| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
AngelicosPhosphoros:try_smarter_vec_from_iter_48994_2, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Improve capacity estimation in Vec::from_iter
Iterates on the attempt made in #53086.
Closes #48994
|
|
Closes #48994
|
|
doc: guarantee call order for sort_by_cached_key
`slice::sort_by_cached_key` takes a caching function `f: impl FnMut(&T) -> K`, which means that the order that calls to the caching function are made is user-visible. This adds a clause to the documentation to promise the current behavior, which is that `f` is called on all elements of the slice from left to right, unless the slice has len < 2 in which case `f` is not called.
For example, this can be used to ensure that the following code is a correct way to involve the index of the element in the sort key:
```rust
let mut index = 0;
slice.sort_by_cached_key(|x| (my_key(index, x), index += 1).0);
```
|
|
|
|
Stabilize vec_spare_capacity
Closes #75017
|
|
Closes #75017
|
|
Docs: recommend VecDeque instead of Vec::remove(0)
Suggestion based on a [discussion](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/should-vec-have-a-try-remove-mut-self-usize-option-t-function/15964/9?u=kornel) where user needlessly struggled with `remove(0)` and accidentally created a quadratic cost.
|
|
|
|
Clarify explicitly that BTree{Map,Set} are ordered.
One of the main reasons one would want to use a BTree{Map,Set} rather than a Hash{Map,Set} is because they maintain their keys in sorted order; but this was never explicitly stated in the top-level docs (it was only indirectly alluded to there, and stated explicitly in the docs for `iter`, `values`, etc.)
This PR states the ordering guarantee more prominently.
|
|
Add diagnostic items for macros
For use in Clippy, it adds diagnostic items to all the stable public macros
Clippy has lints that look for almost all of these (currently by name or path), but there are a few that aren't currently part of any lint, I could remove those if it's preferred to add them as needed rather than ahead of time
|
|
Yield means something else in the context of generators, which are
sufficiently close to iterators that it's better to avoid the
terminology collision here.
|
|
Implement `panic::update_hook`
Add a new function `panic::update_hook` to allow creating panic hooks that forward the call to the previously set panic hook, without race conditions. It works by taking a closure that transforms the old panic hook into a new one, while ensuring that during the execution of the closure no other thread can modify the panic hook. This is a small function so I hope it can be discussed here without a formal RFC, however if you prefer I can write one.
Consider the following example:
```rust
let prev = panic::take_hook();
panic::set_hook(Box::new(move |info| {
println!("panic handler A");
prev(info);
}));
```
This is a common pattern in libraries that need to do something in case of panic: log panic to a file, record code coverage, send panic message to a monitoring service, print custom message with link to github to open a new issue, etc. However it is impossible to avoid race conditions with the current API, because two threads can execute in this order:
* Thread A calls `panic::take_hook()`
* Thread B calls `panic::take_hook()`
* Thread A calls `panic::set_hook()`
* Thread B calls `panic::set_hook()`
And the result is that the original panic hook has been lost, as well as the panic hook set by thread A. The resulting panic hook will be the one set by thread B, which forwards to the default panic hook. This is not considered a big issue because the panic handler setup is usually run during initialization code, probably before spawning any other threads.
Using the new `panic::update_hook` function, this race condition is impossible, and the result will be either `A, B, original` or `B, A, original`.
```rust
panic::update_hook(|prev| {
Box::new(move |info| {
println!("panic handler A");
prev(info);
})
});
```
I found one real world use case here: https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro2/blob/988cf403e741aadfd5340bbf67e35e1062a526aa/src/detection.rs#L32 the workaround is to detect the race condition and panic in that case.
The pattern of `take_hook` + `set_hook` is very common, you can see some examples in this pull request, so I think it's natural to have a function that combines them both. Also using `update_hook` instead of `take_hook` + `set_hook` reduces the number of calls to `HOOK_LOCK.write()` from 2 to 1, but I don't expect this to make any difference in performance.
### Unresolved questions:
* `panic::update_hook` takes a closure, if that closure panics the error message is "panicked while processing panic" which is not nice. This is a consequence of holding the `HOOK_LOCK` while executing the closure. Could be avoided using `catch_unwind`?
