about summary refs log tree commit diff
path: root/compiler/rustc_target
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2025-03-12Rollup merge of #138331 - nnethercote:use-RUSTC_LINT_FLAGS-more, ↵Matthias Krüger-1/+0
r=onur-ozkan,jieyouxu Use `RUSTC_LINT_FLAGS` more An alternative to the failed #138084. Fixes #138106. r? ````@jieyouxu````
2025-03-11Auto merge of #137586 - nnethercote:SetImpliedBits, r=bjorn3bors-7/+5
Speed up target feature computation The LLVM backend calls `LLVMRustHasFeature` twice for every feature. In short-running rustc invocations, this accounts for a surprising amount of work. r? `@bjorn3`
2025-03-11Remove `#![warn(unreachable_pub)]` from all `compiler/` crates.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+0
It's no longer necessary now that `-Wunreachable_pub` is being passed.
2025-03-10Target definition for `wasm32-wali-linux-musl` to support the Wasm LinuxArjun Ramesh-0/+190
Interface This commit does not patch libc, stdarch, or cc
2025-03-10Revert "Use workspace lints for crates in `compiler/` #138084"许杰友 Jieyou Xu (Joe)-3/+1
Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138084> to buy time to consider options that avoids breaking downstream usages of cargo on distributed `rustc-src` artifacts, where such cargo invocations fail due to inability to inherit `lints` from workspace root manifest's `workspace.lints` (this is only valid for the source rust-lang/rust workspace, but not really the distributed `rustc-src` artifacts). This breakage was reported in <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138304>. This reverts commit 48caf81484b50dca5a5cebb614899a3df81ca898, reversing changes made to c6662879b27f5161e95f39395e3c9513a7b97028.
2025-03-09Rollup merge of #138084 - nnethercote:workspace-lints, r=jieyouxuMatthias Krüger-1/+3
Use workspace lints for crates in `compiler/` This is nicer and hopefully less error prone than specifying lints via bootstrap. r? ``@jieyouxu``
2025-03-07Rollup merge of #137957 - Noratrieb:no, r=wesleywiserJacob Pratt-11/+9
Remove i586-pc-windows-msvc See [MCP 840](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/840). I left a specialized error message that should help users that hit this in the wild (for example, because they use it in their CI). ``` error: Error loading target specification: the `i586-pc-windows-msvc` target has been removed. Use the `i686-pc-windows-msvc` target instead. Windows 10 (the minimum required OS version) requires a CPU baseline of at least i686 so you can safely switch. Run `rustc --print target-list` for a list of built-in targets ``` ``@workingjubilee`` ``@calebzulawski`` fyi portable-simd uses this target in CI, if you wanna remove it already before this happens
2025-03-07Rollup merge of #137363 - workingjubilee:untangle-x86-abi-impl, r=jieyouxuJacob Pratt-23/+89
compiler: factor Windows x86-32 ABI impl into its own file While it shares more than zero code with the SysV x86-32 ABI impl, there is no particular reason to organize wildly different ABIs using if-else in the same function.
2025-03-08Remove `#![warn(unreachable_pub)]` from all `compiler/` crates.Nicholas Nethercote-1/+0
(Except for `rustc_codegen_cranelift`.) It's no longer necessary now that `unreachable_pub` is in the workspace lints.
2025-03-08Specify rust lints for `compiler/` crates via Cargo.Nicholas Nethercote-0/+3
By naming them in `[workspace.lints.rust]` in the top-level `Cargo.toml`, and then making all `compiler/` crates inherit them with `[lints] workspace = true`. (I omitted `rustc_codegen_{cranelift,gcc}`, because they're a bit different.) The advantages of this over the current approach: - It uses a standard Cargo feature, rather than special handling in bootstrap. So, easier to understand, and less likely to get accidentally broken in the future. - It works for proc macro crates. It's a shame it doesn't work for rustc-specific lints, as the comments explain.
2025-03-05compiler: factor Windows x86-32 ABI impl into its own fileJubilee Young-23/+89
While it shares more than zero code with the SysV x86-32 ABI impl, there is no particular reason to organize wildly different ABIs using if-else in the same function.
