about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_span/src
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-01-28Rollup merge of #136071 - wowinter13:clippy-add-diagnostic-items, r=flip1995Matthias Krüger-0/+2
[Clippy] Add vec_reserve & vecdeque_reserve diagnostic items I’m currently working on reviving this lint (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10157), and there was [a comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/10157#discussion_r1091591057) from ``@flip1995`` regarding the necessity of adding new diagnostic items.
2025-01-25[Clippy] Add vec_reserve & vecdeque_reserve diagnostic itemswowinter13-0/+2
2025-01-25Rollup merge of #134300 - RalfJung:remove-dead-attrs, r=chenyukangMatthias Krüger-2/+0
remove long-deprecated no-op attributes no_start and crate_id These have emitted a deprecation warning since forever (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/64471) and they already don't do anything. In fact they [apparently](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/64471#issuecomment-531517332) have done nothing since pre-1.0, so... do we even need a crater run? Doesn't seem worth it.
2025-01-25Auto merge of #119286 - jyn514:linker-output, r=bjorn3bors-0/+1
show linker output even if the linker succeeds Show stderr and stderr by default, controlled by a new `linker_messages` lint. fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83436. fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38206. cc https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/233931-t-compiler.2Fmajor-changes/topic/uplift.20some.20-Zverbose.20calls.20and.20rename.20to.E2.80.A6.20compiler-team.23706/near/408986134 <!-- try-job: dist-x86_64-msvc --> try-job: aarch64-apple r? `@bjorn3`
2025-01-22Auto merge of #134478 - compiler-errors:attr-span, r=oli-obkbors-6/+39
Properly record metavar spans for other expansions other than TT This properly records metavar spans for nonterminals other than tokentree. This means that we operations like `span.to(other_span)` work correctly for macros. As you can see, other diagnostics involving metavars have improved as a result. Fixes #132908 Alternative to #133270 cc `@ehuss` cc `@petrochenkov`
2025-01-21remove long-deprecated no-op attributes no_start and crate_idRalf Jung-2/+0
2025-01-20warn on unused linker_messages warning attributesjyn-0/+1
2025-01-19Rename FileName::QuoteExpansion to CfgSpecEric Huss-5/+5
I believe this variant name was used incorrectly. The timeline is roughly: * `FileName::cfg_spec_source_code` was added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/54517. However, it used `FileName::Quote` instead of `FileName::CfgSpec` which I believe was a mistake. * Quote stuff was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51285, but did not remove `FileName::Quote`. * `FileName::CfgSpec` was removed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116474 because it was unused. This restores it so that the `--cfg` variant uses a name that makes more sense with how it is used, and restores what I think is the original intent.
2025-01-18Revert "Auto merge of #133734 - scottmcm:lower-indexing-to-ptrmetadata, ↵Rémy Rakic-4/+0
r=davidtwco,RalfJung" This reverts commit b57d93d8b9525fa261404b4cd9c0670eeb1264b8, reversing changes made to 0aeaa5eb22180fdf12a8489e63c4daa18da6f236.
2025-01-18Revert "Auto merge of #134330 - scottmcm:no-more-rvalue-len, r=matthewjasper"Rémy Rakic-0/+1
This reverts commit e108481f74ff123ad98a63bd107a18d13035b275, reversing changes made to 303e8bd768526a5812bb1776e798e829ddb7d3ca.
2025-01-17Auto merge of #135047 - Flakebi:amdgpu-kernel-cc, r=workingjubileebors-0/+1
Add gpu-kernel calling convention The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit f6b21e90d1ec01081bc2619efb68af6788a63d65 (#120495 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16463) due to inactivity in the amdgpu target. Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to `ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust compiles for. Tracking issue: #135467 amdgpu target tracking issue: #135024
2025-01-16Auto merge of #135592 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-4t69l7i, r=matthiaskrgrbors-0/+1
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #134754 (Implement `use` associated items of traits) - #135481 (coverage: Completely overhaul counter assignment, using node-flow graphs) - #135504 (Allow coercing safe-to-call target_feature functions to safe fn pointers) - #135561 (Update docs for `-Clink-dead-code` to discourage its use) - #135574 (ci: mirror ubuntu:22.04 to ghcr.io) - #135585 (resolve symlinks of LLVM tool binaries before copying them) - #135588 (Add license-metadata.json to rustc-src tarball.) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2025-01-16Rollup merge of #134754 - ↵Matthias Krüger-0/+1
frank-king:feature/import_trait_associated_functions, r=oli-obk Implement `use` associated items of traits This PR implements #134691.
