| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Document iteration order of `retain` functions
For `HashSet` and `HashMap`, this simply copies the comment from
`BinaryHeap::retain`.
For `BTreeSet` and `BTreeMap`, this adds an additional guarantee that
wasn't previously documented. I think that because these data structures
are inherently ordered and other functions guarantee ordered iteration,
it makes sense to provide this guarantee for `retain` as well.
|
|
Removes the implementations that depend on the user-definable trait `Copy`.
Only fix regressions to ensure merge in 1.55: Does not modify `vec::IntoIter`.
|
|
r=Manishearth,oli-obk
Add diagnostic items for Clippy
This adds a bunch of diagnostic items to `std`/`core`/`alloc` functions, structs and traits used in Clippy. The actual refactorings in Clippy to use these items will be done in a different PR in Clippy after the next sync.
This PR doesn't include all paths Clippy uses, I've only gone through the first 85 lines of Clippy's [`paths.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/blob/ecf85f4bdc319f9d9d853d1fff68a8a25e64c7a8/clippy_utils/src/paths.rs) (after rust-lang/rust-clippy#7466) to get some feedback early on. I've also decided against adding diagnostic items to methods, as it would be nicer and more scalable to access them in a nicer fashion, like adding a `is_diagnostic_assoc_item(did, sym::Iterator, sym::map)` function or something similar (Suggested by `@camsteffen` [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/147480-t-compiler.2Fwg-diagnostics/topic/Diagnostic.20Item.20Naming.20Convention.3F/near/225024603))
There seems to be some different naming conventions when it comes to diagnostic items, some use UpperCamelCase (`BinaryHeap`) and some snake_case (`hashmap_type`). This PR uses UpperCamelCase for structs and traits and snake_case with the module name as a prefix for functions. Any feedback on is this welcome.
cc: rust-lang/rust-clippy#5393
r? `@Manishearth`
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #84961 (Rework SESSION_GLOBALS API)
- #86726 (Use diagnostic items instead of lang items for rfc2229 migrations)
- #86789 (Update BTreeSet::drain_filter documentation)
- #86838 (Checking that function is const if marked with rustc_const_unstable)
- #86903 (Fix small headers display)
- #86913 (Document rustdoc with `--document-private-items`)
- #86957 (Update .mailmap file)
- #86971 (mailmap: Add alternative addresses for myself)
Failed merges:
- #86869 (Account for capture kind in auto traits migration)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Update BTreeSet::drain_filter documentation
This commit makes the documentation of `BTreeSet::drain_filter` more
consistent with that of `BTreeMap::drain_filter` after the changes in
f0b8166870bd73a872642f090ae6b88e2bef922a.
In particular, this explicitly documents the iteration order.
|
|
BTree: consistently avoid unwrap_unchecked in iterators
Some iterator support functions named `_unchecked` internally use `unwrap`, some use `unwrap_unchecked`. This PR tries settling on `unwrap`. #86195 went up the same road but travelled way further and doesn't seem successful.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
Add doc comment for `impl From<LayoutError> for TryReserveError`
|
|
|
|
Remove some doc aliases
As per the new doc alias policy in https://github.com/rust-lang/std-dev-guide/pull/25, this removes some controversial doc aliases:
- `malloc`, `alloc`, `realloc`, etc.
- `length` (alias for `len`)
- `delete` (alias for `remove` in collections and also file/directory deletion)
r? `@joshtriplett`
|
|
For `HashSet` and `HashMap`, this simply copies the comment from
`BinaryHeap::retain`.
For `BTreeSet` and `BTreeMap`, this adds an additional guarantee that
wasn't previously documented. I think that because these data structures
are inherently ordered and other functions guarantee ordered iteration,
it makes sense to provide this guarantee for `retain` as well.
|
|
This commit makes the documentation of `BTreeSet::drain_filter` more
consistent with that of `BTreeMap::drain_filter` after the changes in
f0b8166870bd73a872642f090ae6b88e2bef922a.
In particular, this explicitly documents the iteration order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTree: encapsulate LeafRange better & some debug asserts
Looking at iterators again, I think #81937 didn't house enough code in `LeafRange`. Moving the API boundary a little makes things more local in navigate.rs and less complicated in map.rs.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
This method on the Iterator trait is doc(hidden), and about half of
implementations were doc(hidden). This adds the attribute to the
remaining implementations.
|
|
|
|
Update standard library for IntoIterator implementation of arrays
This PR partially resolves issue #84513 of updating the standard library part.
I haven't found any remaining doctest examples which are using iterators over e.g. &i32 instead of just i32 in the standard library. Can anyone point me to them if there's remaining any?