2025-03-05feat: Remove - from xtensa targets cpu namesSergio Gasquez-4/+4
Co-authored-by: MabezDev <scott@mabez.dev>
2025-03-05Simplify `implied_target_features`.Nicholas Nethercote-7/+5
Currently its argument is an iterator, but in practice it's always a singleton.
2025-03-04Auto merge of #135695 - Noratrieb:elf-raw-dylib, r=bjorn3bors-1/+54
Support raw-dylib link kind on ELF raw-dylib is a link kind that allows rustc to link against a library without having any library files present. This currently only exists on Windows. rustc will take all the symbols from raw-dylib link blocks and put them in an import library, where they can then be resolved by the linker. While import libraries don't exist on ELF, it would still be convenient to have this same functionality. Not having the libraries present at build-time can be convenient for several reasons, especially cross-compilation. With raw-dylib, code linking against a library can be cross-compiled without needing to have these libraries available on the build machine. If the libc crate makes use of this, it would allow cross-compilation without having any libc available on the build machine. This is not yet possible with this implementation, at least against libc's like glibc that use symbol versioning. The raw-dylib kind could be extended with support for symbol versioning in the future. This implementation is very experimental and I have not tested it very well. I have tested it for a toy example and the lz4-sys crate, where it was able to successfully link a binary despite not having a corresponding library at build-time. I was inspired by Björn's comments in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/bundle-zig-cc-in-rustup-by-default/22096/27 Tracking issue: #135694 r? bjorn3 try-job: aarch64-apple try-job: x86_64-msvc-1 try-job: x86_64-msvc-2 try-job: test-various
2025-03-03Remove i586-pc-windows-msvcNoratrieb-11/+9
See MCP 840. I left a specialized error message that should help users that hit this in the wild (for example, because they use it in their CI).
2025-03-02Rollup merge of #137860 - taiki-e:powerpcspe-msync, r=workingjubileeMatthias Krüger-1/+3
rustc_target: Add msync target feature and enable it on powerpcspe targets Some older PowerPC processors do not have the `sync` (`sync 0`) and `lwsync` (`sync 1`) instructions, but instead have the `msync` instruction. (IIRC `msync` and `sync` will be assembled into the same bit-pattern, but `lwsync` will be SIGILL. See also https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg01238.html.) LLVM recognizes this as the [`msync` feature](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/cc5d8a4b2fc765c3c432f1ad0b185dae518d41bd/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPC.td#L140) and enables for some cpus such as [e500](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/cc5d8a4b2fc765c3c432f1ad0b185dae518d41bd/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPC.td#L644). powerpcspe is a target for CPUs such as e500 ([Debian Wiki](https://wiki.debian.org/PowerPCSPEPort)). However, the `msync` feature is currently not enabled except for vxworks, and at least since 2022-04, powerpc-unknown-linux-gnuspe was known to not work on real hardware without `-C target-cpu` (e.g., #96394, #117361). https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/8c392966a013fd8a09e6b78b3c8d6e442bc278e1/compiler/rustc_target/src/spec/targets/powerpc_wrs_vxworks_spe.rs#L28 Fixes #117361 cc `@BKPepe` ([powerpc-unknown-linux-muslspe target maintainer](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support/powerpc-unknown-linux-muslspe.html#target-maintainers)) cc `@glaubitz` (who added powerpc-unknown-linux-gnuspe in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48484) cc `@th0ma7` (who opened #117361) r? workingjubilee `@rustbot` label +O-PowerPC +A-target-feature
2025-03-02rustc_target: Add msync target feature and enable it on powerpcspe targetsTaiki Endo-1/+3
2025-02-28rename BackendRepr::Vector → SimdVectorRalf Jung-13/+13
2025-02-26Support raw-dylib link kind on ELFNoratrieb-1/+54
raw-dylib is a link kind that allows rustc to link against a library without having any library files present. This currently only exists on Windows. rustc will take all the symbols from raw-dylib link blocks and put them in an import library, where they can then be resolved by the linker. While import libraries don't exist on ELF, it would still be convenient to have this same functionality. Not having the libraries present at build-time can be convenient for several reasons, especially cross-compilation. With raw-dylib, code linking against a library can be cross-compiled without needing to have these libraries available on the build machine. If the libc crate makes use of this, it would allow cross-compilation without having any libc available on the build machine. This is not yet possible with this implementation, at least against libc's like glibc that use symbol versioning. The raw-dylib kind could be extended with support for symbol versioning in the future. This implementation is very experimental and I have not tested it very well. I have tested it for a toy example and the lz4-sys crate, where it was able to successfully link a binary despite not having a corresponding library at build-time.
