| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Reverts #116530
(cherry picked from commit 5fdb648fc3a672140f3fc8f98ee3268ed3fe5389)
|
|
Co-authored-by: Josh Stone <cuviper@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 10110787154154cddfaaacdeebd7a4406223a25b)
|
|
If the TargetMachine is disposed after the Context is disposed, it can
lead to use after frees in some cases.
I've observed this happening occasionally on code compiled for
aarch64-pc-windows-msvc using `-Zstack-protector=strong` but other users
have reported AVs from host aarch64-pc-windows-msvc compilers as well.
(cherry picked from commit 3323e4dc04e57cc64ac77dbff2f6bf50ac6832f0)
|
|
(cherry picked from commit 9121a41450e905fe5a12c11c955acc14ab1f92fe)
|
|
Validation introduced in #113124 allows UnwindAction::Continue and
TerminatorKind::Resume to occur only in functions with ABI that can
unwind. The function ABI depends on the panic strategy, which can vary
across crates.
Usually MIR is built and validated in the same crate. The coroutine drop
glue thus far was an exception. As a result validation could fail when
mixing different panic strategies.
Avoid the problem by executing AbortUnwindingCalls along with the
validation.
(cherry picked from commit 5161b22143bf9a726cfd69d19bef11552d0ed519)
|
|
(cherry picked from commit 0ba7d19769c068729761eba72e779b53101a19bc)
|
|
This method is trying to detect macro invocations, so that it can split a span
into two parts just after the `!` of the invocation.
Under some circumstances (probably involving nested macros), it gets confused
and produces a span that is larger than the original span, and possibly extends
outside its enclosing function and even into an adjacent file.
In extreme cases, that can result in malformed coverage mappings that cause
`llvm-cov` to fail. For now, we at least want to detect these egregious cases
and avoid them, so that coverage reports can still be produced.
|
|
|
|
On method chain expression failure, look for missing method in earlier segments of the chain
This PR tries to fix the issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115222
As suggested by `@estebank` , I did the following:
1. Add new test `tests/ui/structs/method-chain-expression-failure.rs`
2. In `compiler/rusct_hir_tycheck/src/method/suggest.rs`
walking up the method chain and calling `probe_for_name` with the method name. But the call fails to return `Ok`.
|
|
receiver to align spans
|
|
sync_cg_clif-2023-11-10
|
|
Suggest removing `;` for `;` within let-chains
Fixes #117720
|
|
Fix typo in internal.rs
covert -> convert
|
|
Emit #[inline] on derive(Debug)
While working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116583 I noticed that the `cross_crate_inlinable` query identifies a lot of derived `Debug` impls as a MIR body that's little more than a call, which suggests they may be a good candidate for `#[inline]`. So here I've implemented that change specifically.
It seems to provide a nice improvement to build times.
|
|
|
|
generator layout: ignore fake borrows
fixes #117059
We emit fake shallow borrows in case the scrutinee place uses a `Deref` and there is a match guard. This is necessary to prevent the match guard from mutating the scrutinee: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/fab1054e1742790c22ccc92a625736d658363677/compiler/rustc_mir_build/src/build/matches/mod.rs#L1250-L1265
These fake borrows end up impacting the generator witness computation in `mir_generator_witnesses`, which causes the issue in #117059. This PR now completely ignores fake borrows during this computation. This is sound as thse are always removed after analysis and the actual computation of the generator layout happens afterwards.
Only the second commit impacts behavior, and could be backported by itself.
r? types
|
|
Remove `-Z strip`.
It was stabilized as `-C strip` in November 2021. The unstable option was kept around as a temporary measure to ease the transition. Two years is more than enough!
r? `@tmandry`
|
|
Update ICU4X
This updates all ICU4X crates and regenerates rustc_baked_icu_data.
Since the new unicode license under which they are licensed does not have an SPDX identifier yet, we define some exceptions. The license has to be reviewed to make sure it is still fine to use here, but I assume that is the case.
I also added an exception for rustc_icu_data to the unexplained ignore doctest tidy lint. This is a bit hacky but the whole style.rs in tidy is a mess so I didn't want to touch it more than this small hack.
part of #112865
r? `@davidtwco` `@wesleywiser` `@Manishearth`
|
|
|
|
covert -> convert
|
|
Move `BorrowedBuf` and `BorrowedCursor` from `std:io` to `core::io`
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117693
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/290
|
|
Extend builtin/auto trait args with error when they have >1 argument
Reuse `extend_with_error` to add error args to any auto trait (or built-in trait like `Copy` that is defined incorrectly) that has additional non-`Self` args.
Fixes #117628
|
|
Make `FatalErrorMarker` lower priority than other panics
This makes `FatalErrorMarker` lower priority than other panics in a parallel sections. If any other panics occur, they will be unwound instead of `FatalErrorMarker`. This ensures `rustc` will exit with the correct error code on ICEs.
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116659.
|
|
It was stabilized as `-C strip` in November 2021. The unstable option
was kept around as a temporary measure to ease the transition. Two years
is more than enough!
|
|
Assigned new feature name `core_io_borrowed_buf` to distinguish from the
`Read::read_buf` functionality in `std::io`.
|
|
also adds some comments
|
|
|
|
patterns: reject raw pointers that are not just integers
Matching against `0 as *const i32` is fine, matching against `&42 as *const i32` is not.
