| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Reverting because of a performance regression.
This reverts commit d4812c8638173ec163825d56a72a33589483ec4c, reversing
changes made to 5cc60728e7ee10eb2ae5f61f7d412d9805b22f0c.
|
|
Instead of calling new(), we can just use a struct expression directly.
Before:
Placeholder::new(…, …, …, …)
After:
Placeholder {
position: …,
flags: …,
width: …,
precision: …,
}
|
|
|
|
perform less decoding if it has the same syntax context
Following this [comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127279#issuecomment-2210376603)
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use `abs_diff` where applicable
Very small cleanup, dogfooding a [new clippy lint](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/14482) I'm trying to add
|
|
|
|
expand: Leave traces when expanding `cfg` attributes
This is the same as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138515, but for `cfg(true)` instead of `cfg_attr`.
The difference is that `cfg(true)`s already left "traces" after themselves - the `cfg` attributes themselves, with `expanded_inert_attrs` set to true, with full tokens, available to proc macros.
This is not a reasonably expected behavior, but it could not be removed without a replacement, because a [major rustdoc feature](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3631) and a number of clippy lints rely on it. This PR implements a replacement.
This needs a crater run, because it changes observable behavior (in an intended way) - proc macros can no longer see expanded `cfg(true)` attributes.
(Some minor unnecessary special casing for `sym::cfg_attr` is also removed in this PR.)
r? `@nnethercote`
|
|
Implement lint against using Interner and InferCtxtLike in random compiler crates
Often `Interner` defines similar methods to `TyCtxt` (but often simplified due to the simpler API surface of the type system layer for the new solver), which people will either unintentionally or intentionally import and use. Let's discourage that.
r? lcnr
|
|
hygiene: Ensure uniqueness of `SyntaxContextData`s
`SyntaxContextData`s are basically interned with `SyntaxContext`s working as indices, so they are supposed to be unique.
However, currently duplicate `SyntaxContextData`s can be created during decoding from metadata or incremental cache.
This PR fixes that.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129827#discussion_r1759074553
|
|
|
|
crates
|
|
So the order of the `Symbol::is_*` predicates match the order of the
keywords list.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They're dodgy, covering all the keywords, including weak ones, and
edition-specific ones without considering the edition. They have a
single use in rustfmt. This commit changes that use to
`is_reserved_ident`, which is a much more widely used alternative and is
good enough, judging by the lack of effect on the test suite.
|
|
Reduce FormattingOptions to 64 bits
This is part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99012
This reduces FormattingOptions from 6-7 machine words (384 bits on 64-bit platforms, 224 bits on 32-bit platforms) to just 64 bits (a single register on 64-bit platforms).
Before:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
flags: u32, // only 6 bits used
fill: char,
align: Option<Alignment>,
width: Option<usize>,
precision: Option<usize>,
}
```
After:
```rust
pub struct FormattingOptions {
/// Bits:
/// - 0-20: fill character (21 bits, a full `char`)
/// - 21: `+` flag
/// - 22: `-` flag
/// - 23: `#` flag
/// - 24: `0` flag
/// - 25: `x?` flag
/// - 26: `X?` flag
/// - 27: Width flag (if set, the width field below is used)
/// - 28: Precision flag (if set, the precision field below is used)
/// - 29-30: Alignment (0: Left, 1: Right, 2: Center, 3: Unknown)
/// - 31: Always set to 1
flags: u32,
/// Width if width flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
width: u16,
/// Precision if precision flag above is set. Otherwise, always 0.
precision: u16,
}
```
|
|
Add an attribute that makes the spans from a macro edition 2021, and fix pin on edition 2024 with it
Fixes a regression, see issue below. This is a temporary fix, super let is the real solution.
Closes #138596
|
|
r=Amanieu
add `naked_functions_target_feature` unstable feature
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138568
tagging https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134213 https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90957
This PR puts `#[target_feature(/* ... */)]` on `#[naked]` functions behind its own feature gate, so that naked functions can be stabilized. It turns out that supporting `target_feature` on naked functions is tricky on some targets, so we're splitting it out to not block stabilization of naked functions themselves. See the tracking issue for more information and workarounds.
