about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_passes/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2022-04-16Rollup merge of #95006 - tmiasko:thread-local-static, r=wesleywiserDylan DPC-0/+16
Reject `#[thread_local]` attribute on non-static items
2022-04-16Auto merge of #94468 - Amanieu:global_asm_sym, r=nagisabors-6/+54
Implement sym operands for global_asm! Tracking issue: #93333 This PR is pretty much a complete rewrite of `sym` operand support for inline assembly so that the same implementation can be shared by `asm!` and `global_asm!`. The main changes are: - At the AST level, `sym` is represented as a special `InlineAsmSym` AST node containing a path instead of an `Expr`. - At the HIR level, `sym` is split into `SymStatic` and `SymFn` depending on whether the path resolves to a static during AST lowering (defaults to `SynFn` if `get_early_res` fails). - `SymFn` is just an `AnonConst`. It runs through typeck and we just collect the resulting type at the end. An error is emitted if the type is not a `FnDef`. - `SymStatic` directly holds a path and the `DefId` of the `static` that it is pointing to. - The representation at the MIR level is mostly unchanged. There is a minor change to THIR where `SymFn` is a constant instead of an expression. - At the codegen level we need to apply the target's symbol mangling to the result of `tcx.symbol_name()` depending on the target. This is done by calling the LLVM name mangler, which handles all of the details. - On Mach-O, all symbols have a leading underscore. - On x86 Windows, different mangling is used for cdecl, stdcall, fastcall and vectorcall. - No mangling is needed on other platforms. r? `@nagisa` cc `@eddyb`
2022-04-15Rollup merge of #96027 - matthiaskrgr:clippy_rec, r=fee1-deadDylan DPC-3/+2
remove function parameters only used in recursion
2022-04-14Reimplement lowering of sym operands for asm! so that it also works with ↵Amanieu d'Antras-6/+54
global_asm!
2022-04-14remove redundant function param in check_for_self_assign_helper()Matthias Krüger-3/+2
2022-04-13couple of clippy::complexity fixesMatthias Krüger-2/+2
2022-04-09restrict access to span only when we emit diagnosticMiguel Guarniz-1/+1
2022-04-08add mapping from DefKind to Target and remove more ItemLikeVisitor implsMiguel Guarniz-62/+36
Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
2022-04-08remove some uses of visit_all_item_likes in typeck, symbol_mangling and ↵Miguel Guarniz-1/+16
passes crates Signed-off-by: Miguel Guarniz <mi9uel9@gmail.com>
2022-04-08check_doc_keyword: don't alloc string for emptiness checkklensy-32/+28
check_doc_alias_value: get argument as Symbol to prevent needless string convertions check_doc_attrs: don't alloc vec, iterate over slice. Vec introduced in #83149, but no perf run posted on merge replace as_str() check with symbol check get_single_str_from_tts: don't prealloc string trivial string to str replace LifetimeScopeForPath::NonElided use Vec<Symbol> instead of Vec<String> AssertModuleSource use BTreeSet<Symbol> instead of BTreeSet<String> CrateInfo.crate_name replace FxHashMap<CrateNum, String> with FxHashMap<CrateNum, Symbol>
2022-04-05span: move `MultiSpan`David Wood-2/+2
`MultiSpan` contains labels, which are more complicated with the introduction of diagnostic translation and will use types from `rustc_errors` - however, `rustc_errors` depends on `rustc_span` so `rustc_span` cannot use types like `DiagnosticMessage` without dependency cycles. Introduce a new `rustc_error_messages` crate that can contain `DiagnosticMessage` and `MultiSpan`. Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
2022-04-03Rollup merge of #95553 - jam1garner:naked-function-compile-error, r=tmiaskoDylan DPC-3/+22
Don't emit non-asm contents error for naked function composed of errors ## Motivation For naked functions an error is emitted when they are composed of anything other than a single asm!() block. However, this error triggers in a couple situations in which it adds no additional information or is actively misleading. One example is if you do have an asm!() block but simply one with a syntax error: ```rust #[naked] unsafe extern "C" fn compiler_errors() { asm!(invalid_syntax) } ``` This results in two errors, one for the syntax error itself and another telling you that you need an asm block in your function: ```rust error[E0787]: naked functions must contain a single asm block --> src/main.rs:6:1 | 6 | / unsafe extern "C" fn naked_compile_error() { 7 | | asm!(blah) 8 | | } | |_^ ``` This issue also comes up when [utilizing `compile_error!()` for improving your diagnostics](https://twitter.com/steveklabnik/status/1509538243020218372), such as raising a compiler error when compiling for an unsupported target. ## Implementation The rules this PR implements are as follows: 1. If any non-erroneous non-asm statement is included, an error will still occur 2. If multiple asm statements are included, an error will still occur 3. If 0 or 1 asm statements are present, as well as any non-zero number of erroneous statements, then this error will *not* be raised as it is likely either redundant or incorrect The rule of thumb is effectively "if an error is present and its correction could change things, don't raise an error".