2025-01-16Rollup merge of #133720 - c410-f3r:cfg-match-foo-bar-baz, r=joshtriplettMatthias Krüger-0/+160
[cfg_match] Adjust syntax A year has passed since the creation of #115585 and the feature, as expected, is not moving forward. Let's change that. This PR proposes changing the arm's syntax from `cfg(SOME_CONDITION) => { ... }` to `SOME_CODITION => {}`. ```rust match_cfg! { unix => { fn foo() { /* unix specific functionality */ } } target_pointer_width = "32" => { fn foo() { /* non-unix, 32-bit functionality */ } } _ => { fn foo() { /* fallback implementation */ } } } ``` Why? Because after several manual migrations in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116342 it became clear, at least for me, that `cfg` prefixes are unnecessary, verbose and redundant. Again, everything is just a proposal to move things forward. If the shown syntax isn't ideal, feel free to close this PR or suggest other alternatives.
2025-01-16Implement `use` associated items of traitsFrank King-0/+1
2025-01-16Add gpu-kernel calling conventionFlakebi-0/+1
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit f6b21e90d1ec01081bc2619efb68af6788a63d65 due to inactivity in the amdgpu target. Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to `ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust compiles for.
2025-01-10mir_transform: implement forced inliningDavid Wood-0/+1
Adds `#[rustc_force_inline]` which is similar to always inlining but reports an error if the inlining was not possible, and which always attempts to inline annotated items, regardless of optimisation levels. It can only be applied to free functions to guarantee that the MIR inliner will be able to resolve calls.
2025-01-09Auto merge of #135268 - pietroalbini:pa-bump-stage0, r=Mark-Simulacrumbors-1/+1
Master bootstrap update Part of the release process. r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
2025-01-08Add a list of symbols for stable standard library cratesTrevor Gross-1/+5
There are a few locations where the crate name is checked against an enumerated list of `std`, `core`, `alloc`, and `proc_macro`, or some subset thereof. In most of these cases, all four crates should likely be treated the same. Change this so the crates are listed in one place, and that list is used wherever a list of `std` crates is needed. `test` could be considered relevant in some of these cases, but generally treating it separate from the others seems preferable while it is unstable. There are also a few places that Clippy will be able to use this.
2025-01-08update cfg(bootstrap)Pietro Albini-1/+1
2025-01-06Rollup merge of #131830 - hoodmane:emscripten-wasm-eh, r=workingjubileeJacob Pratt-0/+2
Add support for wasm exception handling to Emscripten target This is a draft because we need some additional setting for the Emscripten target to select between the old exception handling and the new exception handling. I don't know how to add a setting like that, would appreciate advice from Rust folks. We could maybe choose to use the new exception handling if `Ctarget-feature=+exception-handling` is passed? I tried this but I get errors from llvm so I'm not doing it right.
2025-01-06Add support for wasm exception handling to Emscripten targetHood Chatham-0/+2
Gated behind an unstable `-Z emscripten-wasm-eh` flag
2025-01-03turn rustc_box into an intrinsicRalf Jung-1/+0
2024-12-30Auto merge of #134757 - RalfJung:const_swap, r=scottmcmbors-1/+1
stabilize const_swap libs-api FCP passed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/83163. However, I only just realized that this actually involves an intrinsic. The intrinsic could be implemented entirely with existing stable const functionality, but we choose to make it a primitive to be able to detect more UB. So nominating for `@rust-lang/lang` to make sure they are aware; I leave it up to them whether they want to FCP this. While at it I also renamed the intrinsic to make the "nonoverlapping" constraint more clear. Fixes #83163
2024-12-27Rollup merge of #134834 - dtolnay:unnamedcall, r=compiler-errorsDavid Tolnay-0/+6
Skip parenthesis around tuple struct field calls The pretty-printer previously did not distinguish between named vs unnamed fields when printing a function call containing a struct field. It would print the call as `(self.fun)()` for a named field which is correct, and `(self.0)()` for an unnamed field which is redundant. This PR changes function calls of tuple struct fields to print without parens. **Before:** ```rust struct Tuple(fn()); fn main() { let tuple = Tuple(|| {}); (tuple.0)(); } ``` **After:** ```rust struct Tuple(fn()); fn main() { let tuple = Tuple(|| {}); tuple.0(); } ```
2024-12-27Skip parenthesis around tuple struct field callsDavid Tolnay-0/+6
2024-12-27Move `{widening, carrying}_mul` to an intrinsic with fallback MIRScott McMurray-0/+1
Including implementing it for `u128`, so it can be defined in `uint_impl!`. This way it works for all backends, including CTFE.