* Reimplement `panic::set_hook` as `panic::update_hook(|_prev| hook)`?
|
|
Add Sync bound to allocator parameter in vec::IntoIter
The `A: Sync` bound was forgotten in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/8725e4c33749b23f260b2fc46e090c3792b6f97e#diff-b78c3ab6d37f4ede32195707528f8a76c49d4557cc9d3a7a09417b5157729b9fR3132
Similar `unsafe impl Sync` in that commit _do_ include the `A: Sync` bound (and around the alloc lib), so I think this was just an honest mistake.
Here's an example of the unsoundness: https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=16cbfeff7c934ae72ab632c1476fdd8b
`@steffahn` found this, I'm just putting up the fix cause nobody else did :^)
Fixes #92633
|
|
Partially stabilize `maybe_uninit_extra`
This covers:
```rust
impl<T> MaybeUninit<T> {
pub unsafe fn assume_init_read(&self) -> T { ... }
pub unsafe fn assume_init_drop(&mut self) { ... }
}
```
It does not cover the const-ness of `write` under `const_maybe_uninit_write` nor the const-ness of `assume_init_read` (this commit adds `const_maybe_uninit_assume_init_read` for that).
FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63567#issuecomment-958590287.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
This covers:
impl<T> MaybeUninit<T> {
pub unsafe fn assume_init_read(&self) -> T { ... }
pub unsafe fn assume_init_drop(&mut self) { ... }
}
It does not cover the const-ness of `write` under
`const_maybe_uninit_write` nor the const-ness of
`assume_init_read` (this commit adds
`const_maybe_uninit_assume_init_read` for that).
FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63567#issuecomment-958590287.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
|
|
r=Mark-Simulacrum
Replace usages of vec![].into_iter with [].into_iter
`[].into_iter` is idiomatic over `vec![].into_iter` because its simpler and faster (unless the vec is optimized away in which case it would be the same)
So we should change all the implementation, documentation and tests to use it.
I skipped:
* `src/tools` - Those are copied in from upstream
* `src/test/ui` - Hard to tell if `vec![].into_iter` was used intentionally or not here and not much benefit to changing it.
* any case where `vec![].into_iter` was used because we specifically needed a `Vec::IntoIter<T>`
* any case where it looked like we were intentionally using `vec![].into_iter` to test it.
|
|
|
|
Mak DefId to AccessLevel map in resolve for export
hir_id to accesslevel in resolve and applied in privacy
using local def id
removing tracing probes
making function not recursive and adding comments
Move most of Exported/Public res to rustc_resolve
moving public/export res to resolve
fix missing stability attributes in core, std and alloc
move code to access_levels.rs
return for some kinds instead of going through them
Export correctness, macro changes, comments
add comment for import binding
add comment for import binding
renmae to access level visitor, remove comments, move fn as closure, remove new_key
fmt
fix rebase
fix rebase
fmt
fmt
fix: move macro def to rustc_resolve
fix: reachable AccessLevel for enum variants
fmt
fix: missing stability attributes for other architectures
allow unreachable pub in rustfmt
fix: missing impl access level + renaming export to reexport
Missing impl access level was found thanks to a test in clippy
|
|
|
|
Switch all libraries to the 2021 edition
The fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/88638#issuecomment-996620107 is to simply add const-stability for these functions.
r? `@m-ou-se`
Closes #88638.
|
|
And to remove possibility of panics while changing the panic handler,
because that resulted in a double panic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix a minor mistake in `String::try_reserve_exact` examples
The examples of `String::try_reserve_exact` didn't actually use `try_reserve_exact`, which was probably a minor mistake, and this PR fixed it.
|
|
Drop guards in slice sorting derive src pointers from &mut T, which is invalidated by interior mutation in comparison
I tried to run https://github.com/rust-lang/miri-test-libstd on `alloc` with `-Zmiri-track-raw-pointers`, and got a failure on the test `slice::panic_safe`. The test failure has nothing to do with panic safety, it's from how the test tests for panic safety.