2022-04-02Rollup merge of #95544 - jam1garner:improve-naked-noreturn-diagnostic, r=tmiaskoDylan DPC-1/+14
Add error message suggestion for missing noreturn in naked function I had to google the syntax for inline asm's `noreturn` option when I got this error earlier today, so I figured I'd save others the trouble and add the syntax/fix as a suggestion in the error.
2022-04-02Rollup merge of #95354 - dtolnay:rustc_const_stable, r=lcnrDylan DPC-4/+7
Handle rustc_const_stable attribute in library feature collector The library feature collector in [compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/551b4fa395fa588d91cbecfb0cdfe1baa02670cf/compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib_features.rs) has only been looking at `#[stable(…)]`, `#[unstable(…)]`, and `#[rustc_const_unstable(…)]` attributes, while ignoring `#[rustc_const_stable(…)]`. The consequences of this were: - When any const feature got stabilized (changing one or more `rustc_const_unstable` to `rustc_const_stable`), users who had previously enabled that unstable feature using `#![feature(…)]` would get told "unknown feature", rather than rustc's nicer "the feature … has been stable since … and no longer requires an attribute to enable". This can be seen in the way that https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93957#issuecomment-1079794660 failed after rebase: ```console error[E0635]: unknown feature `const_ptr_offset` --> $DIR/offset_from_ub.rs:1:35 | LL | #![feature(const_ptr_offset_from, const_ptr_offset)] | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ``` - We weren't enforcing that a particular feature is either stable everywhere or unstable everywhere, and that a feature that has been stabilized has the same stabilization version everywhere, both of which we enforce for the other stability attributes. This PR updates the library feature collector to handle `rustc_const_stable`, and fixes places in the standard library and test suite where `rustc_const_stable` was being used in a way that does not meet the rules for a stability attribute.
2022-04-01Reword purpose description of noreturn in naked functionjam1garner-1/+1
2022-04-01Don't emit non-asm contents error for naked function composed of errorsjam1garner-3/+22
2022-03-31Add error message suggestion for missing noreturn in naked functionjam1garner-1/+14
2022-03-31Handle rustc_const_stable attribute in library feature collectorDavid Tolnay-4/+7
2022-03-31Merge impl_constness and is_const_fn_raw.Camille GILLOT-1/+1
2022-03-31Rollup merge of #95497 - nyurik:compiler-spell-comments, r=compiler-errorsDylan DPC-4/+4
Spellchecking compiler comments This PR cleans up the rest of the spelling mistakes in the compiler comments. This PR does not change any literal or code spelling issues.
2022-03-30Auto merge of #95436 - cjgillot:static-mut, r=oli-obkbors-1/+1
Remember mutability in `DefKind::Static`. This allows to compute the `BodyOwnerKind` from `DefKind` only, and removes a direct dependency of some MIR queries onto HIR. As a side effect, it also simplifies metadata, since we don't need 4 flavours of `EntryKind::*Static` any more.
2022-03-30Addressed comments by @compiler-errors and @bjorn3Yuri Astrakhan-1/+1
2022-03-30Spellchecking compiler commentsYuri Astrakhan-5/+5
This PR cleans up the rest of the spelling mistakes in the compiler comments. This PR does not change any literal or code spelling issues.
2022-03-30rework implementation for inherent impls for builtin typeslcnr-0/+21
2022-03-29Remember mutability in `DefKind::Static`.Camille GILLOT-1/+1
This allows to compute the `BodyOwnerKind` from `DefKind` only, and removes a direct dependency of some MIR queries onto HIR. As a side effect, it also simplifies metadata, since we don't need 4 flavours of `EntryKind::*Static` any more.
