| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
This enables programmers to use a safe alternative to the current
`extern "platform-intrinsics"` API for writing portable SIMD code.
This is `#![feature(portable_simd)]` as tracked in #86656
|
|
This stabilizes dereferencing immutable raw pointers in const contexts.
It does not stabilize `*mut T` dereferencing. This is placed behind the
`const_raw_mut_ptr_deref` feature gate.
|
|
|
|
Clean up special function const checks
Mark them as const and `#[rustc_do_not_const_check]` instead of hard-coding them in const-eval checks.
r? `@oli-obk`
`@rustbot` label A-const-eval T-compiler
|
|
|
|
Mark them as const and `#[rustc_do_not_const_check]` instead of hard-coding
them in const-eval checks.
|
|
|
|
Stabilize feature `saturating_div` for rust 1.58.0
The tracking issue is #89381
This seems like a reasonable simple change(?). The feature `saturating_div` was added as part of the ongoing effort to implement a `Saturating` integer type (see #87921). The implementation has been discussed [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87921#issuecomment-899357720) and [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87921#discussion_r691888556). It extends the list of saturating operations on integer types (like `saturating_add`, `saturating_sub`, `saturating_mul`, ...) by the function `fn saturating_div(self, rhs: Self) -> Self`.
The stabilization of the feature `saturating_int_impl` (for the `Saturating` type) needs to have this stabilized first.
Closes #89381
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make cfg imply doc(cfg)
This is a reopening of #79341, rebased and modified a bit (we made a lot of refactoring in rustdoc's types so they needed to be reflected in this PR as well):
* `hidden_cfg` is now in the `Cache` instead of `DocContext` because `cfg` information isn't stored anymore on `clean::Attributes` type but instead computed on-demand, so we need this information in later parts of rustdoc.
* I removed the `bool_to_options` feature (which makes the code a bit simpler to read for `SingleExt` trait implementation.
* I updated the version for the feature.
There is only one thing I couldn't figure out: [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79341#discussion_r561855624)
> I think I'll likely scrap the whole `SingleExt` extension trait as the diagnostics for 0 and >1 items should be different.
How/why should they differ?
EDIT: this part has been solved, the current code was fine, just needed a little simplification.
cc `@Nemo157`
r? `@jyn514`
Original PR description:
This is only active when the `doc_cfg` feature is active.
The implicit cfg can be overridden via `#[doc(cfg(...))]`, so e.g. to hide a `#[cfg]` you can use something like:
```rust
#[cfg(unix)]
#[doc(cfg(all()))]
pub struct Unix;
```
By adding `#![doc(cfg_hide(foobar))]` to the crate attributes the cfg `#[cfg(foobar)]` (and _only_ that _exact_ cfg) will not be implicitly treated as a `doc(cfg)` to render a message in the documentation.
|
|
Add functions to add unsigned and signed integers
This PR adds methods to unsigned integers to add signed integers with good overflow semantics under `#![feature(mixed_integer_ops)]`.
The added API is:
```rust
// `uX` is `u8`, `u16`, `u32`, `u64`,`u128`, `usize`
impl uX {
pub const fn checked_add_signed(self, iX) -> Option<Self>;
pub const fn overflowing_add_signed(self, iX) -> (Self, bool);
pub const fn saturating_add_signed(self, iX) -> Self;
pub const fn wrapping_add_signed(self, iX) -> Self;
}
impl iX {
pub const fn checked_add_unsigned(self, uX) -> Option<Self>;
pub const fn overflowing_add_unsigned(self, uX) -> (Self, bool);
pub const fn saturating_add_unsigned(self, uX) -> Self;
pub const fn wrapping_add_unsigned(self, uX) -> Self;
pub const fn checked_sub_unsigned(self, uX) -> Option<Self>;
pub const fn overflowing_sub_unsigned(self, uX) -> (Self, bool);
pub const fn saturating_sub_unsigned(self, uX) -> Self;
pub const fn wrapping_sub_unsigned(self, uX) -> Self;
}
```
Maybe it would be interesting to also have `add_signed` that panics in debug and wraps in release ?
|
|
* Remove "bool_to_options" feature
* Update version for compiler feature
* rustfmt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add `#[must_not_suspend]` to some types in std
I am not sure what else should have it? `Ref`?
|
|
Restructure std::rt
These changes should reduce binary size slightly while at the same slightly improving performance of startup, thread spawning and `std::thread::current()`. I haven't verified if the compiler is able to optimize some of these cases already, but at least for some others the compiler is unable to do these optimizations as they slightly change behavior in cases where program startup would crash anyway by omitting a backtrace and panic location.
