| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
Implement stable overlap check considering negative traits
This PR implement the new disjointness rules for overlap check described in https://rust-lang.github.io/negative-impls-initiative/explainer/coherence-check.html#new-disjointness-rules
r? ``@nikomatsakis``
|
|
Properly track `DepNode`s in trait evaluation provisional cache
Fixes #92987
During evaluation of an auto trait predicate, we may encounter a cycle.
This causes us to store the evaluation result in a special 'provisional
cache;. If we later end up determining that the type can legitimately
implement the auto trait despite the cycle, we remove the entry from
the provisional cache, and insert it into the evaluation cache.
Additionally, trait evaluation creates a special anonymous `DepNode`.
All queries invoked during the predicate evaluation are added as
outoging dependency edges from the `DepNode`. This `DepNode` is then
store in the evaluation cache - if a different query ends up reading
from the cache entry, it will also perform a read of the stored
`DepNode`. As a result, the cached evaluation will still end up
(transitively) incurring all of the same dependencies that it would
if it actually performed the uncached evaluation (e.g. a call to
`type_of` to determine constituent types).
Previously, we did not correctly handle the interaction between the
provisional cache and the created `DepNode`. Storing an evaluation
result in the provisional cache would cause us to lose the `DepNode`
created during the evaluation. If we later moved the entry from the
provisional cache to the evaluation cache, we would use the `DepNode`
associated with the evaluation that caused us to 'complete' the cycle,
not the evaluatoon where we first discovered the cycle. As a result,
future reads from the evaluation cache would miss some incremental
compilation dependencies that would have otherwise been added if the
evaluation was *not* cached.
Under the right circumstances, this could lead to us trying to force
a query with a no-longer-existing `DefPathHash`, since we were missing
the (red) dependency edge that would have caused us to bail out before
attempting forcing.
This commit makes the provisional cache store the `DepNode` create
during the provisional evaluation. When we move an entry from the
provisional cache to the evaluation cache, we create a *new* `DepNode`
that has dependencies going to *both* of the evaluation `DepNodes` we
have available. This ensures that cached reads will incur all of
the necessary dependency edges.
|
|
Check `const Drop` impls considering `~const` Bounds
This PR adds logic to trait selection to account for `~const` bounds in custom `impl const Drop` for types, elaborates the `const Drop` check in `rustc_const_eval` to check those bounds, and steals some drop linting fixes from #92922, thanks `@DrMeepster.`
r? `@fee1-dead` `@oli-obk` <sup>(edit: guess I can't request review from two people, lol)</sup>
since each of you wrote and reviewed #88558, respectively.
Since the logic here is more complicated than what existed, it's possible that this is a perf regression. But it works correctly with tests, and that makes me happy.
Fixes #92881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
filtering
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use let_else in even more places
Followup of #89933, #91018, #91481.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Also rename a trivial_const_drop to match style of other functions in
the util module.
- Also add a test for `const Drop` that doesn't depend on a `~const`
bound.
- Also comment a bit why we remove the const bound during dropck impl
check.
|
|
This is the same idea as #92533, but for `AssocItem` instead
of `VariantDef`/`FieldDef`.
With this change, we no longer have any uses of
`#[stable_hasher(project(...))]`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes #92987
During evaluation of an auto trait predicate, we may encounter a cycle.
This causes us to store the evaluation result in a special 'provisional
cache;. If we later end up determining that the type can legitimately
implement the auto trait despite the cycle, we remove the entry from
the provisional cache, and insert it into the evaluation cache.
Additionally, trait evaluation creates a special anonymous `DepNode`.
All queries invoked during the predicate evaluation are added as
outoging dependency edges from the `DepNode`. This `DepNode` is then
store in the evaluation cache - if a different query ends up reading
from the cache entry, it will also perform a read of the stored
`DepNode`. As a result, the cached evaluation will still end up
(transitively) incurring all of the same dependencies that it would
if it actually performed the uncached evaluation (e.g. a call to
`type_of` to determine constituent types).
Previously, we did not correctly handle the interaction between the
provisional cache and the created `DepNode`. Storing an evaluation
result in the provisional cache would cause us to lose the `DepNode`
created during the evaluation. If we later moved the entry from the
provisional cache to the evaluation cache, we would use the `DepNode`
associated with the evaluation that caused us to 'complete' the cycle,
not the evaluatoon where we first discovered the cycle. As a result,
future reads from the evaluation cache would miss some incremental
compilation dependencies that would have otherwise been added if the
evaluation was *not* cached.
Under the right circumstances, this could lead to us trying to force
a query with a no-longer-existing `DefPathHash`, since we were missing
the (red) dependency edge that would have caused us to bail out before
attempting forcing.
