summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/tests.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2024-06-05Make top-level `rustc_parse` functions fallible.Nicholas Nethercote-5/+17
Currently we have an awkward mix of fallible and infallible functions: ``` new_parser_from_source_str maybe_new_parser_from_source_str new_parser_from_file (maybe_new_parser_from_file) // missing (new_parser_from_source_file) // missing maybe_new_parser_from_source_file source_str_to_stream maybe_source_file_to_stream ``` We could add the two missing functions, but instead this commit removes of all the infallible ones and renames the fallible ones leaving us with these which are all fallible: ``` new_parser_from_source_str new_parser_from_file new_parser_from_source_file source_str_to_stream source_file_to_stream ``` This requires making `unwrap_or_emit_fatal` public so callers of formerly infallible functions can still work. This does make some of the call sites slightly more verbose, but I think it's worth it for the simpler API. Also, there are two `catch_unwind` calls and one `catch_fatal_errors` call in this diff that become removable thanks this change. (I will do that in a follow-up PR.)
2024-06-05Reorder `source_str_to_stream` arguments.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
It's the only one of these functions where `psess` isn't the first argument.
2024-06-05Use `source_str_to_stream` in a test file.Nicholas Nethercote-6/+2
It does exactly what is required.
2024-05-06Move some tests from `rustc_expand` to `rustc_parse`.Nicholas Nethercote-0/+1422
There are some test cases involving `parse` and `tokenstream` and `mut_visit` that are located in `rustc_expand`. Because it used to be the case that constructing a `ParseSess` required the involvement of `rustc_expand`. However, since #64197 merged (a long time ago) `rust_expand` no longer needs to be involved. This commit moves the tests into `rustc_parse`. This is the optimal place for the `parse` tests. It's not ideal for the `tokenstream` and `mut_visit` tests -- they would be better in `rustc_ast` -- but they still rely on parsing, which is not available in `rustc_ast`. But `rustc_parse` is lower down in the crate graph and closer to `rustc_ast` than `rust_expand`, so it's still an improvement for them. The exact renaming is as follows: - rustc_expand/src/mut_visit/tests.rs -> rustc_parse/src/parser/mut_visit/tests.rs - rustc_expand/src/tokenstream/tests.rs -> rustc_parse/src/parser/tokenstream/tests.rs - rustc_expand/src/tests.rs + rustc_expand/src/parse/tests.rs -> compiler/rustc_parse/src/parser/tests.rs The latter two test files are combined because there's no need for them to be separate, and having a `rustc_parse::parser::parse` module would be weird. This also means some `pub(crate)`s can be removed.