2025-02-25Rollup merge of #137370 - RalfJung:x86-abi-fallback, r=SparrowLiiLeón Orell Valerian Liehr-11/+26
adjust_abi: make fallback logic for ABIs a bit easier to read I feel like the match guards here make this unnecessarily harder to follow.
2025-02-24Rollup merge of #137417 - taiki-e:riscv-atomic, r=AmanieuMichael Goulet-0/+5
rustc_target: Add more RISC-V atomic-related features This is a continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130877 and adds a few target features, including `zacas`, which was experimental in LLVM 19 and marked non-experimental in LLVM 20. This adds the following target features to unstable riscv_target_feature: - `za64rs` (Za64rs Extension 1.0): Reservation Set Size of at Most 64 Bytes ([definition in LLVM](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFeatures.td#L227-L228), [available since LLVM 18](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8649328060b4e748502d1d859f9c9c1bd3c2bccc)) - `za128rs` (Za128rs Extension 1.0): Reservation Set Size of at Most 128 Bytes ([definition in LLVM](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFeatures.td#L230-L231), [available since LLVM 18](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8649328060b4e748502d1d859f9c9c1bd3c2bccc)) - IIUC, `za*rs` can be referenced when implementing helpers to reduce contention in synchronization primitives, like [`crossbeam_utils::CachePadded`](https://docs.rs/crossbeam-utils/latest/crossbeam_utils/struct.CachePadded.html). (relevant discussion: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-profiles/issues/79) - `zacas` (Zacas Extension 1.0): Atomic Compare-And-Swap Instructions (`amocas.{w,d,q}{,.aq,.rl,.aqrl}` and `amocas.{b,h}{,.aq,.rl,.aqrl}` when `zabha` is also enabled) ([definition in LLVM](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFeatures.td#L240-L243), [available as non-experimental since LLVM 20](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/614aeda93b2225c6eb42b00ba189ba7ca2585c60)) - This implies `zaamo`. - This is used to optimize CAS in existing atomics and/or implement 64-bit/128-bit atomics on riscv32/riscv64 (e.g., https://github.com/taiki-e/portable-atomic/pull/173). - Note that [LLVM does not automatically use this instruction for 64-bit/128-bit atomics on riscv32/riscv64 even if this feature is enabled, because doing it changes the ABI](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/876174ffd7533dc220f94721173bb767b659fa7f/llvm/docs/RISCVUsage.rst#riscv-zacas-note). (If the ability to do that is provided by LLVM in the future, it should probably be controlled by another ABI feature similar to `forced-atomics`.) - `zama16b` (Zama16b Extension 1.0): Atomic 16-byte misaligned loads, stores and AMOs ([definition in LLVM](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFeatures.td#L255-L256), [available since LLVM 19](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b090569685699abe4a8031ad442a0f81e373146b)) - IIUC, unlike AArch64 FEAT_LSE2 which also makes 16-byte aligned ldp ({i,u}128 load) atomic, this extension only affects instructions that already considered atomic if they were naturally aligned. i.e., fld (f64 load) on riscv32 would not be atomic with or without this extension ([relevant QEMU code](https://github.com/qemu/qemu/blob/b69801dd6b1eb4d107f7c2f643adf0a4e3ec9124/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc#L50-L62)). - `zawrs` (Zawrs Extension 1.0): Wait on Reservation Set (`wrs.nto` and `wrs.sto`) ([definition in LLVM](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-20.1.0-rc2/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVFeatures.td#L258), [available as non-experimental since LLVM 17](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d41a73aa94cb8945dcd0f2906992c2fcea6ed001)) - This is used to optimize synchronization primitives (e.g., Linux uses this for spinlocks (https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/b8ddb0df30f9f6e70422f1e705b7416da115bd24)). Btw, the question of whether `zaamo` is implied by `zabha` or not, which was discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/130877, has been resolved in LLVM 20, since LLVM now treats `zaamo` as implied by `zabha`/`zacas` (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115694), just like GCC and rustc. r? `@Amanieu` `@rustbot` label +O-riscv +A-target-feature
2025-02-23Rollup merge of #136637 - Pyr0de:binary-format, r=NoratriebTrevor Gross-10/+90
Add binary_format to rustc target specs Added binary format field to `TargetOptions` Fixes #135724 r? `@Noratrieb`
2025-02-22rustc_target: Add more RISC-V atomic-related featuresTaiki Endo-0/+5
2025-02-22Upgrade the compiler to edition 2024Michael Goulet-1/+1
2025-02-21Rollup merge of #135630 - folkertdev:s390x-target-features, r=AmanieuMatthias Krüger-1/+20
