| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
This was previously needed because the indirection used to hide some unexplained lifetime errors, which it turned out were related to the `min_choice` algorithm.
Removing the indirection also solves a couple of cycle errors, large moves and makes async blocks support the `#[track_caller]` annotation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PR 107844 made DropAndReplace unused, let's remove it completely
from the codebase.
|
|
Use `nuw` when calculating slice lengths from `Range`s
An `assume` would definitely not be worth it, but since the flag is almost free we might as well tell LLVM this, especially on `_unchecked` calls where there's no obvious way for it to deduce it.
(Today neither safe nor unsafe indexing gets it: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/G1jYT548s>)
|
|
r=pnkfelix,m-ou-se,scottmcm
Add `round_ties_even` to `f32` and `f64`
Tracking issue: #96710
Redux of #82273. See also #55107
Adds a new method, `round_ties_even`, to `f32` and `f64`, that rounds the float to the nearest integer , rounding halfway cases to the number with an even least significant bit. Uses the `roundeven` LLVM intrinsic to do this.
Of the five IEEE 754 rounding modes, this is the only one that doesn't already have a round-to-integer function exposed by Rust (others are `round`, `floor`, `ceil`, and `trunc`). Ties-to-even is also the rounding mode used for int-to-float and float-to-float `as` casts, as well as float arithmentic operations. So not having an explicit rounding method for it seems like an oversight.
Bikeshed: this PR currently uses `round_ties_even` for the name of the method. But maybe `round_ties_to_even` is better, or `round_even`, or `round_to_even`?
|
|
This makes the macro syntax used in documentation more readable.
|
|
An `assume` would definitely not be worth it, but since the flag is almost free we might as well tell LLVM this, especially on `_unchecked` calls where there's no obvious way for it to deduce it.
(Today neither safe nor unsafe indexing gets it: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/G1jYT548s>)
|
|
Use `partial_cmp` to implement tuple `lt`/`le`/`ge`/`gt`
In today's implementation, `(A, B)::gt` contains calls to *both* `A::eq` *and* `A::gt`.
That's fine for primitives, but for things like `String`s it's kinda weird -- `(String, usize)::gt` has a call to both `bcmp` and `memcmp` (<https://rust.godbolt.org/z/7jbbPMesf>) because when `bcmp` says the `String`s aren't equal, it turns around and calls `memcmp` to find out which one's bigger.
This PR changes the implementation to instead implement `(A, …, C, Z)::gt` using `A::partial_cmp`, `…::partial_cmp`, `C::partial_cmp`, and `Z::gt`. (And analogously for `lt`, `le`, and `ge`.) That way expensive comparisons don't need to be repeated.
Technically this is an observable change on stable, so I've marked it `needs-fcp` + `T-libs-api` and will
r? rust-lang/libs-api
I'm hoping that this will be non-controversial, however, since it's very similar to the observable changes that were made to the derives (#81384 #98655) -- like those, this only changes behaviour if a type overrode behaviour in a way inconsistent with the rules for the various traits involved.
(The first commit here is #108156, adding the codegen test, which I used to make sure this doesn't regress behaviour for primitives.)
Zulip conversation about this change: <https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/.60.3E.60.20on.20Tuples/near/328392927>.
|
|
Add more debug assertions to unsafe functions
related to #51713
|
|
|
|
Remove ne implementations from strings
As far as I can tell, there isn't really a reason for those.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Match unmatched backticks in library/
Found with GNU grep:
```
grep -rEn '^(([^`]*`){2})*[^`]*`[^`]*$' library/ | rg -v '\s*[//]?.{1,2}```'
```
split out from #108685 as per advice.
|
|
r=m-ou-se
Add `Atomic*::from_ptr`
This PR adds functions in the following form to all atomic types:
```rust
impl AtomicT {
pub const unsafe fn from_ptr<'a>(ptr: *mut T) -> &'a AtomicT;
}
```
r? `@m-ou-se` (we've talked about it before)
I'm not sure about docs & safety requirements, I'd appreciate some feedback on them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This reverts commit b379d216eefaba083a0627b1724d73f99d4bdf5c.
|
|
|
|
Add support for QNX Neutrino to standard library
This change:
- adds standard library support for QNX Neutrino (7.1).
