| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
Stabilize `vec_pop_if`
Tracking issue: #122741
FCP completed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/122741#issuecomment-2605116387
|
|
|
|
document order of items in iterator from drain
fixes #135710
|
|
|
|
Doc difference between extend and extend_from_slice
fixes #97119
|
|
fixes #97119
|
|
|
|
|
|
fixes 135710
|
|
Add an example for using splice to insert multiple elements efficiently into a vector.
|
|
Fixes #135338
|
|
Asserts the maximum value that can be returned from `Vec::len`
Currently, casting `Vec<i32>` to `Vec<u32>` takes O(1) time:
```rust
// See <https://godbolt.org/z/hxq3hnYKG> for assembly output.
pub fn cast(vec: Vec<i32>) -> Vec<u32> {
vec.into_iter().map(|e| e as _).collect()
}
```
But the generated assembly is not the same as the identity function, which prevents us from casting `Vec<Vec<i32>>` to `Vec<Vec<u32>>` within O(1) time:
```rust
// See <https://godbolt.org/z/7n48bxd9f> for assembly output.
pub fn cast(vec: Vec<Vec<i32>>) -> Vec<Vec<u32>> {
vec.into_iter()
.map(|e| e.into_iter().map(|e| e as _).collect())
.collect()
}
```
This change tries to fix the problem. You can see the comparison here: <https://godbolt.org/z/jdManrKvx>.
|
|
docs: Mention `spare_capacity_mut()` in `Vec::set_len`
I recently went down a small rabbit hole when trying to identify safe use of `Vec::set_len`. The solution was `Vec::spare_capacity_mut`. I think the docs on `Vec::set_len` benefit from mentioning this method.
A possible counter-argument could be that the [clippy lint `uninit_vec`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#/uninit_vec) already nudges people in the right direction. However, I think a working example on `Vec::set_len` is still beneficial.
Happy to hear your thoughts on the matter. :blush:
|
|
|
|
since drain-on-drop behavior was removed those bounds
no longer serve a purpose
|
|
|
|
|
|
In some `Vec` and `VecDeque` examples where elements are i32, examples can seem a bit confusing at first glance if a parameter of the method is an usize.
|
|
Fix missing newlines that rustfmt removed.
fix trailing whitespace
Fix duplicate word.
Reformat panic reasons into a list
remove trailing whitespace 2 electric boogaloo
Change verbe tense.
Integrate suggestions
|
|
Bump boostrap compiler to new beta
Currently failing due to something about the const stability checks and `panic!`. I'm not sure why though since I wasn't able to see any PRs merged in the past few days that would result in a `cfg(bootstrap)` that shouldn't be removed. cc `@RalfJung` #131349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add `#[track_caller]` to allocating methods of `Vec` & `VecDeque`
Part 4 in a lengthy saga.
r? `@joshtriplett` because they were the reviewer the last 3 times.
`@bors` rollup=never "[just in case this has perf effects, Vec is hot](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79323#issuecomment-731866746)"
This was first attempted in #79323 by `@nvzqz.` It got approval from `@joshtriplett,` but rotted with merge conflicts and got closed.
Then it got picked up by `@Dylan-DPC-zz` in #83359. A benchmark was run[^perf], the results (after a bit of thinking[^thinking]) were deemed ok[^ok], but there was a typo[^typo] and the PR was made from a wrong remote in the first place[^remote], so #83909 was opened instead.
By the time #83909 rolled around, the methods in question had received some optimizations[^optimizations], so another perf run was conducted[^perf2]. The results were ok[^ok2]. There was a suggestion to add regression tests for panic behavior [^tests], but before it could be addressed, the PR fell victim to merge conflicts[^conflicts] and died again[^rip].
3 years have passed, and (from what I can tell) this has not been tried again, so here I am now, reviving this old effort.
Given how much time has passed and the fact that I've also touched `VecDeque` this time, it probably makes sense to
`@bors` try `@rust-timer`
[^perf]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83359#issuecomment-804450095
[^thinking]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83359#issuecomment-805286704
[^ok]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83359#issuecomment-812739031
[^typo]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83359#issuecomment-812750205
[^remote]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83359#issuecomment-814067119
[^optimizations]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83909#issuecomment-813736593
[^perf2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83909#issuecomment-813825552
[^ok2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83909#issuecomment-813831341
[^tests]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83909#issuecomment-825788964
[^conflicts]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83909#issuecomment-851173480
[^rip]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/83909#issuecomment-873569771
|
|
liballoc: introduce String, Vec const-slicing
This change `const`-qualifies many methods on `Vec` and `String`, notably `as_slice`, `as_str`, `len`. These changes are made behind the unstable feature flag `const_vec_string_slice`.
