| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
add BinaryHeap::try_reserve and BinaryHeap::try_reserve_exact
`try_reserve` of many collections were stablized in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87993 in 1.57.0. Add `try_reserve` for the rest collections such as `BinaryHeap` should be not controversial.
|
|
BTree: improve public descriptions and comments
BTreeSet has always used the term "value" next to and meaning the same thing as "elements" (in the mathematical sense but also used for key-value pairs in BTreeMap), while in the BTreeMap sense these "values" are known as "keys" and definitely not "values". Today I had enough of that.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
doc: fix typo in comments
`dereferencable -> dereferenceable`
Fixes #91802.
|
|
Btree: assert more API compatibility
Introducing a member such as `BTreeSet::min()` would silently break compatibility if no code calls the existing `BTreeSet::min(set)`. `BTreeSet` is the only btree class silently bringing in stable members, apart from many occurrences of `#[derive(Debug)]` on iterators.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
|
|
dereferencable -> dereferenceable
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: TennyZhuang <zty0826@gmail.com>
|
|
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91668 (Remove the match on `ErrorKind::Other`)
- #91678 (Add tests fixed by #90023)
- #91679 (Move core/stream/stream/mod.rs to core/stream/stream.rs)
- #91681 (fix typo in `intrinsics::raw_eq` docs)
- #91686 (Fix `Vec::reserve_exact` documentation)
- #91697 (Delete Utf8Lossy::from_str)
- #91706 (Add unstable book entries for parts of asm that are not being stabilized)
- #91709 (Replace iterator-based set construction by *Set::From<[T; N]>)
- #91716 (Improve x.py logging and defaults a bit more)
- #91747 (Add pierwill to .mailmap)
- #91755 (Fix since attribute for const_linked_list_new feature)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
r=dtolnay
Fix since attribute for const_linked_list_new feature
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63684
was merged for 1.39 not 1.32
|
|
JosephTLyons:update-HashMap-and-BTreeMap-documentation, r=yaahc
Update documentation to use `from()` to initialize `HashMap`s and `BTreeMap`s
As of Rust 1.56, `HashMap` and `BTreeMap` both have associated `from()` functions. I think using these in the documentation cleans things up a bit. It allows us to remove some of the `mut`s and avoids the Initialize-Then-Modify anti-pattern.
|
|
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/63684
was merged for 1.39 not 1.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact
During developing #91529 , I found that `try_reserve_exact` suggests `reserve` for further insertions. I think it's a mistake by copy&paste, `try_reserve` is better here.
|
|
Deprecate array::IntoIter::new.
|
|
Signed-off-by: TennyZhuang <zty0826@gmail.com>
|
|
Implement VecDeque::retain_mut
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90829.
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90772, someone suggested that `retain_mut` should also be implemented on `VecDeque`. I think that it follows the same logic (coherency). So first: is it ok? Second: should I create a new feature for it or can we put it into the same one?
r? `@joshtriplett`
|
|
|
|
`BTreeMap::insert()`
|
|
All callers already check that the buffer is full before calling
`grow()`. This is where it makes the most sense, since `grow()` is
`inline(never)` and we don't want to pay for a function call just for
that check.
It could also be argued that it would be correct to call `grow()` even
if the buffer wasn't full yet.
This change breaks no code since `grow()` is not `pub`.
|
|
|
|
The discussion is [here](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/append-vec-to-binaryheap/15209/3)
|
|
Add #[must_use] to len and is_empty
Parent issue: #89692
r? `@joshtriplett`
|
|
r=joshtriplett
Add #[must_use] to expensive computations
The unifying theme for this commit is weak, admittedly. I put together a list of "expensive" functions when I originally proposed this whole effort, but nobody's cared about that criterion. Still, it's a decent way to bite off a not-too-big chunk of work.
Given the grab bag nature of this commit, the messages I used vary quite a bit. I'm open to wording changes.
For some reason clippy flagged four `BTreeSet` methods but didn't say boo about equivalent ones on `HashSet`. I stared at them for a while but I can't figure out the difference so I added the `HashSet` ones in.