2024-12-25rename typed_swap → typed_swap_nonoverlappingRalf Jung-1/+1
2024-12-24Auto merge of #134625 - compiler-errors:unsafe-binders-ty, r=oli-obkbors-0/+1
Begin to implement type system layer of unsafe binders Mostly TODOs, but there's a lot of match arms that are basically just noops so I wanted to split these out before I put up the MIR lowering/projection part of this logic. r? oli-obk Tracking: - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130516
2024-12-22Begin to implement type system layer of unsafe bindersMichael Goulet-0/+1
2024-12-22Adjust syntaxCaio-0/+160
2024-12-22Delete `Rvalue::Len`Scott McMurray-1/+0
Everything's moved to `PtrMetadata` instead.
2024-12-21Hash only the spans that we care ended up reading in Span::try_metavarsMichael Goulet-14/+35
2024-12-21Hash the untracked macro variable expansionsMichael Goulet-5/+17
2024-12-20split up `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl]` attributeLukas Markeffsky-0/+1
This commit splits the `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl(implement_via_object = ...)]` attribute into two attributes `#[rustc_deny_explicit_impl]` and `#[rustc_do_not_implement_via_object]`. This allows us to have special traits that can have user-defined impls but do not have the automatic trait impl for trait objects (`impl Trait for dyn Trait`).
2024-12-18Improve comments on `Keywords`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+17
In particular, clarify which predicates apply to which keywords.
2024-12-18Move `gen` in the keyword list.Nicholas Nethercote-3/+3
`gen` is an edition-specific keyword used in unstable Rust, and so belongs with `try` (as `is_unused_keyword_conditional` indicates). Also, the cases in `is_unused_keyword_conditional` should be in alphabetical order, to match the keyword list. These changes don't affect the behaviour of any of the `Symbol::is_*` functions.
2024-12-18Only have one source of truth for keywords.Nicholas Nethercote-0/+10
`rustc_symbol` is the source of truth for keywords. rustdoc has its own implicit definition of keywords, via the `is_doc_keyword`. It (presumably) intends to include all keywords, but it omits `yeet`. rustfmt has its own explicit list of Rust keywords. It also (presumably) intends to include all keywords, but it omits `await`, `builtin`, `gen`, `macro_rules`, `raw`, `reuse`, `safe`, and `yeet`. Also, it does linear searches through this list, which is inefficient. This commit fixes all of the above problems by introducing a new predicate `is_any_keyword` in rustc and using it in rustdoc and rustfmt. It documents that it's not the right predicate in most cases.
2024-12-18Simplify `AllKeywords`.Nicholas Nethercote-37/+15
It's a verbose reinvention of a range type, and can be cut down a lot.
2024-12-18Re-export more `rustc_span::symbol` things from `rustc_span`.Nicholas Nethercote-2/+2
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from `rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good reason. This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`, and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to `rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to one.