## Motivation
This is to support simultaneous variance over ownership and constness. I have an enum type that may contain either `String` or `&str`, and I want to produce a `&str` from it in a possibly-`const` context.
```rust
enum StrOrString<'s> {
Str(&'s str),
String(String),
}
impl<'s> StrOrString<'s> {
const fn as_str(&self) -> &str {
match self {
// In a const-context, I really only expect to see this variant, but I can't switch the implementation
// in some mode like #[cfg(const)] -- there has to be a single body
Self::Str(s) => s,
// so this is a problem, since it's not `const`
Self::String(s) => s.as_str(),
}
}
}
```
Currently `String` and `Vec` don't support this, but can without functional changes. Similar logic applies for `len`, `capacity`, `is_empty`.
## Changes
The essential thing enabling this change is that `Unique::as_ptr` is `const`. This lets us convert `RawVec::ptr` -> `Vec::as_ptr` -> `Vec::as_slice` -> `String::as_str`.
I had to move the `Deref` implementations into `as_{str,slice}` because `Deref` isn't `#[const_trait]`, but I would expect this change to be invisible up to inlining. I moved the `DerefMut` implementations as well for uniformity.
|
|
This change `const`-qualifies many methods on Vec and String, notably
`as_slice`, `as_str`, `len`. These changes are made behind the unstable
feature flag `const_vec_string_slice` with the following tracking issue:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129041
|
|
Since the stabilization in #127679 has reached stage0, 1.82-beta, we can
start using `&raw` freely, and even the soft-deprecated `ptr::addr_of!`
and `ptr::addr_of_mut!` can stop allowing the unstable feature.
I intentionally did not change any documentation or tests, but the rest
of those macro uses are all now using `&raw const` or `&raw mut` in the
standard library.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=MarkSimulacrum,workingjubilee
Add `NonNull` convenience methods to `Box` and `Vec`
Implements the ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/418.
The docs for the added methods are mostly copied from the existing methods that use raw pointers instead of `NonNull`.
I'm new to this "contributing to rustc" thing, so I'm sorry if I did something wrong. In particular, I don't know what the process is for creating a new unstable feature. Please advise me if I should do something. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
some const cleanup: remove unnecessary attributes, add const-hack indications
I learned that we use `FIXME(const-hack)` on top of the "const-hack" label. That seems much better since it marks the right place in the code and moves around with the code. So I went through the PRs with that label and added appropriate FIXMEs in the code. IMO this means we can then remove the label -- Cc ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval.``
I also noticed some const stability attributes that don't do anything useful, and removed them.
r? ``@fee1-dead``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apply size optimizations to panic machinery and some cold functions
* std dependencies gimli and addr2line are now built with opt-level=s
* various panic-related methods and `#[cold]` methods are now marked `#[optimize(size)]`
Panics should be cold enough that it doesn't make sense to optimize them for speed. The only tradeoff here is if someone does a lot of backtrace captures (without panics) and printing then the opt-level change might impact their perf.
Seems to be the first use of the optimize attribute. Tracking issue #54882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add `#[must_use]` to some `into_raw*` functions.
cc #121287
r? ``@cuviper``
Adds `#[must_use = "losing the pointer will leak memory"]`[^1] to `Box::into_raw(_with_allocator)`, `Vec::into_raw_parts(_with_alloc)`, `String::into_raw_parts`[^2], and `rc::{Rc, Weak}::into_raw_with_allocator` (Rc's normal `into_raw` and all of `Arc`'s `into_raw*`s are already `must_use`).
Adds `#[must_use = "losing the raw <resource name may leak resources"]` to `IntoRawFd::into_raw_fd`, `IntoRawSocket::into_raw_socket`, and `IntoRawHandle::into_raw_handle`.
[^1]: "*will* leak memory" may be too-strong wording (since `Box`/`Vec`/`String`/`rc::Weak` might not have a backing allocation), but I left it as-is for simplicity and consistency.
[^2]: `String::into_raw_parts`'s `must_use` message is changed from the previous (possibly misleading) "`self` will be dropped if the result is not used".
|
|
Optimize empty case in Vec::retain
While profiling some code that happens to call Vec::retain() in a tight loop, I noticed more runtime than expected in retain, even in a bench case where the vector was always empty. When I wrapped my call to retain in `if !myvec.is_empty()` I saw faster execution compared with doing retain on an empty vector.
On closer inspection, Vec::retain is doing set_len(0) on itself even when the vector is empty, and then resetting the length again in BackshiftOnDrop::drop.
Unscientific screengrab of a flamegraph illustrating how we end up spending time in set_len and drop:
|
|
|
