| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully stabilize the following API, including const where applicable:
impl <T> NonNull<T> {
pub const unsafe fn offset(self, count: isize) -> Self;
pub const unsafe fn add(self, count: usize) -> Self;
pub const unsafe fn sub(self, count: usize) -> Self;
pub const unsafe fn offset_from(self, origin: NonNull<T>) -> isize;
pub const unsafe fn read(self) -> T;
pub unsafe fn read_volatile(self) -> T;
pub const unsafe fn read_unaligned(self) -> T;
pub unsafe fn write_volatile(self, val: T);
pub unsafe fn replace(self, src: T) -> T;
}
impl<T: ?Sized> NonNull<T> {
pub const unsafe fn byte_offset(self, count: isize) -> Self;
pub const unsafe fn byte_add(self, count: usize) -> Self;
pub const unsafe fn byte_sub(self, count: usize) -> Self;
pub const unsafe fn byte_offset_from<U: ?Sized>(self, origin: NonNull<U>) -> isize;
pub unsafe fn drop_in_place(self);
}
Stabilize the following without const:
impl <T> NonNull<T> {
// const under `const_intrinsic_copy`
pub const unsafe fn copy_to(self, dest: NonNull<T>, count: usize);
pub const unsafe fn copy_to_nonoverlapping(self, dest: NonNull<T>, count: usize);
pub const unsafe fn copy_from(self, src: NonNull<T>, count: usize);
pub const unsafe fn copy_from_nonoverlapping(self, src: NonNull<T>, count: usize);
// const under `const_ptr_write`
pub const unsafe fn write(self, val: T);
pub const unsafe fn write_bytes(self, val: u8, count: usize);
pub const unsafe fn write_unaligned(self, val: T);
// const under `const_swap`
pub const unsafe fn swap(self, with: NonNull<T>);
// const under `const_align_offset`
pub const fn align_offset(self, align: usize) -> usize;
// const under `const_pointer_is_aligned`
pub const fn is_aligned(self) -> bool;
}
Left the following unstable:
impl <T> NonNull<T> {
// moved gate to `ptr_sub_ptr`
pub const unsafe fn sub_ptr(self, subtracted: NonNull<T>) -> usize;
}
impl <T: ?Sized> NonNull<T> {
// moved gate to `pointer_is_aligned_to`
pub const fn is_aligned_to(self, align: usize) -> bool;
}
Fixes: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117691
|
|
Stabilize `Utf8Chunks`
Pending FCP in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99543.
This PR includes the proposed modification in https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/190 as agreed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99543#issuecomment-2050406568.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Do not allocate for ZST ThinBox (attempt 2 using const_allocate)
There's PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123184 which avoids allocation for ZST ThinBox.
That PR has an issue with unsoundness with padding in `MaybeUninit` (see comments in that PR). Also that PR relies on `Freeze` trait.
This PR is much simpler implementation which does not have this problem, but it uses `const_allocate` feature.
`@oli-obk` suggested that `const_allocate` should not be used for that feature. But I like how easy it to do this feature with `const_allocate`. Maybe it's OK to use `const_allocate` while `ThinBox` is unstable? Or, well, we can abandon this PR.
r? `@oli-obk`
|
|
|
|
There's PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123184
which avoids allocation for ZST ThinBox.
That PR has an issue with unsoundness with misuse of `MaybeUninit`
(see comments in that PR).
This PR is much simpler implementation which does not have this
problem, but it uses `const_allocate` feature.
|
|
This is an alternative to #121920
|
|
Stabilize `unchecked_{add,sub,mul}`
Tracking issue: #85122
I think we might as well just stabilize these basic three. They're the ones that have `nuw`/`nsw` flags in LLVM.
Notably, this doesn't include the potentially-more-complex or -more-situational things like `unchecked_neg` or `unchecked_shr` that are under different feature flags.
To quote Ralf https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85122#issuecomment-1681669646,
> Are there any objections to stabilizing at least `unchecked_{add,sub,mul}`? For those there shouldn't be any surprises about what their safety requirements are.
*Semantially* these are [already available on stable, even in `const`, via](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=bdb1ff889b61950897f1e9f56d0c9a36) `checked_*`+`unreachable_unchecked`. So IMHO we might as well just let people write them directly, rather than try to go through a `let Some(x) = x.checked_add(y) else { unsafe { hint::unreachable_unchecked() }};` dance.
I added additional text to each method to attempt to better describe the behaviour and encourage `wrapping_*` instead.
r? rust-lang/libs-api
|
|
|
|
Implement `Vec::pop_if`
This PR adds `Vec::pop_if` to the public API, behind the `vec_pop_if` feature.
