| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
All HIR attributes are outer
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/142649. Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142759.
All HIR attributes, including parsed and not yet parsed, will now be rendered as outer attributes by `rustc_hir_pretty`. The original style of the corresponding AST attribute(s) is not relevant for pretty printing, only for diagnostics.
r? ````@jdonszelmann````
|
|
improve search graph docs, reset `encountered_overflow` between reruns
I think this shouldn't really matter for now. It will be more relevant for my current rework as we otherwise cannot partially reevaluate the root goal in case there has been overflow during the prervious iteration.
r? ````@BoxyUwU````
|
|
r=jdonszelmann
Port `#[rustc_pub_transparent]` to the new attribute system
Very similar to rust-lang/rust#142498.
This is a part of rust-lang/rust#131229, so
r? ````@jdonszelmann````
---
For reference, the `#[rustc_pub_transparent]` attribute was created by me back in rust-lang/rust#129487.
As mentioned back in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129487#discussion_r1730120385, this attribute does not check that it is applied to an ADT, because it checks that `#[repr(transparent)]` is also applied to the same item, which, in turn, should check for ADT.
|
|
Only traverse reachable blocks in JumpThreading.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131451
We only compute loop headers for reachable blocks. We shouldn't try to perform an opt on unreachable blocks anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Improve diagnostics for `concat_bytes!` with C string literals
Use the same error as other invalid types for `concat_bytes!`, rather
than using `ConcatCStrLit` from `concat!`. Also add more information
with a note about why this doesn't work, and a suggestion to use a
null-terminated byte string instead.
|
|
expand: Remove some unnecessary generic parameters
|
|
Port `#[may_dangle]` to the new attribute system
Very similar to rust-lang/rust#142498.
This is a part of rust-lang/rust#131229, so
r? `@jdonszelmann`
|
|
r=saethlin
Rename `LayoutS` to `LayoutData` in comments
`LayoutS` was renamed to `LayoutData`, but some comments in the compiler were not changed. This updates comments in the compiler (and one section of commented-out code in rust-analyzer) to refer to `LayoutData` instead of `LayoutS`.
cc <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132252>, `@workingjubilee`
|
|
Use gen blocks in the compiler instead of `from_coroutine`
r? oli-obk
|
|
r=Manishearth,Urgau
Add diagnostic items for Clippy
Clippy still uses some paths to access items from the standard library. Adding the missing diagnostic items allows removing the last remaining paths.
Closes rust-lang/rust-clippy#5393
|
|
error on calls to ABIs that cannot be called
We recently added `extern "custom"`, which cannot be called using a rust call expression. But there are more ABIs that can't be called in that way, because the call does not semantically make sense.
More details are in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/140566#issuecomment-2846205457
r? `@workingjubilee`
try-job: x86_64-gnu-llvm-19-3
|
|
rustc_target: document public AbiMap-related fn and variants
|
|
r=petrochenkov
Adjust `with_generic_param_rib`.
Currently all of its call sites construct a `LifetimeRibKind::Generics` value, which `with_generic_param_rib` then deconstructs (and panics if it's a different `LifetimeRibKind` variant).
This commit makes the code simpler and shorter: the call sites just pass in the three values and `with_generic_param_rib` constructs the `LifetimeRibKind::Generics` value from them.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
Reason about borrowed classes in CopyProp.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/141122
The current implementation of `CopyProp` avoids unifying two borrowed locals, as this would change the result of address comparison.
However, the implementation was inconsistent with the general algorithm, which identifies equivalence classes of locals and then replaces all locals by a single representative of their equivalence class.
This PR fixes it by forbidding the unification of two *classes* if any of those contain a borrowed local.
|
|
Marks ADT live if it appears in pattern
Marks ADT live if it appears in pattern, it implies the construction of the ADT.
1. Then we can detect unused private ADTs impl `Default`, without special logics for `Default` and other std traits.
2. We can also remove `rustc_trivial_field_reads` on `Default`, and the logic in `should_ignore_item` (introduced by rust-lang/rust#126302).
Fixes rust-lang/rust#120770
Extracted from rust-lang/rust#128637.
r? `@petrochenkov`
|
|
Insert parentheses around binary operation with attribute
Fixes the bug found by `@fmease` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134661#pullrequestreview-2538983253.