2024-12-17Rollup merge of #134202 - nnethercote:rm-existing_doc_keyword, r=GuillaumeGomezJacob Pratt-0/+1
Remove `rustc::existing_doc_keyword` lint The check doesn't require a lint. r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
2024-12-17Remove `rustc::existing_doc_keyword` lint.Nicholas Nethercote-0/+1
`CheckAttrVisitor::check_doc_keyword` checks `#[doc(keyword = "..")]` attributes to ensure they are on an empty module, and that the value is a non-empty identifier. The `rustc::existing_doc_keyword` lint checks these attributes to ensure that the value is the name of a keyword. It's silly to have two different checking mechanisms for these attributes. This commit does the following. - Changes `check_doc_keyword` to check that the value is the name of a keyword (avoiding the need for the identifier check, which removes a dependency on `rustc_lexer`). - Removes the lint. - Updates tests accordingly. There is one hack: the `SelfTy` FIXME case used to used to be handled by disabling the lint, but now is handled with a special case in `is_doc_keyword`. That hack will go away if/when the FIXME is fixed. Co-Authored-By: Guillaume Gomez <guillaume1.gomez@gmail.com>
2024-12-16Rollup merge of #134329 - taiki-e:m68k-target-feature, r=workingjubilee许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-0/+1
Add m68k_target_feature This adds the following unstable target features (tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134328): - isa-68000 - isa-68010 - isa-68020 - isa-68030 - isa-68040 - isa-68060 - isa-68881 - isa-68882 The feature names and implied features are match with [definitions in LLVM](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/M68k/M68k.td#L21-L57). isa-68881 and isa-68882 are FPU ISA features. isa-68881 is needed to support input/output in floating-point regs in inline assembly. isa-68020 is needed to implement https://github.com/taiki-e/atomic-maybe-uninit/pull/28 more robustly. cc `@glaubitz` `@ricky26` (designated developers of [m68k-unknown-linux-gnu](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support/m68k-unknown-linux-gnu.html#designated-developers)) r? workingjubilee `@rustbot` label +O-motorola68k +A-target-feature
2024-12-15Add m68k_target_featureTaiki Endo-0/+1
2024-12-15Auto merge of #134258 - bjorn3:no_public_specialization, r=petrochenkovbors-8/+0
Remove support for specializing ToString outside the standard library This is the only trait specializable outside of the standard library. Before stabilizing specialization we will probably want to remove support for this. It was originally made specializable to allow a more efficient ToString in libproc_macro back when this way the only way to get any data out of a TokenStream. We now support getting individual tokens, so proc macros no longer need to call it as often.
2024-12-14Auto merge of #133734 - scottmcm:lower-indexing-to-ptrmetadata, ↵bors-0/+4
r=davidtwco,RalfJung Bounds-check with PtrMetadata instead of Len in MIR Rather than emitting `Len(*_n)` in array index bounds checks, emit `PtrMetadata(copy _n)` instead -- with some asterisks for arrays and `&mut` that need it to be done slightly differently. We're getting pretty close to removing `Len` entirely, actually. I think just one more PR after this (for slice drop shims). r? mir
2024-12-13Auto merge of #134269 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-fkshwux, r=matthiaskrgrbors-0/+3
Rollup of 7 pull requests Successful merges: - #133900 (Advent of `tests/ui` (misc cleanups and improvements) [1/N]) - #133937 (Keep track of parse errors in `mod`s and don't emit resolve errors for paths involving them) - #133938 (`rustc_mir_dataflow` cleanups, including some renamings) - #134058 (interpret: reduce usage of TypingEnv::fully_monomorphized) - #134130 (Stop using driver queries in the public API) - #134140 (Add AST support for unsafe binders) - #134229 (Fix typos in docs on provenance) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2024-12-13Auto merge of #133099 - RalfJung:forbidden-hardfloat-features, r=workingjubileebors-0/+1
forbid toggling x87 and fpregs on hard-float targets Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344, follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129884: The `x87` target feature on x86 and the `fpregs` target feature on ARM must not be disabled on a hardfloat target, as that would change the float ABI. However, *enabling* `fpregs` on ARM is [explicitly requested](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130988) as it seems to be useful. Therefore, we need to refine the distinction of "forbidden" target features and "allowed" target features: all (un)stable target features can determine on a per-target basis whether they should be allowed to be toggled or not. `fpregs` then checks whether the current target has the `soft-float` feature, and if yes, `fpregs` is permitted -- otherwise, it is not. (Same for `x87` on x86). Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132351. Since `fpregs` and `x87` can be enabled on some builds and disabled on others, it would make sense that one can query it via `cfg`. Therefore, I made them behave in `cfg` like any other unstable target feature. The first commit prepares the infrastructure, but does not change behavior. The second commit then wires up `fpregs` and `x87` with that new infrastructure. r? `@workingjubilee`
2024-12-13Rollup merge of #134140 - compiler-errors:unsafe-binders-ast, r=oli-obkMatthias Krüger-0/+3
Add AST support for unsafe binders I'm splitting up #130514 into pieces. It's impossible for me to keep up with a huge PR like that. I'll land type system support for this next, probably w/o MIR lowering, which will come later. r? `@oli-obk` cc `@BoxyUwU` and `@lcnr` who also may want to look at this, though this PR doesn't do too much yet
2024-12-13Remove support for specializing ToString outside the standard librarybjorn3-8/+0
This is the only trait specializable outside of the standard library. Before stabilizing specialization we will probably want to remove support for this. It was originally made specializable to allow a more efficient ToString in libproc_macro back when this way the only way to get any data out of a TokenStream. We now support getting individual tokens, so proc macros no longer need to call it as often.