2022-03-22use `format-args-capture` and remove unnecessary nested if blocks in some ↵Takayuki Maeda-78/+61
parts of rustc_passes break before the `&&` Update compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_const.rs Co-authored-by: bjorn3 <bjorn3@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-03-16rustc_error: make ErrorReported impossible to constructmark-7/+7
There are a few places were we have to construct it, though, and a few places that are more invasive to change. To do this, we create a constructor with a long obvious name.
2022-03-16Reject `#[thread_local]` attribute on non-static itemsTomasz Miąsko-0/+16
2022-03-15Support other types of pluralization in pluralize macroest31-1/+1
2022-03-11Improve `AdtDef` interning.Nicholas Nethercote-12/+12
This commit makes `AdtDef` use `Interned`. Much the commit is tedious changes to introduce getter functions. The interesting changes are in `compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/adt.rs`.
2022-03-10Rollup merge of #94635 - jhpratt:merge-deprecated-attrs, r=davidtwcoMatthias Krüger-1/+1
Merge `#[deprecated]` and `#[rustc_deprecated]` The first commit makes "reason" an alias for "note" in `#[rustc_deprecated]`, while still prohibiting it in `#[deprecated]`. The second commit changes "suggestion" to not just be a feature of `#[rustc_deprecated]`. This is placed behind the new `deprecated_suggestion` feature. This needs a tracking issue; let me know if this PR will be approved and I can create one. The third commit is what permits `#[deprecated]` to be used when `#![feature(staged_api)]` is enabled. This isn't yet used in stdlib (only tests), as it would require duplicating all deprecation attributes until a bootstrap occurs. I intend to submit a follow-up PR that replaces all uses and removes the remaining `#[rustc_deprecated]` code after the next bootstrap. `@rustbot` label +T-libs-api +C-feature-request +A-attributes +S-waiting-on-review
2022-03-09Permit `#[deprecated]` in stdlibJacob Pratt-1/+1
2022-03-09Rollup merge of #94686 - ChayimFriedman2:issue-94629, r=jackh726Dylan DPC-1/+1
Do not allow `#[rustc_legacy_const_generics]` on methods It caused an ICE since `item` was `None`. Fixes #94629.
2022-03-08Rollup merge of #94580 - xFrednet:55112-only-reason-in-lint-attr, r=lcnrMatthias Krüger-29/+51
Emit `unused_attributes` if a level attr only has a reason Fixes a comment from `compiler/rustc_lint/src/levels.rs`. Lint level attributes that only contain a reason will also trigger the `unused_attribute` lint. The lint now also checks for the `expect` lint level. That's it, have a great rest of the day for everyone reasoning this :upside_down_face: cc: #55112
2022-03-07Do not allow `#[rustc_legacy_const_generics]` on methodsChayim Refael Friedman-1/+1
It caused an ICE since `item` was `None`.
2022-03-05Auto merge of #93142 - estebank:missing-main, r=wesleywiserbors-3/+3
Do not point at whole file missing `fn main` Only point at the end of the crate. We could try making it point at the beginning of the crate, but that is confused with `DUMMY_SP`, causing the output to be *worse*. This change will make it so that VSCode will *not* underline the whole file when `main` is missing, so other errors will be visible.
2022-03-05Do not point at whole file missing `fn main`Esteban Kuber-3/+3
Only point at the end of the crate. We could try making it point at the beginning of the crate, but that is confused with `DUMMY_SP`, causing the output to be *worse*. This change will make it so that VSCode will *not* underline the whole file when `main` is missing, so other errors will be visible.
2022-03-03Emit `unused_attributes` if a level attr only has a reasonxFrednet-29/+51
2022-03-03Make unknown feature error deterministic.Camille GILLOT-3/+3
2022-03-03Gate stability attrs with other attributes.Camille GILLOT-56/+9
2022-03-03Move query providers.Camille GILLOT-1/+10
2022-03-03Remove useless map.Camille GILLOT-9/+5
2022-03-03Move the set of features to the `features` query.Camille GILLOT-11/+0
2022-03-01Rollup merge of #94448 - c410-f3r:yet-more-let-chains, r=estebankDylan DPC-68/+63
5 - Make more use of `let_chains` Continuation of #94376. cc #53667
2022-03-01Rollup merge of #93926 - PatchMixolydic:bugfix/must_use-on-exprs, r=cjgillotDylan DPC-1/+34
Lint against more useless `#[must_use]` attributes This expands the existing `#[must_use]` check in `unused_attributes` to lint against pretty much everything `#[must_use]` doesn't support. Fixes #93906.
