| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Convert all the crates that have had their diagnostic migration
completed (except save_analysis because that will be deleted soon and
apfloat because of the licensing problem).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previously we only exposed a kreg register class which excludes the k0
register since it can't be used in many instructions. However k0 is a
valid register and we need to have a way of marking it as clobbered for
clobber_abi.
Fixes #94977
|
|
Arm's FEAT_FP and Feat_AdvSIMD describe the same thing on AArch64:
The Neon unit, which handles both floating point and SIMD instructions.
Moreover, a configuration for AArch64 must include both or neither.
Arm says "entirely proprietary" toolchains may omit floating point:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/102374/0101/Data-processing---floating-point
In the Programmer's Guide for Armv8-A, Arm says AArch64 can have
both FP and Neon or neither in custom implementations:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0024/a/AArch64-Floating-point-and-NEON
In "Bare metal boot code for Armv8-A", enabling Neon and FP
is just disabling the same trap flag:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/dai0527/a
In an unlikely future where "Neon and FP" become unrelated,
we can add "[+-]fp" as its own feature flag.
Until then, we can simplify programming with Rust on AArch64 by
folding both into "[+-]neon", which is valid as it supersets both.
"[+-]neon" is retained for niche uses such as firmware, kernels,
"I just hate floats", and so on.
|
|
Support can be determined by checking for the "d32" LLVM feature.
|
|
|
|
Checking of asm! register operands now properly takes function
attributes such as #[target_feature] and #[instruction_set] into
account.
|
|
The previous approach of checking for the reserve-r9 target feature
didn't actually work because LLVM only sets this feature very late when
initializing the per-function subtarget.
|
|
This is already handled by supported_types().
|
|
Previously these were entirely disallowed, except for r11 which was
allowed by accident.
|
|
Improve terminology around "after typeck"
Closes #70258.
|
|
|
|
This avoids unnecessary monomorphizations in codegen backends
|
|
This saves a couple of Symbol::intern calls
|
|
|
|
the current target.
|
|
Also restricts r8-r14 from being used on Thumb1 targets as per #90736.
|
|
|
|
* Add wasm64 variants for inline assembly along the same lines as wasm32
* Update a few directives in libtest to check for `target_family`
instead of `target_arch`
* Update some rustc codegen and typechecks specialized for wasm32 to
also work for wasm64.
|
|
|
|
add support for clobbering xer, cr, and cr[0-7] for asm! on OpenPower/PowerPC
Fixes #88315
|
|
S390x inline asm
This adds register definitions and constraint codes for the s390x general and floating point registers necessary for fixing #85931; as well as a few tests.
Further testing is needed, but I am a little unsure of what specific tests should be added to `src/test/assembly/asm/s390x.rs` to address this.
|
|
Fixes #88315
|
|
|
|
added register prefix
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add clobber-only register classes for asm!
These are needed to properly express a function call ABI using a clobber
list, even though we don't support passing actual values into/out of
these registers.
|
|
|
|
These are needed to properly express a function call ABI using a clobber
list, even though we don't support passing actual values into/out of
these registers.
|
|
|
|
Fix unused attributes on macro_rules.
The `unused_attributes` lint wasn't firing on attributes of `macro_rules` definitions. The consequence is that many attributes are silently ignored on `macro_rules`. The reason is that `unused_attributes` is a late-lint pass, and only has access to the HIR, which does not have macro_rules definitions.
My solution here is to change `non_exported_macro_attrs` to be `macro_attrs` (a list of all attributes used for `macro_rules`, instead of just those for `macro_export`), and then to check this list in the `unused_attributes` lint. There are a number of alternate approaches, but this seemed the most reliable and least invasive. I am open to completely different approaches, though.
One concern is that I don't fully understand the implications of extending `non_exported_macro_attrs` to include non-exported macros. That list was originally added in #62042 to handle stability attributes, so I suspect it was just an optimization since that was all that was needed. It was later extended to be included in SVH in #83901. #80641 also added a use to check for `invalid` attributes, which seems a little odd to me (it didn't validate non-exported macros, and seems highly specific).
Overall, there doesn't seem to be a clear story of when `unused_attributes` should be used versus an error like E0518. I considered alternatively using an "allow list" of built-in attributes that can be used on macro_rules (allow, warn, deny, forbid, cfg, cfg_attr, macro_export, deprecated, doc), but I feel like that could be a pain to maintain.
Some built-in attributes already present hard-errors when used with macro_rules. These are each hard-coded in various places:
- `derive`
- `test` and `bench`
- `proc_macro` and `proc_macro_derive`
- `inline`
- `global_allocator`
The primary motivation is that I sometimes see people use `#[macro_use]` in front of `macro_rules`, which indicates there is some confusion out there (evident that there was even a case of it in rustc).
|
|
|
|
|
|
This includes GPRs and FPRs only
|
|
|
|
|
|
They are still allowed on x86 though.
Fixes #83495
|
|
|
