| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Mitigate `#[align]` name resolution ambiguity regression with a rename
Mitigates beta regression rust-lang/rust#143834 after a beta backport.
### Background on the beta regression
The name resolution regression arises due to rust-lang/rust#142507 adding a new feature-gated built-in attribute named `#[align]`. However, unfortunately even [introducing new feature-gated unstable built-in attributes can break user code](https://www.github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134963) such as
```rs
macro_rules! align {
() => {
/* .. */
};
}
pub(crate) use align; // `use` here becomes ambiguous
```
### Mitigation approach
This PR renames `#[align]` to `#[rustc_align]` to mitigate the beta regression by:
1. Undoing the introduction of a new built-in attribute with a common name, i.e. `#[align]`.
2. Renaming `#[align]` to `#[rustc_align]`. The renamed attribute being `rustc_align` will not introduce new stable breakages, as attributes beginning with `rustc` are reserved and perma-unstable. This does mean existing nightly code using `fn_align` feature will additionally need to specify `#![feature(rustc_attrs)]`.
This PR is very much a short-term mitigation to alleviate time pressure from having to fully fix the current limitation of inevitable name resolution regressions that would arise from adding any built-in attributes. Long-term solutions are discussed in [#t-lang > namespacing macro attrs to reduce conflicts with new adds](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/213817-t-lang/topic/namespacing.20macro.20attrs.20to.20reduce.20conflicts.20with.20new.20adds/with/529249622).
### Alternative mitigation options
[Various mitigation options were considered during the compiler triage meeting](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143834#issuecomment-3084415277), and those consideration are partly reproduced here:
- Reverting the PR doesn't seem very minimal/trivial, and carries risks of its own.
- Rename to a less-common but aim-to-stabilization name is itself not safe nor convenient, because (1) that risks introducing new regressions (i.e. ambiguity against the new name), and (2) lang would have to FCP the new name hastily for the mitigation to land timely and have a chance to be backported. This also makes the path towards stabilization annoying.
- Rename the attribute to a rustc attribute, which will be perma-unstable and does not cause new ambiguities in stable code.
- This alleviates the time pressure to address *this* regression, or for lang to have to rush an FCP for some new name that can still break user code.
- This avoids backing out a whole implementation.
### Review advice
This PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit.
- Commit 1 adds a test `tests/ui/attributes/fn-align-nameres-ambiguity-143834.rs` which demonstrates the current name resolution regression re. `align`. This test fails against current master.
- Commit 2 carries out the renames and test reblesses. Notably, commit 2 will cause `tests/ui/attributes/fn-align-nameres-ambiguity-143834.rs` to change from fail (nameres regression) to pass.
This PR, if the approach still seems acceptable, will need a beta-backport to address the beta regression.
|
|
From `#[align]` -> `#[rustc_align]`. Attributes starting with `rustc`
are always perma-unstable and feature-gated by `feature(rustc_attrs)`.
See regression RUST-143834.
For the underlying problem where even introducing new feature-gated
unstable built-in attributes can break user code such as
```rs
macro_rules! align {
() => {
/* .. */
};
}
pub(crate) use align; // `use` here becomes ambiguous
```
refer to RUST-134963.
Since the `#[align]` attribute is still feature-gated by
`feature(fn_align)`, we can rename it as a mitigation. Note that
`#[rustc_align]` will obviously mean that current unstable user code
using `feature(fn_aling)` will need additionally `feature(rustc_attrs)`,
but this is a short-term mitigation to buy time, and is expected to be
changed to a better name with less collision potential.
See
<https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/238009-t-compiler.2Fmeetings/topic/.5Bweekly.5D.202025-07-17/near/529290371>
where mitigation options were considered.
|
|
Distinguish delim kind to decide whether to emit unexpected closing delimiter
Fixes #138401
|
|
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
|
|
Port `#[coverage]` to the new attribute system
r? ``````@jdonszelmann``````
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#142301 (tests: Fix duplicated-path-in-error fail with musl)
- rust-lang/rust#143630 (Drop `./x suggest`)
- rust-lang/rust#143736 (Give all bytes of TypeId provenance)
- rust-lang/rust#143752 (Don't panic if WASI_SDK_PATH not set when detecting compiler)
- rust-lang/rust#143837 (Adjust `run_make_support::symbols` helpers)
- rust-lang/rust#143878 (Port `#[pointee]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure)
- rust-lang/rust#143905 (Recover and suggest to use `;` to construct array type)
- rust-lang/rust#143907 (core: make `str::split_at_unchecked()` inline)
- rust-lang/rust#143910 (Add experimental `backtrace-trace-only` std feature)
- rust-lang/rust#143927 (Preserve constness in trait objects up to hir ty lowering)
- rust-lang/rust#143935 (rustc_type_ir/walk: move docstring to `TypeWalker` itself)
- rust-lang/rust#143938 (Update books)
- rust-lang/rust#143941 (update `cfg_select!` documentation)
Failed merges:
- rust-lang/rust#143926 (Remove deprecated fields in bootstrap)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
update `cfg_select!` documentation
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115585
After rust-lang/rust#143461, and with an eye on a soon(ish) stabilization, I think the docs need some work.
