| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99207 (Enable eager checks for memory sanitizer)
- #101253 (fix the suggestion of format for asm_sub_register)
- #101450 (Add `const_extern_fn` to 1.62 release notes.)
- #101556 (Tweak future opaque ty pretty printing)
- #101563 (Link UEFI target documentation from target list)
- #101593 (Cleanup themes (tooltip))
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Tweak future opaque ty pretty printing
1. The `Return` type of a generator doesn't need to be a lang item just for diagnostic printing of types
2. We shouldn't suppress the `Output = Ty` of a opaque future if the type is a int or float var.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debuginfo line information for macro invocations are collapsed by
default - line information are replaced by the line of the outermost
expansion site. Using `-Zdebug-macros` disables this behaviour.
When the `collapse_debuginfo` feature is enabled, the default behaviour
is reversed so that debuginfo is not collapsed by default. In addition,
the `#[collapse_debuginfo]` attribute is available and can be applied to
macro definitions which will then have their line information collapsed.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
|
|
It allows using `LocalDefId` instead of `DefId` when possible, and also encode cheaper `Visibility<DefIndex>` into metadata.
|
|
r=oli-obk,RalfJung
Make `const_eval_select` a real intrinsic
This fixes issues where `track_caller` functions do not have nice panic
messages anymore when there is a call to the function, and uses the
MIR system to replace the call instead of dispatching via lang items.
Fixes #100696.
|
|
Use head span for `rustc_on_unimplemented`'s `enclosing_scope` attr
This may make #101281 slightly easier to understand
|
|
|
|
safe transmute: use `Assume` struct to provide analysis options
This task was left as a TODO in #92268; resolving it brings [`BikeshedIntrinsicFrom`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/core/mem/trait.BikeshedIntrinsicFrom.html) more in line with the API defined in [MCP411](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/411).
**Before:**
```rust
pub unsafe trait BikeshedIntrinsicFrom<
Src,
Context,
const ASSUME_ALIGNMENT: bool,
const ASSUME_LIFETIMES: bool,
const ASSUME_VALIDITY: bool,
const ASSUME_VISIBILITY: bool,
> where
Src: ?Sized,
{}
```
**After:**
```rust
pub unsafe trait BikeshedIntrinsicFrom<Src, Context, const ASSUME: Assume = { Assume::NOTHING }>
where
Src: ?Sized,
{}
```
`Assume::visibility` has also been renamed to `Assume::safety`, as library safety invariants are what's actually being assumed; visibility is just the mechanism by which it is currently checked (and that may change).
r? `@oli-obk`
---
Related:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/411
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99571
|
|
|
|
Support `#[unix_sigpipe = "inherit|sig_dfl"]` on `fn main()` to prevent ignoring `SIGPIPE`
When enabled, programs don't have to explicitly handle `ErrorKind::BrokenPipe` any longer. Currently, the program
```rust
fn main() { loop { println!("hello world"); } }
```
will print an error if used with a short-lived pipe, e.g.
% ./main | head -n 1
hello world
thread 'main' panicked at 'failed printing to stdout: Broken pipe (os error 32)', library/std/src/io/stdio.rs:1016:9
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
by enabling `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]` like this
```rust
#![feature(unix_sigpipe)]
#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]
fn main() { loop { println!("hello world"); } }
```
there is no error, because `SIGPIPE` will not be ignored and thus the program will be killed appropriately:
% ./main | head -n 1
hello world
The current libstd behaviour of ignoring `SIGPIPE` before `fn main()` can be explicitly requested by using `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_ign"]`.
With `#[unix_sigpipe = "inherit"]`, no change at all is made to `SIGPIPE`, which typically means the behaviour will be the same as `#[unix_sigpipe = "sig_dfl"]`.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/62569 and referenced issues for discussions regarding the `SIGPIPE` problem itself
See the [this](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Proposal.3A.20First.20step.20towards.20solving.20the.20SIGPIPE.20problem) Zulip topic for more discussions, including about this PR.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97889
|
|
optimization of access level table construction
Refactoring which was mentioned in #87487
|
|
Uplift the `let_underscore` lints from clippy into rustc.
This PR resolves #97241.
This PR adds three lints from clippy--`let_underscore_drop`, `let_underscore_lock`, and `let_underscore_must_use`, which are meant to capture likely-incorrect uses of `let _ = ...` bindings (in particular, doing this on a type with a non-trivial `Drop` causes the `Drop` to occur immediately, instead of at the end of the scope. For a type like `MutexGuard`, this effectively releases the lock immediately, which is almost certainly the wrong behavior)
In porting the lints from clippy I had to copy over a bunch of utility functions from `clippy_util` that these lints also relied upon. Is that the right approach?