add more `s390x` target features Closes #88937 tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130869 The target feature names are, right now, just the llvm target feature names. These mostly line up well with the names of [Facility Indications](https://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/a227832d.pdf#page=301) names. The linux kernel (and `/proc/cpuinfo`) uses shorter, more cryptic names. (e.g. "vector" is `vx`). We can deviate from the llvm names, but the CPU vendor (IBM) does not appear to use e.g. `vx` for what they call `vector`. There are a number of implied target features between the vector facilities (based on the [Facility Indications](https://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/a227832d.pdf#page=301) table): - 129 The vector facility for z/Architecture is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. - 134 The vector packed decimal facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 134 is one, bit 129 is also one. - 135 The vector enhancements facility 1 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 135 is one, bit 129 is also one. - 148 The vector-enhancements facility 2 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 148 is one, bits 129 and 135 are also one. - 152 The vector-packed-decimal-enhancement facility 1 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 152 is one, bits 129 and 134 are also one. - 165 The neural-network-processing-assist facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 165 is one, bit 129 is also one. - 192 The vector-packed-decimal-enhancement facility 2 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 192 is one, bits 129, 134, and 152 are also one. The remaining facilities do not have any implied target features (that we provide): - 45 The distinct-operands, fast-BCR-serialization, high-word, and population-count facilities, the interlocked-access facility 1, and the load/store-oncondition facility 1 are installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. - 73 The transactional-execution facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. Bit 49 is one when bit 73 is one. - 133 The guarded-storage facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. - 150 The enhanced-sort facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. - 151 The DEFLATE-conversion facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. The added target features are those that have ISA implications, can be queried at runtime, and have LLVM support. LLVM [defines more target features](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d49a2d2bc9c65c787bfa04ac8ece614da48a8cd5/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZFeatures.td), but I'm not sure those are useful. They can always be added later, and can already be set globally using `-Ctarget-feature`. I'll also update the `is_s390x_feature_supported` macro (added in https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1699, not yet on nightly, that needs an stdarch sync) to include these target features. ``@Amanieu`` you had some reservations about the `"vector"` target feature name. It does appear to be the most "official" name we have. On the one hand the name is very generic, and some of the other names are rather long. For the `neural-network-processing-assist` even LLVM thought that was a bit much and shortened it to `nnp-assist`. Also for `vector-packed-decimal-enhancement facility 1` the llvm naming is inconsistent. On the other hand, the cpuinfo names are very cryptic, and aren't found in the IBM documentation. r? ``@Amanieu`` cc ``@uweigand`` ``@taiki-e``
2025-02-21adjust_abi: make fallback logic for ABIs a bit easier to readRalf Jung-11/+26
2025-02-21add more s390x target featuresFolkert de Vries-1/+20
The target feature names are, right now, based on the llvm target feature names. These mostly line up well with the names of [Facility Inidications](https://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/a227832d.pdf#page=301) names. The linux kernel uses shorter, more cryptic names. (e.g. "vector" is `vx`). We can deviate from the llvm names, but the CPU vendor (IBM) does not appear to use e.g. `vx` for what they call `vector`. There are a number of implied target features between the vector facilities (based on the [Facility Inidications](https://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/a227832d.pdf#page=301) table): - 129 The vector facility for z/Architecture is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. - 134 The vector packed decimal facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 134 is one, bit 129 is also one. - 135 The vector enhancements facility 1 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 135 is one, bit 129 is also one. - 148 The vector-enhancements facility 2 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 148 is one, bits 129 and 135 are also one. - 152 The vector-packed-decimal-enhancement facility 1 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 152 is one, bits 129 and 134 are also one. - 165 The neural-network-processing-assist facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 165 is one, bit 129 is also one. - 192 The vector-packed-decimal-enhancement facility 2 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 192 is one, bits 129, 134, and 152 are also one. And then there are a number of facilities without any implied target features - 45 The distinct-operands, fast-BCR-serialization, high-word, and population-count facilities, the interlocked-access facility 1, and the load/store-oncondition facility 1 are installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. - 73 The transactional-execution facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. Bit 49 is one when bit 73 is one. - 133 The guarded-storage facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. - 150 The enhanced-sort facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. - 151 The DEFLATE-conversion facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. The added target features are those that have ISA implications, can be queried at runtime, and have LLVM support. LLVM [defines more target features](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/d49a2d2bc9c65c787bfa04ac8ece614da48a8cd5/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZFeatures.td), but I'm not sure those are useful. They can always be added later, and can already be set globally using `-Ctarget-feature`.