I minimized the test failure into this very silly program:
```rust
use std::cell::Cell;
use std::cmp::Ordering;
#[derive(Clone)]
struct Evil(Cell<usize>);
fn main() {
let mut input = vec![Evil(Cell::new(0)); 3];
// Hits the bug pattern via CopyOnDrop in core
input.sort_unstable_by(|a, _b| {
a.0.set(0);
Ordering::Less
});
// Hits the bug pattern via InsertionHole in alloc
input.sort_by(|_a, b| {
b.0.set(0);
Ordering::Less
});
}
```
To fix this, I'm just removing the mutability/uniqueness where it wasn't required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constify `Box<T, A>` methods
Tracking issue: none yet
Most of the methods bounded on `~const`. `intrinsics::const_eval_select` is used for handling an allocation error.
<details><summary>Constified API</summary>
```rust
impl<T, A: Allocator> Box<T, A> {
pub const fn new_in(x: T, alloc: A) -> Self
where
A: ~const Allocator + ~const Drop;
pub const fn try_new_in(x: T, alloc: A) -> Result<Self, AllocError>
where
T: ~const Drop,
A: ~const Allocator + ~const Drop;
pub const fn new_uninit_in(alloc: A) -> Box<mem::MaybeUninit<T>, A>
where
A: ~const Allocator + ~const Drop;
pub const fn try_new_uninit_in(alloc: A) -> Result<Box<mem::MaybeUninit<T>, A>, AllocError>
where
A: ~const Allocator + ~const Drop;
pub const fn new_zeroed_in(alloc: A) -> Box<mem::MaybeUninit<T>, A>
where
A: ~const Allocator + ~const Drop;
pub const fn try_new_zeroed_in(alloc: A) -> Result<Box<mem::MaybeUninit<T>, A>, AllocError>
where
A: ~const Allocator + ~const Drop;
pub const fn pin_in(x: T, alloc: A) -> Pin<Self>
where
A: 'static,
A: 'static + ~const Allocator + ~const Drop,
pub const fn into_boxed_slice(boxed: Self) -> Box<[T], A>;
pub const fn into_inner(boxed: Self) -> T
where
Self: ~const Drop,
}
impl<T, A: Allocator> Box<MaybeUninit<T>, A> {
pub const unsafe fn assume_init(self) -> Box<T, A>;
pub const fn write(mut boxed: Self, value: T) -> Box<T, A>;
pub const unsafe fn from_raw_in(raw: *mut T, alloc: A) -> Self;
pub const fn into_raw_with_allocator(b: Self) -> (*mut T, A);
pub const fn into_unique(b: Self) -> (Unique<T>, A);
pub const fn allocator(b: &Self) -> &A;
pub const fn leak<'a>(b: Self) -> &'a mut T
where
A: 'a;
pub const fn into_pin(boxed: Self) -> Pin<Self>
where
A: 'static;
}
unsafe impl<#[may_dangle] T: ?Sized, A: Allocator> const Drop for Box<T, A>;
impl<T: ?Sized, A: Allocator> const From<Box<T, A>> for Pin<Box<T, A>>
where
A: 'static;
impl<T: ?Sized, A: Allocator> const Deref for Box<T, A>;
impl<T: ?Sized, A: Allocator> const DerefMut for Box<T, A>;
impl<T: ?Sized, A: Allocator> const Unpin for Box<T, A> where A: 'static;
```
</details>
<details><summary>Example</summary>
```rust
pub struct ConstAllocator;
unsafe impl const Allocator for ConstAllocator {
fn allocate(&self, layout: Layout) -> Result<NonNull<[u8]>, AllocError> {
unsafe {
let ptr = core::intrinsics::const_allocate(layout.size(), layout.align());
Ok(NonNull::new_unchecked(ptr as *mut [u8; 0] as *mut [u8]))
}
}
unsafe fn deallocate(&self, _ptr: NonNull<u8>, _layout: Layout) {
/* do nothing */
}
fn allocate_zeroed(&self, layout: Layout) -> Result<NonNull<[u8]>, AllocError> {
self.allocate(layout)
}
unsafe fn grow(
&self,
_ptr: NonNull<u8>,
_old_layout: Layout,
_new_layout: Layout,
) -> Result<NonNull<[u8]>, AllocError> {
unimplemented!()
}
unsafe fn grow_zeroed(
&self,
_ptr: NonNull<u8>,
_old_layout: Layout,
_new_layout: Layout,
) -> Result<NonNull<[u8]>, AllocError> {
unimplemented!()
}
unsafe fn shrink(
&self,
_ptr: NonNull<u8>,
_old_layout: Layout,
_new_layout: Layout,
) -> Result<NonNull<[u8]>, AllocError> {
unimplemented!()
}
fn by_ref(&self) -> &Self
where
Self: Sized,
{
self
}
}
#[test]
fn const_box() {
const VALUE: u32 = {
let mut boxed = Box::new_in(1u32, ConstAllocator);
assert!(*boxed == 1);
*boxed = 42;
assert!(*boxed == 42);
*boxed
};
assert!(VALUE == 42);