Note that at the time of writing, the `target_features` attribute is ignored when generating code for naked functions.
r? ``@Amanieu``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For macros that are implemented on the compiler, we do *not* mention the `-Zmacro-backtrace` flag. This includes `derive`s and standard macros.
|
|
r=onur-ozkan,jieyouxu
Use `RUSTC_LINT_FLAGS` more
An alternative to the failed #138084.
Fixes #138106.
r? ````@jieyouxu````
|
|
|
|
The idea is to identify cases of symbols/identifiers that are not
expected to be used. There isn't a perfectly sharp line between "dummy"
and "not dummy", but I think it's useful nonetheless.
|
|
Add `#[define_opaques]` attribute and require it for all type-alias-impl-trait sites that register a hidden type
Instead of relying on the signature of items to decide whether they are constraining an opaque type, the opaque types that the item constrains must be explicitly listed.
A previous version of this PR used an actual attribute, but had to keep the resolved `DefId`s in a side table.
Now we just lower to fields in the AST that have no surface syntax, instead a builtin attribute macro fills in those fields where applicable.
Note that for convenience referencing opaque types in associated types from associated methods on the same impl will not require an attribute. If that causes problems `#[defines()]` can be used to overwrite the default of searching for opaques in the signature.
One wart of this design is that closures and static items do not have generics. So since I stored the opaques in the generics of functions, consts and methods, I would need to add a custom field to closures and statics to track this information. During a T-types discussion we decided to just not do this for now.
fixes #131298
|
|
|
|
Reduce formatting `width` and `precision` to 16 bits
This is part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99012
This is reduces the `width` and `precision` fields in format strings to 16 bits. They are currently full `usize`s, but it's a bit nonsensical that we need to support the case where someone wants to pad their value to eighteen quintillion spaces and/or have eighteen quintillion digits of precision.
By reducing these fields to 16 bit, we can reduce `FormattingOptions` to 64 bits (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136974) and improve the in memory representation of `format_args!()`. (See additional context below.)
This also fixes a bug where the width or precision is silently truncated when cross-compiling to a target with a smaller `usize`. By reducing the width and precision fields to the minimum guaranteed size of `usize`, 16 bits, this bug is eliminated.
This is a breaking change, but affects almost no existing code.
---
Details of this change:
There are three ways to set a width or precision today:
1. Directly a formatting string, e.g. `println!("{a:1234}")`
2. Indirectly in a formatting string, e.g. `println!("{a:width$}", width=1234)`
3. Through the unstable `FormattingOptions::width` method.
This PR:
- Adds a compiler error for 1. (`println!("{a:9999999}")` no longer compiles and gives a clear error.)
- Adds a runtime check for 2. (`println!("{a:width$}, width=9999999)` will panic.)
- Changes the signatures of the (unstable) `FormattingOptions::[get_]width` methods to use a `u16` instead.
---
Additional context for improving `FormattingOptions` and `fmt::Arguments`:
All the formatting flags and options are currently:
- The `+` flag (1 bit)
- The `-` flag (1 bit)
- The `#` flag (1 bit)
- The `0` flag (1 bit)
- The `x?` flag (1 bit)
- The `X?` flag (1 bit)
- The alignment (2 bits)
- The fill character (21 bits)
- Whether a width is specified (1 bit)
- Whether a precision is specified (1 bit)
- If used, the width (a full usize)
- If used, the precision (a full usize)
Everything except the last two can simply fit in a `u32` (those add up to 31 bits in total).
If we can accept a max width and precision of u16::MAX, we can make a `FormattingOptions` that is exactly 64 bits in size; the same size as a thin reference on most platforms.
If, additionally, we also limit the number of formatting arguments, we can also reduce the size of `fmt::Arguments` (that is, of a `format_args!()` expression).
|
|
It's no longer necessary now that `-Wunreachable_pub` is being passed.
|
|
|
|
Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138084> to buy time to
consider options that avoids breaking downstream usages of cargo on
distributed `rustc-src` artifacts, where such cargo invocations fail due
to inability to inherit `lints` from workspace root manifest's
`workspace.lints` (this is only valid for the source rust-lang/rust
workspace, but not really the distributed `rustc-src` artifacts).