2022-02-285 - Make more use of let_chainsCaio-68/+63
2022-02-27Lint against more useless `#[must_use]` attributesRuby Lazuli-1/+34
This expands the existing `#[must_use]` check in `unused_attributes` to lint against pretty much everything `#[must_use]` doesn't support. Fixes #93906.
2022-02-25`check_used` should only look at actual `used` attributescynecx-2/+2
2022-02-25Switch bootstrap cfgsMark Rousskov-1/+1
2022-02-25Auto merge of #93368 - eddyb:diagbld-guarantee, r=estebankbors-3/+5
rustc_errors: let `DiagnosticBuilder::emit` return a "guarantee of emission". That is, `DiagnosticBuilder` is now generic over the return type of `.emit()`, so we'll now have: * `DiagnosticBuilder<ErrorReported>` for error (incl. fatal/bug) diagnostics * can only be created via a `const L: Level`-generic constructor, that limits allowed variants via a `where` clause, so not even `rustc_errors` can accidentally bypass this limitation * asserts `diagnostic.is_error()` on emission, just in case the construction restriction was bypassed (e.g. by replacing the whole `Diagnostic` inside `DiagnosticBuilder`) * `.emit()` returns `ErrorReported`, as a "proof" token that `.emit()` was called (though note that this isn't a real guarantee until after completing the work on #69426) * `DiagnosticBuilder<()>` for everything else (warnings, notes, etc.) * can also be obtained from other `DiagnosticBuilder`s by calling `.forget_guarantee()` This PR is a companion to other ongoing work, namely: * #69426 and it's ongoing implementation: #93222 the API changes in this PR are needed to get statically-checked "only errors produce `ErrorReported` from `.emit()`", but doesn't itself provide any really strong guarantees without those other `ErrorReported` changes * #93244 would make the choices of API changes (esp. naming) in this PR fit better overall In order to be able to let `.emit()` return anything trustable, several changes had to be made: * `Diagnostic`'s `level` field is now private to `rustc_errors`, to disallow arbitrary "downgrade"s from "some kind of error" to "warning" (or anything else that doesn't cause compilation to fail) * it's still possible to replace the whole `Diagnostic` inside the `DiagnosticBuilder`, sadly, that's harder to fix, but it's unlikely enough that we can paper over it with asserts on `.emit()` * `.cancel()` now consumes `DiagnosticBuilder`, preventing `.emit()` calls on a cancelled diagnostic * it's also now done internally, through `DiagnosticBuilder`-private state, instead of having a `Level::Cancelled` variant that can be read (or worse, written) by the user * this removes a hazard of calling `.cancel()` on an error then continuing to attach details to it, and even expect to be able to `.emit()` it * warnings were switched to *only* `can_emit_warnings` on emission (instead of pre-cancelling early) * `struct_dummy` was removed (as it relied on a pre-`Cancelled` `Diagnostic`) * since `.emit()` doesn't consume the `DiagnosticBuilder` <sub>(I tried and gave up, it's much more work than this PR)</sub>, we have to make `.emit()` idempotent wrt the guarantees it returns * thankfully, `err.emit(); err.emit();` can return `ErrorReported` both times, as the second `.emit()` call has no side-effects *only* because the first one did do the appropriate emission * `&mut Diagnostic` is now used in a lot of function signatures, which used to take `&mut DiagnosticBuilder` (in the interest of not having to make those functions generic) * the APIs were already mostly identical, allowing for low-effort porting to this new setup * only some of the suggestion methods needed some rework, to have the extra `DiagnosticBuilder` functionality on the `Diagnostic` methods themselves (that change is also present in #93259) * `.emit()`/`.cancel()` aren't available, but IMO calling them from an "error decorator/annotator" function isn't a good practice, and can lead to strange behavior (from the caller's perspective) * `.downgrade_to_delayed_bug()` was added, letting you convert any `.is_error()` diagnostic into a `delay_span_bug` one (which works because in both cases the guarantees available are the same) This PR should ideally be reviewed commit-by-commit, since there is a lot of fallout in each. r? `@estebank` cc `@Manishearth` `@nikomatsakis` `@mark-i-m`