```rust
impl<T> Vec<T> {
pub fn pop_if<F>(&mut self, f: F) -> Option<T>
where F: FnOnce(&mut T) -> bool;
}
```
Tracking issue: #122741
## Open questions
- [ ] Should the first unit test be split up?
- [ ] I don't see any guidance on ordering of methods in impl blocks, should I move the method elsewhere?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize associated type bounds (RFC 2289)
This PR stabilizes associated type bounds, which were laid out in [RFC 2289]. This gives us a shorthand to express nested type bounds that would otherwise need to be expressed with nested `impl Trait` or broken into several `where` clauses.
### What are we stabilizing?
We're stabilizing the associated item bounds syntax, which allows us to put bounds in associated type position within other bounds, i.e. `T: Trait<Assoc: Bounds...>`. See [RFC 2289] for motivation.
In all position, the associated type bound syntax expands into a set of two (or more) bounds, and never anything else (see "How does this differ[...]" section for more info).
Associated type bounds are stabilized in four positions:
* **`where` clauses (and APIT)** - This is equivalent to breaking up the bound into two (or more) `where` clauses. For example, `where T: Trait<Assoc: Bound>` is equivalent to `where T: Trait, <T as Trait>::Assoc: Bound`.
* **Supertraits** - Similar to above, `trait CopyIterator: Iterator<Item: Copy> {}`. This is almost equivalent to breaking up the bound into two (or more) `where` clauses; however, the bound on the associated item is implied whenever the trait is used. See #112573/#112629.
* **Associated type item bounds** - This allows constraining the *nested* rigid projections that are associated with a trait's associated types. e.g. `trait Trait { type Assoc: Trait2<Assoc2: Copy>; }`.
* **opaque item bounds (RPIT, TAIT)** - This allows constraining associated types that are associated with the opaque without having to *name* the opaque. For example, `impl Iterator<Item: Copy>` defines an iterator whose item is `Copy` without having to actually name that item bound.
The latter three are not expressible in surface Rust (though for associated type item bounds, this will change in #120752, which I don't believe should block this PR), so this does represent a slight expansion of what can be expressed in trait bounds.
### How does this differ from the RFC?
Compared to the RFC, the current implementation *always* desugars associated type bounds to sets of `ty::Clause`s internally. Specifically, it does *not* introduce a position-dependent desugaring as laid out in [RFC 2289], and in particular:
* It does *not* desugar to anonymous associated items in associated type item bounds.
* It does *not* desugar to nested RPITs in RPIT bounds, nor nested TAITs in TAIT bounds.
This position-dependent desugaring laid out in the RFC existed simply to side-step limitations of the trait solver, which have mostly been fixed in #120584. The desugaring laid out in the RFC also added unnecessary complication to the design of the feature, and introduces its own limitations to, for example:
* Conditionally lowering to nested `impl Trait` in certain positions such as RPIT and TAIT means that we inherit the limitations of RPIT/TAIT, namely lack of support for higher-ranked opaque inference. See this code example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120752#issuecomment-1979412531.
* Introducing anonymous associated types makes traits no longer object safe, since anonymous associated types are not nameable, and all associated types must be named in `dyn` types.
This last point motivates why this PR is *not* stabilizing support for associated type bounds in `dyn` types, e.g, `dyn Assoc<Item: Bound>`. Why? Because `dyn` types need to have *concrete* types for all associated items, this would necessitate a distinct lowering for associated type bounds, which seems both complicated and unnecessary compared to just requiring the user to write `impl Trait` themselves. See #120719.
### Implementation history:
Limited to the significant behavioral changes and fixes and relevant PRs, ping me if I left something out--
* #57428
* #108063
* #110512
* #112629
* #120719
* #120584
Closes #52662
[RFC 2289]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2289-associated-type-bounds.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91913
|
|
|
|
Those libraries are build with `-C panic=unwind` and is expected to
be linkable to `-C panic=abort` library. To ensure unsoundness
compiler needs to prevent a `C-unwind` call to exist, as doing so may leak
foreign exceptions into `-C panic=abort`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add LocalWaker and ContextBuilder types to core, and LocalWake trait to alloc.