I can remove 6f6bb16 if preferred.
|
|
|
|
fix potential race in AtomicU64 time monotonizer
The AtomicU64-based monotonizer introduced in #83093 is incorrect because several threads could try to update the value concurrently and a thread which doesn't have the newest value among all the updates could win.
That bug probably has little real world impact since it doesn't make observed time worse than hardware clocks. The worst case would probably be a thread which has a clock that is behind by several cycles observing several inconsistent fixups, which should be similar to observing the unfiltered backslide in the first place.
New benchmarks, they don't look as good as the original PR but still an improvement compared to the mutex.
I don't know why the contended mutex case is faster now than in the previous benchmarks.
```
actually_monotonic() == true:
test time::tests::instant_contention_01_threads ... bench: 44 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test time::tests::instant_contention_02_threads ... bench: 45 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test time::tests::instant_contention_04_threads ... bench: 45 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test time::tests::instant_contention_08_threads ... bench: 45 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test time::tests::instant_contention_16_threads ... bench: 46 ns/iter (+/- 0)
atomic u64:
test time::tests::instant_contention_01_threads ... bench: 66 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test time::tests::instant_contention_02_threads ... bench: 287 ns/iter (+/- 14)
test time::tests::instant_contention_04_threads ... bench: 296 ns/iter (+/- 43)
test time::tests::instant_contention_08_threads ... bench: 604 ns/iter (+/- 163)
test time::tests::instant_contention_16_threads ... bench: 1,147 ns/iter (+/- 29)
mutex:
test time::tests::instant_contention_01_threads ... bench: 78 ns/iter (+/- 0)
test time::tests::instant_contention_02_threads ... bench: 652 ns/iter (+/- 275)
test time::tests::instant_contention_04_threads ... bench: 900 ns/iter (+/- 32)
test time::tests::instant_contention_08_threads ... bench: 1,927 ns/iter (+/- 62)
test time::tests::instant_contention_16_threads ... bench: 3,748 ns/iter (+/- 146)
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update Windows Argument Parsing
Fixes #44650
The Windows command line is passed to applications [as a single string](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/blogs/larryosterman/the-windows-command-line-is-just-a-string) which the application then parses to get a list of arguments. The standard rules (as used by C/C++) for parsing the command line have slightly changed over the years, most recently in 2008 which added new escaping rules.
This PR implements the new rules as [described on MSDN](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/cpp/main-function-command-line-args?view=msvc-160#parsing-c-command-line-arguments) and [further detailed here](https://daviddeley.com/autohotkey/parameters/parameters.htm#WIN). It has been tested against the behaviour of C++ by calling a C++ program that outputs its raw command line and the contents of `argv`. See [my repo](https://github.com/ChrisDenton/winarg/tree/std) if anyone wants to reproduce my work.
For an overview of how this PR changes argument parsing behavior and why we feel it is warranted see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87580#issuecomment-893833893.
For some examples see: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87580#issuecomment-894299249
|
|
|
|
Add Saturating type (based on Wrapping type)
Tracking #87920
### Unresolved Questions
<!--
Include any open questions that need to be answered before the feature can be
stabilised.
-->
- [x] ~`impl Div for Saturating<T>` falls back on inner integer division - which seems alright?~
- [x] add `saturating_div`? (to respect division by `-1`)
- [x] There is no `::saturating_shl` and `::saturating_shr`. (How to) implement `Shl`, `ShlAssign`, `Shr` and `ShrAssign`?