2025-02-20Rollup merge of #137324 - flba-eb:rename_qnx_target_name_i586, r=workingjubileeJubilee-1/+1
Make x86 QNX target name consistent with other Rust targets Rename target to be consistent with other Rust targets: Use `i686` instead of `i586` See also - #136495 - #109173 CC: `@jonathanpallant` `@japaric` `@gh-tr` `@samkearney`
2025-02-20Rollup merge of #137318 - bjorn3:cg_clif_abi_workaround, r=workingjubileeJubilee-1/+3
Workaround Cranelift not yet properly supporting vectors smaller than 128bit While it would technically be possible to workaround this in cg_clif, it quickly becomes very messy and would likely cause correctness issues. Working around it in rustc instead is much simper and won't have any negative impact for code running on stable as vectors smaller than 128bit can only be made on nightly using core::simd or #[repr(simd)].
2025-02-20Rollup merge of #136985 - zachs18:backend-repr-remove-uninhabited, ↵Jubilee-10/+5
r=workingjubilee Do not ignore uninhabited types for function-call ABI purposes. (Remove BackendRepr::Uninhabited) Accepted MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/832 Fixes #135802 Do not consider the inhabitedness of a type for function call ABI purposes. * Remove the [`rustc_abi::BackendRepr::Uninhabited`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_abi/enum.BackendRepr.html) variant * Instead calculate the `BackendRepr` of uninhabited types "normally" (as though they were not uninhabited "at the top level", but still considering inhabitedness of variants to determine enum layout, etc) * Add an `uninhabited: bool` field to [`rustc_abi::LayoutData`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_abi/struct.LayoutData.html) so inhabitedness of a `LayoutData` can still be queried when necessary (e.g. when determining if an enum variant needs a tag value allocated to it). This should not affect type layouts (size/align/field offset); this should only affect function call ABI, and only of uninhabited types. cc ``@RalfJung``
2025-02-20Rollup merge of #136473 - usamoi:infer_linker_hints, r=petrochenkovJubilee-8/+12
infer linker flavor by linker name if it's sufficiently specific Fix: `rustc` does not infer `llvm-bitcode-linker` uses `llbc` linker flavor if targeting `nvptx64-nvidia-cuda`.
2025-02-20Rollup merge of #131651 - Patryk27:avr-unknown-unknown, r=tgross35Jubilee-49/+39
Create a generic AVR target: avr-none This commit removes the `avr-unknown-gnu-atmega328` target and replaces it with a more generic `avr-none` variant that must be specialized using `-C target-cpu` (e.g. `-C target-cpu=atmega328p`). Seizing the day, I'm adding myself as the maintainer of this target - I've been already fixing the bugs anyway, might as well make it official 🙂 Related discussions: - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131171 - https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/800 try-job: x86_64-gnu-debug
2025-02-20Remove `BackendRepr::Uninhabited`, replaced with an `uninhabited: bool` ↵Zachary S-10/+5
field in `LayoutData`. Also update comments that refered to BackendRepr::Uninhabited.
2025-02-20Make x86 QNX target name consistent with other Rust targetsFlorian Bartels-1/+1
2025-02-20Workaround Cranelift not yet properly supporting vectors smaller than 128bitbjorn3-1/+3
While it would technically be possible to workaround this in cg_clif, it quickly becomes very messy and would likely cause correctness issues. Working around it in rustc instead is much simper and won't have any negative impact for code running on stable as vectors smaller than 128bit can only be made on nightly using core::simd or #[repr(simd)].
