| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
Otherwise rust-analyzer doesn't understand vec![].
|
|
Remove unused alloc::std::ops re-export.
Removes unused re-export in alloc/lib.rs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As per T-lang consensus, this uses a branch to handle the dangling case.
The discussed optimization of only doing the branch in the T: ?Sized
case is left for a followup patch, as doing so is not trivial
(as it requires specialization for correctness, not just optimization).
|
|
|
|
The return of the GroupBy and GroupByMut iterators on slice
According to https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2477#issuecomment-742034372, I am opening this PR again, this time I implemented it in safe Rust only, it is therefore much easier to read and is completely safe.
This PR proposes to add two new methods to the slice, the `group_by` and `group_by_mut`. These two methods provide a way to iterate over non-overlapping sub-slices of a base slice that are separated by the predicate given by the user (e.g. `Partial::eq`, `|a, b| a.abs() < b.abs()`).
```rust
let slice = &[1, 1, 1, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2];
let mut iter = slice.group_by(|a, b| a == b);
assert_eq!(iter.next(), Some(&[1, 1, 1][..]));
assert_eq!(iter.next(), Some(&[3, 3][..]));
assert_eq!(iter.next(), Some(&[2, 2, 2][..]));
assert_eq!(iter.next(), None);
```
[An RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2477) was open 2 years ago but wasn't necessary.
|
|
|
|
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65798
This is unblocked now that `min_const_generics` has been stabilized
in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79135.
This PR does *not* include the corresponding `IntoIterator` impl,
which is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65819.
Instead, an iterator can be constructed through the `new` method.
`new` would become unnecessary when `IntoIterator` is implemented
and might be deprecated then, although it will stay stable.
|
|
|
|
They were originally called "opt-in, built-in traits" (OIBITs), but
people realized that the name was too confusing and a mouthful, and so
they were renamed to just "auto traits". The feature flag's name wasn't
updated, though, so that's what this PR does.
There are some other spots in the compiler that still refer to OIBITs,
but I don't think changing those now is worth it since they are internal
and not particularly relevant to this PR.
Also see <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/opt-in.2C.20built-in.20traits.20(auto.20traits).20feature.20name>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize hint::spin_loop
Partially fix #55002, deprecate in another release
r? ``````@KodrAus``````
|
|
Partially fix #55002, deprecate in another release
Co-authored-by: Ashley Mannix <kodraus@hey.com>
Update stable version for stabilize_spin_loop
Co-authored-by: Joshua Nelson <joshua@yottadb.com>
Use better example for spinlock
As suggested by KodrAus
Remove renamed_spin_loop already available in master
Fix spin loop example
|
|
|
|
replace `#[allow_internal_unstable]` with `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` for `const fn`s
`#[allow_internal_unstable]` is currently used to side-step feature gate and stability checks.
While it was originally only meant to be used only on macros, its use was expanded to `const fn`s.
This pr adds stricter checks for the usage of `#[allow_internal_unstable]` (only on macros) and introduces the `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` attribute for usage on `const fn`s.
This pr does not change any of the functionality associated with the use of `#[allow_internal_unstable]` on macros or the usage of `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` (instead of `#[allow_internal_unstable]`) on `const fn`s (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69399#issuecomment-712911540).
Note: The check for `#[rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable]` currently only validates that the attribute is used on a function, because I don't know how I would check if the function is a `const fn` at the place of the check. I therefore openend this as a 'draft pull request'.
Closes rust-lang/rust#69399
r? @oli-obk
|
|
|
|
|
|
Move `slice::check_range` to `RangeBounds`
Since this method doesn't take a slice anymore (#76662), it makes more sense to define it on `RangeBounds`.
Questions:
- Should the new method be `assert_len` or `assert_length`?
|
|
Now that we have by-value array iterators...
|
|
This may not be strictly minimal, but all unstable functions also need a
`rustc_const_unstable` attribute.
|
|
Remove unused feature gates from library/ crates
Removes some unused feature gates from library crates. It's likely not a complete list as I only tested a subset for which it's more likely that it is unused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Libc isn't used by alloc.
And std and panic_* use libc from crates.io now,
which isn't feature gated.
|
|
Updated issue to #75027
Update to rm oob access
And hopefully fix docs as well
Fixed naming conflict in test
Fix test which used 1-indexing
Nth starts from 0, woops
Fix a bunch of off by 1 errors
See https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=757b311987e3fae1ca47122969acda5a
Add even more off by 1 errors
And also write `next` and `next_back` in terms of `nth` and `nth_back`.
Run fmt
Fix forgetting to change fn name in test
add nth_back test & document unsafe
Remove as_ref().unwrap()
Documented occurrences of unsafe, noting what invariants are maintained
|
|
r=jonas-schievink
Remove internal and unstable MaybeUninit::UNINIT.
Looks like it is no longer necessary, as `uninit_array()` can be used instead in the few cases where it was needed.
(I wanted to just add `#[doc(hidden)]` to remove clutter from the documentation, but looks like it can just be removed entirely.)
|
|
Looks like it is no longer necessary, as uninit_array() can be used
instead in the few cases where it was needed.
|
|
|
|
Add `slice::check_range`
This method is useful for [`RangeBounds`] parameters. It's even been [rewritten](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/22ee68dc586440f96b76b32fbd6087507c6afdb9/src/librustc_data_structures/sorted_map.rs#L214) [many](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/22ee68dc586440f96b76b32fbd6087507c6afdb9/library/alloc/src/vec.rs#L1299) [times](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/22ee68dc586440f96b76b32fbd6087507c6afdb9/library/core/src/slice/mod.rs#L2441) in the standard library, sometimes assuming that the bounds won't be [`usize::MAX`].
For example, [`Vec::drain`] creates an empty iterator when [`usize::MAX`] is used as an inclusive end bound:
```rust
assert!(vec![1].drain(..=usize::max_value()).eq(iter::empty()));
```
If this PR is merged, I'll create another to use it for those methods.
[`RangeBounds`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/ops/trait.RangeBounds.html
[`usize::MAX`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.usize.html#associatedconstant.MAX
[`Vec::drain`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.drain
|
|
#[rustc_unsafe_specialization_marker]
|
|
private trait instead
|
|
|
|
# Conflicts:
# library/alloc/src/lib.rs
|
|
|
|
switch to try_fold and segregate the drop handling to keep
collect::<Vec<u8>>() and similar optimizer-friendly
It comes at the cost of less accurate debug_asserts and code complexity
|
|
|
|
Add Arc::new_cyclic
Rework of #72443
References #75861
cc @Diggsey @RalfJung
r? @KodrAus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
add `slice::array_chunks` to std
Now that #74113 has landed, these methods are suddenly usable. A rebirth of #72334
Tests are directly copied from `chunks_exact` and some additional tests for type inference.
r? @withoutboats as you are both part of t-libs and working on const generics. closes #60735
|