Previously, `-Zunpretty=expanded` would expand this program as follows:
```rust
#![feature(stmt_expr_attributes)]
#![allow(unused_attributes)]
macro_rules! group {
($e:expr) => {
$e
};
}
macro_rules! extra {
($e:expr) => {
#[allow()] $e
};
}
fn main() {
let _ = #[allow()] 1 + 1;
let _ = group!(#[allow()] 1) + 1;
let _ = 1 + group!(#[allow()] 1);
let _ = extra!({ 0 }) + 1;
let _ = extra!({ 0 } + 1);
}
```
```console
let _ = #[allow()] 1 + 1;
let _ = #[allow()] 1 + 1;
let _ = 1 + #[allow()] 1;
let _ = #[allow()] { 0 } + 1;
let _ = #[allow()] { 0 } + 1;
```
The first 4 statements are the correct expansion, but the last one is not. The attribute is supposed to apply to the entire binary operation, not only to the left operand.
After this PR, the 5th statement will expand to:
```console
let _ = #[allow()] ({ 0 } + 1);
```
In the future, as some subset of `stmt_expr_attributes` approaches stabilization, it is possible that we will need to do parenthesization for a number of additional cases depending on the outcome of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/127436. But for now, at least this PR makes the pretty-printer align with the current behavior of the parser.
r? fmease
|
|
Bringing `rustc_rayon_core` in tree as `rustc_thread_pool`
This PR moves [`rustc_rayon_core`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-rayon/tree/5fadf44/rayon-core) from commit `5fadf44` as suggested in [this zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/187679-t-compiler.2Fparallel-rustc/topic/Bringing.20.60rustc_rayon_core.60.20in.20tree). I tried to split the work into separate commits so it is easy to review. The first commit is a simple copy and paste from the fork, and subsequent changes were made to use the new crate and to ensure the new crate complies with different format and lint expectations.
**Call-out:** I was also wondering if I need to make any further changes to accommodate licensing requirements.
r? oli-obk
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#142331 (Add `trim_prefix` and `trim_suffix` methods for both `slice` and `str` types.)
- rust-lang/rust#142491 (Rework #[cold] attribute parser)
- rust-lang/rust#142494 (Fix missing docs in `rustc_attr_parsing`)
- rust-lang/rust#142495 (Better template for `#[repr]` attributes)
- rust-lang/rust#142497 (Fix random failure when JS code is executed when the whole file was not read yet)
- rust-lang/rust#142575 (Ensure copy* intrinsics also perform the static self-init checks)
- rust-lang/rust#142650 (Refactor Translator)
- rust-lang/rust#142713 (mbe: Refactor transcription)
- rust-lang/rust#142755 (rustdoc: Remove `FormatRenderer::cache`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remove equivalent new method on context
Noticed the two had converged so much they literally became equivalent. So one could go hehe
|
|
Some symbol and PathRoot cleanups
I'm looking into unifying how we join and print paths. Here are some preliminary cleanups.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
|
|
correct template for `#[align]` attribute
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82232
related: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/142507
I didn't fully understand what `template!` did, clearly. An empty `#[align]` attribute was still rejected later, but without this change it does get suggested in certain cases.
I've also updated some outdated references to `#[repr(align)]` on functions.
r? ``@jdonszelmann``
|
|
|
|
mbe: Refactor transcription
Introduce `MacroTcbCtx` that holds everything relevant to transcription. This allows for the following changes:
* Split `transcribe_sequence` and `transcribe_metavar` out of the heavily nested `transcribe`
* Split `metavar_expr_concat` out of `transcribe_metavar_expr`
This is a nonfunctional change.
|
|
Refactor Translator
My main motivation was to simplify the usage of `SilentEmitter` for users like rustfmt. A few refactoring opportunities arose along the way.
* Replace `Translate` trait with `Translator` struct
* Replace `Emitter: Translate` with `Emitter::translator`
* Split `SilentEmitter` into `FatalOnlyEmitter` and `SilentEmitter`
|
|
Ensure copy* intrinsics also perform the static self-init checks
fixes rust-lang/rust#142532
r? `@RalfJung`
|
|
Better template for `#[repr]` attributes
|
|
Fix missing docs in `rustc_attr_parsing`
|
|
Rework #[cold] attribute parser
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[perf] Cache the canonical *instantiation* of param-envs
r? lcnr
|
|
|
|
Reduce uses of `hir_crate`.
I tried rebasing my old incremental-HIR branch. This is a by-product, which is required if we want to get rid of `hir_crate` entirely.
