| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Port must_use to the new target checking
This PR ports `must_use` to the new target checking logic
This also adds a tool-only suggestion to remove attributes on invalid targets, as to not immediately undo the work of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145274
r? `@jdonszelmann`
|
|
|
|
Remove the `#[no_sanitize]` attribute in favor of `#[sanitize(xyz = "on|off")]`
This came up during the sanitizer stabilization (rust-lang/rust#123617). Instead of a `#[no_sanitize(xyz)]` attribute, we would like to have a `#[sanitize(xyz = "on|off")]` attribute, which is more powerful and allows to be extended in the future (instead
of just focusing on turning sanitizers off). The implementation is done according to what was [discussed on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/343119-project-exploit-mitigations/topic/Stabilize.20the.20.60no_sanitize.60.20attribute/with/495377292)).
The new attribute also works on modules, traits and impl items and thus enables usage as the following:
```rust
#[sanitize(address = "off")]
mod foo {
fn unsanitized(..) {}
#[sanitize(address = "on")]
fn sanitized(..) {}
}
trait MyTrait {
#[sanitize(address = "off")]
fn unsanitized_default(..) {}
}
#[sanitize(thread = "off")]
impl MyTrait for () {
...
}
```
r? ```@rcvalle```
|
|
This removes the #[no_sanitize] attribute, which was behind an unstable
feature named no_sanitize. Instead, we introduce the sanitize attribute
which is more powerful and allows to be extended in the future (instead
of just focusing on turning sanitizers off).
This also makes sanitize(kernel_address = ..) attribute work with
-Zsanitize=address
To do it the same as how clang disables address sanitizer, we now
disable ASAN on sanitize(kernel_address = "off") and KASAN on
sanitize(address = "off").
The same was added to clang in https://reviews.llvm.org/D44981.
|
|
This change implements the #[sanitize(..)] attribute, which opts to
replace the currently unstable #[no_sanitize]. Essentially the new
attribute works similar as #[no_sanitize], just with more flexible
options regarding where it is applied. E.g. it is possible to turn
a certain sanitizer either on or off:
`#[sanitize(address = "on|off")]`
This attribute now also applies to more places, e.g. it is possible
to turn off a sanitizer for an entire module or impl block:
```rust
\#[sanitize(address = "off")]
mod foo {
fn unsanitized(..) {}
#[sanitize(address = "on")]
fn sanitized(..) {}
}
\#[sanitize(thread = "off")]
impl MyTrait for () {
...
}
```
This attribute is enabled behind the unstable `sanitize` feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Added a few more variants which are needed for various attributes
- Previously a trait method with default block had the same target representation as a method in a `impl trait for` block, this has been changed (See `MethodKind`)
- Added `plural_name` for more precision on the form of the name
|
|
Port the `#[linkage]` attribute to the new attribute system
r? `@jdonszelmann`
|
|
Reduce some queries around associated items
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove unused `#[must_use]`
Self-explanatory
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/145257
|
|
|
|
Make no_mangle on foreign items explicit instead of implicit
for a followup PR I'm working on I need some foreign items to mangle. I could add a new attribute: `no_no_mangle` or something silly like that but by explicitly putting `no_mangle` in the codegen fn attrs of foreign items we can default it to `no_mangle` and then easily remove it when we don't want it.
I guess you'd know about this r? `@bjorn3.` Shouldn't be too hard to review :)
Builds on rust-lang/rust#144655 which should merge first.
|
|
Support using #[unstable_feature_bound] on trait
This is needed to unblock https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145095
r? ```````@BoxyUwU```````
|
|
fix: re-enable self-assignment
## Description
Re-enables the self-assignment detection that was previously disabled due to unrelated regressions. The fix detects useless assignments like `x = x` and `foo.field = foo.field`.
## History
The original regressions (rust-lang/rust#81626, rust-lang/rust#81658) were specifically about false positives in write-only field detection, not self-assignment detection. Belows are brief history for the rule that I understand.
- Self-assignment detection was originally implemented in rust-lang/rust#87129 to address rust-lang/rust#75356
- The implementation was disabled alongside the revert of rust-lang/rust#81473's "write-only fields" detection
- rust-lang/rust#81473 was reverted via rust-lang/rust#86212 and rust-lang/rust#83171 due to false positives in write-only field detection (rust-lang/rust#81626, rust-lang/rust#81658)
- The self-assignment detection feature got removed, even though it wasn't the reason for the problems
This PR only re-enables the self-assignment checks, which are orthogonal to the problematic write-only field analysis.
## Changes
- Removed `#[allow(dead_code)]` from `compiler/rustc_passes/src/dead.rs` file
- `handle_assign` and
- `check_for_self_assign`
- Added `ExprKind::Assign` handling in `visit_expr` to call both methods
- Updated test expectations in `tests/ui/lint/dead-code/self-assign.rs`
|
|
Port `#[allow_internal_unsafe]` to the new attribute system (attempt 2)
This is a slightly modified version of ae1487aa9922de7642c448cc0908584026699e1c, which caused a performance regression (reverted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/145086#issue-3303428759). The diff between this PR and the previous one can be seen in 027a1def.
r? ```````@jdonszelmann``````` :sparkling_heart:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement `stability_implications` without a visitor.
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143845, the `Annotator` visitor was a no-op when the crate is not staged_api. This PR avoids using a visitor altogether, making `stability_implications` truly a no-op in most cases.
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit 4f7a6ace9e2f2192af7b5d32f4b1664189e0e143.
|
|
Port `#[allow_internal_unsafe]` to the new attribute system
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issue-2565886367.
r? ````@jdonszelmann````
|
|
|
|
Port `#[should_panic]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure
Ports `#[should_panic]` to the new attribute parsing infrastructure for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issuecomment-2971351163
r? ```@jdonszelmann```
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brouwer <jonathantbrouwer@gmail.com>
|
|
Port `#[coroutine]` to the new attribute system
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issue-2565886367.
r? `````@jdonszelmann`````
|
|
Simplify dead code lint
This PR scratches a few itches I had when looking at that code.
The perf improvement comes from keeping the `scanned` set through several marking phases. This pretty much divides by 2 the number of HIR traversals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131229#issue-2565886367.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disabling loading of pretty printers in the debugger itself is more
reliable. Before this commit the .gdb_debug_scripts section couldn't be
included in dylibs or rlibs as otherwise there is no way to disable the
section anymore without recompiling the entire standard library.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some `let chains` clean-up
Not sure if this kind of clean-up is welcoming because of size, but I decided to try out one
r? compiler
|
|
|
|
|
