| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
Stabilise unix_process_wait_more, extra ExitStatusExt methods
This stabilises the feature `unix_process_wait_more`. Tracking issue #80695, FCP needed.
This was implemented in #79982 and merged in January.
|
|
|
|
Add abstract namespace support for Unix domain sockets
Hello! The other day I wanted to mess around with UDS in Rust and found that abstract namespaces ([unix(7)](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/unix.7.html)) on Linux still needed development. I took the approach of adding `_addr` specific public functions to reduce conflicts.
Feature name: `unix_socket_abstract`
Tracking issue: #85410
Further context: #42048
## Non-platform specific additions
`UnixListener::bind_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<UnixListener>`
`UnixStream::connect_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<()>`
`UnixDatagram::bind_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<UnixDatagram>`
`UnixDatagram::connect_addr(&SocketAddr) -> Result<()>`
`UnixDatagram::send_to_addr(&self, &[u8], &SocketAddr) -> Result<usize>`
## Platform-specific (Linux) additions
`SocketAddr::from_abstract_namespace(&[u8]) -> SocketAddr`
`SockerAddr::as_abstract_namespace() -> Option<&[u8]>`
## Example
```rust
#![feature(unix_socket_abstract)]
use std::os::unix::net::{UnixListener, SocketAddr};
fn main() -> std::io::Result<()> {
let addr = SocketAddr::from_abstract_namespace(b"namespace")?; // Linux only
let listener = match UnixListener::bind_addr(&addr) {
Ok(sock) => sock,
Err(err) => {
println!("Couldn't bind: {:?}", err);
return Err(err);
}
};
Ok(())
}
```
## Further Details
The main inspiration for the implementation came from the [nix-rust](https://github.com/nix-rust/nix/blob/master/src/sys/socket/addr.rs#L558) crate but there are also other [historical](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/commit/c4db0685b181f12c4285dac3d932f1859bba74f5) [attempts](https://github.com/tormol/uds/blob/master/src/addr.rs#L324) with similar approaches.
A comment I did have was with this change, we now allow a `SocketAddr` to be constructed explicitly rather than just used almost as a handle for the return of `peer_addr` and `local_addr`. We could consider adding other explicit constructors (e.g. `SocketAddr::from_pathname`, `SockerAddr::from_unnamed`).
Cheers!
|
|
Add #[must_use] to is_condition tests
I threw in `std::path::Path::has_root` for funsies.
A continuation of #89718.
Parent issue: #89692
r? ```@joshtriplett```
|
|
Add #[must_use] to as_type conversions
Clippy missed these:
```rust
alloc::string::String fn as_mut_str(&mut self) -> &mut str;
core::mem::NonNull<T> unsafe fn as_uninit_mut<'a>(&mut self) -> &'a MaybeUninit<T>;
str unsafe fn as_bytes_mut(&mut self) -> &mut [u8];
str fn as_mut_ptr(&mut self) -> *mut u8;
```
Parent issue: #89692
r? ````@joshtriplett````
|
|
A continuation of #89718.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOLID[1] is an embedded development platform provided by Kyoto
Microcomputer Co., Ltd. This commit introduces a basic Tier 3 support
for SOLID.
# New Targets
The following targets are added:
- `aarch64-kmc-solid_asp3`
- `armv7a-kmc-solid_asp3-eabi`
- `armv7a-kmc-solid_asp3-eabihf`
SOLID's target software system can be divided into two parts: an
RTOS kernel, which is responsible for threading and synchronization,
and Core Services, which provides filesystems, networking, and other
things. The RTOS kernel is a μITRON4.0[2][3]-derived kernel based on
the open-source TOPPERS RTOS kernels[4]. For uniprocessor systems
(more precisely, systems where only one processor core is allocated for
SOLID), this will be the TOPPERS/ASP3 kernel. As μITRON is
traditionally only specified at the source-code level, the ABI is
unique to each implementation, which is why `asp3` is included in the
target names.
More targets could be added later, as we support other base kernels
(there are at least three at the point of writing) and are interested
in supporting other processor architectures in the future.
# C Compiler
Although SOLID provides its own supported C/C++ build toolchain, GNU Arm
Embedded Toolchain seems to work for the purpose of building Rust.
# Unresolved Questions
A μITRON4 kernel can support `Thread::unpark` natively, but it's not
used by this commit's implementation because the underlying kernel
feature is also used to implement `Condvar`, and it's unclear whether
`std` should guarantee that parking tokens are not clobbered by other
synchronization primitives.
# Unsupported or Unimplemented Features
Most features are implemented. The following features are not
implemented due to the lack of native support:
- `fs::File::{file_attr, truncate, duplicate, set_permissions}`
- `fs::{symlink, link, canonicalize}`
- Process creation
- Command-line arguments
Backtrace generation is not really a good fit for embedded targets, so
it's intentionally left unimplemented. Unwinding is functional, however.
## Dynamic Linking
Dynamic linking is not supported. The target platform supports dynamic
linking, but enabling this in Rust causes several problems.
- The linker invocation used to build the shared object of `std` is
too long for the platform-provided linker to handle.
- A linker script with specific requirements is required for the
compiled shared object to be actually loadable.
As such, we decided to disable dynamic linking for now. Regardless, the
users can try to create shared objects by manually invoking the linker.
## Executable
Building an executable is not supported as the notion of "executable
files" isn't well-defined for these targets.