This extends the existing check against function pointers and wide pointers: we now uniformly reject all these pointer types during valtree construction, and then later lint because of that. See [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116930#issuecomment-1784654073) for some more explanation and context.
Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116929.
Cc `@oli-obk` `@lcnr`
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #117263 (handle the case when the change-id isn't found)
- #117282 (Recover from incorrectly ordered/duplicated function keywords)
- #117679 (tests/rustdoc-json: Avoid needless use of `no_core` and `lang_items`)
- #117702 (target: move base and target specifications)
- #117713 (Add test for reexported hidden item with `--document-hidden-items`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
target: move base and target specifications
Follow-up to #116004.
In anticipation of later PRs where we'll want to add tidy checks to ensure that, for each target, we have a test or a platform support document or something like that, this PR moves target specifications into a directory on their own so that we can just list the files in this directory to get a list of all targets.
- Base specifications are moved to `rustc_target::spec::base`.
- Target specifications are moved to `rustc_target::spec::targets`.
- All the other source files containing types used in the target specs remain in `rustc_target::spec`.
- `rustc_target/src/spec/abi.rs` is moved to `rustc_target/src/spec/abi/mod.rs` (where there was already a `tests.rs`) for uniformity.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
|
|
Recover from incorrectly ordered/duplicated function keywords
Fixes #115714
|
|
Compute polonius loan scopes over the region graph
In issue #117146 a loan flows into an SCC containing a placeholder, and whose representative is an existential region. Since we currently compute loan scopes by looking at SCCs and their representatives only, polonius would compute kill points for this loan here whereas NLLs would not of course.
There are a few ways to fix this:
- don't try to be efficient by doing the computation over SCCs, and simply look for free regions and placeholders in the successors of the issuing region.
- change how the SCC representatives are picked, biasing towards placeholders over existential regions. They *shouldn't* matter much, but some downstream code may subtly depend on the current scheme (though no tests fail if we do such a change). This is for unrelated reasons also the way #116891 changes the representative computation. So that PR would also fix issue #117146.
- try to remove placeholders from the main path, and contain them to a pre-pass + a post-pass kind of polonius leak check. If possible, it would fix this issue by turning an outlives constraints to a placeholder into a constraint to 'static. This should also fix the issue, as the representative would be the free region in the SCC. We want to prototype this change to see if it's possible to try to simplify the borrowck main path from having to deal with placeholders and higher-ranked subtyping 🤞.
I'd like to take advantage of fuzzing and a crater run sooner rather than later, so that we grow more confidence that the 2 models are indeed equivalent empirically. Therefore this PR implements option 1 to fix the issue now.
We can take care of efficiency later after validation, and once we implement option 3 (which could also impact option 2 and that associated PR, maybe the lack of placeholders could remove the need to change the representative computation) to traverse SCCs and their representative again.
(Or we maybe will have some kind of naive position-dependent outlives propagation by then and this code would have been changed)
Fixes #117146.
r? `@matthewjasper`
|
|
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #114316 (Add AIX platform support document)
- #117531 (rustdoc: properly elide cross-crate host effect args)
- #117650 (Add -Zcross-crate-inline-threshold=yes)
- #117663 (bump some deps)
- #117667 (Document clippy_config in nightly-rustc docs)
- #117698 (Clarify `space_between`)
- #117700 (coverage: Rename the `run-coverage` test mode to `coverage-run`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
Clarify `space_between`
r? ``@petrochenkov``
|
|
Add -Zcross-crate-inline-threshold=yes
``@thomcc`` says this would be useful for
> seeing if it makes a difference in some code if i do it when building the sysroot, since -Zbuild-std + lto helps more than it seems like it should
And I've changed the possible values as a reference to ``@Manishearth`` saying
> LLVM's inlining heuristic is "yes".
|
|
Only use `normalize_param_env` when normalizing predicate in `check_item_bounds`
Only use the `normalize_param_env` when normalizing the item bound predicate in `check_item_bounds`, instead of using it when processing this obligation as well. This causes <BUG> to reoccur, but hopefully with better caching in the future, we can fix this would having such bad effects on perf.
This PR also fixes #117598. It turns out that the GAT predicate that we install is actually wrong -- given code like:
```
impl<'r> HasValueRef<'r> for Any {
type Database = Any;
}
```
We currently generate a predicate that looks like `<Any as HasValueRef<'r>>::Database = Any`, where `'r` is an early-bound variable. Really this GAT assumption should be universally quantified over the impl's args, i.e. `for<'r> <Any as HasValueRef<'r>>::Database = Any`, but then we'd need the binder to also include all the WC of the impl as well, which we don't support yet, lol.
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
|
|
To avoid `!matches!(...)`, which is hard to think about. Instead every
case now uses direct pattern matching and returns true or false.
Also add a couple of cases to the `stringify.rs` test that currently
print badly.
|
|
|
|
Method suggestion code tweaks
I was rummaging around the method suggestion code after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117006#discussion_r1384153722 and saw a few things to simplify.
This is two unrelated commits, both in the same file. Review them separately, if you'd like.
r? estebank
|
|
Fix some clippy perf lints
`@matthiaskrgr` gave me the output of a clippy run with perf lints enabled. This PR fixes ones that I thought were worth fixing.
r? `@cuviper`
|
|
Small changes w/ `query::Erase<_>`
r? `@cjgillot`
cc `@Zoxc`
|
|
Improve diagnostic for const ctors in array repeat expressions
Fixes #113912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