```rust
// Flagged by clippy.
alloc::collections::btree_set::BTreeSet<T> fn difference<'a>(&'a self, other: &'a BTreeSet<T>) -> Difference<'a, T>;
alloc::collections::btree_set::BTreeSet<T> fn symmetric_difference<'a>(&'a self, other: &'a BTreeSet<T>) -> SymmetricDifference<'a, T>
alloc::collections::btree_set::BTreeSet<T> fn intersection<'a>(&'a self, other: &'a BTreeSet<T>) -> Intersection<'a, T>;
alloc::collections::btree_set::BTreeSet<T> fn union<'a>(&'a self, other: &'a BTreeSet<T>) -> Union<'a, T>;
// Ignored by clippy, but not by me.
std::collections::HashSet<T, S> fn difference<'a>(&'a self, other: &'a HashSet<T, S>) -> Difference<'a, T, S>;
std::collections::HashSet<T, S> fn symmetric_difference<'a>(&'a self, other: &'a HashSet<T, S>) -> SymmetricDifference<'a, T, S>
std::collections::HashSet<T, S> fn intersection<'a>(&'a self, other: &'a HashSet<T, S>) -> Intersection<'a, T, S>;
std::collections::HashSet<T, S> fn union<'a>(&'a self, other: &'a HashSet<T, S>) -> Union<'a, T, S>;
```
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
|
|
|
|
Add #[must_use] to remaining alloc functions
I've run out of compelling reasons to group functions together across crates so I'm just going to go module-by-module. This is everything remaining from the `alloc` crate.
I ignored these because they might be used to purposefully leak memory... or other allocator shenanigans? I dunno. I'll add them if y'all tell me to.
```rust
alloc::alloc unsafe fn alloc(layout: Layout) -> *mut u8;
alloc::alloc unsafe fn alloc_zeroed(layout: Layout) -> *mut u8;
alloc::sync::Arc<T> fn into_raw(this: Self) -> *const T;
```
I don't know why clippy ignored these. I added them myself:
```rust
alloc::collections::btree_map::BTreeMap<K, V> fn range<T: ?Sized, R>(&self, range: R) -> Range<'_, K, V>;
alloc::collections::btree_set::BTreeSet<T> fn range<K: ?Sized, R>(&self, range: R) -> Range<'_, T>;
```
I added these non-mutating `mut` functions:
```rust
alloc::collections::btree_map::BTreeMap<K, V> fn range_mut<T: ?Sized, R>(&mut self, range: R) -> RangeMut<'_, K, V>;
alloc::collections::btree_map::BTreeMap<K, V> fn iter_mut(&mut self) -> IterMut<'_, K, V>;
alloc::collections::btree_map::BTreeMap<K, V> fn values_mut(&mut self) -> ValuesMut<'_, K, V>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::LinkedList<T> fn iter_mut(&mut self) -> IterMut<'_, T>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::LinkedList<T> fn cursor_front_mut(&mut self) -> CursorMut<'_, T>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::LinkedList<T> fn cursor_back_mut(&mut self) -> CursorMut<'_, T>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::LinkedList<T> fn front_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::LinkedList<T> fn back_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::CursorMut<'a, T> fn current(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::CursorMut<'a, T> fn peek_next(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::CursorMut<'a, T> fn peek_prev(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::CursorMut<'a, T> fn front_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
alloc::collections::linked_list::CursorMut<'a, T> fn back_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut T>;
```
I moved a few existing `#[must_use]`s from functions onto the iterator types they return: `IntoIterSorted`, `IntoKeys`, `IntoValues`.
Parent issue: #89692
r? `@joshtriplett`
|
|
|
|
Previously, it wasn't clear whether "This could include" was referring
to logic errors, or undefined behaviour. Tweak wording to clarify this
sentence does not relate to UB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimize VecDeque::append
Optimize `VecDeque::append` to do unsafe copy rather than iterating through each element.
On my `Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 v4 @ 2.20GHz`, the benchmark shows 37% improvements:
```
Master:
custom-bench vec_deque_append 583164 ns/iter
custom-bench vec_deque_append 550040 ns/iter
Patched:
custom-bench vec_deque_append 349204 ns/iter
custom-bench vec_deque_append 368164 ns/iter
```
Additional notes on the context: this is the third attempt to implement a non-trivial version of `VecDeque::append`, the last two are reverted due to unsoundness or regression, see:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/52553, reverted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53571
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/53564, reverted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/54851
Both cases are covered by existing tests.