[1] https://solid.kmckk.com/SOLID/
[2] http://ertl.jp/ITRON/SPEC/mitron4-e.html
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITRON_project
[4] https://toppers.jp/
|
|
Fixes a technicality regarding the size of C's `char` type
Specifically, ISO/IEC 9899:2018 — better known as "C18" — (and at least
C11, C99 and C89) do not specify the size of `byte` in bits.
Section 3.6 defines "byte" as "addressable unit of data storage" while
section 6.2.5 ("Types") only defines "char" as "large enough to store
any member of the basic execution set" giving it a lower bound of 7 bit
(since there are 96 characters in the basic execution set).
With section 6.5.3.4 paragraph 4 "When sizeof is applied to an operant
that has type char […] the result is 1" you could read this as the size
of `char` in bits being defined as exactly the same as the number of
bits in a byte but it's also valid to read that as an exception.
In general implementations take `char` as the smallest unit of
addressable memory, which for modern byte-addressed architectures is
overwhelmingly 8 bits to the point of this convention being completely
cemented into just about all of our software.
So is any of this actually relevant at all? I hope not. I sincerely hope
that this never, ever comes up.
But if for some reason a poor rustacean is having to interface with C
code running on a Cray X1 that in 2003 is still doing word-addressed
memory with 64-bit chars and they trust the docs here blindly it will
blow up in her face. And I'll be truly sorry for her to have to deal
with … all of that.
|
|
Add initial support for m68k
This patch series adds initial support for m68k making use of the new M68k
backend introduced with LLVM-13. Additional changes will be needed to be
able to actually use the backend for this target.
|
|
Specifically, ISO/IEC 9899:2018 — better known as "C18" — (and at least
C11, C99 and C89) do not specify the size of `byte` in bits.
Section 3.6 defines "byte" as "addressable unit of data storage" while
section 6.2.5 ("Types") only defines "char" as "large enough to store
any member of the basic execution set" giving it a lower bound of 7 bit
(since there are 96 characters in the basic execution set).
With section 6.5.3.4 paragraph 4 "When sizeof is applied to an operant
that has type char […] the result is 1" you could read this as the size
of `char` in bits being defined as exactly the same as the number of
bits in a byte but it's also valid to read that as an exception.
In general implementations take `char` as the smallest unit of
addressable memory, which for modern byte-addressed architectures is
overwhelmingly 8 bits to the point of this convention being completely
cemented into just about all of our software.
So is any of this actually relevant at all? I hope not. I sincerely hope
that this never, ever comes up.
But if for some reason a poor rustacean is having to interface with C
code running on a Cray X1 that in 2003 is still doing word-addressed
memory with 64-bit words and they trust the docs here blindly it will
blow up in her face. And I'll be truly sorry for her to have to deal
with … all of that.
|
|
Add intra-doc links and small changes to `std::os` to be more consistent
I believe that a few items in `std::os` should be linked. I've also added a basic example in `std::os::windows`.
|
|
> add intra doc links
> add a usage example for the os::windows module
|
|
Add chown functions to std::os::unix::fs to change the owner and group of files
This is a straightforward wrapper that uses the existing helpers for C
string handling and errno handling.
Having this available is convenient for UNIX utility programs written in
Rust, and avoids having to call unsafe functions like `libc::chown`
directly and handle errors manually, in a program that may otherwise be
entirely safe code.
In addition, these functions provide a more Rustic interface by
accepting appropriate traits and using `None` rather than `-1`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a straightforward wrapper that uses the existing helpers for C
string handling and errno handling.
Having this available is convenient for UNIX utility programs written in
Rust, and avoids having to call unsafe functions like `libc::chown`
directly and handle errors manually, in a program that may otherwise be
entirely safe code.
In addition, these functions provide a more Rustic interface by
accepting appropriate traits and using `None` rather than `-1`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As discussed in #88576, raw handle values in Windows can be null, such
as in `windows_subsystem` mode, or when consoles are detached from a
process. So, don't use `NonNull` to hold them, don't assert that they're
not null, and remove `OwnedHandle`'s `repr(transparent)`. Introduce a
new `HandleOrNull` type, similar to `HandleOrInvalid`, to cover the FFI
use case.
|
|
|
|
As suggested in #88564. This adds a `try_clone()` to `OwnedFd` by
refactoring the code out of the existing `File`/`Socket` code.
|
|
It was previously unclear which should be used when.
|
|
Stabilize std::os::unix::fs::chroot
I've verified that this works as documented, and I've tested it in (a nightly
build of) production software as a replacement for an unsafe call to
`libc::chroot`. It's been available in nightly for a few releases. I think it's
ready to stabilize.
---
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84715
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
|
|
Fix typos “a”→“an”
Fix typos in comments; found using a regex to find some easy instance of incorrect usage of a vs. an.
While automation was used to find these, every change was checked manually.
Changes in submodules get separate PRs:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1201
* https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/9821
* https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1874
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rls/pull/1746
* https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/9984
_folks @ rust-analyzer are fast at merging…_
* https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/9985
* https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/9987
* https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/9989
_For `clippy`, I don’t know if the changes should better better be moved to a PR to the original repo._
<hr>
This has some overlap with #88226, but neither is a strict superset of the other.
If you want multiple commits, I can split it up; in that case, make sure to suggest a criterion for splitting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implement `AsFd`, `From<OwnedFd>`, and `Into<OwnedFd>` for
`UnixListener`. This is a follow-up to #87329.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
