| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Extract common logic for iterating over features
Two places doing the same thing is enough to motivate me to extract this to a method :)
|
|
karolzwolak:only-replace-intended-bar-not-all-in-pattern, r=lcnr
only replace the intended comma in pattern suggestions
Only suggest to replace the intended comma, not all bars in the pattern.
Fixes rust-lang/rust#143330.
This continues rust-lang/rust#143331, the credit for making the fix goes to `@A4-Tacks.` I just blessed tests and added a regression test.
|
|
Fix backtraces with `-C panic=abort` on linux; emit unwind tables by default
The linux backtrace unwinder relies on unwind tables to work properly, and generating and printing a backtrace is done by for example the default panic hook.
Begin emitting unwind tables by default again with `-C panic=abort` (see history below) so that backtraces work.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81902 which is **regression-from-stable-to-stable**
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94815
### History
Backtraces with `-C panic=abort` used to work in Rust 1.22 but broke in Rust 1.23, because in 1.23 we stopped emitting unwind tables with `-C panic=abort` (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/45031 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81902#issuecomment-3046487084).
In 1.45 a workaround in the form of `-C force-unwind-tables=yes` was added (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69984).
`-C panic=abort` was added in [Rust 1.10](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2016/07/07/Rust-1.10/#what-s-in-1-10-stable) and the motivation was binary size and compile time. But given how confusing that behavior has turned out to be, it is better to make binary size optimization opt-in with `-C force-unwind-tables=no` rather than default since the current default breaks backtraces.
Besides, if binary size is a primary concern, there are many other tricks that can be used that has a higher impact.
# Release Note Entry Draft:
## Compatibility Notes
* [Fix backtraces with `-C panic=abort` on Linux by generating unwind tables by default](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143613). Build with `-C force-unwind-tables=no` to keep omitting unwind tables.
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: armhf-gnu
try-job: aarch64-msvc-1
|
|
Introduce debuginfo to statements in MIR
The PR introduces support for debug information within dead statements. Currently, only the reference statement is supported, which is sufficient to fix rust-lang/rust#128081.
I don't modify Stable MIR, as I don't think we need debug information when using it.
This PR represents the debug information for the dead reference statement via `#dbg_value`. For example, `let _foo_b = &foo.b` becomes `#dbg_value(ptr %foo, !22, !DIExpression(DW_OP_plus_uconst, 4, DW_OP_stack_value), !26)`. You can see this here: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/d43js6adv.
The general principle for handling debug information is to never provide less debug information than the optimized LLVM IR.
The current rules for dropping debug information in this PR are:
- If the LLVM IR cannot represent a reference address, it's replaced with poison or simply dropped. For example, see: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/shGqPec8W. I'm using poison in all such cases now.
- All debuginfos is dropped when merging multiple successor BBs. An example is available here: https://rust.godbolt.org/z/TE1q3Wq6M.
I doesn't drop debuginfos in `MatchBranchSimplification`, because LLVM also pick one branch for it.
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#141839 (make rust-analyzer use a dedicated build directory)
- rust-lang/rust#146166 (Implement range support in `//@ edition`)
- rust-lang/rust#147259 (cg_llvm: Use helper methods for all calls to `LLVMMDNodeInContext2`)
- rust-lang/rust#147263 (Disable triagebot auto stable-regression compiler backport nominations pending redesign)
- rust-lang/rust#147268 (add arm-maintainers to various targets)
- rust-lang/rust#147270 (Move doc_cfg-specific code into `cfg.rs`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
If the `LocalRef` is `LocalRef::Place`, we can refer to it directly,
because the local of place is an indirect pointer.
Such a statement is `_1 = &(_2.1)`.
If the `LocalRef` is `LocalRef::Operand`,
the `OperandRef` should provide the pointer of the reference.
Such a statement is `_1 = &((*_2).1)`.
