| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
Add memory layout documentation to generic NonZero<T>
The documentation I've added is based on the same Layout documentation that appears on the other `NonZero*` types. For example see [the Layout docs on `NonZeroI8`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/num/type.NonZeroI8.html#layout-1).
|
|
|
|
Tweak language
Co-authored-by: Jonas Böttiger <jonasboettiger@icloud.com>
|
|
|
|
They are either outdated as emscripten now supports i128 or they are
subsumed by #[cfg_attr(not(panic = "unwind"), ignore]
|
|
remove pointless allowed_through_unstable_modules on TryFromSliceError
This got added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132482 but the PR does not explain why. `@lukas-code` do you still remember? Also Cc `@Noratrieb` as reviewer of that PR.
If I understand the issue description correctly, all paths under which this type is exported are stable now: `core::array::TryFromSliceError` and `std::array::TryFromSliceError`. If that is the case, we shouldn't have the attribute; it's a terrible hack that should only be used when needed to maintain backward compatibility. Getting some historic information right is IMO *not* sufficient justification to risk accidentally exposing this type via more unstable paths today or in the future.
|
|
The `fill` value by default should be set to `' '` (space), but the current implementation uses `#[derive(Default)]` which sets it to `\0`
|
|
Implement `ByteStr` and `ByteString` types
Approved ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/502
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/134915
These types represent human-readable strings that are conventionally,
but not always, UTF-8. The `Debug` impl prints non-UTF-8 bytes using
escape sequences, and the `Display` impl uses the Unicode replacement
character.
This is a minimal implementation of these types and associated trait
impls. It does not add any helper methods to other types such as `[u8]`
or `Vec<u8>`.
I've omitted a few implementations of `AsRef`, `AsMut`, and `Borrow`,
when those would be the second implementation for a type (counting the
`T` impl), to avoid potential inference failures. We can attempt to add
more impls later in standalone commits, and run them through crater.
In addition to the `bstr` feature, I've added a `bstr_internals` feature
for APIs provided by `core` for use by `alloc` but not currently
intended for stabilization.
This API and its implementation are based *heavily* on the `bstr` crate
by Andrew Gallant (`@BurntSushi).`
r? `@BurntSushi`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add an example of using `carrying_mul_add` to write wider multiplication
Just the basic quadratic version that you wouldn't actually use for really-big integers, but it's nice and short so is useful as for a demonstration of why you might find `carrying_mul_add` useful :)
cc #85532 ``````@clarfonthey``````
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enable `unreachable_pub` lint in core
This PR enables the [`unreachable_pub`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/rustc/lints/listing/allowed-by-default.html#unreachable-pub) as warn in `core`, `rtstartup` and `panic_unwind`.
The motivation is similar to the compiler [MCP: Enable deny(unreachable_pub) on `rustc_*` crates](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/773#issue-2467219005) :
> "Where is this thing used?" is a question I ask all the time when reading unfamiliar code. Because of this, I generally find it annoying when things are marked with a more permissive visibility than necessary. "This thing marked pub, which other crates is it used in? Oh, it's not used in any other crates."
Another motivation is to help to lint by utilizing it in-tree and seeing it's limitation in more complex scenarios.
The diff was mostly generated with `./x.py fix --stage 1 library/core/ -- --broken-code`, as well as manual edits for code in macros, generated code and other targets.
r? libs
|
|
Recognise new IPv6 documentation range from IETF RFC 9637
This PR adds the `3fff::/20` range defined by [IETF RFC 9637](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9637/) to those ranges which `Ipv6Addr::is_documentation` recognises as a documentation IP.
See also: https://www.iana.org/assignments/iana-ipv6-special-registry/iana-ipv6-special-registry.xhtml
Unstable tracking issue: #27709
|
|
Reexport likely/unlikely in std::hint
Since `likely`/`unlikely` should be working now, we could reexport them in `std::hint`. I'm not sure if this is already approved or if it requires approval
Tracking issue: #26179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just the basic quadratic version that you wouldn't actually want for a true bigint, but it's nice and short so is useful as an example :)
|
|
This commit adds the 3fff::/20 range defined by RFC9637 to those ranges which Ipv6Addr::is_documentation recognises as a documentation IP.
|
|
Improve `select_nth_unstable` documentation clarity
* Instead uses `before` and `after` variable names in the example
where `greater` and `lesser` are flipped.
* Uses `<=` and `>=` instead of "less than or equal to" and "greater
than or equal to" to make the docs more concise.
* General attempt to remove unnecessary words and be more precise. For
example it seems slightly wrong to say "its final sorted position",
since this implies there is only one sorted position for this element.
|
|
Temporarily bring back `Rvalue::Len`
r? `@compiler-errors` as requested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135671#issuecomment-2599580364
> However, in the mean time, I'd rather we not crunch trying to find and more importantly validate the soundness of a solution 🤔
Agreed. To fix the IMO P-critical #135671 for which we somehow didn't have test coverage, this PR temporarily reverts:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133734
- its bugfix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134371
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134330
cc `@scottmcm`
I added the few samples from that issue as a test, but we can add more in the future, in particular it seems `@steffahn` [will work on that](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135671#issuecomment-2599714354).
Fixes #135671. And if we want to land this, it should also be nominated for beta backport.
|
|
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibraheem@ibraheem.ca>
|
|
This reverts commit e108481f74ff123ad98a63bd107a18d13035b275, reversing
changes made to 303e8bd768526a5812bb1776e798e829ddb7d3ca.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mention the IEEE function by name and create a doc alias of the same.
|
|
FCP completed at [1].
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91399
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/91399#issuecomment-2598734570
|
|
[cfg_match] Adjust syntax
A year has passed since the creation of #115585 and the feature, as expected, is not moving forward. Let's change that.
This PR proposes changing the arm's syntax from `cfg(SOME_CONDITION) => { ... }` to `SOME_CODITION => {}`.
```rust
match_cfg! {
unix => {
fn foo() { /* unix specific functionality */ }
}
target_pointer_width = "32" => {
fn foo() { /* non-unix, 32-bit functionality */ }
}
_ => {
fn foo() { /* fallback implementation */ }
}
}
```
Why? Because after several manual migrations in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/116342 it became clear, at least for me, that `cfg` prefixes are unnecessary, verbose and redundant.
Again, everything is just a proposal to move things forward. If the shown syntax isn't ideal, feel free to close this PR or suggest other alternatives.
|
|
|
|
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #135497 (fix typo in typenames of pin documentation)
- #135522 (add incremental test for issue 135514)
- #135523 (const traits: remove some known-bug that do not seem to make sense)
- #135535 (Add GUI test for #135499)
- #135541 (Methods of const traits are const)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
|
|
fix typo in typenames of pin documentation
I noticed this whilst reading the documentation for pin.
Basically there was just one to many closing angle brackets on the type parameters in the documentation where instead of being `Pin<&mut T>` it was `Pin<&mut T>>`
|
|
|
|
|
|
r=davidtwco
deprecate `std::intrinsics::transmute` etc, use `std::mem::*` instead
The `rustc_allowed_through_unstable_modules` attribute lets users call `std::mem::transmute` as `std::intrinsics::transmute`. The former is a reexport of the latter, and for a long time we didn't properly check stability for reexports, so making this a hard error now would be a breaking change for little gain. But at the same time, `std::intrinsics::transmute` is not the intended path for this function, so I think it is a good idea to show a deprecation warning when that path is used. This PR implements that, for all the functions in `std::intrinsics` that carry the attribute.
I assume this will need ``@rust-lang/libs-api`` FCP.
|
