char_literal` function. The commit also augments the `label-is-actually-char.rs` test in a couple of ways: - Adds testing of labels/lifetimes with identifiers longer than one char, e.g. 'abc. - Adds a new match with simpler patterns, because the `recover_unclosed_char` call in `parse_pat_with_range_pat` was not being exercised (in this test or any other ui tests). Fixes #120397, an assertion failure, which was caused by this behaviour in the parser interacting with some new stricter char literal checking added in #120329.
2024-01-29Tweak comment and naming for `recover_unclosed_char`.Nicholas Nethercote-7/+7
Because it can be used for a lifetime or a label.
2024-01-28Handle methodcalls & operators in patternsLieselotte-0/+13
2024-01-26Rollup merge of #119342 - sjwang05:issue-112254, r=wesleywiserMatthias Krüger-2/+8
Emit suggestion when trying to write exclusive ranges as `..<` Closes #112254
2024-01-20Rollup merge of #120063 - clubby789:remove-box-handling, r=NilstriebGuillaume Gomez-21/+7
Remove special handling of `box` expressions from parser #108471 added a temporary hack to parse `box expr`. It's been almost a year since then, so I think it's safe to remove the special handling. As a drive-by cleanup, move `parser/removed-syntax*` tests to their own directory.
2024-01-18Suggest wrapping mac args in parens rather than the whole expressionMichael Goulet-1/+1
2024-01-17Remove `box <expr>` recoveryclubby789-21/+7
2024-01-10Rename consuming chaining methods on `DiagnosticBuilder`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
In #119606 I added them and used a `_mv` suffix, but that wasn't great. A `with_` prefix has three different existing uses. - Constructors, e.g. `Vec::with_capacity`. - Wrappers that provide an environment to execute some code, e.g. `with_session_globals`. - Consuming chaining methods, e.g. `Span::with_{lo,hi,ctxt}`. The third case is exactly what we want, so this commit changes `DiagnosticBuilder::foo_mv` to `DiagnosticBuilder::with_foo`. Thanks to @compiler-errors for the suggestion.
2024-01-10Rename `{create,emit}_warning` as `{create,emit}_warn`.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
For consistency with `warn`/`struct_warn`, and also `{create,emit}_err`, all of which use an abbreviated form.
2024-01-08Emit suggestion when trying to write exclusive ranges as `..<`sjwang05-2/+8
2024-01-08Remove a second `DiagnosticBuilder::emit_without_consuming` call.Nicholas Nethercote-28/+24
Instead of taking `seq` as a mutable reference, `maybe_recover_struct_lit_bad_delims` now consumes `seq` on the recovery path, and returns `seq` unchanged on the non-recovery path. The commit also combines an `if` and a `match` to merge two identical paths. Also change `recover_seq_parse_error` so it receives a `PErr` instead of a `PResult`, because all the call sites now handle the `Ok`/`Err` distinction themselves.
2024-01-08Make `DiagnosticBuilder::emit` consuming.Nicholas Nethercote-9/+8
This works for most of its call sites. This is nice, because `emit` very much makes sense as a consuming operation -- indeed, `DiagnosticBuilderState` exists to ensure no diagnostic is emitted twice, but it uses runtime checks. For the small number of call sites where a consuming emit doesn't work, the commit adds `DiagnosticBuilder::emit_without_consuming`. (This will be removed in subsequent commits.) Likewise, `emit_unless` becomes consuming. And `delay_as_bug` becomes consuming, while `delay_as_bug_without_consuming` is added (which will also be removed in subsequent commits.) All this requires significant changes to `DiagnosticBuilder`'s chaining methods. Currently `DiagnosticBuilder` method chaining uses a non-consuming `&mut self -> &mut Self` style, which allows chaining to be used when the chain ends in `emit()`, like so: ``` struct_err(msg).span(span).emit(); ``` But it doesn't work when producing a `DiagnosticBuilder` value, requiring this: ``` let mut err = self.struct_err(msg); err.span(span); err ``` This style of chaining won't work with consuming `emit` though. For that, we need to use to a `self -> Self` style. That also would allow `DiagnosticBuilder` production to be chained, e.g.: ``` self.struct_err(msg).span(span) ``` However, removing the `&mut self -> &mut Self` style would require that individual modifications of a `DiagnosticBuilder` go from this: ``` err.span(span); ``` to this: ``` err = err.span(span); ``` There are *many* such places. I have a high tolerance for tedious refactorings, but even I gave up after a long time trying to convert them all. Instead, this commit has it both ways: the existing `&mut self -> Self` chaining methods are kept, and new `self -> Self` chaining methods are added, all of which have a `_mv` suffix (short for "move"). Changes to the existing `forward!` macro lets this happen with very little additional boilerplate code. I chose to add the suffix to the new chaining methods rather than the existing ones, because the number of changes required is much smaller that way. This doubled chainging is a bit clumsy, but I think it is worthwhile because it allows a *lot* of good things to subsequently happen. In this commit, there are many `mut` qualifiers removed in places where diagnostics are emitted without being modified. In subsequent commits: - chaining can be used more, making the code more concise; - more use of chaining also permits the removal of redundant diagnostic APIs like `struct_err_with_code`, which can be replaced easily with `struct_err` + `code_mv`; - `emit_without_diagnostic` can be removed, which simplifies a lot of machinery, removing the need for `DiagnosticBuilderState`.
2024-01-05rustc_span: More consistent span combination operationsVadim Petrochenkov-1/+1
2024-01-05parser: Tiny refactoringVadim Petrochenkov-1/+1