| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Don't call `query_normalize` when reporting similar impls
Firstly, It's sketchy to be using `query_normalize` at all during HIR typeck -- it's asking for an ICE 😅. Secondly, we're normalizing an impl trait ref that potentially has parameter types in `ty::ParamEnv::empty()`, which is kinda sketchy as well.
The only UI test change from removing this normalization is that we don't evaluate anonymous constants in impls, which end up giving us really ugly suggestions:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `[X; 35]: Default` is not satisfied
--> /home/gh-compiler-errors/test.rs:4:5
|
4 | <[X; 35] as Default>::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Default` is not implemented for `[X; 35]`
|
= help: the following other types implement trait `Default`:
&[T]
&mut [T]
[T; 32]
[T; core::::array::{impl#30}::{constant#0}]
[T; core::::array::{impl#31}::{constant#0}]
[T; core::::array::{impl#32}::{constant#0}]
[T; core::::array::{impl#33}::{constant#0}]
[T; core::::array::{impl#34}::{constant#0}]
and 27 others
```
So just fold the impls with a `BottomUpFolder` that calls `ty::Const::eval`. This doesn't work totally correctly with generic-const-exprs, but it's fine for stable code, and this is error reporting after all.
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113413 (Add needs-triage to all new issues)
- #113426 (Don't ICE in `resolve_bound_vars` when associated return-type bounds are in bad positions)
- #113427 (Remove `variances_of` on RPITIT GATs, remove its one use-case)
- #113441 (miri: check that assignments do not self-overlap)
- #113453 (Remove unused from_method from rustc_on_unimplemented)
- #113456 (Avoid calling report_forbidden_specialization for RPITITs)
- #113466 (Update cargo)
- #113467 (Fix comment of `fn_can_unwind`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Remove unused from_method from rustc_on_unimplemented
Fixes #113439
`on_unimplemented_note` was calling `item_name` for RPITITs and that produced ICEs. I've added a regression test for that but also have removed `from_method` symbol entirely because it wasn't even used and by doing that the `item_name` call was also removed.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
|
|
Require TAITs to be mentioned in the signatures of functions that register hidden types for them
r? `@lcnr` `@compiler-errors`
This implements the lang team decision from [the TAIT design meeting](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/design.20meeting.202023-05-31.20TAITs/near/362518164).
|
|
|
|
sanity check field offsets in unsizeable structs
As promised in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112062#issuecomment-1567494994, this PR extends the layout sanity checks to ensure that structs fields don't move around when unsizing and prevent issues like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112048 in the future. Like most other layout sanity checks, this only runs on compilers with debug assertions enabled.
Here is how it looks when it fails:
```text
error: internal compiler error: compiler/rustc_ty_utils/src/layout.rs:533:21: unsizing GcNode<std::boxed::Box<i32>> changed field order!
Layout { size: Size(32 bytes), align: AbiAndPrefAlign { abi: Align(8 bytes), pref: Align(8 bytes) }, abi: Aggregate { sized: true }, fields: Arbitrary { offsets: [Size(0 bytes), Size(8 bytes), Size(24 bytes)], memory_index: [0, 1, 2] }, largest_niche: Some(Niche { offset: Size(24 bytes), value: Pointer(AddressSpace(0)), valid_range: 1..=18446744073709551615 }), variants: Single { index: 0 } }
Layout { size: Size(24 bytes), align: AbiAndPrefAlign { abi: Align(8 bytes), pref: Align(8 bytes) }, abi: Aggregate { sized: false }, fields: Arbitrary { offsets: [Size(16 bytes), Size(0 bytes), Size(24 bytes)], memory_index: [1, 0, 2] }, largest_niche: None, variants: Single { index: 0 } }
```
r? `@the8472`
|
|
hidden types for them
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move `ty::ConstKind` to `rustc_type_ir`
Needed this in another PR for custom debug impls, and this will also be required to move the new solver into a separate crate that does not use `TyCtxt` so that r-a and friends can depend on the trait solver.
Rebased on top of #113325, only the second and third commits needs reviewing
|
|
Add some extra information to opaque type cycle errors
Plus a bunch of cleanups.
This should help users debug query cycles due to auto trait checking. We'll probably want to fix cycle errors in most (or all?) cases by looking at the current item's hidden types (new solver does this), and by delaying the auto trait checks to after typeck.
