| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
[Clippy] Get rid of most `std` `match_def_path` usage, swap to diagnostic items.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5393.
This was going to remove all `std` paths, but `SeekFrom` has issues being cleanly replaced with a diagnostic item as the paths are for variants, which currently cannot be diagnostic items.
This also, as a last step, categories the paths to help with future path removals.
|
|
|
|
instead of path
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
items instead of paths
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=compiler-errors
[Clippy] Swap `manual_retain` to use diagnostic items instead of paths
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5393, just a chore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add new_cyclic_in for Rc and Arc
Currently, new_cyclic_in does not exist for Rc and Arc. This is an oversight according to https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-allocators/issues/132.
This PR adds new_cyclic_in for Rc and Arc. The implementation is almost the exact same as new_cyclic with some small differences to make it allocator-specific. new_cyclic's implementation has been replaced with a call to `new_cyclic_in(data_fn, Global)`.
Remaining questions:
* ~~Is requiring Allocator to be Clone OK? According to https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-allocators/issues/88, Allocators should be cheap to clone. I'm just hesitant to add unnecessary constraints, though I don't see an obvious workaround for this function since many called functions in new_cyclic_in expect an owned Allocator. I see Allocator.by_ref() as an option, but that doesn't work on when creating Weak { ptr: init_ptr, alloc: alloc.clone() }, because the type of Weak then becomes Weak<T, &A> which is incompatible.~~ Fixed, thank you `@zakarumych!` This PR no longer requires the allocator to be Clone.
* Currently, new_cyclic_in's documentation is almost entirely copy-pasted from new_cyclic, with minor tweaks to make it more accurate (e.g. Rc<T> -> Rc<T, A>). The example section is removed to mitigate redundancy and instead redirects to cyclic_in. Is this appropriate?
* ~~The comments in new_cyclic_in (and much of the implementation) are also copy-pasted from new_cyclic. Would it be better to make a helper method new_cyclic_in_internal that both functions call, with either Global or the custom allocator? I'm not sure if that's even possible, since the internal method would have to return Arc<T, Global> and I don't know if it's possible to "downcast" that to an Arc<T>. Maybe transmute would work here?~~ Done, thanks `@zakarumych`
* Arc::new_cyclic is #[inline], but Rc::new_cyclic is not. Which is preferred?
* nit: does it matter where in the impl block new_cyclic_in is defined?
|
|
Co-authored-by: David Tolnay <dtolnay@gmail.com>
|
|
Implement feature `string_from_utf8_lossy_owned` for lossy conversion from `Vec<u8>` to `String` methods
Accepted ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/116
Tracking issue: #129436
Implement feature for lossily converting from `Vec<u8>` to `String`
- Add `String::from_utf8_lossy_owned`
- Add `FromUtf8Error::into_utf8_lossy`
---
Related to #64727, but unsure whether to mark it "fixed" by this PR.
That issue partly asks for in-place replacement of the original allocation. We fulfill the other half of that request with these functions.
closes #64727
|
|
Stabilize `&mut` (and `*mut`) as well as `&Cell` (and `*const Cell`) in const
This stabilizes `const_mut_refs` and `const_refs_to_cell`. That allows a bunch of new things in const contexts:
- Mentioning `&mut` types
- Creating `&mut` and `*mut` values
- Creating `&T` and `*const T` values where `T` contains interior mutability
- Dereferencing `&mut` and `*mut` values (both for reads and writes)
The same rules as at runtime apply: mutating immutable data is UB. This includes mutation through pointers derived from shared references; the following is diagnosed with a hard error:
```rust
#[allow(invalid_reference_casting)]
const _: () = {
let mut val = 15;
let ptr = &val as *const i32 as *mut i32;
unsafe { *ptr = 16; }
};
```
The main limitation that is enforced is that the final value of a const (or non-`mut` static) may not contain `&mut` values nor interior mutable `&` values. This is necessary because the memory those references point to becomes *read-only* when the constant is done computing, so (interior) mutable references to such memory would be pretty dangerous. We take a multi-layered approach here to ensuring no mutable references escape the initializer expression:
- A static analysis rejects (interior) mutable references when the referee looks like it may outlive the current MIR body.
- To be extra sure, this static check is complemented by a "safety net" of dynamic checks. ("Dynamic" in the sense of "running during/after const-evaluation, e.g. at runtime of this code" -- in contrast to "static" which works entirely by looking at the MIR without evaluating it.)
- After the final value is computed, we do a type-driven traversal of the entire value, and if we find any `&mut` or interior-mutable `&` we error out.
- However, the type-driven traversal cannot traverse `union` or raw pointers, so there is a second dynamic check where if the final value of the const contains any pointer that was not derived from a shared reference, we complain. This is currently a future-compat lint, but will become an ICE in #128543. On the off-chance that it's actually possible to trigger this lint on stable, I'd prefer if we could make it an ICE before stabilizing const_mut_refs, but it's not a hard blocker. This part of the "safety net" is only active for mutable references since with shared references, it has false positives.
Altogether this should prevent people from leaking (interior) mutable references out of the const initializer.