}
```
</details>
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remove pronunciation guide from Vec<T>
I performed an extremely scientific poll on twitter, and determined this is not how it's pronounced: https://twitter.com/at_tcsc/status/1476643344285581315
|
|
Implement split_at_spare_mut without Deref to a slice so that the spare slice is valid
~I'm not sure I understand what's going on here correctly. And I'm pretty sure this safety comment needs to be changed. I'm just referring to the same thing that `as_mut_ptr_range` does.~ (Thanks `@RalfJung` for the guidance and clearing things up)
I tried to run https://github.com/rust-lang/miri-test-libstd on alloc with -Zmiri-track-raw-pointers, and got a failure on the test `vec::test_extend_from_within`.
I minimized the test failure into this program:
```rust
#![feature(vec_split_at_spare)]
fn main() {
Vec::<i32>::with_capacity(1).split_at_spare_mut();
}
```
The problem is that the existing implementation is actually getting a pointer range where both pointers are derived from the initialized region of the Vec's allocation, but we need the second one to be valid for the region between len and capacity. (thanks Ralf for clearing this up)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In `Vec`, two doc tests are using `MaybeUninit::write` , stabilized in 1.55. This makes docs' usage of `maybe_uninit_extra` feature unnecessary.
|
|
r=joshtriplett
RawVec: don't recompute capacity after allocating.
Currently it sets the capacity to `ptr.len() / mem::size_of::<T>()`
after any buffer allocation/reallocation. This would be useful if
allocators ever returned a `NonNull<[u8]>` with a size larger than
requested. But this never happens, so it's not useful.
Removing this slightly reduces the size of generated LLVM IR, and
slightly speeds up the hot path of `RawVec` growth.
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow reverse iteration of lowercase'd/uppercase'd chars
The PR implements `DoubleEndedIterator` trait for `ToLowercase` and `ToUppercase`.
This enables reverse iteration of lowercase/uppercase variants of character sequences.
One of use cases: determining whether a char sequence is a suffix of another one.
Example:
```rust
fn endswith_ignore_case(s1: &str, s2: &str) -> bool {
for eob in s1
.chars()
.flat_map(|c| c.to_lowercase())
.rev()
.zip_longest(s2.chars().flat_map(|c| c.to_lowercase()).rev())
{
match eob {
EitherOrBoth::Both(c1, c2) => {
if c1 != c2 {
return false;
}
}
EitherOrBoth::Left(_) => return true,
EitherOrBoth::Right(_) => return false,
}
}
true
}
```
|
|
Currently it sets the capacity to `ptr.len() / mem::size_of::<T>()`
after any buffer allocation/reallocation. This would be useful if
allocators ever returned a `NonNull<[u8]>` with a size larger than
requested. But this never happens, so it's not useful.
Removing this slightly reduces the size of generated LLVM IR, and
slightly speeds up the hot path of `RawVec` growth.
|
|
The previous implementation used slice::as_mut_ptr_range to derive the
pointer for the spare capacity slice. This is invalid, because that
pointer is derived from the initialized region, so it does not have
provenance over the uninitialized region.
|
|
|
|
Update example code for Vec::splice to change the length
The current example for `Vec::splice` illustrates the replacement of a section of length 2 with a new section of length 2. This isn't a particularly interesting case for splice, and makes it look a bit like a shorthand for the kind of manipulations that could be done with a mutable slice.
In order to provide a stronger example, this updates the example to use different lengths for the source and destination regions, and uses a slice from the middle of the vector to illustrate that this does not necessarily have to be at the beginning or the end.
Resolves #92067
|