- upgrades `libc` to version `0.2.139` which supports QNX Neutrino
`@gh-tr`
⚠️ Backtraces on QNX require https://github.com/rust-lang/backtrace-rs/pull/507 which is not yet merged! (But everything else works without these changes) ⚠️
Tested mainly with a x86_64 virtual machine (see qnx-nto.md) and partially with an aarch64 hardware (some tests fail due to constrained resources).
|
|
Fixes #108546
|
|
Merge two different equality specialization traits in `core`
Arrays and slices each had their own version of this, without a matching set of `impl`s.
Merge them into one (still-`pub(crate)`) `cmp::BytewiseEq` trait, so we can stop doing all these things twice.
And that means that the `[T]::eq` → `memcmp` specialization picks up a bunch of types where that previously only worked for arrays, so examples like <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/KjsG8MGGT> will use it now instead of emitting loops.
r? the8472
|
|
|
|
Add `Option::as_`(`mut_`)`slice`
This adds the following functions:
* `Option<T>::as_slice(&self) -> &[T]`
* `Option<T>::as_mut_slice(&mut self) -> &[T]`
The `as_slice` and `as_mut_slice_mut` functions benefit from an optimization that makes them completely branch-free. ~~Unfortunately, this optimization is not available on by-value Options, therefore the `into_slice` implementations use the plain `match` + `slice::from_ref` approach.~~
Note that the optimization's soundness hinges on the fact that either the niche optimization makes the offset of the `Some(_)` contents zero or the mempory layout of `Option<T>` is equal to that of `Option<MaybeUninit<T>>`.
The idea has been discussed on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Option.3A.3Aas_slice). Notably the idea for the `as_slice_mut` and `into_slice´ methods came from `@cuviper` and `@Sp00ph` hardened the optimization against niche-optimized Options.
The [rust playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=release&edition=2021&gist=74f8e4239a19f454c183aaf7b4a969e0) shows that the generated assembly of the optimized method is basically only a copy while the naive method generates code containing a `test dx, dx` on x86_64.
---
EDIT from reviewer: ACP is https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/150
|
|
rustdoc: Show that repeated expression arrays can be made with constant values
The [rust reference](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/array-expr.html) currently says that repeated values for arrays can be constant or `Copy`
> repeat operand is [Copy](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/special-types-and-traits.html#copy) or that it must be a [path](https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions/path-expr.html) to a constant item
This updates the rust documentation on primitive arrays to reflect what the rust reference says (and also compiler suggestions if you do not use a `const` item)
|
|
This adds the following functions:
* `Option<T>::as_slice(&self) -> &[T]`
* `Option<T>::as_slice_mut(&mut self) -> &[T]`
The `as_slice` and `as_slice_mut` functions benefit from an
optimization that makes them completely branch-free.
Note that the optimization's soundness hinges on the fact that either
the niche optimization makes the offset of the `Some(_)` contents zero
or the mempory layout of `Option<T>` is equal to that of
`Option<MaybeUninit<T>>`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This way one can `mem::take()` them out of structs or #[derive(Default)] on structs containing them.
These changes will be insta-stable.
|
|
Co-authored-by: gh-tr <troach@qnx.com>
|
|
Inline `Poll` methods
With `opt-level="z"`, the `Poll::map*` methods are sometimes not inlined (see <https://godbolt.org/z/ca5ajKTEK>). This PR adds `#[inline]` to these methods. I have a project that can benefit from this change, but do we want to enable this behavior universally?
Fixes #101080.
|
|
Stabilize cmpxchg16b_target_feature
Tracking issue for target features
+ #44839
stdarch issue
+ https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/issues/827
stdarch PR
+ https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1358
reference PR
+ https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1331
It's my first time contributing to rust-lang/rust. Please tell me if I missed something.
|
|
Stabilize `#![feature(target_feature_11)]`
## Stabilization report
### Summary
Allows for safe functions to be marked with `#[target_feature]` attributes.