But there is a special case that hasn't been handled, scalar pairs like `(&[i32; 16], i32)`.
|
|
cg_llvm: Use helper methods for all calls to `LLVMMDNodeInContext2`
Originally I was only planning on extracting an `md_node_in_context` method, but then I noticed that all callers of `LLVMMDNodeInContext2` could be covered by a small number of additional helper methods.
There should be no change in compiler output.
|
|
Two places doing the same thing is enough to motivate me to extract this to a method :)
|
|
r=saethlin
Extending `#[rustc_force_inline]` to be applicable to inherent methods
`#[rustc_force_inline]` is an internal-only attribute similar to `#[inline(always)]` but which emits an error if inlining cannot occur. rustc_force_inline uses the MIR inliner to do this and has limitations on where it can be applied to ensure that an error is always emitted if inlining can't happen (e.g. it can't be applied to trait methods because calls to those can't always be resolved).
`#[rustc_force_inline]` is motivated by AArch64 pointer authentication intrinsics where it is vital for the security properties of these intrinsics that they do not exist in standalone functions that could be used as gadgets in an exploit (if they could, then you could sign whatever pointers you want, for example, which is bad, but if you force inlining, then you can't jump to a reusable function containing only these instructions).
Since its initial implementation, `#[rustc_force_inline]` could only be applied to free functions. This can be relaxed to also allow inherent methods while still preserving the desired properties. In a work-in-progress patch for manual pointer authentication intrinsics, it is useful to introduce types with inherent methods that would need to be force inlined.
r? `@saethlin`
|
|
|
|
The linux backtrace unwinder relies on unwind tables to work properly,
and generating and printing a backtrace is done by for example the
default panic hook.
Begin emitting unwind tables by default again with `-C panic=abort` (see
history below) so that backtraces work.
History
=======
Backtraces with `-C panic=abort` used to work in Rust 1.22 but broke in
Rust 1.23, because in 1.23 we stopped emitting unwind tables with `-C
panic=abort` (see 24cc38e3b00).
In 1.45 (see cda994633ee) a workaround in the form
of `-C force-unwind-tables=yes` was added.
`-C panic=abort` was added in [Rust
1.10](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2016/07/07/Rust-1.10/#what-s-in-1-10-stable)
and the motivation was binary size and compile time. But given how
confusing that behavior has turned out to be, it is better to make
binary size optimization opt-in with `-C force-unwind-tables=no` rather
than default since the current default breaks backtraces.
Besides, if binary size is a primary concern, there are many other
tricks that can be used that has a higher impact.
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#146281 (Support `#[rustc_align_static]` inside `thread_local!`)
- rust-lang/rust#146535 (mbe: Implement `unsafe` attribute rules)
- rust-lang/rust#146585 (indexing: reword help)
- rust-lang/rust#147004 (Tweak handling of "struct like start" where a struct isn't supported)
- rust-lang/rust#147221 (Forbid `//@ compile-flags: -Cincremental=` in tests)
- rust-lang/rust#147225 (Don't enable shared memory by default with Wasm atomics)
- rust-lang/rust#147227 (implement `Box::take`)
- rust-lang/rust#147233 (Initialize llvm submodule if not already the case to run citool)
- rust-lang/rust#147236 (Update books)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
- Changes parser to allow application to inherent methods.
- Adds tests to confirm extended functionality works just as the existing.
|
|
Don't enable shared memory by default with Wasm atomics
This prepares us for a future where LLVM eventually stabilizes the atomics target feature, in which case we don't want to inflate atomics with threads. Otherwise users would be stuck with shared memory even when they don't want it/need it.
### Context
Currently the atomics target features is unstable and can't be used without re-building Std with it (`-Zbuild-std`).
Enabling the atomics target feature automatically enables shared memory.
Shared memory is required to actually allow multi-threading.
However, shared memory comes with a performance overhead when atomic instructions aren't able to be lowered to regular memory access instructions or when interacting with certain Web APIs.
So it is very undesirable to enable shared memory by default for the majority of users.