- [naively](3f7d2ce28f8cf4dec56bf65fa2e6da0cf329ec55)
- [x] ~`saturating_neg` is only implemented on [signed integer types](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/?search=saturating_n)~
- [x] Is the implementation copied over from the `Wrapping`-type correct for `Saturating`?
- [x] `Saturating::rotate_left`
- [x] `Saturating::rotate_right`
- [x] `Not`
- [x] `BitXorOr` and `BitXorOrAssign`
- [x] `BitOr` and `BitOrAssign`
- [x] `BitAnd` and `BitAndAssign`
- [x] `Saturating::swap_bytes`
- [x] `Saturating::reverse_bits`
|
|
|
|
The libs-api team agrees to allow const_trait_impl to appear in the
standard library as long as stable code cannot be broken (they are
properly gated) this means if the compiler teams thinks it's okay, then
it's okay.
My priority on constifying would be:
1. Non-generic impls (e.g. Default) or generic impls with no
bounds
2. Generic functions with bounds (that use const impls)
3. Generic impls with bounds
4. Impls for traits with associated types
For people opening constification PRs: please cc me and/or oli-obk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As derived from extensive testing of `argv` in a C/C++ application.
Co-Authored-By: Jane Lusby <jlusby42@gmail.com>
|
|
Stabilize Vec<T>::shrink_to
This PR stabilizes `shrink_to` feature and closes the corresponding issue. The second point was addressed already, and no `panic!` should occur.
Closes #56431.
|
|
Hide allocator details from TryReserveError
I think there's [no need for TryReserveError to carry detailed information](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/48043#issuecomment-825139280), but I wouldn't want that issue to delay stabilization of the `try_reserve` feature.
So I'm proposing to stabilize `try_reserve` with a `TryReserveError` as an opaque structure, and if needed, expose error details later.
This PR moves the `enum` to an unstable inner `TryReserveErrorKind` that lives under a separate feature flag. `TryReserveErrorKind` could possibly be left as an implementation detail forever, and the `TryReserveError` get methods such as `allocation_size() -> Option<usize>` or `layout() -> Option<Layout>` instead, or the details could be dropped completely to make try-reserve errors just a unit struct, and thus smaller and cheaper.
|
|
This commit intends to fill out some of the remaining pieces of the
C-unwind ABI. This has a number of other changes with it though to move
this design space forward a bit. Notably contained within here is:
* On `panic=unwind`, the `extern "C"` ABI is now considered as "may
unwind". This fixes a longstanding soundness issue where if you
`panic!()` in an `extern "C"` function defined in Rust that's actually
UB because the LLVM representation for the function has the `nounwind`
attribute, but then you unwind.
* Whether or not a function unwinds now mainly considers the ABI of the
function instead of first checking the panic strategy. This fixes a
miscompile of `extern "C-unwind"` with `panic=abort` because that ABI
can still unwind.
* The aborting stub for non-unwinding ABIs with `panic=unwind` has been
reimplemented. Previously this was done as a small tweak during MIR
generation, but this has been moved to a separate and dedicated MIR
pass. This new pass will, for appropriate functions and function
calls, insert a `cleanup` landing pad for any function call that may
unwind within a function that is itself not allowed to unwind. Note
that this subtly changes some behavior from before where previously on
an unwind which was caught-to-abort it would run active destructors in
the function, and now it simply immediately aborts the process.
* The `#[unwind]` attribute has been removed and all users in tests and
such are now using `C-unwind` and `#![feature(c_unwind)]`.
I think this is largely the last piece of the RFC to implement.
Unfortunately I believe this is still not stabilizable as-is because
activating the feature gate changes the behavior of the existing `extern
"C"` ABI in a way that has no replacement. My thinking for how to enable
this is that we add support for the `C-unwind` ABI on stable Rust first,
and then after it hits stable we change the behavior of the `C` ABI.
That way anyone straddling stable/beta/nightly can switch to `C-unwind`
safely.
|
|
Make const panic!("..") work in Rust 2021.