This breakage was reported in
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138304>.
This reverts commit 48caf81484b50dca5a5cebb614899a3df81ca898, reversing
changes made to c6662879b27f5161e95f39395e3c9513a7b97028.
|
|
Use workspace lints for crates in `compiler/`
This is nicer and hopefully less error prone than specifying lints via bootstrap.
r? ``@jieyouxu``
|
|
add a "future" edition
This idea has been discussed previously [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/213817-t-lang/topic/Continuous.20edition-like.20changes.3F/near/432559262) (though what I've implemented isn't exactly the "next"/"future" editions proposed in that message, just the "future" edition). I've found myself prototyping changes that involve edition migrations and wanting to target an upcoming edition for those migrations, but none exists. This should be permanently unstable and not removed.
|
|
(Except for `rustc_codegen_cranelift`.)
It's no longer necessary now that `unreachable_pub` is in the workspace
lints.
|
|
By naming them in `[workspace.lints.rust]` in the top-level
`Cargo.toml`, and then making all `compiler/` crates inherit them with
`[lints] workspace = true`. (I omitted `rustc_codegen_{cranelift,gcc}`,
because they're a bit different.)
The advantages of this over the current approach:
- It uses a standard Cargo feature, rather than special handling in
bootstrap. So, easier to understand, and less likely to get
accidentally broken in the future.
- It works for proc macro crates.
It's a shame it doesn't work for rustc-specific lints, as the comments
explain.
|
|
Ergonomic ref counting
This is an experimental first version of ergonomic ref counting.
This first version implements most of the RFC but doesn't implement any of the optimizations. This was left for following iterations.
RFC: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3680
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132290
Project goal: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-project-goals/issues/107
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
|
|
Rollup of 25 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135733 (Implement `&pin const self` and `&pin mut self` sugars)
- #135895 (Document workings of successors more clearly)
- #136922 (Pattern types: Avoid having to handle an Option for range ends in the type system or the HIR)
- #137303 (Remove `MaybeForgetReturn` suggestion)
- #137327 (Undeprecate env::home_dir)
- #137358 (Match Ergonomics 2024: add context and examples to the unstable book)
- #137534 ([rustdoc] hide item that is not marked as doc(inline) and whose src is doc(hidden))
- #137565 (Try to point of macro expansion from resolver and method errors if it involves macro var)
- #137637 (Check dyn flavor before registering upcast goal on wide pointer cast in MIR typeck)
- #137643 (Add DWARF test case for non-C-like `repr128` enums)
- #137744 (Re-add `Clone`-derive on `Thir`)
- #137758 (fix usage of ty decl macro fragments in attributes)
- #137764 (Ensure that negative auto impls are always applicable)
- #137772 (Fix char count in `Display` for `ByteStr`)
- #137798 (ci: use ubuntu 24 on arm large runner)
- #137802 (miri native-call support: all previously exposed provenance is accessible to the callee)
- #137805 (adjust Layout debug printing to match the internal field name)
- #137808 (Do not require that unsafe fields lack drop glue)
- #137820 (Clarify why InhabitedPredicate::instantiate_opt exists)
- #137825 (Provide more context on resolve error caused from incorrect RTN)
- #137834 (rustc_fluent_macro: use CARGO_CRATE_NAME instead of CARGO_PKG_NAME)
- #137868 (Add minimal platform support documentation for powerpc-unknown-linux-gnuspe)
- #137910 (Improve error message for `AsyncFn` trait failure for RPIT)
- #137920 (interpret/provenance_map: consistently use range_is_empty)
- #138038 (Update `compiler-builtins` to 0.1.151)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Try to point of macro expansion from resolver and method errors if it involves macro var
In the case that a macro caller passes an identifier into a macro generating a path or method expression, point out that identifier in the context of the *macro* so it's a bit more clear how the macro is involved in causing the error.
r? ``````````@estebank`````````` or reassign
|
|
|