The second commit is a drive-by cleanup. It can be pulled into its own PR.
r? ````@oli-obk````
|
|
r=nnethercote,WaffleLapkin
Extract some shared code from codegen backend target feature handling
There's a bunch of code duplication between the GCC and LLVM backends in target feature handling. This moves that into new shared helper functions in `rustc_codegen_ssa`.
The first two commits should be purely refactoring. I am fairly sure the LLVM-side behavior stays the same; if the GCC side deliberately diverges from this then I may have missed that. I did account for one divergence, which I do not know is deliberate or not: GCC does not seem to use the `-Ctarget-feature` flag to populate `cfg(target_feature)`. That seems odd, since the `-Ctarget-feature` flag is used to populate the return value of `global_gcc_features` which controls the target features actually used by GCC. ``@GuillaumeGomez`` ``@antoyo`` is there a reason `target_config` ignores `-Ctarget-feature` but `global_gcc_features` does not? The second commit also cleans up a bunch of unneeded complexity added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135927.
The third commit extracts some shared logic out of the functions that populate `cfg(target_feature)` and the backend target feature set, respectively. This one actually has some slight functional changes:
- Before, with `-Ctarget-feature=-feat`, if there is some other feature `x` that implies `feat` we would *not* add `-x` to the backend target feature set. Now, we do. This fixes rust-lang/rust#134792.
- The logic that removes `x` from `cfg(target_feature)` in this case also changed a bit, avoiding a large number of calls to the (uncached) `sess.target.implied_target_features` (if there were a large number of positive features listed before a negative feature) but instead constructing a full inverse implication map when encountering the first negative feature. Ideally this would be done with queries but the backend target feature logic runs before `tcx` so we can't use that...
- Previously, if feature "a" implied "b" and "b" was unstable, then using `-Ctarget-feature=+a` would also emit a warning about `b`. I had to remove this since when accounting for negative implications, this emits a ton of warnings in a bunch of existing tests... I assume this was unintentional anyway.
The fourth commit increases consistency of the GCC backend with the LLVM backend.
The last commit does some further cleanup:
- Get rid of RUSTC_SPECIAL_FEATURES. It was only needed for s390x "backchain", but since LLVM 19 that is always a regular target feature so we don't need this hack any more. The hack also has various unintended side-effects so we don't want to keep it. Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/142412.
- Move RUSTC_SPECIFIC_FEATURES handling into the shared parse_rust_feature_flag helper so all consumers of `-Ctarget-feature` that only care about actual target features (and not "crt-static") have it. Previously, we actually set `cfg(target_feature = "crt-static")` twice: once in the backend target feature logic, and once specifically for that one feature. IIUC, some targets are meant to ignore `-Ctarget-feature=+crt-static`, it seems like before this PR that flag still incorrectly enabled `cfg(target_feature = "crt-static")` (but I didn't test this).
- Move fixed_x18 handling together with retpoline handling.
- Forbid setting fixed_x18 as a regular target feature, even unstably. It must be set via the `-Z` flag.
``@bjorn3`` I did not touch the cranelift backend here, since AFAIK it doesn't really support target features. But if you ever do, please use the new helpers. :)
Cc ``@workingjubilee``
|
|
rewrite `optimize` attribute to use new attribute parsing infrastructure
r? ```@oli-obk```
I'm afraid we'll get quite a few of these PRs in the future. If we get a lot of trivial changes I'll start merging multiple into one PR. They should be easy to review :)
Waiting on #138165 first
|
|
|
|
- `Ident::from_str_and_span` -> `Ident::new` when the string is
pre-interned.
- `Ident::from_str` -> `Ident::with_dummy_span` when the string is
pre-interned.
- `_d` and `_e` are unused.
|
|
This avoids some symbol interning and `to_string` conversions.
|
|
`{{root}}` is supposed to be an internal-only name but it shows up in
the output.
(I'm working towards a more general fix -- a universal "joiner" function
that can be used all over the place -- but I'm not there yet, so let's
fix this one in-place for now.)
|
|
|
|
Allow storing `format_args!()` in variable
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92698
Tracking issue for super let: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139076
Tracking issue for format_args: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99012
This change allows:
```rust
let name = "world";
let f = format_args!("hello {name}!"); // New: Store format_args!() for later!
println!("{f}");
```
This will need an FCP.
This implementation makes use of `super let`, which is unstable and might not exist in the future in its current form. However, it is entirely reasonable to assume future Rust will always have _a_ way of expressing temporary lifetimes like this, since the (stable) `pin!()` macro needs this too. (This was also the motivation for merging https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139114.)
(This is a second version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139135)
|