While it is possible to use atomics without shared memory, the question remains what use-case this scenario has.
The only one I can think of would involve multiple memories, where the main memory remains un-shared but a second shared memory exists. While Rust doesn't support multiple memories, it might be possible with inline assembly (rust-lang/rust#136382).
So alternatively, we might consider *not* enabling atomics by default even when LLVM does. In which case everything would remain the same.
---
This will break current Web multi-threading users. To address this they can add the following `RUSTFLAGS`:
```
-Clink-args=--shared-memory,--max-memory=1073741824,--import-memory,--export=__wasm_init_tls,--export=__tls_size,--export=__tls_align,--export=__tls_base
```
We could add a new experimental flag that enables the right linker arguments for users, but I feel that's not in Rusts scope. Or like suggested before: a Rust-only `threads` target feature.
Addresses rust-lang/rust#77839.
r? ``@alexcrichton``
|
|
Tweak handling of "struct like start" where a struct isn't supported
This improves the case where someone tries to write a `match` expr where the patterns have type ascription syntax. Makes them less verbose, by giving up on the first encounter in the block, and makes them more accurate by only treating them as a struct literal if successfully parsed as such.
Before, encountering something like `match a { b:` would confuse the parser and think everything after `match` *must* be a struct, and if it wasn't it would generate a cascade of unnecessary diagnostics.
|
|
indexing: reword help
After looking at https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/40850, I thought I'd try to improve wording around error E0608 a bit. Hopefully I've succeeded.
|
|
mbe: Implement `unsafe` attribute rules
This implements `unsafe attr` rules for declarative `macro_rules!` attributes, as specified in [RFC 3697](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3697).
An invocation of an attribute that uses an `unsafe attr` rule requires the `unsafe(attr(...))` syntax.
An invocation of an attribute that uses an ordinary `attr` rule must *not* use the `unsafe(attr(...))` syntax.
`unsafe` is only supported on an `attr` rule, not any other kind of `macro_rules!` rule.
Tracking issue for `macro_rules!` attributes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143547
|
|
Split Bound index into Canonical and Bound
See [#t-types/trait-system-refactor > perf `async-closures/post-mono-higher-ranked-hang.rs`](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/364551-t-types.2Ftrait-system-refactor/topic/perf.20.60async-closures.2Fpost-mono-higher-ranked-hang.2Ers.60/with/541535613) for context
Things compile and tests pass, but not sure if this actually solves the perf issue (edit: it does). Opening up this to do a perf (and maybe crater) run.
r? lcnr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Turn ProjectionElem::Subtype into CastKind::Subtype
I noticed that drop elaboration can't, in general, handle `ProjectionElem::SubType`. It creates a disjoint move path that overlaps with other move paths. (`Subslice` does too, and I'm working on a different PR to make that special case less fragile.) If its skipped and treated as the same move path as its parent then `MovePath.place` has multiple possible projections. (It would probably make sense to remove all `Subtype` projections for the canonical place but it doesn't make sense to have this special case for a problem that doesn't actually occur in real MIR.)
The only reason this doesn't break is that `Subtype` is always the sole projection of the local its applied to. For the same reason, it works fine as a `CastKind` so I figured that makes more sense than documenting and validating this hidden invariant.
cc rust-lang/rust#112651, rust-lang/rust#133258
r? Icnr (bc you've been the main person dealing with `Subtype` it looks like)
|
|
`LegacyAttr` here
`LegacyAttr` is only used for builtin attributes, and builtin attributes
have their safety checked by `check_attribute_safety`, so we don't need
to check `unsafety` here.