Implementation for #118959.
|
|
stabilise array methods
Closes #76118
Stabilises the remaining array methods
FCP is yet to be carried out for this
There wasn't a clear consensus on the naming, but all the other alternatives had some flaws as discussed in the tracking issue and there was a silence on this issue for a year
|
|
removing a #[cfg(target_has_atomic = ptr)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expand in-place iteration specialization to Flatten, FlatMap and ArrayChunks
This enables the following cases to collect in-place:
```rust
let v = vec![[0u8; 4]; 1024]
let v: Vec<_> = v.into_iter().flatten().collect();
let v: Vec<Option<NonZeroUsize>> = vec![NonZeroUsize::new(0); 1024];
let v: Vec<_> = v.into_iter().flatten().collect();
let v = vec![u8; 4096];
let v: Vec<_> = v.into_iter().array_chunks::<4>().collect();
```
Especially the nicheful-option-flattening should be useful in real code.
|
|
Stabilize `ptr::addr_eq`
This PR stabilize the `ptr_addr_eq` library feature, representing:
```rust
// core::ptr
pub fn addr_eq<T: ?Sized, U: ?Sized>(p: *const T, q: *const U) -> bool;
```
FCP has already started [on the tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116324#issuecomment-1813008697) and is waiting on the final period comment.
Note: stabilizing this feature is somewhat of requirement for a new T-lang lint, cf. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117758#issuecomment-1813183686.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add `std::hash::{DefaultHasher, RandomState}` exports (needs FCP)
This implements rust-lang/libs-team#267 to move the libstd hasher types to `std::hash` where they belong, instead of `std::collections::hash_map`.
<details><summary>The below no longer applies, but is kept for clarity.</summary>
This is a small refactor for #27242, which moves the definitions of `RandomState` and `DefaultHasher` into `std::hash`, but in a way that won't be noticed in the public API.
I've opened rust-lang/libs-team#267 as a formal ACP to move these directly into the root of `std::hash`, but for now, they're at least separated out from the collections code in a way that will make moving that around easier.
I decided to simply copy the rustdoc for `std::hash` from `core::hash` since I think it would be ideal for the two to diverge longer-term, especially if the ACP is accepted. However, I would be willing to factor them out into a common markdown document if that's preferred.
</details>
|
|
Renamed "group by" to "chunk by" a per #80552.
Newly stable items:
* `core::slice::ChunkBy`
* `core::slice::ChunkByMut`
* `[T]::chunk`
* `[T]::chunk_by`
Closes #80552.
|
|
|
|
Stabilize `const_maybe_uninit_zeroed` and `const_mem_zeroed`
Make `MaybeUninit::zeroed` and `mem::zeroed` const stable. Newly stable API:
```rust
// core::mem
pub const unsafe fn zeroed<T>() ->;
impl<T> MaybeUninit<T> {
pub const fn zeroed() -> MaybeUninit<T>;
}
```
This relies on features based around `const_mut_refs`. Per `@RalfJung,` this should be OK since we do not leak any `&mut` to the user.
For this to be possible, intrinsics `assert_zero_valid` and `assert_mem_uninitialized_valid` were made const stable.
Tracking issue: #91850
Zulip discussion: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/146212-t-compiler.2Fconst-eval/topic/.60const_mut_refs.60.20dependents
r? libs-api
`@rustbot` label -T-libs +T-libs-api +A-const-eval
cc `@RalfJung` `@oli-obk` `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
|
|
Make `MaybeUninit::zeroed` const stable. Newly stable API:
// core::mem
impl<T> MaybeUninit<T> {
pub const fn zeroed() -> MaybeUninit<T>;
}
Use of `const_mut_refs` should be acceptable since we do not leak the
mutability.
Tracking issue: #91850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since it's made for stuff like this (see 106447)
|
|
|
|
Also stabilizes saturating_int_assign_impl, gh-92354.
And also make pub fns const where the underlying saturating_*
fns became const in the meantime since the Saturating type was
created.
|
|
|
|
r=workingjubilee
Add `suggestion` for some `#[deprecated]` items
Consider code:
```rust
fn main() {
let _ = ["a", "b"].connect(" ");
}
```
Currently it shows deprecated warning:
```rust
warning: use of deprecated method `std::slice::<impl [T]>::connect`: renamed to join
--> src/main.rs:2:24
|
2 | let _ = ["a", "b"].connect(" ");
| ^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(deprecated)]` on by default
```
This PR adds `suggestion` for `connect` and some other deprecated items, so the warning will be changed to this:
```rust
warning: use of deprecated method `std::slice::<impl [T]>::connect`: renamed to join
--> src/main.rs:2:24
|
2 | let _ = ["a", "b"].connect(" ");
| ^^^^^^^
|
= note: `#[warn(deprecated)]` on by default
help: replace the use of the deprecated method
|
2 | let _ = ["a", "b"].join(" ");
| ^^^^
```
|
