| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Windows x86: Change i128 to return via the vector ABI
Clang and GCC both return `i128` in xmm0 on windows-msvc and windows-gnu. Currently, Rust returns the type on the stack. Add a calling convention adjustment so we also return scalar `i128`s using the vector ABI, which makes our `i128` compatible with C.
In the future, Clang may change to return `i128` on the stack for its `-msvc` targets (more at [1]). If this happens, the change here will need to be adjusted to only affect MinGW.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134288 (does not fix) [1]
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: x86_64-msvc-ext1
try-job: x86_64-mingw-1
try-job: x86_64-mingw-2
|
|
Clang and GCC both return `i128` in xmm0 on windows-msvc and
windows-gnu. Currently, Rust returns the type on the stack. Add a
calling convention adjustment so we also return scalar `i128`s using the
vector ABI, which makes our `i128` compatible with C.
In the future, Clang may change to return `i128` on the stack for its
`-msvc` targets (more at [1]). If this happens, the change here will
need to be adjusted to only affect MinGW.
Link: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134288
|
|
use `PassMode::Direct` for vector types on `s390x`
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135744
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130869
Previously, all vector types were type erased to `Ni8`, now we pass non-wrapped vector types directly. That skips emitting a bunch of casting logic in rustc, that LLVM then has to clean up. The initial LLVM IR is also a bit more readable.
This calling convention is tested extensively in `tests/assembly/s390x-vector-abi.rs`, showing that this change has no impact on the ABI in practice.
r? ````@taiki-e````
|
|
r=wesleywiser
AIX: use align 8 for byval parameter
On AIX, byval pointer arguments are aligned to 8 bytes based on the 64bit register size. For example, the C callee https://godbolt.org/z/5f4vnG6bh will expect the following argument.
```
ptr nocapture noundef readonly byval(%struct.TwoU64s) align 8 %0
```
This case is captured by `run-make/extern-fn-explicit-align`
|
|
|
|
use indirect return for `i128` and `f128` on wasm32
fixes #135532
Based on https://github.com/WebAssembly/tool-conventions/blob/main/BasicCABI.md we now use an indirect return for `i128`, `u128` and `f128`. That is what LLVM ended up doing anyway.
r? `@bjorn3`
|
|
Add gpu-kernel calling convention
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit f6b21e90d1ec01081bc2619efb68af6788a63d65 (#120495 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16463) due to inactivity in the amdgpu target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to `ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust compiles for.
Tracking issue: #135467
amdgpu target tracking issue: #135024
|
|
|
|
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit
f6b21e90d1ec01081bc2619efb68af6788a63d65 due to inactivity in the amdgpu
target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to
`ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust
compiles for.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
aarch64 softfloat target: always pass floats in int registers
This is a part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131058: on softfloat aarch64 targets, the float registers may be unavailable. And yet, LLVM will happily use them to pass float types if the corresponding target features are enabled. That's a problem as it means enabling/disabling `neon` instructions can change the ABI.
Other targets have a `soft-float` target feature that forces the use of the soft-float ABI no matter whether float registers are enabled or not; aarch64 has nothing like that.
So we follow the aarch64 [softfloat ABI](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131058#issuecomment-2385027423) and treat floats like integers for `extern "C"` functions. For the "Rust" ABI, we do the same for scalars, and then just do something reasonable for ScalarPair that avoids the pointer indirection.
Cc ```@workingjubilee```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The initial naming of "Abi" was an awful mistake, conveying wrong ideas
about how psABIs worked and even more about what the enum meant.
It was only meant to represent the way the value would be described to
a codegen backend as it was lowered to that intermediate representation.
It was never meant to mean anything about the actual psABI handling!
The conflation is because LLVM typically will associate a certain form
with a certain ABI, but even that does not hold when the special cases
that actually exist arise, plus the IR annotations that modify the ABI.
Reframe `rustc_abi::Abi` as the `BackendRepr` of the type, and rename
`BackendRepr::Aggregate` as `BackendRepr::Memory`. Unfortunately, due to
the persistent misunderstandings, this too is now incorrect:
- Scattered ABI-relevant code is entangled with BackendRepr
- We do not always pre-compute a correct BackendRepr that reflects how
we "actually" want this value to be handled, so we leave the backend
interface to also inject various special-cases here
- In some cases `BackendRepr::Memory` is a "real" aggregate, but in
others it is in fact using memory, and in some cases it is a scalar!
Our rustc-to-backend lowering code handles this sort of thing right now.
That will eventually be addressed by lifting duplicated lowering code
to either rustc_codegen_ssa or rustc_target as appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This finally unites TyAndLayout, Layout, and LayoutS into the same crate,
as one might imagine they would be placed. No functional changes.
|
|
|