Signed-off-by: tabokie <xy.tao@outlook.com>
|
|
The unifying theme for this commit is weak, admittedly. I put together a
list of "expensive" functions when I originally proposed this whole
effort, but nobody's cared about that criterion. Still, it's a decent
way to bite off a not-too-big chunk of work.
Given the grab bag nature of this commit, the messages I used vary quite
a bit.
|
|
Add #[must_use] to as_type conversions
Clippy missed these:
```rust
alloc::string::String fn as_mut_str(&mut self) -> &mut str;
core::mem::NonNull<T> unsafe fn as_uninit_mut<'a>(&mut self) -> &'a MaybeUninit<T>;
str unsafe fn as_bytes_mut(&mut self) -> &mut [u8];
str fn as_mut_ptr(&mut self) -> *mut u8;
```
Parent issue: #89692
r? ````@joshtriplett````
|
|
|
|
Add #[must_use] to alloc constructors
Added `#[must_use]`. to the various forms of `new`, `pin`, and `with_capacity` in the `alloc` crate. No extra explanations given as I couldn't think of anything useful to add.
I figure this deserves extra scrutiny compared to the other PRs I've done so far. In particular:
* The 4 `pin`/`pin_in` methods I touched. Are there legitimate use cases for pinning and not using the result? Pinning's a difficult concept I'm not very comfortable with.
* `Box`'s constructors. Do people ever create boxes just for the side effects... allocating or zeroing out memory?
Parent issue: #89692
r? ``@joshtriplett``
|
|
r=joshtriplett
Add #[must_use] to conversions that move self
Everything here got the same message. Is the wording okay?
```rust
#[must_use = "`self` will be dropped if the result is not used"]
```
I want to draw attention to these methods in particular:
```rust
alloc::sync::Arc<MaybeUninit<T>> unsafe fn assume_init(self) -> Arc<T>;
alloc::sync::Arc<[MaybeUninit<T>]> unsafe fn assume_init(self) -> Arc<[T]>;
core::pin::Pin<&'a mut T> const fn into_ref(self) -> Pin<&'a T>;
core::pin::Pin<&'a mut T> const fn get_mut(self) -> &'a mut T;
core::pin::Pin<&'a mut T> const unsafe fn get_unchecked_mut(self) -> &'a mut T;
core::pin::Pin<&'a mut T> unsafe fn map_unchecked_mut(self, func: F) -> Pin<&'a mut U>;
core::pin::Pin<&'a mut Pin<P>> fn as_deref_mut(self) -> Pin<&'a mut P::Target>;
```
Parent issue: #89692
r? `@joshtriplett`
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's nothing insightful to say about these so I didn't write any
extra explanations.
|
|
r=joshtriplett
refactor: make VecDeque's IterMut fields module-private, not just crate-private
Made the fields of VecDeque's IterMut private by creating a IterMut::new(...) function to create a new instance of IterMut and migrating usage to use IterMut::new(...).
|
|
Made the fields of VecDeque's IterMut private by creating a IterMut::new(...) function to create a new instance of IterMut and migrating usage to use IterMut::new(...).
|
|
|
|
r=joshtriplett
refactor: VecDeques PairSlices fields to private
Reducing VecDeque's PairSlices fields to private, a `from(...)` method is already used to create PairSlices.
|
|
Stabilize try_reserve
Stabilization PR for the [`try_reserve` feature](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48043#issuecomment-898040475).
|
|
Include the length in BTree hashes
This change makes it consistent with `Hash` for all other collections.
|
|
VecDeque: improve performance for From<[T; N]>
Create `VecDeque` directly from the array instead of inserting items one-by-one.
Benchmark
```
./x.py bench library/alloc --test-args vec_deque::bench_from_array_1000
```
* Before
```
test vec_deque::bench_from_array_1000 ... bench: 3,991 ns/iter (+/- 717)
```
* After
```
test vec_deque::bench_from_array_1000 ... bench: 268 ns/iter (+/- 37)
```
|
|
|
|
BTree: refine some comments
|