While updating the tests I learned that surprisingly, this code gets rejected:
```rust
const _: Vec<i32> = {
let mut x = Vec::<i32>::new(); //~ ERROR destructor of `Vec<i32>` cannot be evaluated at compile-time
let r = &mut x;
let y = x;
y
};
```
The analysis that rejects destructors in `const` is very conservative when it sees an `&mut` being created to `x`, and then considers `x` to be always live. See [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65394#issuecomment-541499219) for a longer explanation. `const_precise_live_drops` will solve this, so I consider this problem to be tracked by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73255.
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval` `@rust-lang/lang`
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57349
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80384
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=MarkSimulacrum,workingjubilee
Add `NonNull` convenience methods to `Box` and `Vec`
Implements the ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/418.
The docs for the added methods are mostly copied from the existing methods that use raw pointers instead of `NonNull`.
I'm new to this "contributing to rustc" thing, so I'm sorry if I did something wrong. In particular, I don't know what the process is for creating a new unstable feature. Please advise me if I should do something. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
make basic allocation functions track_caller in Miri for nicer backtraces
This matches what we did with basic pointer and atomic operations.
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #130101 (some const cleanup: remove unnecessary attributes, add const-hack indications)
- #130208 (Introduce `'ra` lifetime name.)
- #130263 (coverage: Simplify creation of sum counters)
- #130273 (more eagerly discard constraints on overflow)
- #130276 (Add test for nalgebra hang in coherence)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
some const cleanup: remove unnecessary attributes, add const-hack indications
I learned that we use `FIXME(const-hack)` on top of the "const-hack" label. That seems much better since it marks the right place in the code and moves around with the code. So I went through the PRs with that label and added appropriate FIXMEs in the code. IMO this means we can then remove the label -- Cc ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval.``
I also noticed some const stability attributes that don't do anything useful, and removed them.
r? ``@fee1-dead``
|
|
Update compiler-builtins to 0.1.125
This commit updates the compiler-builtins crate from 0.1.123 to 0.1.125. The changes in this update are:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/682
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/678
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/685
|
|
|
|
Ban non-array SIMD
Nearing the end of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/621 !
Currently blocked on ~~https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/673~~ ~~https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/674~~ ~~https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129400~~ ~~https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129481~~ for windows.
|
|
Also emit `missing_docs` lint with `--test` to fulfil expectations
This PR removes the "test harness" suppression of the `missing_docs` lint to be able to fulfil `#[expect]` (expectations) as it is now "relevant".
I think the goal was to maybe avoid false-positive while linting on public items under `#[cfg(test)]` but with effective visibility we should no longer have any false-positive.
Another possibility would be to query the lint level and only emit the lint if it's of expect level, but that is even more hacky.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130021
try-job: x86_64-gnu-aux
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bump boostrap compiler to new beta
Accidentally left some comments on the update cfgs commit directly xd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This commit updates the compiler-builtins crate from 0.1.123 to 0.1.125.
The changes in this update are:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/682
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/678
* https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-builtins/pull/685
|
|
|
|
enable -Zrandomize-layout in debug CI builds
This builds rustc/libs/tools with `-Zrandomize-layout` on *-debug CI runners.
Only a handful of tests and asserts break with that enabled, which is promising. One test was fixable, the rest is dealt with by disabling them through new cargo features or compiletest directives.
The config.toml flag `rust.randomize-layout` defaults to false, so it has to be explicitly enabled for now.
|
|
|
|
Box validity: update for new zero-sized rules
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/529
Cc `@joshlf` `@rust-lang/opsem`
|
|
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #127474 (doc: Make block of inline Deref methods foldable)
- #129678 (Deny imports of `rustc_type_ir::inherent` outside of type ir + new trait solver)
- #129738 (`rustc_mir_transform` cleanups)
- #129793 (add extra linebreaks so rustdoc can identify the first sentence)
- #129804 (Fixed some typos in the standard library documentation/comments)
- #129837 (Actually parse stdout json, instead of using hacky contains logic.)
- #129842 (Fix LLVM ABI NAME for riscv64imac-unknown-nuttx-elf)
- #129843 (Mark myself as on vacation for triagebot)
- #129858 (Replace walk with visit so we dont skip outermost expr kind in def collector)
Failed merges:
- #129777 (Add `unreachable_pub`, round 4)
- #129868 (Remove kobzol vacation status)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
Fixed some typos in the standard library documentation/comments
I spent some time to fix a few typos in `library/std` and `library/core`
|
|
Apply size optimizations to panic machinery and some cold functions
* std dependencies gimli and addr2line are now built with opt-level=s
* various panic-related methods and `#[cold]` methods are now marked `#[optimize(size)]`
Panics should be cold enough that it doesn't make sense to optimize them for speed. The only tradeoff here is if someone does a lot of backtrace captures (without panics) and printing then the opt-level change might impact their perf.
Seems to be the first use of the optimize attribute. Tracking issue #54882
|
|
|
|
Lint that warns when an elided lifetime ends up being a named lifetime
As suggested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48686#issuecomment-1817334575
Fixes #48686
|
|
struct sizes
|