2025-02-20infer linker flavor by linker name if it's sufficiently specificusamoi-8/+12
2025-02-19Create a generic AVR target: avr-nonePatryk Wychowaniec-49/+39
This commit removes the `avr-unknown-gnu-atmega328` target and replaces it with a more generic `avr-none` variant that must be specialized with the `-C target-cpu` flag (e.g. `-C target-cpu=atmega328p`).
2025-02-19Rollup merge of #137094 - RalfJung:softfloat-means-no-simd, r=tgross35Matthias Krüger-6/+10
x86_win64 ABI: do not use xmm0 with softfloat ABI This adjusts https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134290 to not apply the new logic to targets marked as "softfloat". That fixes most instances of the issue brought up [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116558#issuecomment-2661027437). r? `@tgross35`
2025-02-19x86_win64 ABI: do not use xmm0 with softfloat ABIRalf Jung-6/+10
2025-02-18x86-sse2 ABI: use SSE registers for floats and SIMDRalf Jung-47/+85
2025-02-17Adds binary_format to rustc target specsPyrode-10/+90
2025-02-17Rollup merge of #137149 - Noratrieb:wtf-is-this-target, r=RalfJungMatthias Krüger-0/+1
Remove SSE ABI from i586-pc-windows-msvc As an i586 target, it should not have SSE. This caused the following warning to be emitted: ``` warning: target feature `sse2` must be enabled to ensure that the ABI of the current target can be implemented correctly | = note: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release! = note: for more information, see issue #116344 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344> warning: 1 warning emitted ``` see #116344. r? RalfJung
2025-02-17Auto merge of #136953 - ken-matsui:import-target-metadata, r=workingjubileebors-568/+679
rustc_target: import TargetMetadata
2025-02-16rustc_target: import TargetMetadataKen Matsui-568/+679
2025-02-16Remove SSE ABI from i586-pc-windows-msvcNoratrieb-0/+1
As an i586 target, it should not have SSE. This caused the following warning to be emitted: ``` warning: target feature `sse2` must be enabled to ensure that the ABI of the current target can be implemented correctly | = note: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release! = note: for more information, see issue #116344 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344> warning: 1 warning emitted ```
2025-02-16Rollup merge of #137072 - Urgau:check-cfg-load-builtins-at-once, r=NoratriebMatthias Krüger-0/+13
Load all builtin targets at once instead of one by one in check-cfg This PR adds a method on `rustc_target::Target` to load all the builtin targets at once, and then uses that method when constructing the `target_*` values in check-cfg instead of load loading each target one by one by their name, which requires a lookup and was more of a hack anyway. This may give us some performance improvements as we won't need to do the lookup for the _currently_ 287 targets we have.
2025-02-16Rollup merge of #136545 - durin42:nvptx64-align, r=nikicJacob Pratt-1/+1
nvptx64: update default alignment to match LLVM 21 This changed in llvm/llvm-project@91cb8f5d3202870602c6bef807bc4c7ae8a32790. The commit itself is mostly about some intrinsic instructions, but as an aside it also mentions something about addrspace for tensor memory, which I believe is what this string is telling us. `@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
2025-02-15Load all builtin targets at once instead of one by oneUrgau-0/+13
This should give us some performance improvements as we won't need to do the lookup for the _currently_ 287 targets we have.
2025-02-14add x86-sse2 (32bit) ABI that requires SSE2 target featureRalf Jung-19/+71
2025-02-13Rollup merge of #134999 - Berrysoft:dev/new-cygwin-target, ↵Jacob Pratt-2/+74
r=chenyukang,workingjubilee Add cygwin target. This PR simply adds cygwin target together with msys2 target, based on ````@ookiineko```` 's (the account has been deleted) [work](https://github.com/ookiineko-cygport/rust) on cygwin target. My full work is here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...Berrysoft:rust:dev/cygwin I have succeeded in building a new rustc for cygwin target, and eventually distributed a new version of [fish-shell](https://github.com/Berrysoft/fish-shell/releases) (rewritten by Rust) for MSYS2. I will open a new PR to fix std if this PR is accepted.