|
|
`TypeParameterDefinition` always require a `DefId`
the `None` case never actually reaches diagnostics so it feels better for diagnostics to be able to rely on the `DefId` being there, cc #113310
|
|
-Ztrait-solver=next: stop depending on old solver
removes the final dependencies on the old solver when `-Ztrait-solver=next` is enabled.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113192 (`assemble_candidates_after_normalizing_self_ty` docs)
- #113251 (Use scoped-tls for SMIR to map between TyCtxt and SMIR datastructures)
- #113282 (Update platform-support.md to improve ARM target descriptions)
- #113296 (add flag for enabling global cache usage for proof trees and printing proof trees on error)
- #113324 (implement `ConstEvaluatable` goals in new solver)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
add flag for enabling global cache usage for proof trees and printing proof trees on error
This adds a few new things:
- `-Zdump-solver-proof-tree=always/never/on-error`
- `always`/`never` were previosuly specifiable by whether the flag exists or not, th new flag is `on_error` which reruns obligations of fulfillment and selection errors with proof tree generation enabled and prints them out
- `-Zdump-solver-proof-tree-uses-cache`
- allows forcing global cache to be used or unused for all generated proof trees, global cache is enabled by default for `always` so that it accurately represents what happend. This flag currently would affect misc uses of `GenerateProofTree::Yes` which will be added in the future for things like diagnostics logic and rustdoc's auto_trait file. We can fix this when we start using proof tree generation for those use cases if it's desirable.
I also changed the output to go straight to stdout instead of going through `debug!` so that `-Zdump-solver-proof-tree` can be adequately used on `nightly` not just a locally built toolchain.
The idea for `on-error` is that it should hopefully make it easier to quickly figure out "why doesnt this code compile"- you just pass in `-Zdump-solver-proof-tree=on-error` and you'll only get proof trees you care about.
---
r? `@lcnr` `@compiler-errors`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
change snapshot tracking in fulfillment contexts
use the exact snapshot number to prevent misuse even when created inside of a snapshot
|
|
compiler-errors:normalize-opaques-with-late-bound-vars-again, r=jackh726
Normalize opaques with late-bound vars again
We have a hack in the compiler where if an opaque has escaping late-bound vars, we skip revealing it even though we *could* reveal it from a technical perspective. First of all, this is weird, since we really should be revealing all opaques in `Reveal::All` mode. Second of all, it causes subtle bugs (linked below).
I attempted to fix this in #100980, which was unfortunately reverted due to perf regressions on codebases that used really deeply nested futures in some interesting ways. The worst of which was #103423, which caused the project to hang on build. Another one was #104842, which was just a slow-down, but not a hang. I took some time afterwards to investigate how to rework `normalize_erasing_regions` to take advantage of better caching, but that effort kinda fizzled out (#104133).
However, recently, I was made aware of more bugs whose root cause is not revealing opaques during codegen. That made me want to fix this again -- in the process, interestingly, I took the the minimized example from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/103423#issuecomment-1292947043, and it doesn't seem to hang any more...
Thinking about this harder, there have been some changes to the way we lower and typecheck async futures that may have reduced the pathologically large number of outlives obligations (see description of #103423) that we were encountering when normalizing opaques with bound vars the last time around:
* #104321 (lower `async { .. }` directly as a generator that implements `Future`, removing the `from_generator` shim)
* #104833 (removing an `identity_future` fn that was wrapping desugared future generators)
... so given that I can see:
* No significant regression on rust perf bot (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1600070317)
* No timeouts in crater run I did (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605428952, rechecked failing crates in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/107620#issuecomment-1605973434)
... and given that this PR:
* Fixes #104601
* Fixes #107557
* Fixes #109464
* Allows us to remove a `DefiningAnchor::Bubble` from codegen (75a8f681837c70051e0200a14f58ae07dbe58e66)
I'm inclined to give this another shot at landing this. Best case, it just works -- worst case, we get more examples to study how we need to improve the compiler to make this work.
r? types
|
|
|
|
More `ImplSource` nits
Even more clean-ups, I'll put this up in parallel with the `select_in_new_trait_solver` PR.
r? ``@lcnr``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Don't emit same goal as input during `wf::unnormalized_obligations`
r? `@aliemjay` cc `@lcnr`
I accidentally pruned the logic to handle `WF(?0)` when writing `wf::unnormalized_obligations`.
idk if you wanted to construct a test first, but this is an obvious fix. Copied the comment from above.
Fixes rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative#36
|
|
Migrate `item_bounds` to `ty::Clause`
Should be simpler than the next PR that's coming up. Last three commits are the relevant ones.
r? ``@oli-obk`` or ``@lcnr``
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a trait is used without specifying the implementation (e.g. calling
a non-member associated function without fully-qualified syntax) and
there are multiple implementations available, use a placeholder comment
for the implementation type in the suggestion instead of picking a
random implementation.
Example:
```
fn main() {
let _ = Default::default();
}
```
Previous output:
```
error[E0790]: cannot call associated function on trait without specifying the corresponding `impl` type
--> test.rs:2:13
|
2 | let _ = Default::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot call associated function of trait
|
help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation (273 found)
|
2 | let _ = <FileTimes as Default>::default();
| +++++++++++++ +
```
New output:
```
error[E0790]: cannot call associated function on trait without specifying the corresponding `impl` type
--> test.rs:2:13
|
2 | let _ = Default::default();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cannot call associated function of trait
|
help: use a fully-qualified path to a specific available implementation (273 found)
|
2 | let _ = </* self type */ as Default>::default();
| +++++++++++++++++++ +
```
|