During const eval, this replaces calls to core::panicking::panic_fmt and std::panicking::being_panic_fmt with a call to a new const fn: core::panicking::const_panic_fmt. That function uses fmt::Arguments::as_str() to get the str and calls panic_str with that instead.
panic!() invocations with formatting arguments are still not accepted, as the creation of such a fmt::Arguments cannot be done in constant functions right now.
r? `@RalfJung`
|
|
Stabilize core::task::ready!
_Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70922_
This PR stabilizes the `task::ready!` macro. Similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80886, this PR was waiting on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/74355 to be fixed.
The `task::ready!` API has existed in the futures ecosystem for several years, and was added on nightly last year in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70817. The motivation for this macro is the same as it was back then: virtually every single manual future implementation makes use of this; so much so that it's one of the few things included in the [futures-core](https://docs.rs/futures-core/0.3.12/futures_core) library.
r? ``@tmandry``
cc/ ``@rust-lang/wg-async-foundations`` ``@rust-lang/libs``
## Example
```rust
use core::task::{Context, Poll};
use core::future::Future;
use core::pin::Pin;
async fn get_num() -> usize {
42
}
pub fn do_poll(cx: &mut Context<'_>) -> Poll<()> {
let mut f = get_num();
let f = unsafe { Pin::new_unchecked(&mut f) };
let num = ready!(f.poll(cx));
// ... use num
Poll::Ready(())
}
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add Integer::log variants
_This is another attempt at landing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70835, which was approved by the libs team but failed on Android tests through Bors. The text copied here is from the original issue. The only change made so far is the addition of non-`checked_` variants of the log methods._
_Tracking issue: #70887_
---
This implements `{log,log2,log10}` methods for all integer types. The implementation was provided by `@substack` for use in the stdlib.
_Note: I'm not big on math, so this PR is a best effort written with limited knowledge. It's likely I'll be getting things wrong, but happy to learn and correct. Please bare with me._
## Motivation
Calculating the logarithm of a number is a generally useful operation. Currently the stdlib only provides implementations for floats, which means that if we want to calculate the logarithm for an integer we have to cast it to a float and then back to an int.
> would be nice if there was an integer log2 instead of having to either use the f32 version or leading_zeros() which i have to verify the results of every time to be sure
_— [`@substack,` 2020-03-08](https://twitter.com/substack/status/1236445105197727744)_
At higher numbers converting from an integer to a float we also risk overflows. This means that Rust currently only provides log operations for a limited set of integers.
The process of doing log operations by converting between floats and integers is also prone to rounding errors. In the following example we're trying to calculate `base10` for an integer. We might try and calculate the `base2` for the values, and attempt [a base swap](https://www.rapidtables.com/math/algebra/Logarithm.html#log-rules) to arrive at `base10`. However because we're performing intermediate rounding we arrive at the wrong result:
```rust
// log10(900) = ~2.95 = 2
dbg!(900f32.log10() as u64);
// log base change rule: logb(x) = logc(x) / logc(b)
// log2(900) / log2(10) = 9/3 = 3
dbg!((900f32.log2() as u64) / (10f32.log2() as u64));
```
_[playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=6bd6c68b3539e400f9ca4fdc6fc2eed0)_
This is somewhat nuanced as a lot of the time it'll work well, but in real world code this could lead to some hard to track bugs. By providing correct log implementations directly on integers we can help prevent errors around this.
## Implementation notes
I checked whether LLVM intrinsics existed before implementing this, and none exist yet. ~~Also I couldn't really find a better way to write the `ilog` function. One option would be to make it a private method on the number, but I didn't see any precedent for that. I also didn't know where to best place the tests, so I added them to the bottom of the file. Even though they might seem like quite a lot they take no time to execute.~~
## References
- [Log rules](https://www.rapidtables.com/math/algebra/Logarithm.html#log-rules)
- [Rounding error playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=6bd6c68b3539e400f9ca4fdc6fc2eed0)
- [substack's tweet asking about integer log2 in the stdlib](https://twitter.com/substack/status/1236445105197727744)
- [Integer Logarithm, A. Jaffer 2008](https://people.csail.mit.edu/jaffer/III/ilog.pdf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
