| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Make graphviz font configurable
Alternative to PR #76776.
To change the graphviz output to use an alternative `fontname` value,
add a command line option like: `rustc --graphviz-font=monospace`.
r? @ecstatic-morse
|
|
Overrides the debugging_opts.graphviz_font setting.
|
|
Alternative to PR ##76776.
To change the graphviz output to use an alternative `fontname` value,
add a command line option like: `rustc --graphviz-font=monospace`.
|
|
Add -Zgraphviz_dark_mode and monospace font fix
Many developers use a dark theme with editors and IDEs, but this
typically doesn't extend to graphviz output.
When I bring up a MIR graphviz document, the white background is
strikingly bright. This new option changes the colors used for graphviz
output to work better in dark-themed UIs.
<img width="1305" alt="Screen Shot 2020-09-09 at 3 00 31 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3827298/92659478-4b9bff00-f2ad-11ea-8894-b40d3a873cb9.png">
Also fixed the monospace font for common graphviz renders (e.g., VS Code extensions), as described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76500#issuecomment-689837948
**Before:**
<img width="943" alt="Screen Shot 2020-09-09 at 2 48 44 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3827298/92658939-47231680-f2ac-11ea-97ac-96727e4dd622.png">
**Now with fix:**
<img width="943" alt="Screen Shot 2020-09-09 at 2 49 02 PM" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/3827298/92658959-51451500-f2ac-11ea-9aae-de982d466d6a.png">
|
|
Introduce a compiler option to let rustc combines all regular CGUs into
a single one at the end of compilation.
Part of Issue #64191
|
|
Many developers use a dark theme with editors and IDEs, but this
typically doesn't extend to graphviz output.
When I bring up a MIR graphviz document, the white background is
strikingly bright. This new option changes the colors used for graphviz
output to work better in dark-themed UIs.
|
|
Tools, tests, and experimenting with MIR-derived coverage counters
Leverages the new mir_dump output file in HTML+CSS (from #76074) to visualize coverage code regions
and the MIR features that they came from (including overlapping spans).
See example below.
The `run-make-fulldeps/instrument-coverage` test has been refactored to maximize test coverage and reduce code duplication. The new tests support testing with and without `-Clink-dead-code`, so Rust coverage can be tested on MSVC (which, currently, only works with `link-dead-code` _disabled_).
New tests validate coverage region generation and coverage reports with multiple counters per function. Starting with a simple `if-else` branch tests, coverage tests for each additional syntax type can be added by simply dropping in a new Rust sample program.
Includes a basic, MIR-block-based implementation of coverage injection,
available via `-Zexperimental-coverage`. This implementation has known
flaws and omissions, but is simple enough to validate the new tools and
tests.
The existing `-Zinstrument-coverage` option currently enables
function-level coverage only, which at least appears to generate
accurate coverage reports at that level.
Experimental coverage is not accurate at this time. When branch coverage
works as intended, the `-Zexperimental-coverage` option should be
removed.
This PR replaces the bulk of PR #75828, with the remaining parts of
that PR distributed among other separate and indentpent PRs.
This PR depends on two of those other PRs: #76002, #76003 and #76074
Rust compiler MCP rust-lang/compiler-team#278
Relevant issue: #34701 - Implement support for LLVMs code coverage
instrumentation
r? @tmandry
FYI: @wesleywiser
|
|
Adds a new mir_dump output file in HTML/CSS to visualize code regions
and the MIR features that they came from (including overlapping spans).
See example below:
Includes a basic, MIR-block-based implementation of coverage injection,
available via `-Zexperimental-coverage`. This implementation has known
flaws and omissions, but is simple enough to validate the new tools and
tests.
The existing `-Zinstrument-coverage` option currently enables
function-level coverage only, which at least appears to generate
accurate coverage reports at that level.
Experimental coverage is not accurate at this time. When branch coverage
works as intended, the `-Zexperimental-coverage` option should be
removed.
This PR replaces the bulk of PR #75828, with the remaining parts of
that PR distributed among other separate and indentpent PRs.
This PR depends on three of those other PRs: #76000, #76002, and
Rust compiler MCP rust-lang/compiler-team#278
Relevant issue: #34701 - Implement support for LLVMs code coverage
instrumentation
|
|
If a symbol name can only be imported from one place for a type, and
as long as it was not glob-imported anywhere in the current crate, we
can trim its printed path and print only the name.
This has wide implications on error messages with types, for example,
shortening `std::vec::Vec` to just `Vec`, as long as there is no other
`Vec` importable anywhere.
This adds a new '-Z trim-diagnostic-paths=false' option to control this
feature.
On the good path, with no diagnosis printed, we should try to avoid
issuing this query, so we need to prevent trimmed_def_paths query on
several cases.
This change also relies on a previous commit that differentiates
between `Debug` and `Display` on various rustc types, where the latter
is trimmed and presented to the user and the former is not.
|
|
Stabilise link-self-contained option
MCP has been accepted: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/343
I'll add improved heuristic in next PR.
|
|
Similar to `-Z dump-mir-graphviz`, this adds the option to write
HTML+CSS files that allow users to analyze the spans associated with MIR
elements (by individual statement, just terminator, or overall basic
block).
This PR was split out from PR #76004, and exposes an API for spanview
HTML+CSS files that is also used to analyze code regions chosen for
coverage instrumentation (in a follow-on PR).
Rust compiler MCP rust-lang/compiler-team#278
Relevant issue: #34701 - Implement support for LLVMs code coverage
instrumentation
|
|
Fix `-Z instrument-coverage` on MSVC
Found that `-C link-dead-code` (which was enabled automatically
under `-Z instrument-coverage`) was causing the linking error that
resulted in segmentation faults in coverage instrumented binaries. Link
dead code is now disabled under MSVC, allowing `-Z instrument-coverage`
to be enabled under MSVC for the first time.
More details are included in Issue #76038 .
Note this PR makes it possible to support `Z instrument-coverage` but
does not enable instrument coverage for MSVC in existing tests. It will be
enabled in another PR to follow this one (both PRs coming from original
PR #75828).
r? @tmandry
FYI: @wesleywiser
|
|
Found that -C link-dead-code (which was enabled automatically
under -Z instrument-coverage) was causing the linking error that
resulted in segmentation faults in coverage instrumented binaries. Link
dead code is now disabled under MSVC, allowing `-Z instrument-coverage`
to be enabled under MSVC for the first time.
More details are included in Issue #76038.
(This PR was broken out from PR #75828)
|
|
|
|
Fixes #75050
Previously, we would unconditionally suppress the panic hook during
proc-macro execution. This commit adds a new flag
-Z proc-macro-backtrace, which allows running the panic hook for
easier debugging.
|
|
|