Note that I've set the `must_use` and `drop` lints to Allow by default and set `lock` to Deny by default (this matches the same settings that clippy has). In talking with `@estebank` he informed me to do a Crater run (I am not sure what type of Crater run to request here--I think it's just "check only"?)
On the linked issue, there's some discussion about using `must_use` and `Drop` together as a heuristic for when to warn--I did not implement this yet.
r? `@estebank`
|
|
|
|
by module
|
|
|
|
Do not report too many expr field candidates
When considering "this expressions' field has a {field/method}" suggestions:
1. Don't report methods that are out of scope
2. Use `span_suggestions` instead of reporting each field candidate, which caps the number of suggestions to 4
4. Blacklist some common traits like `Clone` and `Deref`
Fixes #100894
|
|
This makes it possible to instruct libstd to never touch the signal
handler for `SIGPIPE`, which makes programs pipeable by default (e.g.
with `./your-program | head -n 1`) without `ErrorKind::BrokenPipe`
errors.
|
|
Add pointer masking convenience functions
This PR adds the following public API:
```rust
impl<T: ?Sized> *const T {
fn mask(self, mask: usize) -> *const T;
}
impl<T: ?Sized> *mut T {
fn mask(self, mask: usize) -> *const T;
}
// mod intrinsics
fn mask<T>(ptr: *const T, mask: usize) -> *const T
```
This is equivalent to `ptr.map_addr(|a| a & mask)` but also uses a cool llvm intrinsic.
Proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95643#issuecomment-1121562352
cc `@Gankra` `@scottmcm` `@RalfJung`
r? rust-lang/libs-api
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parser will not suggest invalid expression when use public
Fixes #100165
|
|
Symbols: do not write string values of preinterned symbols into compiled artifacts
r? `@bjorn3`
Followup for #98851
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98851#issuecomment-1215606291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This was left as a TODO in #92268, and brings the trait more in
line with what was defined in MCP411.
`Assume::visibility` has been renamed to `Assume::safety`, as
library safety is what's actually being assumed; visibility is
just the mechanism by which it is currently checked (this may
change).
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/411
ref: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99571
|
|
In the MIR pretty printing, it can sometimes happen that the span of the
statement is outside the span of the body (for example through
inlining). In this case, don't display a relative span but an absolute
span. This will make the mir-opt-tests a little more prone to diffs
again, but the impact should be small.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit adds the following functions all of which have a signature
`pointer, usize -> pointer`:
- `<*mut T>::mask`
- `<*const T>::mask`
- `intrinsics::ptr_mask`
These functions are equivalent to `.map_addr(|a| a & mask)` but they
utilize `llvm.ptrmask` llvm intrinsic.
*masks your pointers*
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add the diagnostic translation lints to crates that don't emit them
Some of these have a note saying that they should build on a stable compiler, does that mean they shouldn't get these lints? Or can we cfg them out on those?
|
|
Lazily decode SourceFile from metadata
Currently, source files from foreign crates are decoded up-front from metadata.
Spans from those crates were matched with the corresponding source using binary search among those files.
This PR changes the strategy by matching spans to files during encoding. This allows to decode source files on-demand, instead of up-front. The on-disk format for spans becomes: `<tag> <position from start of file> <length> <file index> <crate (if foreign file)>`.
|
|
rustc_metadata: dedupe strings to prevent multiple copies in rmeta/query cache blow file size
r? `@cjgillot`
Encodes strings in rmeta/query cache so duplicated ones will be encoded as offsets to first strings, reducing file size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
improve "try ignoring the field" diagnostic
Closes #95795
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement `#[rustc_default_body_unstable]`
This PR implements a new stability attribute — `#[rustc_default_body_unstable]`.
`#[rustc_default_body_unstable]` controls the stability of default bodies in traits.
For example:
```rust
pub trait Trait {
#[rustc_default_body_unstable(feature = "feat", isssue = "none")]
fn item() {}
}
```
In order to implement `Trait` user needs to either
- implement `item` (even though it has a default implementation)
- enable `#![feature(feat)]`
This is useful in conjunction with [`#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92164), we may want to relax requirements for a trait, for example allowing implementing either of `PartialEq::{eq, ne}`, but do so in a safe way — making implementation of only `PartialEq::ne` unstable.
r? `@Aaron1011`
cc `@nrc` (iirc you were interested in this wrt `read_buf`), `@danielhenrymantilla` (you were interested in the related `#[rustc_must_implement_one_of]`)
P.S. This is my first time working with stability attributes, so I'm not sure if I did everything right 😅
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