Functions marked with `#[target_feature]` are generally considered as unsafe functions: they are unsafe to call, cannot be assigned to safe function pointers, and don't implement the `Fn*` traits.
However, calling them from other `#[target_feature]` functions with a superset of features is safe.
```rust
// Demonstration function
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn avx2() {}
fn foo() {
// Calling `avx2` here is unsafe, as we must ensure
// that AVX is available first.
unsafe {
avx2();
}
}
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn bar() {
// Calling `avx2` here is safe.
avx2();
}
```
### Test cases
Tests for this feature can be found in [`src/test/ui/rfcs/rfc-2396-target_feature-11/`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/tree/b67ba9ba208ac918228a18321fc3a11a99b1c62b/src/test/ui/rfcs/rfc-2396-target_feature-11/).
### Edge cases
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73631
Closures defined inside functions marked with `#[target_feature]` inherit the target features of their parent function. They can still be assigned to safe function pointers and implement the appropriate `Fn*` traits.
```rust
#[target_feature(enable = "avx2")]
fn qux() {
let my_closure = || avx2(); // this call to `avx2` is safe
let f: fn() = my_closure;
}
```
This means that in order to call a function with `#[target_feature]`, you must show that the target-feature is available while the function executes *and* for as long as whatever may escape from that function lives.
### Documentation
- Reference: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1181
---
cc tracking issue #69098
r? `@ghost`
|
|
|
|
Move IpAddr, SocketAddr and V4+V6 related types to `core`
Implements RFC https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2832. The RFC has completed FCP with disposition merge, but is not yet merged.
Moves IP types to `core` as specified in the RFC.
The full list of moved types is: `IpAddr`, `Ipv4Addr`, `Ipv6Addr`, `SocketAddr`, `SocketAddrV4`, `SocketAddrV6`, `Ipv6MulticastScope` and `AddrParseError`.
Doing this move was one of the main driving arguments behind #78802.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nilstrieb:˂DiagnosticItem˂FromFn˃ as From˂˂LangItemFromFn˃˃˃꞉꞉from, r=cjgillot
Remove `from` lang item
It was probably a leftover from the old `?` desugaring but anyways, it's unused now except for clippy, which can just use a diagnostics item.
|
|
Require `literal`s for some `(u)int_impl!` parameters
The point of these is to be seen *lexically* in the docs, so they should always be passed as the correct literal, not as an expression.
(Otherwise we could just compute `Min`/`Max` from `BITS`, for example.)
r? Nilstrieb
|
|
It was probably a leftover from the old `?` desugaring but anyways, it's
unused now except for clippy, which can just use a diagnostics item.
|
|
Lint against `Iterator::map` receiving a callable that returns `()`
Close #106991
|
|
Optimize break patterns
Use `wyrand` instead of calling `XORSHIFT` 2 times in break patterns for the 64-bit platform. The new PRNG is 2x faster than the previous one.
Bench result(via https://gist.github.com/zhangyunhao116/11ef41a150f5c23bb47d86255fbeba89):
```
old time: [1.3258 ns 1.3262 ns 1.3266 ns]
change: [+0.5901% +0.6731% +0.7791%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Change within noise threshold.
Found 13 outliers among 100 measurements (13.00%)
7 (7.00%) high mild
6 (6.00%) high severe
new time: [657.65 ps 657.89 ps 658.18 ps]
change: [-1.6910% -1.6110% -1.5256%] (p = 0.00 < 0.05)
Performance has improved.
Found 6 outliers among 100 measurements (6.00%)
2 (2.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe
```
|
|
implement const iterator using `rustc_do_not_const_check`
Previous experiment: #102225.
Explanation: rather than making all default methods work under `const` all at once, this uses `rustc_do_not_const_check` as a workaround to "trick" the compiler to not run any checks on those other default methods. Any const implementations are only required to implement the `next` method. Any actual calls to the trait methods other than `next` will either error in compile time (at CTFE runs), or run the methods correctly if they do not have any non-const operations. This is extremely easy to maintain, remove, or improve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