This commit makes the provisional cache store the `DepNode` create
during the provisional evaluation. When we move an entry from the
provisional cache to the evaluation cache, we create a *new* `DepNode`
that has dependencies going to *both* of the evaluation `DepNodes` we
have available. This ensures that cached reads will incur all of
the necessary dependency edges.
|
|
Directly use ConstValue for single literals in blocks
Addresses the minimal repro in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92186, but doesn't fix the underlying problem (which would be solved by solving the anon subst problem afaict).
I do, however, think that it makes sense in general to treat single literals in anon blocks as const values directly, especially in light of the problem that the issue refers to (anon const evaluation being postponed until infer variables in substs can be resolved, which was introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90023), i.e. while we do get warnings for those unnecessary braces, we should try to avoid errors caused by those braces if possible.
|
|
|
|
allow eq constraints on associated constants
Updates #70256
(cc `@varkor,` `@Centril)`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Also prevent ICE when adding a const in associated const equality.
|
|
Removes uses of ty() where a method is implemented on TypeFoldable, and also directly formats
a Term.
|
|
Replace use of `ty()` on term and use it in more places. This will allow more flexibility in the
future, but slightly worried it allows items which are consts which only accept types.
|
|
ProjectionPredicate should be able to handle both associated types and consts so this adds the
first step of that. It mainly just pipes types all the way down, not entirely sure how to handle
consts, but hopefully that'll come with time.
|
|
|
|
Replace `NestedVisitorMap` with generic `NestedFilter`
This is an attempt to make the `intravisit::Visitor` API simpler and "more const" with regard to nested visiting.
With this change, `intravisit::Visitor` does not visit nested things by default, unless you specify `type NestedFilter = nested_filter::OnlyBodies` (or `All`). `nested_visit_map` returns `Self::Map` instead of `NestedVisitorMap<Self::Map>`. It panics by default (unreachable if `type NestedFilter` is omitted).
One somewhat trixty thing here is that `nested_filter::{OnlyBodies, All}` live in `rustc_middle` so that they may have `type Map = map::Map` and so that `impl Visitor`s never need to specify `type Map` - it has a default of `Self::NestedFilter::Map`.
|
|
Remove deprecated LLVM-style inline assembly
The `llvm_asm!` was deprecated back in #87590 1.56.0, with intention to remove
it once `asm!` was stabilized, which already happened in #91728 1.59.0. Now it
is time to remove `llvm_asm!` to avoid continued maintenance cost.
Closes #70173.
Closes #92794.
Closes #87612.
Closes #82065.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-inline-asm`
r? `@Amanieu`
|
|
|
|
Include Projections when elaborating TypeOutlives
Fixes #92280
In `Elaborator`, we elaborate that `Foo<<Bar as Baz>::Assoc>: 'a` -> `<Bar as Baz>::Assoc: 'a`. This is the same rule that would be applied to any other `Param`. If there are escaping vars, we continue to do nothing.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
|
|
partially revertish `lazily "compute" anon const default substs`
reverts #87280 except for some of the changes around `ty::Unevaluated` having a visitor and a generic for promoted
why revert: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92805#issuecomment-1010736049>
r? `@lcnr`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prefer projection candidates instead of param_env candidates for Sized predicates
Fixes #89352
Also includes some drive by logging and verbose printing changes that I found useful when debugging this, but I can remove this if needed.
This is a little hacky - but imo no more than the rest of `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`. Importantly, in a Chalk-like world, both candidates should be completely compatible.
r? ```@nikomatsakis```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=nikomatsakis
Welcome opaque types into the fold
r? ```@nikomatsakis``` because idk who else to bug on the type_op changes
The commits have explanations in them. The TLDR is that
* 5c4600227329a273c0c6c844e4a10ce650ead601 stops the "recurse and replace" scheme that replaces opaque types with their canonical inference var by just doing that ahead of time
* bdeeb07bf6400622074f04ca2523dac1512ab662 does not affect anything on master afaict, but since opaque types generate obligations when instantiated, and lazy TAIT instantiates opaque types *everywhere*, we need to properly handle obligations here instead of just hoping no problematic obligations ever come up.
|
|
|
|
r=Mark-Simulacrum
Replace usages of vec![].into_iter with [].into_iter
`[].into_iter` is idiomatic over `vec![].into_iter` because its simpler and faster (unless the vec is optimized away in which case it would be the same)
So we should change all the implementation, documentation and tests to use it.
I skipped:
* `src/tools` - Those are copied in from upstream
* `src/test/ui` - Hard to tell if `vec![].into_iter` was used intentionally or not here and not much benefit to changing it.
* any case where `vec![].into_iter` was used because we specifically needed a `Vec::IntoIter<T>`
* any case where it looked like we were intentionally using `vec![].into_iter` to test it.
|