Thanks!
r? ```@m-ou-se```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally committed to Rust in 2013, it is identical to append
with a reversed order of arguments.
|
|
Implement the new desugaring from `try_trait_v2`
~~Currently blocked on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84782, which has a PR in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84811~~ Rebased atop that fix.
`try_trait_v2` tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84277
Unfortunately this is already touching a ton of things, so if you have suggestions for good ways to split it up, I'd be happy to hear them. (The combination between the use in the library, the compiler changes, the corresponding diagnostic differences, even MIR tests mean that I don't really have a great plan for it other than trying to have decently-readable commits.
r? `@ghost`
~~(This probably shouldn't go in during the last week before the fork anyway.)~~ Fork happened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since just `ops::Try` will need to change meaning.
|
|
Stablize {HashMap,BTreeMap}::into_{keys,values}
I would propose to stabilize `{HashMap,BTreeMap}::into_{keys,values}`( aka. `map_into_keys_values`).
Closes #75294.
|
|
For certain sorts of systems, programming, it's deemed essential that
all allocation failures be explicitly handled where they occur. For
example, see Linus Torvald's opinion in [1]. Merely not calling global
panic handlers, or always `try_reserving` first (for vectors), is not
deemed good enough, because the mere presence of the global OOM handlers
is burdens static analysis.
One option for these projects to use rust would just be to skip `alloc`,
rolling their own allocation abstractions. But this would, in my
opinion be a real shame. `alloc` has a few `try_*` methods already, and
we could easily have more. Features like custom allocator support also
demonstrate and existing to support diverse use-cases with the same
abstractions.
A natural way to add such a feature flag would a Cargo feature, but
there are currently uncertainties around how std library crate's Cargo
features may or not be stable, so to avoid any risk of stabilizing by
mistake we are going with a more low-level "raw cfg" token, which
cannot be interacted with via Cargo alone.
Note also that since there is no notion of "default cfg tokens" outside
of Cargo features, we have to invert the condition from
`global_oom_handling` to to `not(no_global_oom_handling)`. This breaks
the monotonicity that would be important for a Cargo feature (i.e.
turning on more features should never break compatibility), but it
doesn't matter for raw cfg tokens which are not intended to be
"constraint solved" by Cargo or anything else.
To support this use-case we create a new feature, "global-oom-handling",
on by default, and put the global OOM handler infra and everything else
it that depends on it behind it. By default, nothing is changed, but
users concerned about global handling can make sure it is disabled, and
be confident that all OOM handling is local and explicit.
For this first iteration, non-flat collections are outright disabled.
`Vec` and `String` don't yet have `try_*` allocation methods, but are
kept anyways since they can be oom-safely created "from parts", and we
hope to add those `try_` methods in the future.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAHk-=wh_sNLoz84AUUzuqXEsYH35u=8HV3vK-jbRbJ_B-JjGrg@mail.gmail.com/
|
|
|
|
|
|
It now doesn't fully rebuild the heap, but only the parts that are
necessary.
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Mara Bos <m-ou.se@m-ou.se>
|
|
|
|
#78021
|
|
|
|
BTree: move blocks around in node.rs
Without changing any names or implementation, reorder some members:
- Move down the ones defined long ago on the demised `struct Root`, to below the definition of their current host `struct NodeRef`.
- Move up some defined on `struct NodeRef` that are interspersed with those defined on `struct Handle`.
- Move up the `correct_…` methods squeezed between the two flavours of `push`.
- Move the unchecked static downcasts (`cast_to_…`) after the upcasts (`forget_`) and the (weirdly named) dynamic downcasts (`force`).
r? ````@Mark-Simulacrum````
|
|
r=Mark-Simulacrum
BTree: no longer search arrays twice to check Ord
A possible addition to / partial replacement of #83147: no longer linearly search the upper bound of a range in the initial portion of the keys we already know are below the lower bound.
- Should be faster: fewer key comparisons at the cost of some instructions dealing with offsets
- Makes code a little more complicated.
- No longer detects ill-defined `Ord` implementations, but that wasn't a publicised feature, and was quite incomplete, and was only done in the `range` and `range_mut` methods.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
alloc: Added `as_slice` method to `BinaryHeap` collection
I initially asked about whether it is useful addition on https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/should-i-add-as-slice-method-to-binaryheap/13816, and it seems there were no objections, so went ahead with this PR.
> There is [`BinaryHeap::into_vec`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/collections/struct.BinaryHeap.html#method.into_vec), but it consumes the value. I wonder if there is API design limitation that should be taken into account. Implementation-wise, the inner buffer is just a Vec, so it is trivial to expose as_slice from it.
Please, guide me through if I need to add tests or something else.
UPD: Tracking issue #83659
|
