summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_parse/src/validate_attr.rs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2022-11-29Avoid unnecessary `MetaItem`/`Attribute` conversions.Nicholas Nethercote-17/+26
`check_builtin_attribute` calls `parse_meta` to convert an `Attribute` to a `MetaItem`, which it then checks. However, many callers of `check_builtin_attribute` start with a `MetaItem`, and then convert it to an `Attribute` by calling `cx.attribute(meta_item)`. This `MetaItem` to `Attribute` to `MetaItem` conversion is silly. This commit adds a new function `check_builtin_meta_item`, which can be called instead from these call sites. `check_builtin_attribute` also now calls it. The commit also renames `check_meta` as `check_attr` to better match its arguments.
2022-11-28Rename `ast::Lit` as `ast::MetaItemLit`.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+1
2022-11-22Split `MacArgs` in two.Nicholas Nethercote-7/+8
`MacArgs` is an enum with three variants: `Empty`, `Delimited`, and `Eq`. It's used in two ways: - For representing attribute macro arguments (e.g. in `AttrItem`), where all three variants are used. - For representing function-like macros (e.g. in `MacCall` and `MacroDef`), where only the `Delimited` variant is used. In other words, `MacArgs` is used in two quite different places due to them having partial overlap. I find this makes the code hard to read. It also leads to various unreachable code paths, and allows invalid values (such as accidentally using `MacArgs::Empty` in a `MacCall`). This commit splits `MacArgs` in two: - `DelimArgs` is a new struct just for the "delimited arguments" case. It is now used in `MacCall` and `MacroDef`. - `AttrArgs` is a renaming of the old `MacArgs` enum for the attribute macro case. Its `Delimited` variant now contains a `DelimArgs`. Various other related things are renamed as well. These changes make the code clearer, avoids several unreachable paths, and disallows the invalid values.
2022-11-16Use `token::Lit` in `ast::ExprKind::Lit`.Nicholas Nethercote-4/+6
Instead of `ast::Lit`. Literal lowering now happens at two different times. Expression literals are lowered when HIR is crated. Attribute literals are lowered during parsing. This commit changes the language very slightly. Some programs that used to not compile now will compile. This is because some invalid literals that are removed by `cfg` or attribute macros will no longer trigger errors. See this comment for more details: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102944#issuecomment-1277476773
2022-05-05Overhaul `MacArgs::Eq`.Nicholas Nethercote-7/+32
The value in `MacArgs::Eq` is currently represented as a `Token`. Because of `TokenKind::Interpolated`, `Token` can be either a token or an arbitrary AST fragment. In practice, a `MacArgs::Eq` starts out as a literal or macro call AST fragment, and then is later lowered to a literal token. But this is very non-obvious. `Token` is a much more general type than what is needed. This commit restricts things, by introducing a new type `MacArgsEqKind` that is either an AST expression (pre-lowering) or an AST literal (post-lowering). The downside is that the code is a bit more verbose in a few places. The benefit is that makes it much clearer what the possibilities are (though also shorter in some other places). Also, it removes one use of `TokenKind::Interpolated`, taking us a step closer to removing that variant, which will let us make `Token` impl `Copy` and remove many "handle Interpolated" code paths in the parser. Things to note: - Error messages have improved. Messages like this: ``` unexpected token: `"bug" + "found"` ``` now say "unexpected expression", which makes more sense. Although arbitrary expressions can exist within tokens thanks to `TokenKind::Interpolated`, that's not obvious to anyone who doesn't know compiler internals. - In `parse_mac_args_common`, we no longer need to collect tokens for the value expression.
2021-11-12rustc_feature: Convert `BuiltinAttribute` from tuple to a structVadim Petrochenkov-6/+5
2021-09-25Check for macros in built-in attributes that don't support them.Eric Huss-1/+13
2021-09-25Move malformed attribute code to a function and fix inner attribute suggestion.Eric Huss-59/+60
Moving to a dedicated function in preparation for other validation. The suggestion given didn't consider if it was an inner attribute.
2021-08-25Use if-let guards in the codebaseLéo Lanteri Thauvin-9/+8
2021-01-09ast: Remove some indirection layers from values in key-value attributesVadim Petrochenkov-2/+3
2020-08-30mv compiler to compiler/mark-0/+163