The existing text read more like a motivation for the feature existing to me, so I've tried to now be a bit more descriptive. Still, suggestions are very welcome.
I also added a test for an empty `select! {}` because it's just the sort of thing that might break.
r? ``@traviscross``
|
|
Recover and suggest to use `;` to construct array type
Fixes rust-lang/rust#143828
r? compiler
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: xizheyin <xizheyin@smail.nju.edu.cn>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
and make internal terminology consistent
Co-authored-by: Travis Cross <tc@traviscross.com>
|
|
r=jdonszelmann
Port `#[omit_gdb_pretty_printer_section]` to the new attribute parsing
Ports `#[omit_gdb_pretty_printer_section]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issuecomment-2971351163
r? ```@jdonszelmann```
|
|
Port #[link_ordinal] to the new attribute parsing infrastructure
Ports link_ordinal to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issuecomment-2971353197
|
|
Port `#[automatically_derived]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure
Ports `#[automatically_derived]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issuecomment-2971351163
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@jdonszelmann`
|
|
make `cfg_select` a builtin macro
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115585
This parses mostly the same as the `macro cfg_select` version, except:
1. wrapping in double brackets is no longer supported (or needed): `cfg_select {{ /* ... */ }}` is now rejected.
2. in an expression context, the rhs is no longer wrapped in a block, so that this now works:
```rust
fn main() {
println!(cfg_select! {
unix => { "foo" }
_ => { "bar" }
});
}
```
3. a single wildcard rule is now supported: `cfg_select { _ => 1 }` now works
I've also added an error if none of the rules evaluate to true, and warnings for any arms that follow the `_` wildcard rule.
cc `@traviscross` if I'm missing any feature that should/should not be included
r? `@petrochenkov` for the macro logic details
|
|
|
|
|
|
infrastructure
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Port several trait/coherence-related attributes the new attribute system
Part of rust-lang/rust#131229
This ports:
- `#[const_trait]`
- `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl]`
- `#[rustc_do_not_implement_via_object]`
- `#[rustc_coinductive]`
- `#[type_const]`
- `#[rustc_specialization_trait]`
- `#[rustc_unsafe_specialization_marker]`
- `#[marker]`
- `#[fundamental]`
- `#[rustc_paren_sugar]`
- `#[rustc_allow_incoherent_impl]`
- `#[rustc_coherence_is_core]`
This also changes `#[marker]` to error on duplicates instead of warning.
cc rust-lang/rust#142838, but I don't think it matters too much, since it's unstable.
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port several linking (linkage?) related attributes the new attribute system
This ports:
- `#[export_stable]`
- `#[ffi_const]`
- `#[ffi_pure]`
- `#[rustc_std_internal_symbol]`
Part of rust-lang/rust#131229
r? ``@oli-obk``
|
|
const-block-as-pattern: do not refer to no-longer-existing nightly feature
Surely everyone who used this nightly feature has fixed their code by now. So let's not confused people on stable that try to use a const block as a pattern by referring to some dead nightly feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
compiler: rename BareFn to FnPtr
At some point "BareFn" was the chosen name for a "bare" function, without the niceties of `~fn`, `&fn`, or a few other ways of writing a function type. However, at some point the syntax for a "bare function" and any other function diverged even more. We started calling them what they are: function pointers, denoted by their own syntax.
However, we never changed the *internal* name for these, as this divergence was very gradual. Personally, I have repeatedly searched for "FnPtr" and gotten confused until I find the name is BareFn, only to forget this until the next time, since I don't routinely interact with the higher-level AST and HIR. But even tools that interact with these internal types only touch on them in a few places, making a migration easy enough. Let's use a more intuitive and obvious name, as this 12+ year old name has little to do with current Rust.
|
|
Fix some comments and related types and locals where it is obvious, e.g.
- bare_fn -> fn_ptr
- LifetimeBinderKind::BareFnType -> LifetimeBinderKind::FnPtrType
Co-authored-by: León Orell Valerian Liehr <me@fmease.dev>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
|