|
|
|
|
This simplifies subsequent initialization of enum variants.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#146593 (Allow specifying multiple bounds for same associated item, except in trait objects)
- rust-lang/rust#147177 ([DebugInfo] Fix MSVC tuple child creation)
- rust-lang/rust#147195 (iter repeat: add tests for new count and last behavior)
- rust-lang/rust#147202 (Swap order of `resolve_coroutine_interiors` and `handle_opaque_type_uses`)
- rust-lang/rust#147204 (Refactor ArrayWindows to use a slice)
- rust-lang/rust#147219 (Add proper error handling for closure in impl)
- rust-lang/rust#147226 (include `outer_inclusive_binder` of pattern types)
- rust-lang/rust#147230 (Fix typo in 'unfulfilled_lint_expectation' to plural)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
include `outer_inclusive_binder` of pattern types
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/237
r? ```@lcnr```
|
|
Add proper error handling for closure in impl
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147146
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/146620
Not sure if it can cause any regressions or anything, as for test also have no idea where to store this one
cc ```@theemathas```
r? compiler
|
|
Swap order of `resolve_coroutine_interiors` and `handle_opaque_type_uses`
r? ```@BoxyUwU```
if the comment says x should be last, it helps if it's actually last hehe :P
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/239
|
|
Allow specifying multiple bounds for same associated item, except in trait objects
Supersedes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143146, fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/143143.
This PR proposes to stop enforcing E0719 in all contexts other than trait object types.
E0719 forbids constraining the same associated item twice within the same angle-bracket delimited associated item bound list (the `…` inside `T: Trait<…>`). For example, the following are forbidden:
| Forbidden | Working alternative |
|--------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------|
| `T: Trait<Gat<u32> = u32, Gat<u64> = u64>` | `T: Trait<Gat<u32> = u32> + Trait<Gat<u64> = u64>` |
| `T: Iterator<Item = u32, Item = i32>` | `T: Iterator<Item = u32> + Iterator<Item = i32>` (trivially false) |
| `T: Iterator<Item = u32, Item = u32>` | `T: Iterator<Item = u32>` |
| `T: Iterator<Item: Send, Item: Sync>` | `T: Iterator<Item: Send + Sync>` |
| `T: Trait<ASSOC = 3, ASSOC = 4>` | `T: Trait<ASSOC = 3> + Trait<ASSOC = 4>` (trivially false) |
| `T: Trait<ASSOC = 3, ASSOC = 3>` | `T: Trait<ASSOC = 3>` |
With this PR, all those previously forbidden examples would start working, as well as their APIT and RPIT equivalents.
Types like `dyn Iterator<Item = u32, Item = u32>` will continue to be rejected, however. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/143146#issuecomment-3274421752 for the reason why.
```@rustbot``` label T-lang T-types needs-fcp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix autodiff empty ret regression
closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/147144
The two gsoc summer projects caused a bit of churn, which was to be expected, especially since we don't run autodiff in CI yet.
This adds a void return testcase that we should have had anyway, and fixes the regression.
r? `@Zalathar` (Just guessing since I've seen you in a few LLVM PRs and Oli is probably still busy. Feel free to reroll!)
|
|
remove outdated comment in (inner) `InferCtxt`
This comment seems to have stopped being relevant around 3 years ago after https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/9f95c605f83bcf4c158ea4b3fd5a7abb825a4178. A map? what map? :P
r? `@lcnr`
|
|
add tests
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/105
the index test is for rust-lang/rust#146637
r? types
|
|
simplify setup_constraining_predicates, and note it is potentially cubic
|
|
Co-authored-by: beef <ent3rm4n@gmail.com>
|
|
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- rust-lang/rust#143069 (Add fast-path for accessing the current thread id)
- rust-lang/rust#146518 (Improve the documentation around `ZERO_AR_DATE`)
- rust-lang/rust#146596 (Add a dummy codegen backend)
- rust-lang/rust#146617 (Don’t suggest foreign `doc(hidden)` types in "the following other types implement trait" diagnostics)
- rust-lang/rust#146635 (cg_llvm: Stop using `as_c_char_ptr` for coverage-related bindings)
- rust-lang/rust#147184 (Fix the bevy implied bounds hack for the next solver)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
|
|
|
